Share this article on:

Reply: The Incidence and Management of Secondary Abdominoplasty and Secondary Abdominal Contour Surgery

Matarasso, Alan M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: July 2014 - Volume 134 - Issue 1 - p 163e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000258

1009 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10028,

Back to Top | Article Outline


Thank you for your questions and comments, which I will address individually. First, my colleagues and I do not have the exact incidence of secondary abdominoplasty in massive weight loss patients. However, we have noted that there is significant damage in the remaining unresected skin in this population of patients (nonexcised portions). Consequently, some further relaxation is expected. Indeed, anecdotally it seems that a proportion of postoperative massive weight loss abdominoplasty patients will feel at some point that they could be “tighter,” as their skin undergoes postoperative relaxation. Second, in my experience, whether secondary abdominoplasty patients had an intervening pregnancy or not, the midline rectus muscle will benefit from additional reinforcement.

Third, any full second operation (e.g., liposuction followed by an abdominoplasty) or an additional liposuction operation was considered secondary. Revisions (e.g., dog-ears) or touch-ups (e.g., spot areas of liposuction) were not considered secondary “complete” operations. A private duty nurse accompanies the patient to a hotel-type facility (the patient ambulates). They are versed in our postoperative care and expectations. Parenthetically, please note that Figure 1 of the article should read full abdominoplasty n = 1, not 4.5.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Alan Matarasso, M.D.

1009 Park Avenue

New York, N.Y. 10028

Back to Top | Article Outline


Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2014American Society of Plastic Surgeons