Although over 15.1 million cosmetic procedures (compared with 5.7 million reconstructive procedures) were performed in the United States in 2013,1 there is, without question, a stigma in American culture attached to cosmetic surgery and a hidden condescension toward patients undergoing these procedures. Steps should be taken to address and resolve this issue.
Perhaps the first step is to admit its existence. There is some resistance to accept this view in academic circles, and one possible factor is that plastic surgeons are reluctant to admit that their work may be controversial and stigmatized. Individuals who choose to undergo these procedures often find themselves condescended to or shamed, and even accused of having psychological problems, which in turn influences them to hide or deny that they have gone under the knife. Many celebrities, considered cultural icons of natural beauty, are “outed” later in their careers in a demeaning and salacious manner by the media as if surgery is a shameful secret of their past. Beauty is not skin deep, and cosmetic surgery is not superficial in terms of its impact on patients’ lives: it often addresses psychosocial issues that are deeper and more complex than pure aesthetics. Evidence has shown that patients who undergo these procedures enjoy benefits such as improved sex lives, self-confidence, and self-image.2,3
The reasons for the discomfort with plastic surgery in American culture—one that prides itself in more liberal views—remain unclear. Maybe this is a cultural phenomenon. The media often describes Iran as the rhinoplasty capital of the world, perhaps because of the Persian cultural acceptance and endorsement of the pursuit of a higher aesthetic ideal. Brazil is the country in which the second largest number of cosmetic surgery procedures are performed4; there, the public perception is that plastic surgery improves one’s self-image and quality of life.5
Perhaps the stigma in American culture has to do with disrupting antiquated, classicist ideals that beauty is something with which one is born. The compelling slogan “Maybe she’s born with it?” (Maybelline, New York, N.Y.) comes to mind. If beauty is bought or assisted with surgery, does that somehow cheapen it and devalue its luster?
As advocates for our patients, intervening steps should be taken to address this problem. The media are in part responsible for perpetuating this stigma. Rather than stigmatizing plastic surgery, media messages can foster acceptance and more realistic views about individuals who make this choice. If patients and the celebrities serving as culture’s tastemakers and role models are more confident and transparent about their decisions, we may experience a paradigm shift in the field. From an academic standpoint, more education needs to be provided to explain the potential psychosocial benefits of plastic surgery in patients’ lives. Academics from both surgery and psychology backgrounds can collaborate to change harmful public perceptions. Until we can recognize the stigma plaguing our field and pursue means of reversing the detrimental perceptions about plastic surgery, the empowerment inherent in the choice to enhance self-image is muddled with the shame that can haunt our patients.
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Saba Motakef, M.D.
Department of Plastic Surgery
Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, Calif.
Sahar Motakef, M.A.
Graduate School of Education and Psychology
Michael T. Chung, M.D.
Department of Surgery
Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery
Michael J. Ingargiola, M.D.
Department of Surgery
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, N.Y.
Jose Rodriguez-Feliz, M.D.
Department of Surgery
Division of Plastic Surgery
Albany Medical Center
2. Ozgür F, Tuncali D, Güler Gürsu K. Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image: A psychosocial evaluation of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998;22:412–419
3. Bolton MA, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Persing JA. Measuring outcomes in plastic surgery: Body image and quality of life in abdominoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:619–625; discussion 626
Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:
- Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
- References—maximum of five
- Authors—no more than five
- Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.
We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.