I very much enjoyed the article “Microvascular Repair of Heminasal, Subtotal, and Total Nasal Defects with a Folded Radial Forearm Flap and a Full-Thickness Forehead Flap,” by Drs. Frederick Menick and Arthur Salibian (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;127:637–651).1 The authors used a radial forearm free flap for various degrees of nasal reconstruction, using the temporal artery and the external jugular vein and/or the facial vessels. There were 13 cases with similar defects, although none was secondary to a burn.
I am taking the liberty to share with you a case that occurred in 1986. The absence of the nose was the result of third-degree burns, and the deformity had affected the availability of suitable vascular access.
The procedure was performed in three stages. During the first operation, we raised a nasally shaped radial forearm flap, and skin grafted the back side with a split graft. We left it attached as a “delay” (Fig. 1, below).
When the viability and take were ensured, we proceeded with a second procedure, where we created a microvascular access by forming a 10-cm loop as an arteriovenous fistula connected to the left temporal artery, thus bypassing all the scarring. During the third procedure, we separated the nasal substitute from the forearm (Fig. 1, above), divided the arteriovenous fistula, and performed the microvascular anastomoses accordingly. The flap was set in by suturing the grafted side to mucosa and the radial flap to the surrounding skin (Fig. 2).
The case was never reported, primarily because the flap underwent severe congestion, resulting in epidermolysis and very significant tissue loss. I was on the faculty of the University of Tennessee at the time. The case remained in my files all these years; I had not seen another case in private practice in which this flap could have been used.
The authors need to be congratulated for their contribution. Their cases are unique and the solutions were successful and complex. It needs to be pointed out that a complete external nasal structure can be formed in the forearm over a period of time, one that carries all the components, including mucosa, cartilage, and bone. Ample time is needed before the eventual transfer.2
Nicholas G. Economides, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio University, at Holzer Clinic, Athens, Ohio
1. Menick F, Salibian A. Microvascular repair of heminasal, subtotal, and total nasal defects with a folded radial forearm flap and a full-thickness forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:637–651.
2. Atisha D, Alderman AK, Janiga T, Singal B, Wilkins EG. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:383–388.
Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.
Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.
We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.
The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.