Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Reply: Capsular Contracture and Genetic Profile of ica Genes among Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from Subclinical Periprosthetic Infections

Deva, Anand K. M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 2011 - Volume 127 - Issue 4 - p 1748-1749
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820a65f2

Macquarie Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery; Macquarie University Clinic; Suite 301, Level 3; 2 Technology Place; Macquarie University; New South Wales 2109, Australia;

Back to Top | Article Outline


I thank Dr. Perischetti et al. for their analysis of the distribution of the icaA and icaD operons in relation to the presence of capsular contracture in patients undergoing second-stage breast reconstruction.

The ica cluster contains all the genes necessary for the production of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin, one of two polysaccharides produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis that help it to accumulate biofilm once initial attachment has occurred to a surface. There are four open reading frames (icaA, icaD, icaB, and icaC) and a regulator (icaR) located upstream from the start codon that contribute to the successful production and activation of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin.1

Initial studies did show a competitive advantage in that strains with ica activity were more capable of forming attachment to medical prosthetics and more likely to cause invasive infection.2,3 More recent analysis, however, has shown that ica-negative strains are able to overcome their disadvantage and are also responsible for clinical infection. Investigation in knockout mutants has revealed no conclusive result, with three of four reports demonstrating no significant reduction in virulence in ica-inactive strains.4 Furthermore, recent studies examining isolates from prosthetic joints and patients with neurosurgical meningitis have shown that ica-negative strains are also capable of causing invasive biofilm infection.5,6 These observations have been attributed to the presence of alternative polysaccharide intercellular adhesion–independent mechanisms of biofilm accumulation such as the biofilm-associated protein that may be able to overcome deficiencies in ica expression.

In summary, the presence or absence of ica operon activity does not necessarily impact on the ability of S. epidermidis to cause clinical biofilm disease. It is therefore not possible to draw conclusions about the apparent random distribution of icaA/icaD activity in patients with capsular contracture from this patient sample.

Anand K. Deva, M.D.

Macquarie Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery

Macquarie University Clinic

Suite 301, Level 3

2 Technology Place

Macquarie University

New South Wales 2109, Australia

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Heilman C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, Vannitanakom N, Mack D, Gotz F. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20:1083–1091.
2. Ziehbur W, Heilman C, Gotz F, et al. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect Immun. 1997;65:890–896.
3. Frebourg NB, Lefebvre S, Baert S, Lemeland JF. PCR based assay for discrimination between invasive and contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:877–880.
4. Rohde H, Mack D, Christner M, Burdelski C, Franke G, Knobloch JKM. Pathogenesis of staphylococcal device-related infections: From basic science to new diagnostic, therapeutic and prophylactic approaches. Rev Med Microbiol. 2006;17:45–54.
5. Stevens NT, Tharmabala M, Dillane T, Greene C, O'Gara JP, Humphreys H. Biofilm and the role of the ica operon and aap in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates causing neurosurgical meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:719–722.
6. Koskela A, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson A, Persson L, Soderquist B. Prevalence of the ica operon and insertion sequence IS256 among Staphylococcus epidermidis prosthetic joint infection isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:655–660.

Section Description


Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons