Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Reply: Incidence of Breast Hematoma after Placement of BreastProstheses

Collins, James B. M.D.; Verheyden, Charles N. M.D. Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: October 2012 - Volume 130 - Issue 4 - p 612e–613e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f3f3

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Scott & White Healthcare, Temple, Texas

Correspondence to Dr. Verheyden, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, Texas 76508,

Back to Top | Article Outline


We commend the authors on their accumulation of data regarding the incidence of breast hematoma following cosmetic breast augmentation and welcome their insightful discussion. The incidence of breast hematoma in their accumulated data is similar to our concluded incidence of breast hematoma associated with prosthetic breast implantation. The incidence of breast hematoma in their population of cosmetic breast augmentations was 2.5 percent. The incidence of breast hematoma at our center was 1.65 percent of all patients undergoing procedures involving prosthetic breast implantation, without any measured statistical difference in incidence between cosmetic and reconstructive procedures.1 In addition, in our review of the literature, the incidence of breast hematoma following similar procedures ranged from 1.0 to 12 percent, with an average incidence of 2.3 percent in a cumulative 6542 patients.2-9

All hematomas identified during the study period were included, to reduce selection bias. Patients identified with breast hematoma later were more likely to present with either a palpable swelling about the implant that was evacuated in a nonemergent manner or identified incidentally in the operating room during a second procedure. Although we did not identify any emergent late hematomas, such hematomas are reported in the medical literature even in the absence of obvious trauma or anticoagulation and years after the procedure.10,11 Although breast hematomas are exceedingly rare beyond 1 month after the procedure, hematomas do still occur. Because of the rare nature of these hematomas and without adequate knowledge of the incidence of spontaneous hematoma in the unoperated breast, an assessment to implicate the breast prosthesis cannot be engaged.

Patient follow-up varied somewhat between the surgeons included in our study, but typically included a follow-up at approximately day 2, day 14, and week 8. Hematomas could have been identified in any of the following settings: postanesthesia care unit, emergency department, plastic surgery clinic, or the hospital’s associated non–plastic surgery clinics. Ten of the 21 emergent hematomas were identified by the first postoperative day; six of these were identified on the day of operation either in the postanesthesia care unit or in the emergency department. The average interval of 37 days following the procedure results from inclusion of three breast hematomas identified greater than 30 days from the procedure. These were identified at days 84, 229, and 652. Exclusion of these patients results in an average interval of 7.7 days. We have no additional insight regarding timing of presentation of hematomas between ours and other data sets beyond speculation.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

James B. Collins, M.D.

Charles N. Verheyden, M.D. Ph.D.

Department of Surgery

Division of Plastic Surgery

Scott & White Healthcare

Temple, Texas

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Collins JB, Verheyden CN. Incidence of breast hematoma after placement of breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2012;129:413e–420e
2. Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard DM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ III. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med.. 1997;336:677–682
3. Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: A multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2000;105:2143–2149 discussion 2150–2151
4. Kjøller K, Hölmich LR, Jacobsen PH. Epidemiological investigation of local complications after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg.. 2002;48:229–237
5. Chang L, Caldwell E, Reading G, Wray RC Jr. A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 1992;89:79–82
6. Lavine DM. Saline inflatable prostheses: 14 years’ experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg.. 1993;17:325–330
7. Williams JE. Experiences with a large series of Silastic breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 1972;49:253–258
8. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2010;125:1606–1614
9. Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2011;127:1300–1310
10. Brickman M, Parsa NN, Parsa FD. Late hematoma after breast implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg.. 2004;28:80–82
11. Rasko Y, Saint-Cyr M, Peng Y, Rao R. Spontaneous hematoma of the breast 30 years after augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2010;126:41e–42e
©2012American Society of Plastic Surgeons