Journal Logo


Introducing the Plastic Surgery Research Network

A Comprehensive Online Platform to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Plastic Surgery Research

Jalali, Morteza M.B., Ch.B.(Manc.); Saldanha, Francesca M.B., B.Chir.(Cantab.), M.A., B.A.(Cantab.)

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: June 2015 - Volume 135 - Issue 6 - p 1083e-1085e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001312
  • Free


The confluence of biomedical science and plastic surgery has the ability to revolutionize the treatment of patients with wide-ranging reconstructive requirements following trauma, cancer, burns, and congenital anomalies. Surgeon scientists are ideally positioned to recognize the potential of basic scientific discoveries and illuminate novel therapeutics that will enhance tomorrow’s surgical solutions.1 Plastic surgeon scientists offer a unique perspective and skill set. By marrying the specialty’s longstanding tradition of innovation2 with its inextricable scientific links to fields such as developmental and regenerative biology, there is great scope for these individuals to transform current treatment strategies in plastic surgery. Furthermore, the specialty’s ability to improve healthcare by successfully blending laboratory advancements with insights from bioengineering, nanotechnology, and biomaterials will be heavily reliant on having a cohort of scientifically trained plastic surgeons participating in interdisciplinary translational research. A cadre of such surgeon scientists will be pivotal to securing the specialty’s place at the forefront of applied regenerative medicine.

There is currently a paucity of plastic surgeon scientists leading impactful translational scientific research studies globally. A facility fostering international collaboration between these clinician scientists would be a necessary and invaluable asset, which would undoubtedly accelerate transformative health research. Such an initiative will further enhance the global plastic surgery research base, and inspire and support the next generation of plastic surgery translationalists.3

The Plastic Surgery Research Network ( is a unique opportunity for plastic surgery. As the world’s first online community for plastic surgeon scientists, it seeks to capitalize on synergies between clinicians, scientists, life sciences industry partners, and patients at the center of care, to help overcome current barriers to the timely translation of biomedical research.4,5

The Plastic Surgery Research Network website is a virtual environment for interdisciplinary research efforts surrounding tissue reconstruction and regeneration, featuring 12 innovative elements to foster collaborative research (Fig. 1). Most crucially, the Plastic Surgery Research Network will nurture an interactive global community by providing dynamic research-centric resources, currently not widely available to plastic surgery researchers. The biomedical research digest, interdisciplinary discussion fora, and globalized laboratory and funding directories (Table 1) will enable aspiring surgeon scientists to stay abreast of scientific advancements in the field, identify potential collaborators, acquire research training, and secure funding. With these features, the Plastic Surgery Research Network holds enormous potential to strengthen connections between plastic surgeon scientists and those from allied disciplines, to enable global translational research collaborations that will revolutionize patient care in plastic surgery.

Table 1
Table 1:
Plastic Surgery Research Network Features*
Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
The Plastic Surgery Research Network (psrn) platform is a unique and easily navigable interface, with 12 main functions catering to the needs of plastic surgery researchers at all stages of their training. Each box pertains to a key aspect of the Plastic Surgery Research Network, and its position as a research hub and training facility.

The launch of the Plastic Surgery Research Network allows users to join the growing online community free of charge while the network is under construction on Drupal (, an open-source content management platform. Drupal’s core system and extensive modular library provides an ideal basis for efficiently deploying the Plastic Surgery Research Network community functionality, including membership accounts, collaboration tools, searchable discussion fora, customized directories, secure data exchange and management facilities. As a pioneering network in plastic surgery, the Plastic Surgery Research Network serves as a prelude to a global clinician scientist network. We envisage an exciting future ahead and urge the plastic surgery community to join us.


Morteza Jalali is the founder and chief executive officer of the Plastic Surgery Research Network (

Morteza Jalali, M.B., Ch.B.(Manc.)

Anne McLaren Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council

Cambridge Stem Cell Institute

Department of Surgery

School of Clinical Medicine

University of Cambridge

Cambridge, and

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

John Radcliffe Hospital

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and

Musculoskeletal Sciences

Medical Sciences Division

University of Oxford

Oxford, United Kingdom

Francesca Saldanha, M.B., B.Chir.(Cantab.), M.A., B.A.(Cantab.)

Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge, Mass., and

The Healing Foundation Centre

Faculty of Life Sciences

University of Manchester

Manchester, United Kingdom


1. Jalali M, Kirkpatrick WN, Cameron MG, Pauklin S, Vallier L.. Human stem cells for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1437–1451
2. Rohrich RJ, Rosen J, Longaker MT.. So you want to be an innovator? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1107–1109
3. Saldanha FY, Winterton RI, Jalali M.. Towards a global plastic surgery research network. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37:633–634
4. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). . Engineering strategies, opportunities, and challenges for tissue repair and regenerationCIRM Workshop Summary and RecommendationsJanuary 12–13, 2012San Francisco, Calif
5. Madry H, Alini M, Stoddart MJ, Evans C, Miclau T, Steiner S.. Barriers and strategies for the clinical translation of advanced orthopaedic tissue engineering protocols. Eur Cell Mater. 2014;27:17–21; discussion 21


Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

  • Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
  • References—maximum of five
  • Authors—no more than five
  • Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2015American Society of Plastic Surgeons