Journal Logo

LETTERS

Reply

Serra-Renom, Jose Maria Ph.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2010 - Volume 126 - Issue 2 - p 675-676
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181df7199
  • Free

Sir:

I would like to thank Dr. Knobloch for his letter and for his interesting comments on my article. I agree that the BREAST-Q evaluation method is very useful.

I am familiar with the studies by Hyakusoku, Mu, and Yoshimura and I am aware of the issues they raise. However, Dr. Knobloch seems to be mixing two procedures in his letter: in breast augmentation, fat is injected into an unoperated, healthy breast, and in the breast reconstruction technique my colleagures and I reported, it is injected in the subcutaneous plane in the skin of the thorax after a mastectomy.

In the first case, the injection of fat in the breast may alter the breast parenchyma and may produce calcification. I agree that the patient should be informed thoroughly of this risk. If calcifications do occur, they should be evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging.

In the procedure my colleagues and I perform, the fat is injected into subcutaneous tissue, which has already undergone surgery; the tissue may present internal scars and may have calcifications as a result of the earlier mastectomy.

In this situation, I follow patients clinically, as I do with all mastectomy patients. I only perform magnetic resonance imaging when I consider it necessary for the follow-up of the disease, not as a routine procedure.

I would like to thank Dr. Knobloch again for his interest in the article and for his comments.

Jose Maria Serra-Renom, Ph.D.

Instituto de Cirugía Estetica Dr. Serra-Renom

Plaza Alfonso Comín 5-7, 4a planta

Barcelona 08023, Spain

drserra@cirugiaestetica.org

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2010American Society of Plastic Surgeons