Measurement of Breast Volume after Breast Reconstruction Using Computed Tomographic Scanning : Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Journal Logo


Measurement of Breast Volume after Breast Reconstruction Using Computed Tomographic Scanning

Park, Sang Uk M.D.; Shim, Jeong Su M.D., Ph.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: June 2012 - Volume 129 - Issue 6 - p 1020e-1021e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824f000c
  • Free



The goal of breast reconstruction is to have the breast that had the lesion resemble the preoperative breast. For this, symmetry of both breasts needs to be satisfied. To satisfy the symmetry of both breasts following breast reconstruction, an accurate size of the flap inserted to the breast that has the lesion has to be considered for breast reconstruction. However, changes in breast volume occur with time following breast reconstruction with flaps.1 Amir et al. determined the volume of the actual flap, which was calculated from the actual volume of the flap plus an additional 10 percent of its volume.2 However, quantitative measurement of breast volume during follow-up has not yet been reported after breast reconstruction by flap. Therefore, in the current study, postoperative breast volume changes were measured by computed tomography after breast reconstruction using the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap.

From September of 2007 to July of 2010, among the patients who underwent breast reconstruction by TRAM flaps after mastectomy, a total of five patients followed for more than 3 years and who underwent computed tomographic scanning more than two times during follow-up were enrolled. Consecutive computed tomographic scanning was performed with 1-mm interval and 1-mm thickness at 120 kV and 170 mA with a LightSpeed 64-channel multidetector-row computed tomography (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.) device and with patients lying supine, holding their breath, and raising both hands over their heads. The breast volumes were examined by the INFINITT program (INFINITT Health Care, Korea). When we measured the breast volume, we set the range of the breast from the posterior margin, anterior of the pectoralis major to the anterior margin, skin, and nipple-areola complex. On the axial view, we set the range of the breast from the starting part of the breast crest to the ending part of the breast crest. The medial side of the breast was the lateral border of the sternum, and the lateral side of the breast was the midaxillary line (Fig. 1). After we checked each section of the axial computed tomographic scan, the sections were transformed into three-dimensional images. We then measured the volume of the three-dimensional image. We compared the changes in breast volume as time passed, and we used a paired sample t test for statistical verification.

Fig. 1:
The authors' methods for measuring breast volume. (Left) The borderline of the breast is selected in each axial computed tomographic section. (Right) Several selected sections of the axial view were reconstructed as a three-dimensional image. The image shows the basal view of the three-dimensionally reconstructed breast.

The breast volume of a total of five patients showed a decrease by an average of 12 percent, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean follow-up period was 42 months. Accordingly, the result was determined to be attributable to common operators, and patients were more satisfied with the results obtained by applying an overcorrection of flap size, when the design of the flap was made.

This study has a limitation of generalization, because only a few cases were examined and the follow-up periods after reconstruction were short. Also, our method was difficult to measure by computed tomographic scanning subjectively. However, this method is cost-effective and does not cause patient discomfort. Therefore, this method is an objective and effective method for measuring the volume of the breast and can be very helpful in designing the size of TRAM flaps.

Sang Uk Park, M.D.

Jeong Su Shim, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea


The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.


1. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Zervoudis S. TRAM flap breast reconstruction and weight fluctuations: It is alive! Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:696–697.
2. Amir A, Silfen R, Hauben DJ. Use of Archimedes' law for measuring the volume of the TRAM flap in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1329.


Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

  • Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
  • References—maximum of five
  • Authors—no more than five
  • Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2012American Society of Plastic Surgeons