Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

The Individualized Component Face Lift: Developing a Systematic Approach to Facial Rejuvenation

Rohrich, Rod J. M.D.; Ghavami, Ashkan M.D.; Lemmon, Joshua A. M.D.; Brown, Spencer A. Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: March 2009 - Volume 123 - Issue 3 - p 1050-1063
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819c91b0

Background: Accurate preoperative planning combined with facial fat compartment augmentation can improve precision and balance in facial rejuvenation techniques. Understanding the concept of “facial shaping” with respect to symmetry and soft-tissue (fat) distribution preoperatively is critical to optimizing aesthetic outcomes in various face lift techniques.

Methods: A review of 822 consecutive face lifts performed from January of 1994 to June of 2007 by a single surgeon (R.J.R.) was conducted. From this database, randomly selected cohorts of 50 preoperative and postoperative photographs were critically analyzed by three plastic surgeons exclusive of the senior surgeon (R.J.R.). Three facial parameters were compared on each facial side: facial height, degree of malar deflation, and orbit size. Long-term improvement was evaluated to delineate factors contributing to success in creating an aesthetically balanced facial shape.

Results: Asymmetry between the two facial sides was noted in every patient preoperatively with respect to the three study parameters and was improved postoperatively. There was no statistically significant interobserver bias in the evaluations (p < 0.005). Facial asymmetry dictated differential treatment of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) tissue between facial sides to achieve the desired youthful facial shape. The angle (vector) and extent of SMAS-stacking varied depending on the preoperative analysis. Similarly, the selection of SMAS-ectomy versus SMAS-stacking depended on the degree of malar deflation and resultant cheek fullness.

Conclusions: Proper preoperative analysis for evaluating facial shape should address (1) facial height, (2) facial width, and (3) overall distribution/location of facial fullness. This method of evaluating facial shape and symmetry is simple and reproducible, and can aid in formulating a comprehensive treatment plan.

Dallas, Texas; and Beverly Hills, Calif.

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and private practice.

Received for publication October 8, 2007; accepted May 9, 2008.

Disclosure:None of the authors received financial benefit from any commercial entity in support of this article.

Rod J. Rohrich, M.D., Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1801 Inwood Road, Dallas, Texas 75390-9132,

©2009American Society of Plastic Surgeons