Journal Logo

Viewpoints

Is There a Right Way to Interpret SPY? Normalization of Indocyanine Green Angiography Readings in a Burn Model

Fourman, Mitchell S. M.D., M.Phil.; Gersch, Robert P. Ph.D.; Levites, Heather A. M.D.; Phillips, Brett T. M.D., M.B.A.; Bui, Duc T. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: July 2015 - Volume 136 - Issue 1 - p 128e-130e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001380
  • Free

Sir:

The applications of indocyanine green dye angiography in plastic and reconstructive surgery continue to expand. LifeCell SPY-Elite (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.) has allowed for the intraoperative assessment of blood flow within mastectomy skin flaps and burn wounds. Kanuri and colleagues recently performed a fiscal analysis of the intraoperative use of indocyanine green dye angiography for mastectomy reconstructive flaps in high-risk patients such as smokers, the obese, and diabetics, suggesting its utility for these patients.1 However, challenges remain in defining consistent and effective criteria for interpreting these measurements.

In this communication, we suggest that normalization of SPY-Elite measurements to uninjured tissue within the field of view improves measurement precision compared with reading raw absolute values as provided by the device’s onboard software. We demonstrate this technique by using data from prior work evaluating burn interspace survival in a validated porcine hot comb burn model.2

SPY-Elite was used to retrospectively characterize the interspaces between standardized full-thickness burns in female Yorkshire swine.3 Interspace viability was evaluated histopathologically 3 weeks after injury for evidence of horizontal burn progression. Interspaces that were found to have adnexal components or viable epidermal layer were considered viable, whereas skin lacking these components was deemed nonviable. Indocyanine green dye angiography measurements were taken 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours after injury. Each field was evaluated by SPY-Elite for absolute value (measured in arbitrary perfusion units) (Fig. 1, left), and normalized as a percentage of the highest value measured in uninjured skin within that frame (Fig. 1, right). Each frame was renormalized in this same method. Statistical analysis between absolute values and normalized values in viable and nonviable interspaces was performed by means of t test using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., LaJolla, Calif.).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Reading of image showing absolute values (left) and normalized values (right) of blood flow using the LifeCell SPY-Q analysis software. Normalization values were obtained by finding the highest blood flow measurement on the uninjured tissue within the same captured field as the target wound. Each time the wound was imaged, the normalization was recalculated based on these criteria.

Comparing absolute values showed no significant differences between viable and nonviable interspaces, attributable in part to increased variability between animals (Fig. 2, left). When interspace values were normalized to the maximal perfusion in normal skin, thereby accounting for intrinsic variation in the vascularity and systemic state of the animal, perfusion levels showed significance (p < 0.05) between viable and nonviable tissues at 1, 4, and 48 hours after injury.3 Our group postulates that several factors relate to the increased variability of absolute perfusion values. Differences in the vascularity and the plasma composition of each animal may skew absolute value measurements. Plasma turbidity, a background fluorescence related to indocyanine green dye binding to a nonalbumin fraction of plasma proteins, is also organism-dependent, and contributes to subject variability.4 Clinically, absolute values may vary because of different patient demographics and systemic comorbidities such as obesity, smoking, and diabetes. Normalization would account for these variables and should result in more consistent indocyanine green dye angiography reading.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
Perfusion levels are reported for 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours after burn injury in viable and nonviable tissue. Results are shown for absolute values (left) as arbitrary perfusion units (apu) and for normalized values (right) as percentages of normal perfusion. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

A persistent obstacle preventing reliable interpretation of indocyanine green dye angiography is the precision of the measurement. In this communication, we describe a method of standardizing and normalizing quantitative readings provided by the LifeCell SPY-Elite. We have used this technique with success when studying the blood flow over time within Integra artificial skin (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, N.J.).5 It will be further validated when used in upcoming randomized prospective studies on burn and breast reconstruction patients, and ongoing basic science studies.

DISCLOSURE

No author has any personal financial interest in the study presented. The authors have received research funds from the LifeCell Corporation unrelated to the data presented herein; that funding was intended for studying applications of the SPY-Elite device in reconstructive surgery.

Mitchell S. Fourman, M.D., M.Phil.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pa.

Robert P. Gersch, Ph.D.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pa.

Heather A. Levites, M.D.

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, N.Y.

Brett T. Phillips, M.D., M.B.A.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, N.C.

Duc T. Bui, M.D.

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, N.Y.

REFERENCES

1. Kanuri A, Liu AS, Guo L. Whom should we SPY? A cost analysis of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography in prevention of mastectomy skin flap necrosis during prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:448e–454e
2. Singer AJ, McClain SA, Taira BR, Romanov A, Rooney J, Zimmerman T. Validation of a porcine comb burn model. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:285–288
3. Fourman MS, Phillips BT, Crawford L, et al. Indocyanine green dye angiography accurately predicts survival in the zone of ischemia in a burn comb model. Burns. 2014;40:940–946
4. Luetkemeier MJ, Fattor JA. Measurement of indocyanine green dye is improved by use of polyethylene glycol to reduce plasma turbidity. Clin Chem. 2001;47:1843–1845
5. Fourman MS, Phillips BT, Fritz JR, et al. Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography accurately predicts the split-thickness graft timing of integra artificial dermis. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73:150–155

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

  • Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
  • References—maximum of five
  • Authors—no more than five
  • Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2015American Society of Plastic Surgeons