In the past decade, the number of patients undergoing female genital plastic surgery has grown. In fact, the number of labiaplasty procedures performed in 2011 through 2018 increased from 2142 to 12,756.1 These procedures are controversial, however, and in 2019, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reaffirmed its stance against cosmetic vulvovaginal procedures, stating their safety and efficacy have not yet been established.2 The aim of this article is to review the safety of female genital cosmetic surgery for those performing these procedures.
Safety and Patient Choice
Women are motivated to seek labiaplasty for a variety of reasons, including functional, appearance-related, and sexual symptoms.3–9 Patients interested in vaginoplasty and perineoplasty may complain of vaginal laxity after childbirth, with a loss of friction during intercourse and reduced sexual satisfaction.10,11
Mons and labia majora reduction and augmentation are generally cosmetic concerns. As with any aesthetic procedure, disproportionate dissatisfaction with the appearance of a normal-appearing anatomy may indicate body dysmorphic disorder.
Body Mass Index
The patient’s body mass index is a primary consideration in female genital procedures. Obese female patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2) are more likely to experience pelvic floor disorders such as pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, cystocele, and rectocele.12,13 Pelvic floor disorders occur among 23.7 percent of women,14,15 and the incidence increases to 90 percent in patients who are morbidly obese.14,16 The pressure on the pelvic floor in this patient population makes them poor candidates for vaginal tightening procedures.
Pelvic floor disorders are also associated with parity. Significant risk factors include a history of vaginal birth, multiparity, instrumental births, and high newborn birth weights.17,18
Evaluation for Vaginal Laxity, Rectocele, and Cystocele
Vaginoplasty/perineoplasty patients should be evaluated for pelvic organ prolapse, including rectocele and cystocele, to determine whether they should be referred to a gynecologist, urologist, or urogynecologist. Pelvic organ prolapse is associated with sexual dysfunction, pelvic pressure, and visualization of prolapse.19–21 The short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence/Sexual Questionnaire is an excellent screening tool for plastic surgeons.22 A cystocele is associated with urinary frequency, urgency, and incontinence; a rectocele is associated with constipation, including a history of digital manipulation to facilitate defecation.19
The patient should be examined in the standing and lithotomy positions. Typically, the perineum is located at the level or within 2 cm of the ischial tuberosities in the standing position. If the perineum is located below this level at rest or with a Valsalva maneuver, the patient should be referred for an evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse.
In the lithotomy position, placing two fingers in the vaginal canal, the separation of the levators is assessed digitally, measuring the hiatus with muscles at rest and contracted. The number of fingerbreadths may be roughly converted into centimeters. Lax, widely separated levator ani muscles are best addressed with a vaginoplasty.10,11 The perineal mucosa may be attenuated with little muscle within the perineal body.10 A rectovaginal examination is conducted to assess the integrity of the posterior vaginal wall.10
The dorsal lithotomy position used in vaginal surgery comes with unique risks, including nerve injury, lower limb compartment syndrome, and deep venous thrombosis.23 An understanding of the pathophysiology of each entity and their potential linkage is important to preventing these complications.
Prevention of Nerve Injury
Sensory nerve injury occurs in up to 2.3 percent of patients in the dorsal lithotomy position. As the legs are flexed, abducted, and externally rotated, the positioning can result in pressure or stretching of the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, sciatic, and common peroneal nerves.24 Patients who are thin, diabetic, and/or alcoholic, and those who smoke, have peripheral vascular disease, or have subclinical neuropathies, are at higher risk for neurapraxia.25 “Candy cane” leg holders can place direct pressure on the nerves, whereas Allen YelloFin Elite Lift Assist (Allen Medical Systems, Chicago, Ill.) stirrups limit points of contact,24 as can be seen in Figure 1.
Although rare, motor nerve injuries can occur with prolonged stretch or compression. Flexed hips and extended knees can create tension along the sciatic nerve and compress the peroneal nerve against the head of the of the fibula.26 To avoid nerve injury, patients should be limited to no more than 90 minutes in the dorsal lithotomy position, and all compressive and stretch mechanisms should be eliminated. Fortunately, sensory nerve injury typically resolves within 6 months, and these prevention strategies should drive nerve injury rates to less than 0.5 percent.24
Prevention of Compartment Syndrome
Hemodynamic changes and leg elevation can put the patient in the dorsal lithotomy position at risk for compartment syndrome of the leg. Although case studies of compartment syndrome are rare, the consequences are severe, including compromised limb function and muscle damage, leading to rhabdomyolysis, myoglobinemia, and acute tubular necrosis.27 The diagnosis is based on clinical findings, including signs and symptoms of tight fascial compartments, pain on passive stretch, with confirmation by compartment pressure measurements. Compartment pressures greater than 30 mmHg or a pressure within 20 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure are correlated with compartment syndrome.27,28 The affected fascial compartment must be released within 6 hours for complete recovery.25 The risk of compartment syndrome is less then 0.3 percent by normalizing leg position every 90 minutes, avoiding hypotension, and limiting operative times.29
Prevention of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are uncommon in the setting of vaginal surgery. A 2016 meta-analysis showed a risk of 2.6 thromboembolic events per 1000 cesarean delivery patients, which was four times higher than patients delivering vaginally.30 Nonetheless, patients should be evaluated for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism risk factors, including age older than 35 years, body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2, hypercoagulability, family history, smoking, and estrogen therapy.23 A useful tool for risk stratification in these patients is the Caprini scoring system, which takes multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism into account and serves as a guideline for degree of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, including placement of sequential compression devices and administration of pharmacologic agents. Other prophylactic considerations include early ambulation, adequate hydration, advising weight loss, and temporary cessation of exogenous estrogen 3 to 4 weeks before and after surgery.31,32
Types of Anesthesia
Female genital plastic surgery can be performed under general, local, and pudendal block anesthesia. General anesthesia is ideal for combinations of procedures, such as breast augmentation and labiaplasty, but costs are greater, and patients with multiple comorbidities may be at greater risk for complications.
Local anesthesia, with or without oral sedation, is ideal for labiaplasty, majoraplasty, perineoplasty, and mons liposuction. A vaginoplasty can be performed under general anesthesia or pudendal block. In general, local anesthesia offers a safer alternative to general anesthesia by limiting both minor complications, such as nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, sore throat, and drowsiness; and major complications, such as aspiration, pneumonia, malignant hyperthermia, and thromboembolic events.
Textbooks and scientific articles tend to show the vulva in a similar manner: clitoral show underneath the clitoral hood; the lateral clitoral hood not encroaching onto the lateral labia minora; a distinct interlabial sulcus; and an unstretched introitus. This limited view of the anatomy can prove confounding for the novice labiaplasty surgeon faced with an anatomical variant.
Common variants include redundant folds lateral to the clitoral hood; a double-clitoral hood, as can be seen in Figure 2, above, left; and merging of the lateral clitoral hood onto the lateral labium minus,33,34 which can be seen in Figure 2, above, right. The fourchette mucosa can be thick and prominent, merging with a pronounced raphe between the introitus and the anus, as can be seen in Figure 2, below, left. In some instances, the lateral clitoral hood merges onto the medial labium minus, and the superior labium minus merges onto the medial labium majus. This anatomical variant can be confusing and is shown in Figure 2, below, right. In this instance, there is no superior sulcus where the two labia merge. Labia minora vary in pigmentation, texture (rugose or smooth), thickness, symmetry, shape, and projection.34
There are several classification systems for labia minora, varying in how the length is classified: by degree of protrusion of the labia minora beyond the majora33,34; by the labia minora length from introitus to labial edge35,36; or by the relationship of minora, majora, clitoral hood, and fourchette.37 Although it is important to assess the labial dimensions as part of operative planning, classification of labia by length or protrusion is a minor factor in determining a patient’s candidacy for labiaplasty compared with her symptomatology.3–5
The mons may be ptotic, thick with adipose tissue, flat, or mildly projecting. The labia majora may vary in fullness, firmness, projection, and shape. The introitus may be widened in the postpartum patient, with the posterior wall extending farther toward the anus.
Nerve Supply and Vasculature
The pudendal nerve provides the nerve supply to the external female genitalia. At the superficial transverse perineal muscle, the pudendal nerve splits into the deep perineal nerve, from which the dorsal nerve of the clitoris arises, and the superficial perineal nerve, from which the posterior labial nerve arises.34 A fresh cadaver study demonstrated a heterogeneous distribution of sensory nerves of the labia minora.38
The labia minora have numerous vascular lumens, and the surrounding tissue is nonerectile connective tissue.39–41 A central core of nervous tissue parallels the vasculature along the length of the minora.41 In a prospective study, Placik and Arkins demonstrated that external genital sensation was not diminished following edge (trim) labiaplasty and clitoral hood reduction.42
The labia majora have sparse nerve fibers, but the clitoris has a consistent dorsal nerve, along with erectile tissue in its body. This erectile tissue, nerve, and artery are encapsulated in a dense connective tissue sheath attaching the clitoris crus to the medial aspect of the ischiopubic rami, where it is deep en route to the glans. Thus, injury to the clitoris is unlikely if the surgeon avoids encroaching on the glans and remains superficial to the dartos fascia.
The posterior labial and perineal arteries arise from the pudendal artery to deliver the blood supply to the labia majora and minora. The labia minora are supplied by a small anterior artery, a dominant central artery, and two moderate posterior arteries. The external pudendal artery supplies the clitoral hood and communicates with the internal pudendal artery by means of the frenulum arteries.43
The bulbocavernosus muscles underlie the labia majora, meeting each other at the posterior introitus, where the medial transverse superficial perineal muscles also meet, altogether forming the bulk of the perineal body. The broad, thin, levator ani muscles, consisting of the pubococcygeus, the iliococcygeus, and the puborectalis, form a major part of the pelvic floor, and when they separate with pregnancy and childbirth, patients may experience vaginal laxity (Fig. 3).10,11
Impact of Childbirth on Tissues
Because several anatomical structures can be injured during delivery, it is helpful to obtain an obstetric history when assessing patients for vaginal laxity. The stretching and trauma of vaginal childbirth, especially during operative vaginal delivery, can result in injury to the levator ani muscle complex, most notably the pubococcygeal muscle,44,45 resulting in weakening of the pelvic floor and the urethral support system, predisposing patients to pelvic organ prolapse (Fig. 4).
Vaginal delivery can also result in injury to the pudendal nerve, caused by stretching and compression.46 The risk factors for pudendal nerve injury include a large fetus, forceps delivery, and fetal malposition.47
Impact of Menopause on Tissues
Estrogen production plummets permanently at menopause, leading to atrophic changes of the vaginal mucosa, vulva, and genital tissues. Symptoms that can result, known as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, include vaginal pain, vulvar pain, itching, discharge, and dyspareunia from loss of lubrication and narrowing of the vagina. The vaginal pH becomes more acidic in postmenopausal women, predisposing them to urinary tract infections.47 Half of postmenopausal women experience this condition within a decade of the onset of menopause.48 Locally active estradiol therapy is available as a cream, capsules, tablets, and rings and can increase the thickness of the vaginal mucosa, reduce the vaginal pH, and improve the symptoms of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia.49–51
Surgical Safety, Potential Complications, and Postoperative Care
Paralleling the growth in labiaplasty surgery in the United States,1 studies have consistently demonstrated patient satisfaction outcomes regarding appearance and functionality of greater than 90 percent.3,8,9,52–57 Studies of other vulvovaginal procedures are fewer, as they are performed less frequently.52,53 Following is a brief overview of possible surgical complications and how to avoid them.
Labiaplasty (Labia Minoraplasty)
Poor labiaplasty results can result in amputation of the labia, dehiscence, scarring, pain, dyspareunia, reduced erotic sensation, deformity, and loss of self-esteem.3,6,57 Overresection or amputation of the labia can predisposed to dryness, pain from scarring at the introitus, scar contracture, deformity, and constant drainage of vaginal discharge.58,59 These complications are nearly all avoidable with good operative technique. The best technique to use is the one the surgeon feels most comfortable doing, while also considering the patient’s specific anatomy and aesthetic preference.60,61 Surgical Videos 1 and 2 demonstrate a trim labiaplasty with clitoral hood reduction, and Video 3 demonstrates a wedge labiaplasty. [See Video 1 (online), which demonstrates a trim labiaplasty and clitoral hood reduction. Part 1. The surgical technique is shown, and the steps are narrated with subtitles. See Video 2 (online), which demonstrates a trim labiaplasty and clitoral hood reduction. Part 2. The surgical technique is shown, and the steps are narrated with subtitles. See Video 3 (online), which demonstrates a wedge labiaplasty. The surgical technique is shown, and the steps are narrated with subtitles.]
Because different techniques offer unique advantages, however, the labiaplasty surgeon may want to master more than one. The trim and wedge techniques are the most commonly performed techniques. The trim technique, which is also known as a linear, curvilinear, edge, direct excision, or amputation labiaplasty,5 may seem less technically demanding than the wedge or other techniques,58 so the surgical skill to perform the procedure well may be underappreciated.60 The novice labiaplasty surgeon may be surprised how easy it is to overresect and even amputate the labia minora. A scalloped edge can result when the closure is performed with a running suture, particularly one that is under tension. An aggressive trim resection can divide the frenulum and allow the clitoris to rotate so it projects more anteriorly, subjecting it to chafing, irritation, and pain.
The wedge labiaplasty technique retains the natural labial edge, but if the patient dislikes her thick, darkly pigmented, rough edge, a trim technique can be an excellent option.60 In contrast, the wedge can dehisce when closed under tension or sutured inadequately, and patients with thick labia may be dissatisfied with the persistent labia dimensions. See Table 1 for a summary of the potential complications associated with the wedge and trim labiaplasty techniques, along with preventative measures.
Table 1. -
Summary of Potential Complications Associated with the Wedge and Trim Labiaplasties along with Preventative Measures*
||Consider the blood supply when orienting the wedge: the small anterior labial artery may not be sufficient for a large or long superiorly based flap†
||Plan the wedge dimensions to allow closure without tension; overresection requires a tight closure, predisposing to at least partial dehiscence
||Avoid surgery in nicotine-addicted patients
||A robust suture closure of the central lamina without tension, in addition to mucosal closure, protects against thinning of the tissues along the suture line
||Closing all layers, including the central lamina, securely; avoiding tension; and patients avoiding nicotine use also protects against fenestration, which can occur along the suture line
|Narrowing of the introitus
||Watching the advancement of the posterior introitus when planning the wedge can help one avoid overresection that can result in advancement of the fourchette, narrowing the introitus, which may impact intercourse
|Pulling the clitoral hood inferiorly
||Just as overresection can draw the fourchette anteriorly, the clitoral hood can be placed under tension and pulled inferiorly
||Pigment variation along the labia minora, from anterior to posterior, can result in a color mismatch along the incision line; this possibility should be discussed with patients with this predisposing color variation
||Notching where the scar is slightly depressed can be avoided with secure sutures, particularly along the labial edge, where the tension is the greatest
||Overresection and amputation of the labia
||The inexperienced surgeon may hold the labia under tension when excising the redundant distal labium, and the resulting labia may be much shorter than planned; the frenulum serves as a landmark for the anterior resection and should be preserved; the labium should be no shorter than the distance from the sulcus to the frenulum
||Running, baseball sutures predispose to scalloped edges; running subcuticular or interrupted sutures prevent the gathering and intermittent strangling and swelling along the baseball suture line
||A hematoma can occur with any technique, but the trim cuts across the vasculature described by Georgiou†; after tissue excision, the central lamina should be carefully inspected for the lumens of vessels, which should be coagulated, even if they are not actively bleeding; suturing can be used both to shape the central lamina and to add further hemostatic protection
|Broad, flat edge
||Thick labia may appear broad and flat after their length has been reduced; the central lamina thickness can be reduced centrally, hemostasis achieved, and sutures used to shape the lamina so it narrows from proximal to distal
|Prominent clitoral hood
||The heavy clitoral hood should be addressed at the time of the labiaplasty to prevent this imbalance
||The excision line should begin posterior to the frenulum, and no more proximal to the sulcus than the frenulum; dividing the frenulum can result in anterior rotation of the clitoris, resulting in painful chafing
|Scar contracture across the fourchette
||The posterior labial excisions should not meet one another, as the scar can contract, resulting in pain with intercourse; a perineoplasty may be considered in patients with redundant mucosa in perineal area.
*The wedge and trim labiaplasty techniques are the two most commonly used techniques.
†Georgiou CA, Benatar M, Dumas P, et al. A cadaveric study of the arterial blood supply of the labia minora. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:167–178.
Amputated labia minora can be reconstructed with the clitoral hood flaps, wedge excisions, and YV flaps.59 If that local tissue is unavailable, reconstruction is difficult.
Clitoral Hood Reduction
The patient interested in a labiaplasty should also be assessed for a possible clitoral hood reduction, because failure to address a heavy clitoral hood at the time of a labiaplasty can result in patient complaints of a masculine, “penis-like” appearance.58 The trim technique is associated with a higher chance of disproportional clitoral hood redundancy.57–59 The wedge can reduce the clitoral hood prominence through posterior tension.58
Labia Majora Reduction
Liposuction may address anterior majora fullness, usually in continuity with the mons. Use of a cannula 3 mm or smaller minimizes the chance of surface irregularities and should be passed gently to avoid bleeding and injury.62
Patients presenting for labia majoraplasty, in which excess skin and/or adipose tissue are excised, generally have redundant, ptotic, or projecting labia majora.62,63 A scar designed to fall along the medial labia majora hairline may be readily noticeable, so an alternative is to conceal it in the interlabial sulcus. Overexcision can result in a widened introitus.62 Intensive cyclists can experience chronic swelling of the labium majus, with associated vulvar lymphadenopathy that may limit long-term results of labia majoraplasty.64,65
Labia Majora Augmentation
Patients with flat, empty, or atrophic labia majora may present for augmentation. First described by Felicio in 2007, fat grafting is the most common technique used.36,59,66 In their literature review, Jabbour et al. found a wide range of volumes injected per session (18 to 120 ml). Undertreatment is far better than creating oversized labia. The possibility of future weight gain should be considered, particularly in the younger patient.
Alternatively, hyaluronic acid is sometimes used as a volume filler, both subcutaneously and deep to the dartos fascia, with reports ranging from 2 to 6 ml per session.66 Reported adverse events include swelling, bruising, and palpable nodules, which can be treated with light massage, intralesional corticosteroid, or hyaluronidase injection.64,67,68
Vaginoplasty and Perineoplasty
Up to 76 percent of women experience decreased sensation associated with vaginal laxity.69,70 Vaginal tightening is performed to improve sexual function.71
A vaginoplasty can be performed by tightening the anterior wall of the vagina by plicating the vesicovaginal fascia.72 More commonly, the posterior vaginal wall is tightened by plicating the rectovaginal fascia in the midline. Wedge excisions of the vaginal epithelium and rectovaginal fascia show favorable results in narrowing the vagina.20,73 The surgical technique of a vaginoplasty is demonstrated. [See Video 4 (online), which demonstrates vaginoplasty. The surgical technique is shown, and the steps are narrated with subtitles.]
Tightening of the lateral vaginal canal may be as or more effective than posterior tightening, without a scar in the area of greatest pressure and sensitivity.70,74,75 In one study of 40 women, 95 percent experienced improved sexual sensitivity after vaginal tightening without muscle.69 Other methods of vaginal tightening involve excision of redundant mucosa, median levator muscle imbrication, and reconstruction of the perineal body with a perineoplasty. Without an objective, reproducible method of measuring vaginal laxity, a correlation between physical width and quality of sensation is not possible.70
Infusing tumescent fluid (100 to 120 ml) containing adrenaline posterior to the vaginal mucosa serves as a spacer to prevent entry to the rectum, and the vasoconstrictive action minimizes bleeding, which aids in visualization.76 Postmenopausal patients interested in vaginoplasty should be on estrogen to maximize the thickness of their vaginal tissues.49–51
Perineoplasties are often performed in cases of postpartum dyspareunia. The posterior bulbocavernosus and the medial transverse superficial perineal muscles are returned to their original midline positions.71,76 Nearly 90 percent of patients experience improved sexual intercourse satisfaction rates after a perineoplasty.77 A perineoplasty without muscle plication can also be performed for aesthetic reasons in the nulliparous patient (Fig. 5).
Monsplasty and Mons Liposuction
Candidates for a monsplasty or mons liposuction are frequently obese. The convex fatty mons with no ptosis can be treated by liposuction, but the ptotic mons demands both skin and fat excision.62,78,79 The Scarpa fascia is anchored to the rectus abdominis muscle fascia to avoid descent. The procedure can be combined with an abdominoplasty or performed alone. Careful hemostasis is important, as this area is well-vascularized.78,79
Video 5 shows the preoperative and postoperative appearance of a selection of cosmetic vulvovaginal cases (Fig. 6). [See Video 5 (online), which demonstrates clinical cases of female genital plastic surgery. This narrated video shows different surgical cases with anatomical variations. The cases that are shown through preoperative and postoperative photographs include trim and wedge labiaplasties, clitoral hood reduction, majoraplasty, and perineoplasty.]
Reconstruction after Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
Female genital mutilation or cutting is defined as the practice of surgically altering the female genitalia without medical indication,80 ranging from nicking the clitoral hood to completely severing the majority of the genitalia, with the exception of the labia majora (Table 2 and Figs. 7 and 8).
Table 2. -
Types of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
||Otherwise known as clitoridectomy, involves removal, partial or complete, of the clitoris and sometimes the prepuce
||Termed excision, it is the partial or complete removal of the clitoris, labia minora, and sometimes the labia majora
||Known as infibulation and defined as the narrowing of the vaginal opening through repositioning of the labia by means of cutting or stitching
||Encompasses other forms of mutilation such as pricking and cauterization of the genital area
Often misleadingly described as female circumcision, female genital mutilation/cutting is most commonly performed on young babies, girls, and women for cultural reasons, usually performed without consent.81,82 Despite their prevalence, these practices have no medical benefit. Rather, they present extensive, profound, and persistent morbidity, and are internationally classified as a violation of human rights.83
Prevalence in the United States and Demographics
Approximately 200 million women worldwide are affected by female genital mutilation, with 3 million at risk annually.84 Despite a decrease in global prevalence, the U.S. numbers have been increasing, with greater than 500,000 women estimated to be at risk each year.85 In 1996, a federal law against female genital mutilation/cutting was passed, followed by similar action in 35 states. Nevertheless, the sensitive cultural nature of the issue makes enforcement of the laws difficult.
Complications of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
In the absence of anesthetics, victims may suffer from severe and unrelenting pain.86 Urinary retention caused by both physical and psychological damage is common.87 Babies and girls are at heightened risk of life-threatening hemorrhage and infection,86,88 and some progress to shock, sepsis, and death.86,87
Neurologic and genitourinary problems, including recurrent urinary and vaginal infections, may persist or develop later on.87,88 Dyspareunia, inability to conceive, an unsuccessful prenatal course, or unsuccessful vaginal labor and delivery may also develop.89,90 The lack of self-confidence, embarrassment, and dissatisfaction with appearance following mutilation/cutting, and the fear of being shunned from their cultural community often may deter women from seeking care.91
After a physical and psychological assessment, reasonable expectations of what is surgically feasible should be established with the patient, and her partner (if she has one) should be involved with her care. The extent of the defect is established during the genital examination. The World Health Organization currently classifies it into four main categories, as listed in Table 2 (Figs. 7 and 8).92 If the patient’s discomfort of severe external scarring prevents a full preoperative examination, findings such as cysts, masses, and internal scarring may not discovered until a complete examination can be performed in the operating room.
The reconstructive approach is guided by the physical findings. Even after “full clitoridectomy,” a viable clitoral remnant deep to the scar tissue can often be salvaged. When resurrected, it is important to support the resurfaced buried structures with buccal mucosal grafting or remucosalization, and to minimize fibrosis, to optimize sensory restoration and functional recovery.93 Long-term bolsters are critical for the success of both grafting and remucosalization.
Labial remnants should be salvaged after incisional release of scar tissue of the labia minora. The scar tissue should not be excised, because it can aid in labial reconstruction by serving as medially based flaps. The labia majora are then transposed medially, and the remnant scar tissue is anchored to the pubic bone to minimize labial adhesion. Finally, the labia minora are resurfaced with mucosal grafting. If there is insufficient graft material to resurface all defects, remucosalization of raw tissue surfaces may be required. Fat grafting is conducted in all cases for volume restoration and support of tissue regeneration.
A postoperative dressing regimen helps prevent scarring and readherence. Twice-a-day lidocaine/antibiotic ointment is used for pain and infection control.91 Restoration of pigmentation and sensation is variable and can take over 1 year. Restoration of sexual function requires both physical and psychological healing.
1. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic (aesthetic) surgery National Data Bank statistics 2018. Available at: https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics
. Accessed August 11, 2019.
2. Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion. umber 378: Vaginal "rejuvenation" and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:737–738. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000263927.82639.9b
3. Sorice SC, Li AY, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Why women request labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:856–863.
4. Sorice-Virk S, Li AY, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. The role of pornography, physical symptoms, and appearance in labiaplasty interest. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40:876–883.
5. Sorice-Virk S, Li AY, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Comparison of patient symptomatology before and after labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:526–536.
6. Bucknor A, Chen AD, Egeler S, et al. Labiaplasty: Indications and predictors of postoperative sequelae in 451 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38:644–653.
7. Goodman MP, Placik OJ, Matlock DL, et al. Evaluation of body image and sexual satisfaction in women undergoing female genital plastic/cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:1048–1057.
8. Turini T, Weck Roxo AC, Serra-Guimarães F, et al. The impact of labiaplasty on sexuality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:87–92.
9. Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. Psychological outcomes of labiaplasty: A prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:1202–1209.
10. Pelosi MA III, Pelosi MA II.. Hamori CA, Banwell PE, Alinsod R. Perineoplasty and vaginoplasty. In: Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery: Concepts, Classification, and Techniques. 2017:New York: Thieme; 162–180.
11. Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Branham GH, Dover SJ, Furnas HJ, Tenenbaum MMJ, Wulc AE. Nonsurgical vaginal treatments. In: Advances in Cosmetic Surgery 2. 2109:New York: Elsevier; 195– 201.
12. Iglesia CB, Yurteri-Kaplan L, Alinsod R. Female genital cosmetic surgery: A review of techniques and outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1997–2009.
13. Wilkie G, Bartz D. Vaginal rejuvenation: A review of female genital cosmetic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73:287–292.
14. Wasserberg N, Haney M, Petrone P, et al. Morbid obesity adversely impacts pelvic floor function in females seeking attention for weight loss surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:2096–2103.
15. Brown JS, Grady D, Ouslander JG, Herzog AR, Varner RE, Posner SF. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Heart & Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:66–70.
16. Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden SK, Creasman JM, Subak LL. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: Prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1396–1403.
17. Quiroz LH, Muñoz A, Shippey SH, Gutman RE, Handa VL. Vaginal parity and pelvic organ prolapse. J Reprod Med. 2010;55:93–98.
18. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:777–784.
19. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1332–1337; discussion 1337–1338.
20. Cundiff GW, Fenner D. Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: Focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1403–1421.
21. Segal JL, Karram MM. Evaluation and management of rectoceles. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:345–352.
22. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:164–168; discussion 168.
23. Gelder C, McCallum AL, Macfarlane AJR, Anderson JH. A systematic review of mechanical thromboprophylaxis in the lithotomy position. Surgeon. 2018;16:365–371.
24. Sze EHM. An alternate approach to using candy cane stirrups in vaginal surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:666–668.
25. Sajid MS, Shakir AJ, Khatri K, Baig MK. Lithotomy-related neurovascular complications in the lower limbs after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1203–1213.
26. Irvin W, Andersen W, Taylor P, Rice L. Minimizing the risk of neurologic injury in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:374–382.
27. Bauer EC, Koch N, Janni W, Bender HG, Fleisch MC. Compartment syndrome after gynecologic operations: Evidence from case reports and reviews. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:7–12.
28. Meyer RS, White KK, Smith JM, et al. Intramuscular and blood pressures in legs positioned in the hemilithotomy position. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1829–1835.
29. Halliwill JR, Hewitt SA, Joyner MJ, Warner MA. Effect of various lithotomy positions on lower-extremity blood pressure. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1373–1376.
30. Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK, Boehlen F, Righini M, Smith NL. Risks of venous thromboembolism after cesarean sections: A meta-analysis. Chest. 2016;150:572–596.
31. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th
ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl):e227S–e277S.
32. Pannucci CJ. Venous thromboembolism in aesthetic surgery: Risk optimization in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:209–219.
33. Motakef S, Rodriguez-Feliz J, Chung MT, Ingargiola MJ, Wong VW, Patel A. Vaginal labiaplasty: Current practices and a simplified classification system for labial protrusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:774–788.
34. Banwell PE. Hamori CA, Banwell PE, Alinsod R. Anatomy and classification of the female genitalia: Implications for surgical management. In: Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery: Concepts, Classification, and Techniques. 2017:New York: Thieme; 4–22.
35. Franco T, Franco D. Hipertropfia de ninfas. J Bras Ginecol. 1993;103:163–168.
36. Felicio YA. Labial surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2007;27:322–328.
37. Chang P, Salisbury MA, Narsete T, et al. Vaginal labiaplasty: Defense of the simple “clip and snip” and a new classification system. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:887–891.
38. Kelishadi SS, Omar R, Herring N, et al. The safe labiaplasty: A study of nerve density in labia minora and its implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:705–709.
39. Ginger VA, Cold CJ, Yang CC. Structure and innervation of the labia minora: More than minor skin folds. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17:180–183.
40. Sacher BC. The normal vulva, vulvar examination and evaluation tools. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:442–452.
41. Jackson LA, Hare AM, Carrick KS, Ramirez DMO, Hamner JJ, Corton MM. Anatomy, histology, and nerve density of clitoris and associated structures: Clinical applications to vulvar surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:519.e1–519.e9.
42. Placik OJ, Arkins JP. A prospective evaluation of female external genitalia sensitivity to pressure following labia minora reduction and clitoral hood reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:442e–452e.
43. Georgiou CA, Benatar M, Dumas P, et al. A cadaveric study of the arterial blood supply of the labia minora. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:167–178.
44. DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.
45. Dietz HP, Simpson JM. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2008;115:979–984.
46. Fitzpatrick M, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:730–735.
47. Goldberg RP, Abramov Y, Botros S, et al. Delivery mode is a major environmental determinant of stress urinary incontinence: Results of the Evanston-Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:2149–2153.
48. Faubion SS, Sood R, Kapoor E. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Management strategies for the clinician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1842–1849.
49. Gandhi J, Chen A, Dagur G, et al. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: An overview of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, etiology, evaluation, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:704–711.
50. Rahn DD, Carberry C, Sanses TV, et al.; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:1147–1156.
51. Naumova I, Castelo-Branco C. Current treatment options for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:387–395.
52. Goodman MP. Female cosmetic genital surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:154–159.
53. Goodman MP, Faschler S, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Brotto LA. The sexual, psychological, and body image health of women undergoing elective vulvovaginal plastic/cosmetic procedures: A pilot study. Am J Cosmetic Surg. 2011;28:219–226.
54. Veale D, Naismith I, Eshkevari E, et al. Psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty: A prospective case-comparison study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:831–839.
55. Miklos JR, Moore RD, Chinthakanan O. Overall patient satisfaction scores, including sexual function, following labiaplasty surgery: A prospective study comparing women with a history of prior cosmetic surgery to those with none. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:124–125.
56. Goodman MP, Placik OJ, Benson RH III, et al. A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1565–1577.
57. Alter GJ. Commentary on: The safe labiaplasty: A study of nerve density in labia minora and its implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:710–711.
58. Hamori CA. Postoperative clitoral hood deformity after labiaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:1030–1036.
59. Alter GJ. Labia minora reconstruction using clitoral hood flaps, wedge excisions, and YV advancement flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2356–2363.
60. Furnas HJ. Trim labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1349.
61. Hunter JG. Labia minora, labia majora, and clitoral hood reduction: Experience-based recommendations. Aesthet Surg. J. 2106;36:71–79.
62. Triana L, Robledo AM. Aesthetic surgery of female external genitalia. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:165–177.
63. Placik OJ, Devgan LL. Female genital and vaginal plastic surgery: An overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:284e–297e.
64. Baeyens L, Vermeersch E, Bourgeois P. Bicyclist’s vulva: Observational study. BMJ. 2002;325:138–139.
65. Humphreys D. Unilateral vulvar hypertrophy in competitive female cyclists. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:463–464.
66. Jabbour S, Kechichian E, Hersant B, et al. Labia majora augmentation: A systematic review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:1157–1164.
67. Fasola E, Gazzola R. Labia majora augmentation with hyaluronic acid filler: Technique and results. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:1155–1163.
68. Hexsel D, Dal’Forno T, Caspary P, Hexsel CL. Soft-tissue augmentation with hyaluronic acid filler for labia majora and mons pubis. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:911–914.
69. Berman JR, Berman LA, Werbin TJ, Goldstein I. Female sexual dysfunction: Anatomy, physiology, evaluation and treatment. Curr Opin Urol. 1999;9:563–568.
70. Adamo C, Corvi M. Cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening (lateral colporrhaphy): Improving sexual sensitivity in women with a sensation of wide vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:212e–213e.
71. Barbara G, Facchin F, Buggio L, Alberico D, Frattaruolo MP, Kustermann A. Vaginal rejuvenation: Current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:513–519.
72. Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1826–1836.
73. Jeffcoate TN. Posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1959;77:490–502.
74. Pardo JS, Solá VD, Ricci PA, Guilooff EF, Freundlich OK. Colpoperineoplasty in women with a sensation of a wide vagina. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2006;85:1125–1127.
75. Alzate H, Londoño ML. Vaginal erotic sensitivity. J Sex Marital Ther. 1984;10:49–56.
76. Furnas HJ, Canales FL. Vaginoplasty and perineoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1558.
77. Woodward AP, Matthews CA. Outcomes of revision perineoplasty for persistent postpartum dyspareunia. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16:135–139.
78. Seitz IA, Wu C, Retzlaff K, Zachary L. Measurements and aesthetics of the mons pubis in normal weight females. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:46e–48e.
79. Joseph MV, Friedman T, Coon D, Rubin JP. Mons rejuvenation in the massive weight loss patient using superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;126:45e–46e.
80. World Health Organisation. Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation. 2008.Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press;
81. Klein E, Helzner E, Shayowitz M, Kohlhoff S, Smith-Norowitz TA. Female genital mutilation: Health consequences and complications. A short literature review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018;2018:7365715.
82. Nour NM. Female genital cutting: A persisting practice. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:135–139.
83. Zurynski Y, Sureshkumar P, Phu A, Elliott E. Female genital mutilation and cutting: A systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015;15:32.
84. World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation (FGM). Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/prevalence/en/
. Accessed October 14, 2019.
85. Population Reference Bureau. Women and girls at risk of female genital mutilation/cutting in the United States. Available at: https://www.prb.org/us-fgmc/
. Accessed October 14, 2019.
86. Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sex Res Soc Pol. 2012;9:41–56.
87. Nour NM. Female genital cutting: Impact on women’s health. Semin Reprod Med. 2015;33:41–46.
88. Odukogbe AA, Afolabi BB, Bello OO, Adeyanju AS. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:138–148.
89. Yassin K, Idris HA, Ali AA. Characteristics of female sexual dysfunctions and obstetric complications related to female genital mutilation in Omdurman maternity hospital, Sudan. Reprod Health. 2018;15:7.
90. Thabet SM, Thabet AS. Defective sexuality and female circumcision: The cause and the possible management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003;29:12–19.
91. Akinbiyi T, Langston E, Percec I. Female genital mutilation reconstruction for plastic surgeons: A call to arms. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6:e1945.
92. World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation/
. Accessed October 14, 2019.
93. Chang CS, Low DW, Percec I. Female genital mutilation reconstruction: A preliminary report. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:942–946.