Journal Logo

VIEWPOINTS

A Simple Way to Reduce Neurovascular Complications in Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression

Baker, Richard H. J. M.R.C.S.; Gill, Katherine M.R.C.S.; Davey, Paul A F.R.C.S.(Orth.)

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 2008 - Volume 121 - Issue 4 - p 224e-225e
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000305385.60765.da
  • Free

Sir:

This brief communication details a simple way of avoiding the ulnar neurovascular bundle when performing an elective routine open carpal tunnel decompression. The consequences of damaging this structure are paralysis of the small muscles of the hand, ulnar paraesthesia, and possible digital ischemia. The incision used by the senior author is a modification of the standard incision [from the ulnar border of the palmaris longus toward the midpoint of the ring finger (a more ulnar position)], the purpose of which is to reduce the likelihood of damaging the superficial palmar branch of the median nerve, which can cause palmar paraesthesia and a painful scar. This study was stimulated by the observation of the senior author that, using this incision, the ulnar artery is more commonly encountered in patients with small hands. If this is a true observation, then the risk of damaging the ulnar neurovascular bundle structures can be ameliorated by moving the modified incision radially in smaller hands, thereby reducing the procedure’s overall complication rate.

Over 6 months, all patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression under the care of the senior author had preoperative measurements taken of hand volume (measured by water displacement) and length and wrist circumference (Fig. 1). The same described incision was used in all cases. The ulnar artery was not specifically identified by dissection intraoperatively, but if it was encountered in the process of dividing the subcutaneous fat and palmar ligament, then this fact was recorded.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.:
Hand length and wrist circumference were measured, as was the position of the incision relative to anatomical structures (UNB, ulnar neurovascular bundle; PL, palmaris longus; FCR, flexor carpi radialis).

Thirty patients (39 hands) took part. In 29 hands, the ulnar artery was not encountered and in 10 hands it was. The hands in which the ulnar artery were encountered were found to have, on average, wrist circumference/hand length ratios above 0.95; those hands in which it was not encountered had ratios, on average, below 0.95. This association achieved statistical significance (p < 0.0003).

In conclusion, the likelihood of encountering the ulnar neurovascular bundle in routine carpal tunnel decompression using the described incision can be determined by simply measuring the wrist circumference and hand length and calculating their ratio. Therefore, for trainees new to this procedure, we recommend using the described incision to avoid damaging the superficial palmar branch of the median nerve, except in instances where the patient has a wrist circumference/hand length ratio above 0.95. In these cases, the incision should be moved about 3 to 5 mm radially to reduce the risk of damage to the ulnar neurovascular bundle.

Richard H. J. Baker, M.R.C.S.

Katherine Gill, M.R.C.S.

Paul A Davey, F.R.C.S.(Orth.)

Department of Orthopaedics

Kingston Hospital

Middlesex, United Kingdom

DISCLOSURE

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2008American Society of Plastic Surgeons