Journal Logo

LETTERS AND VIEWPOINTS: LETTERS

Correction of Ectropion in Facial Paralysis

Reply

Hayashi, Akiteru M.D.; Maruyama, Yu M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 1, 2006 - Volume 117 - Issue 4 - p 1352
  • Free

Sir:

We thank Dr. Bernardino for his thoughtful comments concerning our article published in the January 2005 issue of the Journal.1 Among the seven patients in our series, one patient developed a suture abscess in the medial region of the lower eyelid, but the infection was healed after simple removal of the nonabsorbable suture. Six months later, the same procedure was successfully reperformed in this patient. We assessed this case as an accidental incident, so the postoperative evaluation of this patient was based on the second procedure. There were no other complications related to permanent materials, including infection or exposure of sutures or anchors, in our series.

As indicated in our article, a single-stage neurovascularized muscle transfer was carried out simultaneously in case 1 and case 3. We suppose that neurotization occurred in these patients and that this contributed to some extent to recovery of the orbicularis oculi and frontalis as well as static tension of the right cheek. Actually, some recovery of the orbicularis oculi and support of the cheek by the transferred muscle might have partially contributed to resolution of the lagophthalmos. We do not agree that the lagophthalmos in these cases was merely “due to upper eyelid retraction.” We considered that the correction of ectropion variously contributed to resolution of the lagophthalmos in all of our patients. We would like to emphasize that our procedure is a good option for correcting ectropion as part of the complex management of facial paralysis, and that reliable results, including consistent suspension of the lower lid, were obtained in our patients. When contractile force or gravity continuously pulls the cheek region downward, our method for ectropion repair should not be used in isolation. In such situations, release of the contracture and correction of midfacial descent are necessary in addition to ectropion repair.2 If the lagophthalmos is due to upper eyelid retraction and remains vision-threatening, a gold weight is a good option to be considered.3

The cause of facial paralysis was Bell’s palsy in two patients, a 78-year-old woman and an 80-year-old woman, and the preoperative periods of complete paralysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. Therefore, we recognized these patients as having established facial paralysis and performed correction of ectropion using our simple, easy, and less invasive procedure.

Akiteru Hayashi, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toho University Sakura Hospital, Chiba, Japan

Yu Maruyama, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toho University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

REFERENCES

1. Hayashi, A., and Maruyama, Y. Use of a suture anchor for correction of ectropion in facial paralysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 115: 234, 2005.
2. McCord, C. D. The correction of lower lid malposition following lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103: 1036, 1999.
3. Ueda, K., Harii, K., Yamada, A., and Asato, H. A comparison of temporal muscle transfer and lid loading in the treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Hand Surg. 29: 45, 1995.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor and View-points are welcome. Letters to the Editor discuss material recently published in the Journal. Letters will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters and Viewpoints are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Viewpoints pertain to issues of general interest, even if they are not related to items previously published (such as unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on). Please note the following criteria for Letters and Viewpoints:

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters and Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit letters and viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a letter and/or viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the letters to the Editor and viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2006American Society of Plastic Surgeons