Journal Logo

LETTERS AND VIEWPOINTS: LETTERS

Correction of Ectropion in Facial Paralysis

Reply

Hayashi, Akiteru M.D.; Maruyama, Yu M.D.

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 1, 2006 - Volume 117 - Issue 4 - p 1351
  • Free

Sir:

We thank Dr. Uraloglu and his colleagues for the attention they gave to our article.1 We agree with their comments that inorganic materials would increase the risk of infection. Actually, one of our patients developed a suture abscess in the medial region of the lower eyelid, but infection was healed after simple removal of the nonabsorbable suture. Six months later, the same procedure was successfully reperformed in this patient. We assessed this case as an accidental incident. There were no other acute or chronic reactions around the anchor in our series.

Dr. Uraloglu and his colleagues advised attention to the possible weakness of bony fixation on long-term follow-up of 5 to 10 years, metallic corrosion, and possible osteoporosis in elderly patients. These subjects should be analyzed later using patients who have appeared in the literature.2–4 In our clinical series, four patients had been followed for more than 2 years at the time our article was prepared, and we did not encounter any relaxation of the anchors, even in the oldest patient, who was 80 years old.

Even though three stab incisions were made for passage of the suture, there were neither scars nor dimples along the subciliary line. To pass the threads precisely through the pretarsal space along the subciliary line, as well as to take bites of the periosteum through a small incision along the periorbital line, we prefer to use small needles mounted originally on the device.

Akiteru Hayashi, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toho University Sakura Hospital, Chiba, Japan

Yu Maruyama, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toho University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

REFERENCES

1. Hayashi, A., Maruyama, Y., Okada, E., and Ogino, A. Use of a suture anchor for correction of ectropion in facial paralysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 115: 234, 2005.
2. Antonyshyn, O. M., Weinberg, M. J., and Dagum, A. B. Use of a new anchoring device for tendon reinsertion in medial canthopexy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 98: 520, 1996.
3. Dzwierzynski, W. W., Sanger, J. R., and Larson, D. L. Use of Mitek suture anchors in head and neck reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 38: 449, 1997.
4. Seeley, B. M., To, W. C., and Papay, F. A. A multivectored bone-anchored system for facial resuspension in patients with facial paralysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 108: 1686, 2001.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor and View-points are welcome. Letters to the Editor discuss material recently published in the Journal. Letters will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters and Viewpoints are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Viewpoints pertain to issues of general interest, even if they are not related to items previously published (such as unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on). Please note the following criteria for Letters and Viewpoints:

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters and Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit letters and viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a letter and/or viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the letters to the Editor and viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2006American Society of Plastic Surgeons