Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Cleft Palate Repair and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction

Hopper, Richard A. M.D., M.S.; Tse, Raymond M.D.; Smartt, James M.D.; Swanson, Jordan M.D.; Kinter, Sara M.A., C.C.C.-S.L.P.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: June 2014 - Volume 133 - Issue 6 - p 852e–864e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000184
CME
Buy
CME
Watch Video
Watch Video

Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the technical details common to all cleft palate repairs that optimize outcomes and minimize complications. 2. Explain the subjective and objective evaluation of speech in children with cleft palate. 3. Practice with an increased awareness of the management of complications associated with cleft palate repair. 4. Design a treatment plan for velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Summary: Goals of a successful cleft palate repair include separation of the oral and nasal components without fistula, achieving sufficient velar length, and creating functional transverse orientation of the levator muscle sling. A number of techniques have been described to achieve these goals, but they all have the following technical details in common: elevation of oral mucosal flaps based on the greater palatine arteries, tension free nasal lining mobilization, and functional intervelar muscle dissection. After palate repair, speech evaluation needs to be performed by an objective interdisciplinary team following a standardized protocol. Identification of velopharyngeal insufficiency secondary to an incompetent nasopharyngeal port will necessitate secondary speech surgery. These secondary techniques include pharyngeal flaps, soft palate lengthening, or pharyngeal sphincters, which should be tailored to optimize speech, while minimizing the risk of obstructive sleep apnea.

Related Video Content is available online.

Seattle, Wash.

From the Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children’s Hospital.

Received for publication July 10, 2012; accepted February 5, 2014.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Related Video content is available for this article. The videos can be found under the “Related Videos” section of the full-text article, or, for Ovid users, using the URL citations published in the article.

Richard A. Hopper, M.D., M.S., Division of Plastic Surgery, Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children’s Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Wash. 98105, richard.hopper@seattlechildrens.org

©2014American Society of Plastic Surgeons