Journal Logo

LETTERS

The Diminishing Presence of Plastic Surgeons in Hand Surgery: A Critical Analysis

Hammert, Warren C. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: September 2010 - Volume 126 - Issue 3 - p 1127-1128
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b7a8
  • Free

Sir:

I read the January 2010 article by Dr. Higgins (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:248–260)1 with great interest as a hand surgeon and plastic surgeon. By way of disclosure, I am a member of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and a member of the resident education committee, so I have been aware of the work on this topic before its publication. Dr. Higgins does an excellent job of outlining a problem: the diminishing presence of plastic surgeons in the subspeciality of hand surgery. Over the years, the definition and scope of hand surgery has changed significantly. Now, hand surgery includes the wrist and distal forearm, and our understanding of carpal kinematics and pathology has expanded significantly since 1993.

In addition, specialization is more common in all surgical disciplines, and I believe the role of a “part-time hand surgeon” will be the exception rather than the rule in the future. Dr. Concannon has mentioned several “hand surgery leaders in plastic surgery” that fall in the category of “part time.” Although all of these surgeons have been leaders in the past and served a vital role in the education of residents, most of them are in the latter part of their careers, and when browsing the Web sites of those mentioned, more than half do not mention hand surgery as an area of interest. There will be some surgeons who are able to maintain a general plastic surgery practice and be leaders in hand surgery, but not the majority.

Although it may be rare for plastic surgeons to have a practice where the significant majority or all is hand surgery, the current leaders in hand surgery with a plastic surgery background do have this scope of practice. Andy Lee, M.D., Kevin Chung, M.D., Jim Chang, M.D., Neil Jones, M.D., Nick Vedder, M.D., and Chris Pederson, M.D., just to name a few, are all current leaders in hand surgery, active members in the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and involved with educating residents and fellows. Most of us would probably not choose a cardiac surgeon, neurosurgeon, or oncologic surgeon who practices something else more than half of the time, and hand surgery should not be any different.

We can all speculate on the reasons residents have not chosen to pursue hand surgery fellowships and a career in this subspeciality. Residents often choose a subspecialty because of an influential person or mentor,2 and a decreasing number of hand surgeons with a plastic surgery background will result in fewer mentors.

This is a critical time for the subspeciality of hand surgery within plastic surgery. Currently, the inservice examination is 25 percent hand and extremity; however, 25 percent of the didactic programs are rarely dedicated to hand surgery. As residency programs are transitioning from 2 to 3 years, this is the optimal time to address this issue of hand surgery, so that it will remain an integral part of plastic surgery. Plastic surgeons have always been great innovators, but we are at risk of hand surgery following the same path as burn surgery and head and neck cancer/reconstruction.

Warren C. Hammert, M.D.

University of Rochester Medical Center

601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665

Rochester, N.Y.

REFERENCES

1.Higgins JP. The diminishing presence of plastic surgeons in hand surgery: A critical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:248–260; discussion 261–263.
2.McCord JH, McDonald R, Sippel RS, Leverson G, Mahvi DM, Weber SM. Surgical career choices: The vital impact of mentoring. J Surg Res. 2009;155:136–141.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2010American Society of Plastic Surgeons