Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Modified Nipple Flap with Free Areolar Graft for Component Nipple-Areola Complex Construction

Outcomes with a Novel Technique for Chest Wall Reconstruction in Transgender Men

Lo Russo, Giulia, M.D.; Tanini, Sara, M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: June 2019 - Volume 143 - Issue 6 - p 1309e–1310e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005657
Letters
Free

Depertment of Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence Italy

Correspondence to Dr. Lo Russo, Department Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Palagi 1, Florence, Italy 50139, giulialorusso70@gmail.com

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

We read with great interest the article entitled ‘‘Modified Nipple Flap with Free Areolar Graft for Component Nipple-Areola Complex Construction: Outcomes with a Novel Technique for Chest Wall Reconstruction in Transgender Men’’ by Frey et al.1 The authors presented their nipple-areola complex creation in chest wall reconstruction for transgender men with a modified skate flap and free areolar graft in conjunction with double-incision mastectomy.1 Inspired by the authors, we would like to express our considerations on nipple reconstruction technique.

The anatomical features of the chest identify an individual as male or female, and even the smallest details of these features determine the appropriate appearance for each gender. In transgender men, the creation of an aesthetically pleasing male chest is the most important step. Incorrect positioning of the nipple-areola complex on the chest wall and suboptimal shaping and sizing of the nipple-areola complex are common pitfalls in male nipple-areola complex creation.2 In our clinical practice of chest wall contouring surgery, double-incision mastectomy with nipple-areola complex grafting is the preferred technique in patients with large breasts, but even in those with medium-sized and small breasts, for the excellent reposition and reshaping of the nipple-areola complex and the great aesthetic results.2,3

We believe that the first choice for nipple reconstruction for chest wall reconstruction in transgender men is a graft of a smaller portion of the native nipple. With this technique, the surgical principle of plastic surgery—replacing like tissue with like tissue—is respected and we can obtain perfect reposition and reshaping of the nipple. We have good graft healing, projection, pigmentation, and aesthetically male results (Fig. 1). To avoid the main disadvantages of free nipple grafting, such as graft loss, nipple flattening, and severe depigmentation, we have introduced some procedural precautions. We harvest a small, full-thickness graft from the native nipple that is 5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height. We use only four peripheral stitches to fix the nipple grafts, a tie-over dressing for 7 days, and, during postoperative follow-up, a “no touch” technique (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Since the introduction of these precautions, we have had no graft loss or flattening, and we have a small nipple with “natural” projection and pigmentation. Depigmentation occurred only in a case of partial graft lost. In our surgical practice of almost 100 cases (55 double-incision mastectomies with nipple-areola complex grafting), we have had only three cases of nipple graft loss and in only one patient have we used a local flap in the second-step revision.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Giulia Lo Russo, M.D.

Sara Tanini, M.D.

Depertment of Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery

Careggi University Hospital

Florence Italy

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Frey JD, Yu JZ, Poudrier G, et al. Modified nipple flap with free areolar graft for component nipple-areola complex construction: Outcomes with a novel technique for chest wall reconstruction in transgender men. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:331–336.
2. Tanini S, Lo Russo G. Shape, position and dimension of the nipple areola complex in the ideal male chest: A quick and simple operating room technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42:951–957.
3. Lo Russo G, Tanini S, Innocenti M. Masculine chest-wall contouring in FtM transgender: A personal approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41:369–374.
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2019American Society of Plastic Surgeons