Postburn contractures are still a challenging problem. Various local and distant flaps have been used to reconstruct hand contractures. However, distant flaps are more complicated and are mostly not suitable for the thin skin of the hand. We have used dorsolateral proximally pedicled ulnar skin flaps to cover a patient’s flexion contracture defects.
A 7-year-old boy sustained a burn on the right hand that caused severe flexion scar contractures on the metacarpophalangeal joints of fingers 3, 4, and 5. First, the contractures were released and scar tissues were excised to obtain complete extension of the metacarpophalangeal joints. The flexor tendons were exposed after release of the contractures. Dorsolateral proximally pedicled local flaps were raised from the ulnar sides of fingers 3, 4, and 5 (Fig. 1). The flaps were rotated to cover the flexion defects. The donor sites were closed primarily. The hand was splinted for 2 weeks. Passive motion was started after 1 week. After 3 weeks, physical therapy was started to move the metacarpophalangeal joints.
In postburn contractures of the hand, surgical treatment is often necessary when splinting has failed to improve the functional or aesthetic outcome. In our experience, there are several major types of postburn contracture involving the volar and dorsal sides of the hand: flexion contracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint, flexion contracture of the proximal interphalangeal joint, adduction contracture of the thumb, and extension dorsal contracture.1
Postburn contractures of the hand require appropriate surgical treatment whenever conservative approaches have failed. Kalliainen and Schubert1 stated that multiple reconstructive options exist for the web space contracture: skin grafts, local flaps, and distant flaps have all been used to release the contracture and resurface the resultant defect. Local flaps, however, are frequently more suited to web contractures between the fingers.1 Katsaros used free flaps in selected cases and stated that it is a modern reminder that there are many ways to treat defects of the upper limb and that the responsibility of the surgeon is to be both imaginative and wise in securing the best possible result for the patient.2 However, microsurgery is a more complex and expensive method, so free flaps may be indicated in selected cases. Innocenti and Felli reported some distant flaps for reconstruction of the first interdigital commissure,3 but distant flaps require multiple sessions, so they are not superior to local flaps. Furnas used Z-plasties to treat hand contractures.4 Z-plasties are especially useful in treating the web contractures, but they may be insufficient to cover large flexion defects. Our new flap has a secure blood supply that is very suitable for the palmar defect because it is thin. Cross-finger flaps have been used to cover palmar defects, but donor-site morbidity is one of the major drawbacks of this method.5 Our flap is prepared from the ulnar sides of the finger, which are not involved in opposition, so donor-site morbidity is minimal (Fig. 2).
Asuman Sevin, M.D.
Plastic Surgery Department
Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital
Kutlu Sevin, M.D.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department
Ankara University Ankara Medical Faculty
1. Kalliainen, L. K., and Schubert, W. The management of web space contractures. Clin. Plast. Surg.
32: 503, 2005.
2. Katsaros, J. Indications for free soft-tissue flap transfer to the upper limb and the role of alternative procedures. Hand Clin.
8: 479, 1992.
3. Innocenti, M., and Felli, L. Reconstruction of the first interdigital commissure with distal flaps. Chir. Organi. Mov.
74: 69, 1989.
4. Furnas, D. W. Z-plasties and related procedures for the hand and upper limb. Hand Clin.
1: 649, 1985.
5. Koch, H., Kielnhofer, A., Hubmer, M., and Scharnagl, E. Donor-site morbidity in cross-finger flaps. Br. J. Plast. Surg.
58: 1131, 2005.
Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.
We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.