Journal Logo

LETTERS

Reply

Thorne, Charles H. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2010 - Volume 126 - Issue 2 - p 688
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1a45
  • Free

Sir:

The authors have corrected my mistakes regarding interpretation of their statistics. I thank them for that and I apologize for my statistical naiveté.

They have in their discussion, however, admitted an important bias in a way that is more clear, and more alarming, than I could ever articulate in a Discussion. They state, “This study was based on an idea that most women to a certain degree are dissatisfied with their appearance, but although some would be interested in a surgical fix, others would aim at different and perhaps more healthy solutions to their dissatisfaction, such as to develop strategies to accept their appearance as it is, or to change their body through physical exercise.”

In other words, the authors admit that they began their study with the belief that cosmetic surgery was a less healthy solution to dissatisfaction with appearance than other methods. Unfortunately, this reveals more than a bias, it reveals a lack of understanding about cosmetic surgery. If the authors understood that cosmetic surgery is not indicated for any problem that can be remedied by exercise, they might have approached their study differently.

Obviously, I have a bias in favor of plastic surgery as an option for some patients, and the authors of this article have a bias against it. We will not solve that here. I would only hope the authors would be more informed about a subject before writing about it.

Charles H. Thorne, M.D.

812 Park Avenue

New York, N.Y. 10021

ct32@aol.com

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2010American Society of Plastic Surgeons