Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Reply: Updating the Epidemiology of Isolated Cleft Palate

Mahabir, Raman C. M.D.; Tanaka, Shoichiro A. B.S., M.P.H.; Jupiter, Daniel C. Ph.D.; Menezes, John M. M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2014 - Volume 133 - Issue 1 - p 68e–69e
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436820.19085.06
Letters
Free

Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, and Division of Plastic Surgery, Scott & White Healthcare, Temple, Texas

Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas

Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, and Department of Surgery, Scott & White Healthcare, Temple, Texas

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nev.

Correspondence to Dr. Mahabir, Division of Plastic Surgery, Scott & White Memorial Hospital, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, Texas 76508, rmahabir@sw.org

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

We thank Dr. Lowry for taking the time to read our article,1 and we appreciate his comments. Our article was first written as an Original Article. However, at the request of the Editor, it was revised as a Viewpoint article. As such, there was a significant space constraint and much of the material that was cut to fit the shorter format would have addressed the issues he mentioned. We agree that there is some confusion about the term “isolated cleft palate.” To clarify, we used the term isolated cleft palate to mean a cleft of the palate without a cleft of the lip, as is the convention in national and international database and research efforts. Isolated cleft palate can be associated with other anomalies (e.g., cardiac) and still be considered isolated cleft palate (without cleft lip). In fact, up to 40 percent of patients with cleft palate have associated anomalies, a higher rate than cleft lip and palate. Some studies try to separate syndromic from nonsyndromic; however, we made no such attempts in describing overall rates. No sources were given, as the number of references is limited in a Viewpoint article. We referenced our earlier article2 to help clarify for anyone that was interested in reviewing the original data, and Dr. Lowry correctly identified that. His concerns about the intranational and international differences in reporting data are similarly addressed in the earlier article.2 Finally, we would agree that a 5-year study may be too short to infer trends in rates. The counterpoint, though, is that data and reporting continuously improve and more recent data may be more valuable than older data. This was the original inspiration for this series of articles. As a point of correction, we reported that the U.S. rate was increasing and the international rate was stable. The data cited by Dr. Lowry would seem to support and not refute our conclusions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Raman C. Mahabir, M.D.

Texas A&M Health Science Center

College of Medicine, and

Division of Plastic Surgery

Scott & White Healthcare

Temple, Texas

Shoichiro A. Tanaka, B.S., M.P.H.

Texas A&M Health Science Center

College of Medicine

Temple, Texas

Daniel C. Jupiter, Ph.D.

Texas A&M Health Science Center

College of Medicine, and

Department of Surgery

Scott & White Healthcare

Temple, Texas

John M. Menezes, M.D.

Division of Plastic Surgery

University of Nevada School of Medicine

Las Vegas, Nev.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC, Menezes JM. Updating the epidemiology of isolated cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:650e–652e
2. Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC, Menezes JM. Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:511e–518e
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2014American Society of Plastic Surgeons