Journal Logo

LETTERS

The Mercator Design for Abdominoplasties

Reply

Pechter, Edward A. M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2007 - Volume 120 - Issue 2 - p 574
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000267670.20848.4d
  • Free

Sir:

While I appreciate the comments of Dr. Anous, I would like to point out a few points of disagreement. The locations of the five vertical lines on which he bases his design are straightforward, but relying on the height of the stretch marks and the elasticity of the skin to determine placement of the horizontal line (of resection) is imprecise, since striae may be present throughout the abdomen and skin elasticity is subjective. Preliminary skin stapling may add a few minutes to the procedure, but confirmation of the exact amount of safe skin resection is worth the tradeoff. Safety is improved by caution, not speed.

The grid pattern allows precise determination of the amount of skin resected by transposing the coordinates of the specimen to the preoperative photograph (Fig. 1). The same cannot be said of the pattern outlined by Dr. Anous on his patient, since we do not know if it is identical to the resection.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.:
(Left) Preoperative view of abdominoplasty patient with grid marked. The exact amount and pattern of skin to be resected are indicated by the black outline. (Right) Three-month postoperative view.

The map projection devised by Mercator in 1569 is helpful for navigation, but its widespread use has given many people a distorted vision of the world. For example, it shows Europe to be larger than South America, even though the latter is almost double the size of the former. In a similar way, blind trust in any preoperative abdominoplasty design is hazardous. The grid/staple technique allows a truer vision of the operation we are performing.

Edward A. Pechter, M.D.

25880 Tournament Road, Suite 217

Valencia, Calif. 91355-2844

[email protected]

Section Description

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2007American Society of Plastic Surgeons