Putting arms on the Venus de Milo is simply silly. The original use of this icon in the American Society of Plastic Surgeons logo perfectly captures the concept that beauty can be approximated with imperfect materials. What better symbol could represent what we do?
Putting a second Venus in the logo, one with drifting, awkward arms, clutters the emblem and transforms a subtle use of symbol into a cartoon.
I would prefer an after and a before sketch of Humpty Dumpty to this proposed reconstruction of Venus.
William Lineaweaver, M.D.
Rankin Plastic Surgery Center
348 Crossgates Boulevard, Suite 2400
Brandon, Miss. 39042
Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.
We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.