Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Arterial Wall Penetration Forces in Needles versus Cannulas

Pavicic, Tatjana, M.D.; Webb, Katherine L.; Frank, Konstantin, M.D.; Gotkin, Robert H., M.D.; Tamura, Bhertha, M.D.; Cotofana, Sebastian, M.D., Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: March 2019 - Volume 143 - Issue 3 - p 504e-512e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005321
Cosmetic: Original Articles
Buy
SDC
Patient Safety CME

Background: If safety is defined as the diminished ability to penetrate facial arteries, the goal of this study was to investigate whether different-sized cannulas are safer than correspondingly sized needles for the application of facial soft-tissue fillers.

Methods: Two hundred ninety-four penetration procedures of the facial and superficial temporal arteries were performed in four fresh frozen cephalic specimens using both needles (20-, 22-, 25-, and 27-gauge) and cannulas (22-, 25-, and 27-gauge). Continuously increasing force was applied and measured until intraarterial penetration occurred.

Results: No statistically significant differences were detected when comparing forces required to penetrate the facial arterial vasculature between different sexes, arteries, or sides of the face (all p > 0.05). Forces needed to penetrate significantly (p < 0.001) decreased with smaller diameter needles (20-gauge, 1.12 ± 0.29 N; 22-gauge, 1.08 ± 0.25 N; 25-gauge, 0.69 ± 0.24 N; and 27-gauge, 0.70 ± 0.29 N) and in cannulas (22-gauge, 1.50 ± 0.31 N; 25-gauge, 1.04 ± 0.36 N; and 27-gauge, 0.78 ± 0.35 N). Comparing 27-gauge injectors, no statistically significant difference was detected between needles and cannulas; an artery could be penetrated with a similar force independent of whether the injector was a needle or a cannula (0.70 ± 0.29 N versus 0.78 ± 0.35 N; p = 0.558).

Conclusions: Cannulas, in all measured sizes except 27-gauge, required greater forces for intraarterial penetration compared with correspondingly sized needles, confirming the safety of 22- and 25-gauge cannulas; 27-gauge cannulas, however, required similar forces as 27-gauge needles, indicating that 27-gauge cannulas are not safer than 27-gauge needles.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Patient Safety CME.

Munich, Germany; Albany and New York, N.Y.; and Sao Paulo, Brazil

From private practice and the Department for Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University; the Department of Medical Education, Albany Medical College; private practice; and Medical School General Hospital, University of Sao Paulo.

Received for publication May 2, 2018; accepted August 21, 2018.

Disclosure:None of the authors has any commercial associations or financial disclosures that might pose or create a conflict of interest with the methods applied or the results presented in this article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the text; simply type the URL address into any Web browser to access this content. Clickable links to the material are provided in the HTML text of this article on the Journal’s website (www.PRSJournal.com).

By reading this article, you are entitled to claim one (1) hour of Category 2 Patient Safety Credit. ASPS members can claim this credit by logging in to PlasticSurgery.org Dashboard, clicking “Submit CME,” and completing the form.

Sebastian Cotofana, M.D., Ph.D., Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, MC-135, Albany, N.Y. 12208, cotofas@amc.edu, Instagram: @professorsebastiancotofana, Facebook: professorsebastiancotofana

Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons