Journal Logo


Success of the Orbicularis Oculi Myocutaneous Vertical V-Y Advancement Flap for Upper Eyelid Reconstruction

Kusumoto, Kenji M.D., Ph.D.; Kakudo, Natsuko M.D., Ph.D.; Ogawa, Yutaka M.D., Ph.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2009 - Volume 123 - Issue 1 - p 423-424
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318194d274
  • Free


We read a very interesting article that was recently published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery regarding a subcutaneous pedicle flap technique for eyelid reconstruction.1 The authors suggested the orbicularis oculi myocutaneous vertical V-Y advancement flap technique for treating upper eyelid defects. They reported the method to be simpler and less invasive than other techniques, in addition to allowing a good functional and aesthetic reconstruction for all the patients treated.

We have previously attempted a similar technique for a patient with meibomian gland cancer of the upper eyelid, and have already published a case report on this technique2 (Fig. 1). In our opinion, the vertical V-Y advancement flap technique is particularly suitable for elderly patients with slack skin. When an advancement flap is set downward from the upper region, the flap may easily retract due to the contraction of the wound around the flap, which may consequently cause ectropion. Thus, it is better to shift the flap in the horizontal direction. For this purpose, the horizontal advancement flap3 and the Mustardé switch flap4 are adequate, and are currently the most frequently used flaps. However, in some cases in which there is excess skin, where the defect is horizontally long and vertically short, the vertical advancement flap is useful (Fig. 2). In such cases, Z-plasty on the vertical scar may be necessary at a later stage. When making the vertical V-Y flap, relaxed upper eyelid skin and definitely making the pedicle are needed.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.:
A 20 × 8-mm defect remains in the upper eyelid after eradication of the tumor.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.:
Vertical V-Y advancement flap.

Another essential key to success is the longer mucosal graft for the conjunctival defect. To reconstruct a full-thickness defect and a posterior lobe defect of the upper lid, hard-palate mucosa is preferred in our institution. This probably causes mucosal atrophy to some degree; therefore, a mucosal graft that is 1.5 mm longer should be applied when treating conjunctival defects. We believe that appropriate surgical indication, careful consideration of the flap, and sufficient abruption of the pedicle, as mentioned above, lead to excellent lid reconstruction and avoid ectropion.

Kenji Kusumoto, M.D., Ph.D.

Natsuko Kakudo, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Kansai Medical University

Osaka, Japan

Yutaka Ogawa, M.D., Ph.D.

Otowa Memorial Hospital

Kyoto, Japan


1. Demir Z, Yüce S, Karamürsel S, Celebioglu S. Orbicularis oculi myocutaneous advancement flap for upper eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:443–450.
2. Kakudo N, Shimotsuma A, Ogawa Y. Use of local flap for reconstruction of the upper eyelid after surgery for malignancy. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol. (Rinsho Ganka) 2004;58:2027–2031.
3. Okada E, Iwahira Y, Maruyama Y. The V-Y advancement myotarsocutaneous flap for upper eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:996–998.
4. Mustardé JC. Reconstruction of the upper lid, and the use of nasal mucosal grafts. Br J Plast Surg. 1968;21:367–377.

Section Description


Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2009American Society of Plastic Surgeons