Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

The Incidence of Donor-Site Morbidity after Transverse Cervical Artery Vascularized Lymph Node Transfers: The Need for a Lymphatic Surgery National Registry

Massey, Marga F. M.D., C.L.T.; Gupta, Dhanesh K. M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: May 2015 - Volume 135 - Issue 5 - p 939e–940e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001202
Viewpoints
Free

The National Institute of Lymphology, Chicago

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to Dr. Massey, The National Institute of Lymphology, 505 North Lake Shore Drive, Suite 214-B, Chicago, Ill. 60611, me@drmarga.com

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

Surgical treatment for lymphedema is expanding at a rapid pace. The following case demonstrates a critical need for communication between surgeons, whether they are invested in microsurgical techniques or debulking liposuction.

A 57-year-old woman with bilateral lower extremity primary lymphedema tarda underwent a right transverse cervical artery vascularized lymph node transfer to the left lower extremity (the first surgeon was Marga F. Massey, M.D.; the second surgeon is not identified but was in an independent practice in a different state than Dr. Massey). Her preoperative lymphoscintigram (Fig. 1, left) demonstrated no lymph node tracer uptake in either groin. Eight months after surgery, the patient presented with intermittent mild right arm swelling. Repeated lymphoscintigraphy showed no tracer uptake in the right axilla (ipsilateral to the cervical donor site) and a new finding of tracer uptake in the nonoperative right inguinal region (Fig. 1, right). The patient was subsequently lost to in-person follow-up after having related dissipation of her right arm swelling by means of several follow-up phone consultations.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Approximately 18 months after transverse cervical artery vascularized lymph node transfer, the patient presented to a second surgeon requesting debulking liposuction of the left leg. Right arm swelling was noted on physical examination by the second surgeon. A third lymphoscintigram was obtained (not shown). No tracer uptake was demonstrated in either groin or in the right axilla (these results were reported in an abstract presentation by the second surgeon at the National Lymphedema Network Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C., in September of 2014). She reportedly underwent uneventful left lower extremity liposuction debulking performed by the second surgeon without any contact with the initial surgeon, thus leaving the initial surgeon unaware of the progression of the donor-site morbidity.

This communication relates the first reported case of iatrogenic upper extremity lymphedema from a transverse cervical artery vascularized lymph node transfer. Teaching has focused on the potential risk of secondary lymphedema of the head and neck in the setting of a supraclavicular flap harvest. This case highlights the need for the use of ipsilateral upper extremity reverse lymphatic mapping when using a cervical approach.1,2 Furthermore, this case illustrates variability in the quality of lymphoscintigraphic imaging versus a putative dynamic presentation of primary lymphedema. Review of the three sequential lymphoscintigrams of the nonoperative right lower extremity revealed an illusive appearance of inguinal regional lymph nodes only on the second study. Such variability begs further investigation.3

This case demonstrates the importance of coordinated care and collection of outcomes data in the expanding field of lymphatic reconstruction. Because lymphedema patients are often moving from surgeon to surgeon hoping for a surgical cure for this chronic, debilitating disease, it is not uncommon for patients to be lost to in-person clinical follow-up. Therefore, it is imperative that we as surgeons develop a system within Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act guidelines that allows tracking of patient-centered outcomes and morbidity. I would call on the American Society of Plastic Surgeons to initiate a patient registry for the surgical treatment of lymphedema to track patient outcomes and morbidity. Surgeon participation in a national registry would result in total transparency and an improvement in the quality of care for this high-risk patient population.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

Dr. Massey is on the Medical Advisory Board of the National Lymphedema Network. The authors have no commercial associations that pose a potential conflict of interest.

Marga F. Massey, M.D., C.L.T.

The National Institute of Lymphology, Chicago

Dhanesh K. Gupta, M.D.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Chicago, Ill.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Dayan JH, Dayan E, Smith ML.. Reverse lymphatic mapping: A new technique for maximizing safety in vascularized lymph node transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:277–285
2. Klimberg VS.. A new concept toward the prevention of lymphedema: Axillary reverse mapping. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:563–564
3. Becker C, Assouad J, Riquet M, Hidden G.. Postmastectomy lymphedema: Long-term results following microsurgical lymph node transplantation. Ann Surg. 2006;243:313–315
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

  • Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
  • References—maximum of five
  • Authors—no more than five
  • Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2015American Society of Plastic Surgeons