Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Preclinical Experience Using a New Robotic System Created for Microsurgery

van Mulken, Tom J. M. M.D.; Boymans, Clint A. E. M. M.D.; Schols, Rutger M. M.D., Ph.D.; Cau, Raimondo Ph.D.; Schoenmakers, Ferry B. F.; Hoekstra, Lisette T. M.D., Ph.D.; Qiu, Shan S. M.D., Ph.D.; Selber, Jesse C. M.D., M.P.H.; van der Hulst, René R. W. J. M.D., Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: November 2018 - Volume 142 - Issue 5 - p 1367-1376
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004939
Plastic Surgery Focus: Technology and Innovations
Buy
SDC
Discussion

Background: Robotic assistance in microsurgery could enhance human precision and dexterity to improve clinical outcomes. Because no robotic device has been designed primarily for microsurgery, the authors developed a dedicated microsurgical robotic system. This preclinical study investigates whether microsurgical anastomosis can be successfully completed on silicone vessels using a prototype of this new robotic system, and compares outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional microsurgery.

Methods: Three participants at different levels of microsurgical training completed 10 anastomoses by hand and 10 anastomoses with robotic assistance. Four blinded, experienced microsurgeons evaluated the quality of the microsurgical skills using a modified version of the Structured Assessment of Microsurgical Skills. Time to perform the anastomosis and adverse events were recorded.

Results: The total time to perform the anastomoses with and without robotic assistance decreased to 35.1 minutes and 12.5 minutes, respectively, during the study. The overall performance and indicative skill of the Structured Assessment of Microsurgical Skills improved with the conventional method (from 2.8 to 3.6 and from 2.6 to 3.7, respectively) and the robot-assisted method (from 2.3 to 3.0 and from 2.3 to 3.1, respectively).

Conclusions: It is feasible to complete anastomotic microsurgery on silicone vessels using the MicroSure robotic system. In comparison with the conventional method, time to perform the anastomosis was longer and quality of microsurgical skills was lower in the robot-assisted group. However, the robot-assisted performance showed steeper learning curves for both surgical time and domains of microsurgical skills. The encouraging results indicate further development of the system and (pre)clinical trials.

Maastricht and Eindhoven, The Netherlands; and Houston, Texas

From the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Robotics Technologies, Eindhoven University of Technology; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Received for publication September 24, 2017; accepted April 25, 2018.

Disclosure:Tom van Mulken is Chief Medical Officer of the spinoff company MicroSure, with costs of travel and share in the company. Rene van der Hulst is a shareholder of MicroSure. Raimondo Cau is Chief Technical Officer and shareholder of MicroSure. Ferry Schoenmakers is a software developer for MicroSure. The other authors have no financial disclosures.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the text; simply type the URL address into any Web browser to access this content. Clickable links to the material are provided in the HTML text of this article on the Journal’s website (www.PRSJournal.com).

Tom J. M. van Mulken, M.D., Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands, tom.van.mulken@mumc.nl

Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons