Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Reply: Acute Lymphedema of the Eyelid after Major Reconstruction of the Medial Canthus The Role of the Lymphatic Drainage Pattern

Pan, Wei-Ren M.D., Ph.D.; Le Roux, Cara Michelle B.Biomed.Sc., B.Sc.(Hons.); Briggs, Christopher A. M.S., Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: October 2011 - Volume 128 - Issue 4 - p 372e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268912
Letters
Free

Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to Dr. Pan, Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Room E533, Medical Building, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3050 w.pan@unimelb.edu.au

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

Figure

Figure

We thank Drs. Aveta et al. for reporting this case of acute lymphedema of the eyelid after major reconstruction of the medial canthus, which confirms our anatomical findings.1 The authors have described upper eyelid lymphedema occurring as a result of the radical tissue resection around the medial canthus that damaged the inner canthus branch of the lymphatic vessel and the rotational cheek flap that disturbed the outer canthus branch of the lymphatic vessel. The lower eyelid was unaffected because of the presence of the inferior branch of the lymphatic vessel or other anastomotic vessels.

Existing texts describe the lymphatic drainage of the eyelids in two groups: the medial group and the lateral group. The medial group drains to the submandibular nodes and the lateral group drains to the preauricular nodes. The inferior eyelid lymphatic branch has not been described; however, it is represented in diagrams in some articles.25 It is important to note that the inferior lymphatic branch of the lower eyelid converges either to the outer or inner canthus lymphatic branches and then drains into the submandibular or preauricular (or parotid) lymph nodes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Our study demonstrated that the drainage patterns of the eyelid lymphatics are different from person to person, even on both sides of the same body. We believe that accurate anatomical knowledge of the eyelid lymphatics is the key to surgical management, including cosmetic procedures, trauma, and malignancies such as sentinel lymph node biopsy in this region.

Wei-Ren Pan, M.D., Ph.D.

Cara Michelle Le Roux, B.Biomed.Sc., B.Sc.(Hons.)

Christopher A. Briggs, M.S., Ph.D.

Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Pan WR, Le Roux CM, Briggs CA. Variations in the lymphatic drainage pattern of the head and neck: Further anatomic studies and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:611–620.
2. Sappey PC. Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques. Paris: Adrien Delahaye; 1874.
3. Haagensen CD, Feind CR, Herter FP, et al.. The Lymphatics in Cancer. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1972.
4. Lemke BN, Della Rocca RC. Surgery of the Eyelids and Orbit: An Anatomical Approach. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1992.
5. Weinfeld AB, Burke R, Codner MA. The comprehensive management of chemosis following cosmetic lower blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:579–586.
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons