Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Fat Necrosis in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps: An Ultrasound-Based Review of 202 Cases

Peeters, Wouter J., M.D.; Nanhekhan, Lloyd, M.D.; Van Ongeval, Chantal, M.D.; Fabré, Gerd, M.D.; Vandevoort, Marc, M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: December 2009 - Volume 124 - Issue 6 - p 1754-1758
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf7e03
BREAST: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Buy

Background: In autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy, fat necrosis is a rather common complication that may lead to secondary corrective surgery. The understanding of fat necrosis until now has been limited because previous studies were based exclusively on physical examination and used diverse definitions.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the incidence of fat necrosis and the correlation of several risk factors in 202 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps for breast reconstruction. The incidence of fat necrosis was based on both physical examination and ultrasound imaging. The following risk factors were studied: age, smoking, body mass index, timing of reconstruction, and timing and extent of radiation therapy fields.

Results: Physical examination revealed a palpable mass or nodule in 14 percent of the DIEP flaps (28 of 202). Ultrasound examination added another 21 percent of DIEP flaps (42 of 202) with a firm area of scar tissue (diameter ≥5 mm). The overall ultrasound incidence of fat necrosis in this study was 35 percent (71 of 202). Although the overall ultrasound incidence of fat necrosis was very high, only 7 percent of the DIEP flaps (15 of 202) needed to undergo an extra surgical procedure for removal of this area. In contrast to previous studies, none of the risk factors studied was statistically significant for the occurrence of fat necrosis.

Conclusions: These results suggest that there is no significant association between previously suspected risk factors and fat necrosis. The overall incidence of fat necrosis, however, is much higher than previously accepted, even though the need for corrective surgery is limited.

Leuven, Belgium

From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, and the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, H. Hart Roeselare.

Received for publication September 23, 2008; accepted June 29, 2009.

Disclosure:None of the authors has any conflicts of interest or financial matters to disclose with regard to this article.

Wouter J. Peeters, M.D., Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, w_peeters@yahoo.com

©2009American Society of Plastic Surgeons