Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Reply: Are Systemic Antibiotics Indicated in Aesthetic Breast Surgery? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Hardwicke, Joseph Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2014 - Volume 133 - Issue 1 - p 63e–64e
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436829.88570.68
Letters
Free

University Hospitals of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Egbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom, j.hardwicke@bham.ac.uk

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

I would sincerely like to thank Drs. Gigliofiorito et al. for their considerate letter regarding our article.1 I agree that international agreement for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in aesthetic breast surgery is key to safer practice. This will allow the provision of the best quality of care to our patients and avoid the need to practice empirical “defensive medicine.” Some of the current national guidance available is limited in its scope and has drawn broad conclusions that could be applied to reduction and augmentation mammaplasty from evidence that has been gleaned from other surgical specialities.2 The American Society of Plastic Surgeons guidelines3 do at the outset provide a disclaimer stating that “…this guideline should not be construed as a rule, nor should it be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed at obtaining the appropriate results,” and although our systematic review did not attempt to provide a clinical guideline, our aim was to present the available evidence, on which the clinician could base their best practice. We attempted to show that the best available evidence was sometimes insufficient for drawing substantial conclusions. Based on this, we cannot refute current U.K. guidelines2 with respect to augmentation mammaplasty and U.S. guidelines3 with respect to reduction mammaplasty for the reduction of surgical-site infection, and would therefore consider these to be current best practice and could be used as a framework for the development of future international protocols/guidelines. I agree that not all decisions in medicine are based on scientific fact, and the role of personal experience and common sense in practicing the art of medicine, tailored uniquely to the patient’s requirements, is an important skill to learn and master. Although systematic reviews of randomized and blinded patient cohorts are considered to be the best evidence available, we always need to recognize the needs of the individual patient under our duty of care, and weigh the risks associated with extended antibiotic administration.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Joseph Hardwicke, Ph.D.

University Hospitals of Birmingham

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Mindelsohn Way, Egbaston

Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom

j.hardwicke@bham.ac.uk

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Hardwicke JT, Bechar J, Skillman JM. Are systemic antibiotics indicated in aesthetic breast surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1395–1403
2. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Surgical Site Infection: Prevention and Treatment of S urgical Site Infection. 2008 London Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Guideline, October 2008 Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11743/42378/42378.pdf Accessed May 11, 2012.
3. Kalliainen LKASPS Health Policy Committee. . ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:785–789
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2014American Society of Plastic Surgeons