Journal Logo

LETTERS

Transconjunctival Septal Suture Repair for Lower Lid Blepharoplasty

Reply

Sadove, Richard M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 2008 - Volume 121 - Issue 4 - p 1506
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000305290.87845.39
  • Free

Sir:

I thank Drs. Atiyeh and Hayek for their kind comments. They correctly express surprise with the take-home point: septal suture can be performed with preservation of lid height and no changes in aperture shape. Mendelsohn and Muhlbauer showed us the same in their experience, via the subciliary approach.

Why weaken the muscle if this is not necessary? Preservation of orbicularis muscle integrity/innervation reduces risks in the treatment of the lower eyelid bulge.

Tightening the septum clearly rejuvenates the lower eyelid. In some patients, it is all that is required. In other patients, much more is needed. Transconjunctival septal suture is clearly not a panacea for all aging manifestations of the eyelid and/or face.

We all have seen too many patients in our offices with lax lower lids after undergoing some unknown subciliary approach many years previously. Even without a blepharoplasty, aging patients may have a loss of aperture shape. The corner of the eye becomes more rounded and open in a vertical dimension. It behooves us to offer procedures to our patients that do not create or hasten this deformity.

Drs. Atiyeh and Hayek avoid or enhance aperture change with their orbicularis sling and canthoplasty in the treatment of bulging fat. These interventions can be obviated with transconjunctival septal suture. If we do not break it, we do not have to fix it.

Richard Sadove, M.D.

Department of Surgery

P. O. Box 100286

Gainesville, Fla. 32610

sadove@surgery.ufl.edu

Section Description

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2008American Society of Plastic Surgeons