Journal Logo

LETTERS

Advancements in Free Flap Monitoring in the Last Decade: A Critical Review

Lin, Chih-Ming M.D.; Huang, Chieh-Chi M.D.; Hsu, Honda M.B.Ch.B.; Chiu, Chih-Hung M.D.; Chien, Sou-Hsin M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2010 - Volume 126 - Issue 2 - p 679
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181df720b
  • Free

Sir:

We read with great interest the article by Smit et al.1 We, at our center, perform approximately 260 free tissue transfers per year. We are fully aware of the numerous devices available for free flap monitoring. After using a few of the devices ourselves, we have found the conventional method of monitoring skin color to be the best method. The dilemma arises when the monitoring devices show a good signal but the flap appears compromised. At this stage, we are not sure what the authors would do, but we would perform exploration immediately. Thus, it all comes down to what the surgeon's eye sees. If the flap color appears compromised, we will return to the operating room, whether the monitoring device shows a good signal or not. We have our nurses monitor the flap hourly. If there is a change in color, the microsurgeon is called immediately. We have found that in this way it is “harmless to patient and flap, rapidly responsive, accurate, reliable, and applicable to all types of flap.” It is also the cheapest method available.

Chih-Ming Lin, M.D.

Chieh-Chi Huang, M.D.

Honda Hsu, M.B.Ch.B.

Chih-Hung Chiu, M.D.

Sou-Hsin Chien, M.D.

Division of Plastic Surgery

Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital

Chia-Yi, Taiwan

REFERENCE

1. Smit JM, Zeebregts CJ, Acosta R, Werker PM. Advancements in free flap monitoring in the last decade: A critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:177–185.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2010American Society of Plastic Surgeons