Journal Logo

LETTERS

Reply

Trussler, Andrew P. M.D.; Bradley, James P. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2009 - Volume 123 - Issue 1 - p 427-428
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904e71
  • Free

Sir:

We thank Dr. Malaviya for sharing his opinion and commentary on autologous lip augmentation. Palmaris longus tendon is a soft, thin, autologous implant that does restore volume in a hypoplastic or scarred lip. It is a valuable and versatile soft-tissue filler that has taken the place, in certain circumstances, of other autologous options, such as microfat grafting and dermal fat grafts. The donor-site incision is small, inconspicuous, and well tolerated. We doubt the options presented by Dr. Malaviya, including the fascia lata and gracilis, could have the same small donor site and longevity objectively demonstrated in our article. We agree that lip augmentation has no one answer, as Dr. Malaviya has commented. In the reconstructive lip, the palmaris longus tendon is readily available and form-stable, with the ability to contour with stacking to fill the specific void after a stable soft-tissue envelope has been created. A multimodal approach should be applied to the lip and should include volume augmentation, combined with skin resurfacing or scar revision, and alteration of the orbicularis oris, either surgically or through chemodenervation. These principles hold true for both the cosmetic and the reconstructive patient. We believe that the palmaris longus tendon does play a role in this multimodal approach. It is presented as a viable, safe addition to the lip algorithm and not as a single solution, as Dr. Malaviya suggested. Plastic surgery has been plagued by subjective opinions and dogma; this article offers objective data that support our technique. The author has obviously missed the point of the article and, ironically, fallen into the trap of subjective opinion in his letter.

Andrew P. Trussler, M.D.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas

James P. Bradley, M.D.

UCLA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Los Angeles, Calif.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2009American Society of Plastic Surgeons