Journal Logo

LETTERS

Flash Fires during Facial Surgery

Ersek, Robert A. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2008 - Volume 121 - Issue 1 - p 346
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000294967.68234.a8
  • Free

Sir:

In their communication entitled “Flash Fires during Facial Surgery: Recommendations for the Safe Delivery of Oxygen” (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 119: 1982, 2007), Rosenfield and Chang claim that in “nonintubated patients undergoing facial surgery, supplemental oxygen is most commonly delivered via nasal cannula.” However, they give no reference to support this statement. Perhaps it is their habit to do this. However, it is not necessary. In the past 30 years, I have performed more than 30,000 plastic surgery procedures, from head to toe, including rhinoplasty, face lift, brow lift, eyes, nose, chin, neck, and liposuction from head to toe, and I have never used supplemental oxygen.

The authors then cite five other cases of operating room fires in which oxygen was used. In the interest of patient safety, why not eliminate the common denominator: oxygen? If safe sedation is used with Valium and ketamine,1 or with an anesthesiologist, propofol, and ketamine,2 supplemental oxygen is rarely required. At that time when a fire might occur, surgery should be stopped and, of course, the electric cautery should be turned off before the oxygen is ever turned on.

Robert A. Ersek, M.D.

630 West 34th Street, Suite 201

Austin, Texas 78705

ersek@ersek.com

REFERENCES

1. Ersek, R. A. Dissociative anesthesia for safety’s sake: Ketamine and diazepam–-A 35-year personal experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 1955, 2003.
2. Friedberg, B. L. (Ed.). Anesthesia and Cosmetic Surgery. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2008American Society of Plastic Surgeons