Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Management of Contour Irregularities following Superficial Liposuction

Castello, Manuel Francisco M.D.; Lazzeri, Davide M.D.; Agostini, Tommaso M.D.; Silvestri, Alessandro M.D.; Gasparotti, Marco M.D.; D'Aniello, Carlo M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2011 - Volume 128 - Issue 2 - p 601-602
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821ef017
Letters
Free

Division of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery; Clinica Ars Medica; Rome, Italy (Castello)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit; University Hospital of Siena; Siena, Italy (Lazzeri)

Burn Center Unit; Hospital of Pisa; Pisa, Italy (Agostini)

Division of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery; Clinica Ars Medica; Rome, Italy (Silvestri, Gasparotti)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit; University Hospital of Siena; Siena, Italy (D'Aniello)

Correspondence to Dr. Castello; Divisione di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva; Clinica Ars Medica; Via C. Ferrero di Cambiano, 29; 00191 Rome, Italy; manuelfranciscocastello@gmail.com

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

We read with much interest the article by Youn Hwan Kim et al. entitled “Analysis of Postoperative Complications for Superficial Liposuction: A Review of 2398 Cases” (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:863–871).1 The article reports their 14-year experience in performing superficial liposuction and analyzes postoperative complications associated with these procedures in three subgroups of patients who underwent power-assisted liposuction alone (subgroup 1), power-assisted liposuction combined with ultrasound energy (subgroup 2), and power-assisted liposuction combined with external ultrasound and postoperative Endermologie (subgroup 3). We think the surgical technique performed by the authors is safe and effective, and we appreciated their accurate, well-documented article; however, we have a few comments regarding some of the topics.

Among major complications analyzed in their series, they reported contour irregularities in 3 percent of patients (n = 71). Although superficial liposuction has been popularized because of its redraping effect of the dermal flap by destroying connections between dermis and the subcutaneous fat, skin irregularities and depressions appearing after the initial healing phase following liposuction may be a frequent cause of the patient's disappointment about cosmetic outcomes.

A global consensus in treating these complications is lacking. Following the suggestions of Gasperoni and Gasperoni,2 Youn Hwan Kim et al. in their article1 highlighted the need to correct depressions immediately because of excessive fatty tissue removal by injecting some of the aspirated fat from areas not crushed by the ultrasonic energy. Unfortunately, as the authors stated,1 major visible skin irregularities, such as severe dimpling and retractions caused by excessive fat removal, could be dramatically appreciated only after the healing process, including areas that are insufficiently reduced by lipoaspiration. We agree with them in approaching false depressions by resuctioning the undertreated surrounding areas and true depression with fat tissue transfer in the overcorrected regions because areas of excessive or insufficient fat removal can yield an asymmetrical, unnatural, or otherwise disappointing result.

In our experience, secondary liposuction most often requires more surgical access for cannulas, allowing the surgeon to perform additional, strategic localized liposuction to correct asymmetries and areas that were insufficiently reduced by the primary procedure and autologous fat transfer in areas overreduced by the primary treatment. In this way, it should be possible to prevent further deformities by adopting extremely selective aspiration and injection and avoiding additional iatrogenic overtreatment and undertreatment. A careful evaluation to document the anticipated amount of secondary lipoaspirate or augmentation with fat grafts should be made, taking care to plan honestly the surgical removal of the persistent skin redundancy when present. Nevertheless, rarely should skin excision techniques such as brachioplasty, abdominoplasty, medial thighplasty, and circumferential body lift be combined with the treatment modalities described previously for areas of inadequate skin retraction, especially when patients remain dissatisfied after several operations.3

Patients are urged to maintain realistic expectations when considering corrective liposuction reintervention. As are all cosmetic procedures, secondary liposuction is far more complicated than performing the procedure the first time, even in experienced hands.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Manuel Francisco Castello, M.D.

Division of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery

Clinica Ars Medica

Rome, Italy

Davide Lazzeri, M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit

University Hospital of Siena

Siena, Italy

Tommaso Agostini, M.D.

Burn Center Unit

Hospital of Pisa

Pisa, Italy

Alessandro Silvestri, M.D.

Marco Gasparotti, M.D.

Division of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery

Clinica Ars Medica

Rome, Italy

Carlo D'Aniello, M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit

University Hospital of Siena

Siena, Italy

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Kim YH, Cha SM, Naidu S, Hwang WJ. Analysis of postoperative complications for superficial liposuction: A review of 2398 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:863–871.
2. Gasperoni C, Gasperoni P. Subdermal liposuction: Long-term experience. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33:63–73.
3. Iverson RE, Pao VS. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: Liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1–11.

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons