Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Abdominoplasty Flap Elevation More Superficially

Koller, Matthias M.D.; Hintringer, Thomas M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2011 - Volume 128 - Issue 2 - p 102e-103e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821ef2b0
Viewpoints
Free

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sisters of Mercy Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria

Correspondence to Dr. Koller, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sisters of Mercy Hospital Linz, Seilerstätte 4, 4020 Linz, Austria, matthias.koller@bhs.at

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

Recently, abdominoplasty flap elevation in a more superficial plane has been a frequently discussed topic.1,2 As we have been using this method for more than 2 years, we would now like to share our experiences.

Fifty patients who were scheduled for primary abdominoplasty at our department between February of 2008 and February of 2010 were included in a prospective randomized study. Patients were randomized to preparation on either the Scarpa fascia or the rectus fascia. Inclusion criteria were no previous surgery on the abdominal wall and a body mass index below 28.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate seroma reduction when using the Scarpa fascia for a more superficial preparation. A full abdominoplasty was performed using the harmonic scalpel for preparation. In one group, we stayed above the Scarpa fascia infraumbilical and used the rectus fascia for further preparation. In the other group, preparation was done at the level of the rectus fascia from the very beginning. In the case of the Scarpa fascia group, we suspended the Scarpa fascia onto the rectus fascia after flap resection with absorbable sutures to use it as an excellent lifting layer for the pubic area.

The mean weight of resected tissue was 968 g in the Scarpa fascia group and 1378 g in the rectus group. The explanation for the minor resection in one group is the thinner flap as a result of more superficial preparation.

Two closed suction drains were removed with a drain output less or equal to 30 cc collected within 24 hours. Most patients in both groups (Scarpa fascia group, n = 12 patients; rectus group, n = 13 patients) had their drains removed on the third day postoperatively.

Two weeks after surgery, 18 patients in each group underwent an ultrasound examination of the abdominal wall performed by a radiologist. The purpose was to evaluate whether there were differences in asymptomatic fluid collection among these groups. Twelve patients each had an asymptomatic fluid collection that did not differ in volume (mean, 20 ml). Six patients in the Scarpa fascia group and two patients in the rectus group showed no fluid collection at all.

The rate of seroma formation was significantly higher in the rectus group. Whereas four patients in this group had symptomatic fluid collections, there were none in the Scarpa fascia group. Seromas were treated with one to three punctures in the ambulatory setting.

Because of our experience with this small prospective study, we conclude that preparation more superficially might reduce seroma formation after abdominoplasty procedures. In the future, more prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to gain more evidence regarding this.

Matthias Koller, M.D.

Thomas Hintringer, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Sisters of Mercy Hospital Linz

Linz, Austria

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Vásconez LO, Amarante J. Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: A prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1232–1239.
2. Fang RC, Lin SJ, Mustoe TA. Abdominoplasty flap elevation in a more superficial plane: Decreasing the need for drains. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:677–682.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons