Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Using a Second Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap after Repeated Mandibulectomy Is Associated with a Low Complication Rate and Acceptable Functional Outcomes

Mericli, Alexander F., M.D.; Schaverien, Mark V., M.D.; Hanasono, Matthew M., M.D.; Yu, Peirong, M.D.; Largo, Rene D., M.D.; Villa, Mark T., M.D.; Reece, Greg, M.D.; Butler, Charles E., M.D.; Garvey, Patrick B., M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2017 - Volume 140 - Issue 2 - p 381-389
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003523
Reconstructive: Head and Neck: Original Articles
Buy

Background: A significant percentage of patients who undergo segmental mandibulectomy for head and neck cancer will develop a new or recurrent cancer or osteoradionecrosis, necessitating a second mandibulectomy and reconstruction. In this scenario, many surgeons are reluctant to perform a reconstruction with an osseous flap because of the presumed increased morbidity and complexity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing a second free fibula flap reconstruction after repeated segmental mandibulectomy.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed their prospectively maintained departmental database for mandible reconstructions performed between 1991 and 2016, identifying patients who had two sequential free fibula flap reconstructions. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Twenty patients underwent a second free fibula flap reconstruction after a second mandibulectomy. The median follow-up was 72.5 months (range, 16 to 243 months). Preoperative virtual planning was used more often for the second fibula flap compared with the first (50 percent versus 10 percent; p = 0.004). The mean operative times were statistically similar for the first versus second fibula flap (673 minutes versus 586 minutes, respectively; p = 0.13). The postoperative complication rates (50 percent versus 30 percent, respectively; p = 0.19) and functional outcomes were similar between the first and second fibula flap reconstructions.

Conclusion: Despite the increased technical complexity, the use of a second free fibula flap after repeated segmental mandibulectomy appears to be safe and to confer no higher risk than that for the first fibula flap.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Houston, Texas

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Received for publication December 6, 2016; accepted February 17, 2017.

Disclosure:The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. No funding was received for this work.

Patrick B. Garvey, M.D., Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1488, Houston, Texas 77030, pbgarvey@mdanderson.org

Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons