Secondary Logo

Burden of Neonatal Infections in Developing Countries: A Review of Evidence From Community-Based Studies

Thaver, Durrane MBBS, MSc; Zaidi, Anita K. M. MBBS, SM

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal: January 2009 - Volume 28 - Issue 1 - p S3-S9
doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181958755
Supplement
Free

Introduction: Infections are a major contributor to newborn deaths in developing countries. Majority of these deaths occur at home without coming to medical attention. The Millennium Development Goal for child survival cannot be achieved without substantial reductions in infection-specific neonatal mortality. We describe the burden of neonatal infections in developing countries and discuss the need for community-based management approaches to improve survival from neonatal infections in these countries.

Methods: We reviewed community-based studies published since 1990 from developing countries to estimate the rates of neonatal and young infant infections and infection-specific neonatal mortality.

Results: Thirty-two studies reviewed suggest that infections may be responsible for 8% to 80% of all neonatal deaths and as many as 42% of deaths in the first week of life. Eleven reports provided data on incidence of infections in neonates and infants up to 60 days of life. Rates of neonatal sepsis were as high as 170/1000 live births (clinically diagnosed) and 5.5/1000 live births (blood culture-confirmed).

Conclusions: Considerable heterogeneity exists among included studies, and more accurate data and standardized methodologies are required. However, data indicate that a significant proportion of neonatal deaths in developing countries are due to infections. Current recommendations of hospitalization and parenteral therapy for managing neonatal infections are inadequately followed in developing countries. Approaches for detecting and managing serious infections within the community, at home or first-level health facilities, may be more effective options in settings where delays and reluctance to seek care, health system inefficiencies, socioeconomic and cultural, as well as logistic constraints exist.

From the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Supported by Saving Newborn Lives (program funded by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), Save the Children, USA, and World Health Organization.

Address for correspondence: Anita K. M. Zaidi, MBBS, SM, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. E-mail: anita.zaidi@aku.edu.

Almost 99% of the estimated 4 million annual neonatal deaths occur in developing countries.1,2 Although postneonatal mortality rates have declined substantially, in large part due to successful child survival interventions, deaths in the neonatal period have been largely unaddressed as a global health concern and account for 40% of all deaths in children under 5.2,3 Despite the current increased efforts, much more needs to be accomplished to reduce neonatal mortality rates from levels as high as 40 to 60 per 1000 live births, and to achieve the Millennium Development Goal for child survival.2,3

Although the precise cause of neonatal deaths in developing countries is difficult to ascertain, estimates suggest that infections, including sepsis, pneumonia, tetanus, and diarrhea, are the most common causes.1,2 Numerous factors contribute to such high incidence of infections and consequent mortality. These include immediate causes such as lack of antenatal care, unsupervised or poorly supervised home deliveries, unhygienic and unsafe delivery practices and cord care, prematurity, low birth weight, lack of exclusive breast-feeding, and delays in recognition of danger signs in both mother and baby.2,4–9 Underlying factors such as health system inefficiencies, infra-structural, logistic, or economic constraints2,4–9 also contribute to high rates of infection and infection-associated mortality. In addition, wide inequities exist in health service provision, such that the lowest coverage rates of known effective maternal and child interventions exist within the poorest income groups.10

In this article, we review community-based studies to describe the burden of disease from neonatal infections and infection-associated neonatal mortality in developing countries. We also review in later manuscripts, the etiology, antimicrobial resistance, management options, as well as research priorities for serious bacterial infections among neonatal and young infants in developing country community settings.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Studies reporting rates of infections in young infants (up to 60 days of age) in community settings were identified through a search of PubMed (date of last search May 7, 2007) unrestricted by year, using combinations of the words infant*, neonat*, newborn* with communit*, “community acquired” and incidence, rate, “1000 live births” and infection*, sepsis, septic*, bacter*, cross-linked with names of all middle and low income countries, as defined by the World Bank11 [adding an asterisk in the search term allows the search to also locate variations or expansions of the word—eg, neonate, neonatal, neonates]. Related links to a key review on neonatal infections in developing countries were also screened.4 To identify studies reporting infection- specific neonatal mortality rates in communities, the search was restricted to 1990 onwards, with additional words such as death*, mortality, “neonatal mortality rate.” The search was supplemented by screening articles in the author's collection, studies identified in other searches conducted for this review series, and relevant references from an earlier review.6

Community-based studies, defined as home-based surveillance, population surveys, or those conducted in first-level health facilities, where information on live births in the study population was available, were included. Studies not reporting live births or an (estimated) denominator, or adequate information for its derivation, were excluded. Studies reporting the impact of specific maternal and child interventions on mortality were also excluded, unless data were available for comparison arms. Data were extracted for all infections including sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia, tetanus, gastroenteritis, or related symptoms and/or categories. Some approximations were necessary when data were incomplete or when substantial proportions were missing, eg, applying proportion of infection-related deaths reported for a specific time period to mortality rates reported for an aggregated time-period. Confidence intervals (binomial exact) for all-cause and infection-specific rates were obtained using STATA version 9.2, using live births and number of deaths.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Infections as a Major Cause of Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality

We reviewed 3212–43 community-based studies published since 1990. Individual studies, conducted retrospectively or prospectively, included as few as 200 and as many as over 33,000 live births. The all-cause mortality ranged from 8.1 per 1000 live births (95% CI, 5.5–11.6) in urban and semi-urban areas of Egypt to as high as 97.2 (95% CI, 80–116.8) in rural Indian villages. Infection-specific mortality rates ranged from 2.7 (95% CI, 1.6–4.2) reported from South Africa to 38.6 (95% CI, 16.8–74.7) per 1000 live births in Somalia.12–43 Overall, these reports suggest that between 8% and 80% (median, 36.5%; interquartile range, 26%-49%) of all neonatal deaths in different regions of the developing world are due to infectious causes (Fig. 1) –representing a substantial burden of avoidable neonatal deaths. In the first week of life, during which three-fourths of all neonatal deaths are estimated to occur,2 the studies reviewed12,17,20,35,37,39,41,42,44–46 suggest that as many as 42% of neonatal deaths can be attributed to infections (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Incidence of Serious Neonatal and Young Infant Infections

There were very few community-based studies from developing countries, which measured the incidence of sepsis in newborns and young infants, and most had biases in selection of study population (Table 1), which may have under-estimated true incidence rates. In addition to variable study quality, the lack of laboratory-based confirmation of neonatal sepsis as well as varied clinical criteria and methodology used to diagnose neonatal sepsis limits comparability across the 11 reports identified17,44,47–58 (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Clinically diagnosed neonatal sepsis ranged from 49 per 1000 live births in babies older than 24 hours of life in rural Guatemala,47 to as high as 170 per 1000 live births detected by village health workers in rural India.51,56 A first-level facility in Kenya estimated a minimal rate of blood culture confirmed sepsis of 5.5 per 1000 live births among neonates presenting to this facility.57 In the absence of active household surveillance, however, the true incidence is expected to be significantly higher.

The incidence of neonatal meningitis among studies reviewed ranged from 0.8 in the first week of life to 6.1 per 1000 live births.17,44,47,52 The only study based on regionally representative surveillance data reports 4.2 cases of bacterial meningitis per 1000 child-years in infants below 2 months of age.52 Estimated incidence of severe pneumonia was 142 episodes per 1000 child-years of observation among infants seen at first-level rural health centers in Lombok, Indonesia.53 A study from Egypt58 reported high rates of acute respiratory infections (201 per 1000 live births) based on maternal recall of infant morbidity at 1-month follow-up. Rates of diarrhea ranged from 30 to 156 per 1000 newborns among studies of heterogeneous quality17,50,51,56,58 (Table 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Limitations of Available Evidence on Causes of Death

The studies reviewed and data presented are limited by substantial inter- and intracountry variation, methodological heterogeneity in population selection and completeness of follow-up, as well as possible misclassifications and/or biases in cause of death ascertainment. The main reason for such inaccuracies includes lack of vital registration or surveillance systems in developing countries, where the majority of babies are born, and succumb to infections, within their homes–seldom, if ever, coming to medical attention.2,59 Other reasons compounding uncertainty include lack of standardization as well as inherent limitations of verbal autopsy tools, comorbid, and often multiple causes of neonatal death.40,42,46,59–62 Sparse data from regions of the world, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, where the highest burden of childhood illness lies, also limits the generalizability of these data.61

Accurate information on causes of death is crucial to designing intervention programs and monitoring progress and sustainability of interventions as well as providing data for intracountry and regional comparisons.1,62

In addition to data on cause specific mortality, more information on incidence of neonatal infections is required to obtain accurate estimates. Very few studies have addressed this issue in developing countries, where deriving accurate incidence rates would require household surveillance capturing all births that occur at home. The information available is further limited by the lack of sensitive and specific tools to diagnose neonatal sepsis. On the one hand, using clinical signs to diagnose neonatal sepsis based on features such as rapid breathing or lethargy may be overly nonspecific, resulting in misclassifying respiratory distress syndrome, and birth asphyxia, as sepsis. On the other hand, blood cultures are often negative in neonates in whom there is strong clinical and circumstantial evidence of sepsis. This is most likely the explanation for the wide range of incidence rates reported from developing countries, ranging from 170 per 1000 live births observed by Bang et al in rural India, based on active household surveillance of newborns by village health workers, using a clinical algorithm detecting clinical signs of serious illness,51,55 and a blood culture confirmed rate of neonatal sepsis of 5.5 per 1000 live births reported by Berkeley et al from rural Kenya.57 However, it is important to note that there are no published data on population-based rates of blood-culture confirmed neonatal sepsis from countries where the majority of births take place at home. The study by Berkeley et al from Kenya did not undertake active household surveillance for sick newborns, and the data reported are from newborns presenting to a hospital facility within the catchment area, and therefore may be significant underestimates.57

Despite the glaring limitations in the quality and quantity of data discussed above, studies consistently implicate infections as a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the developing world. Evidence-based strategies for prevention and management of newborn infections in low-income countries are thus urgently needed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Rationale for Community-Based Approaches for Management of Newborn Infection in Developing Countries

Current WHO recommendations for treating serious bacterial infections in infants under 2 months of age include hospitalization and 10 days of parenteral therapy.63–66 However, these recommendations are inadequately followed in developing countries with high burden of neonatal deaths–due to logistic and resource constraints–and socio-cultural factors such as confinement after birth, unwillingness of families to seek care outside the home, and frequent rejection or refusal of allopathic or facility-based care.35,47,51,67–69 Moreover, because of delays in care seeking, inadequate or poor quality care, unhygienic handling and feeding, contaminated hospital equipment, and multiresistant hospital-acquired pathogens, case fatality rates for sepsis among hospitalized babies treated with recommended therapy are as high as 30% to 50%.4,6,70 These findings suggest that alternate approaches for prevention, early detection, and management of neonatal infections, such as those implemented within the community or home, may have a greater impact in reducing neonatal mortality in the near-term.

Community or home-based approaches are being increasingly evaluated to deliver preventive and curative services, frequently through local community health workers.71 Substantial reductions in neonatal mortality have resulted from community-level case management of neonatal pneumonia,13,72 and of neonatal sepsis, delivered together with home-based care in rural India.73 To extend this successful program to a larger population, India's recently developed neonatal Integrated Management of Childhood Illness program also incorporates a component for home-based care of the neonate in the first week of life.74 A recent large randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh has also demonstrated significant reduction in neonatal mortality rates with a package of home-based care including antibiotic therapy for sick newborns where referral failed.75

Such approaches, by utilizing a local cadre of community workers, may ensure higher and more equitable coverage, may improve care seeking, be more cost-effective, have greater acceptability in the community, and may also ensure better adherence to case management guidelines and protocols.71 Prompt detection and treatment of neonatal illness at the community level may also prevent adverse sequelae of serious infections.76

There is continued need for development and validation of simplified diagnostic algorithms, in addition to development of evidence-based treatment guidelines, to enable minimally trained health care workers to effectively manage neonatal sepsis during home-visits, or at first level facilities.77 In addition to research addressing numerous health system challenges and constraints for implementation and sustainability, an exploration of etiological agents, drug resistance patterns, and antibiotic regimens is required before community-based case management strategies utilizing antibiotics can be employed on national scales in developing countries with high burden of neonatal mortality.

These issues are discussed further in related articles in this supplement, which aims to (1) describe the pathogens causing serious bacterial infections among neonatal and young infants in developing country community settings; (2) antimicrobial resistance patterns of major etiological agents causing these infections; (3) treatment options for management of these infections in community settings, including a pharmacological appraisal of potential antimicrobials; and (4) identify research gaps and future directions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, et al. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147–1152.
2. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Four million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900.
3. Lawn JE, Cousens SN, Darmstadt GL, et al. One year after The Lancet Neonatal Survival Series–was the call for action heard? Lancet. 2006;367:1541–1547.
4. Stoll BJ. The global impact of neonatal infection. Clin Perinatol. 1997;24:1–21.
5. Osrin D, Tumbahangphe KM, Shrestha D, et al. Cross sectional, community based study of care of newborn infants in Nepal. BMJ. 2002;325:1063.
6. Stoll BJ. Neonatal Infections: a global perspective. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, eds. Infectious Disease of Fetus, Newborn and Infants. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2005:27–57.
7. Barnett S, Azad K, Barua S, et al. Maternal and newborn-care practices during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period: a comparison in three rural districts in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:394–402.
8. Darmstadt GL, Syed U, Patel Z, et al. Review of domiciliary newborn-care practices in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:380–393.
9. Mercer A, Haseen F, Huq NL, et al. Risk factors for neonatal mortality in rural areas of Bangladesh served by a large NGO programme. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21:432–443.
10. Fenn B, Kirkwood BR, Popatia Z, et al. Inequities in neonatal survival interventions: evidence from national surveys. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F361–F366.
11. The World Bank Country Groups by income. The World Bank. 2007. Available at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,contentMDK:20421402∼pagePK:64133150∼piPK:64133175∼theSitePK:239419,00.html. Accessed May 2007.
12. Alisjahbana A, Soeroto-Hamzah E, Peeters R, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in rural West-Java, Indonesia, part II: the results of a longitudinal survey on pregnant women. Paediatr Indones. 1990;30:179–190.
13. Bang AT, Bang RA, Tale O, et al. Reduction in pneumonia mortality and total childhood mortality by means of community-based intervention trial in Gadchiroli, India. Lancet. 1990;336:201–206.
14. Fauveau V, Wojtyniak B, Chakraborty J, et al. The effect of maternal and child health and family planning services on mortality: is prevention enough? BMJ. 1990;301:103–107.
15. Mohamed TA. Registration of births’ and infants’ deaths in Demo village in Fayoum governorate. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1990;65:207–220.
16. Molbak K, Aaby P, Ingholt L, et al. Persistent and acute diarrhoea as the leading causes of child mortality in urban Guinea Bissau. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86:216–220.
17. Bhardwaj N, Hasan SB. High perinatal and neonatal mortality in rural India. J R Soc Health. 1993;113:60–63.
18. de FA, Hall AJ, Schellenberg JR, et al. The pattern of infant and childhood mortality in Upper River Division, The Gambia. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1993;13:345–352.
19. Garg SK, Mishra VN, Singh JV, et al. Neonatal mortality in Meerut district. Indian J Med Sci. 1993;47:222–225.
20. Khalique N, Sinha SN, Yunus M, et al. Early childhood mortality–a rural study. J R Soc Health. 1993;113:247–249.
21. Khan SR, Jalil F, Zaman S, et al. Early child health in Lahore, Pakistan: X. mortality. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1993;82(suppl 390):109–117.
22. Pison G, Trape JF, Lefebvre M, et al. Rapid decline in child mortality in a rural area of Senegal. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:72–80.
23. Taha TE, Gray RH, Abdelwahab MM. Determinants of neonatal mortality in central Sudan. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1993;13:359–364.
24. Gadallah MA, Rady MH, Sadawy M. Infant mortality rate at a selected urban, semi-urban and rural areas of Egypt, 1992: a retrospective study. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1994;69:449–467.
25. Ibrahim MM, Omar HM, Persson LA, et al. Child mortality in a collapsing African society. Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74:547–552.
26. Lehmann D, Heywood P. Effect of birthweight on pneumonia-specific and total mortality among infants in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J. 1996;39:274–283.
27. Slutsker L, Bloland P, Steketee RW, et al. Infant and second-year mortality in rural Malawi: causes and descriptive epidemiology. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55(suppl 1):77–81.
28. Jaffar S, Leach A, Greenwood AM, et al. Changes in the pattern of infant and childhood mortality in upper river division, The Gambia, from 1989 to 1993. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2:28–37.
29. Phukan RK, Mahanta J. A study of neonatal deaths in the tea gardens of Dibrugarh district of upper Assam. J Indian Med Assoc. 1998;96:333–334, 337.
30. Alam N, van Ginneken JK. Repeated neonatal deaths in families with special reference to causes of death. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999;13:78–88.
31. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, et al. Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet. 1999;354:1955–1961.
32. Thapa N, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater AF, et al. Infant death rates and animal-shed delivery in remote rural areas of Nepal. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1447–1456.
33. Yassin KM. Indices and sociodemographic determinants of childhood mortality in rural upper Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:185–197.
34. Lawoyin TO. Risk factors for infant mortality in a rural community in Nigeria. J R Soc Health. 2001;121:114–118.
35. Bhandari N, Bahl R, Taneja S, et al. Pathways to infant mortality in urban slums of Delhi, India: implications for improving the quality of community- and hospital-based programmes. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002;20:148–155.
36. Fikree FF, Azam SI, Berendes HW. Time to focus child survival programmes on the newborn: assessment of levels and causes of infant mortality in rural Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:271–276.
37. Hinderaker SG, Olsen BE, Bergsjo PB, et al. Avoidable stillbirths and neonatal deaths in rural Tanzania. BJOG. 2003;110:616–623.
38. Adazu K, Lindblade KA, Rosen DH, et al. Health and demographic surveillance in rural western Kenya: a platform for evaluating interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:1151–1158.
39. Chowdhury ME, Akhter HH, Chongsuvivatwong V, et al. Neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: an exploratory study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005;23:16–24.
40. Freeman JV, Christian P, Khatry SK, et al. Evaluation of neonatal verbal autopsy using physician review versus algorithm-based cause-of-death assignment in rural Nepal. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005;19:323–331.
41. Baiden F, Hodgson A, Adjuik M, et al. Trend and causes of neonatal mortality in the Kassena-Nankana district of northern Ghana, 1995–2002. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:532–539.
42. Baqui AH, Darmstadt GL, Williams EK, et al. Rates, timing and causes of neonatal deaths in rural India: implications for neonatal health programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:706–13.
43. Garrib A, Jaffar S, Knight S, et al. Rates and causes of child mortality in an area of high HIV prevalence in rural South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:1841–1848.
44. Jalil F, Lindblad BS, Hanson LA, et al. Early child health in Lahore, Pakistan: IX. Perinatal events. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1993;82(suppl 390):95–107.
45. Leach A, McArdle TF, Banya WA, et al. Neonatal mortality in a rural area of The Gambia. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1999;19:33–43.
46. Bang AT, Paul VK, Reddy HM, et al. Why do neonates die in rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part I): primary causes of death assigned by neonatologist based on prospectively observed records. J Perinatol. 2005;25(suppl 1):S29–S34.
47. Bartlett AV, Paz de Bocaletti ME, Bocaletti MA. Neonatal and early postneonatal morbidity and mortality in a rural Guatemalan community: the importance of infectious diseases and their management. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:752–757.
48. Zaman S, Jalil F, Karlberg J, et al. Early child health in Lahore, Pakistan: VI. Morbidity. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1993;82(suppl 390):63–78.
49. Etuk SJ, Etuk IS, Ekott MI, et al. Perinatal outcome in pregnancies booked for antenatal care but delivered outside health facilities in Calabar, Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2000;75:29–33.
50. Vaahtera M, Kulmala T, Maleta K, et al. Epidemiology and predictors of infant morbidity in rural Malawi. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14:363–371.
51. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule S, et al. Burden of morbidities and the unmet need for health care in rural neonates–a prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38:952–965.
52. Weiss DP, Coplan P, Guess H. Epidemiology of bacterial meningitis among children in Brazil, 1997–1998. Rev Saude Publica. 2001;35:249–255.
53. Sutanto A, Gessner BD, Djlantik I, et al. Acute respiratory illness incidence and death among children under two years of age on Lombok Island, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:175–179.
54. English M, Muhoro A, Aluda M, et al. Outcome of delivery and cause-specific mortality and severe morbidity in early infancy: a Kenyan District Hospital birth cohort. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:228–232.
55. English M, Ngama M, Mwalekwa L, et al. Signs of illness in Kenyan infants aged less than 60 days. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:323–329.
56. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Baitule SB, et al. The incidence of morbidities in a cohort of neonates in rural Gadchiroli, India: seasonal and temporal variation and a hypothesis about prevention. J Perinatol. 2005;25(suppl 1):S18–S28.
57. Berkley JA, Lowe BS, Mwangi I, et al. Bacteremia among children admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:39–47.
58. Mansour E, Eissa AN, Nofal LM, et al. Morbidity and mortality of low-birth-weight infants in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2005;11:723–731.
59. Lawn JE, Wilczynska-Ketende K, Cousens SN. Estimating the causes of 4 million neonatal deaths in the year 2000. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:706–718.
60. Mulholland K. Global burden of acute respiratory infections in children: implications for interventions. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;36:469–474.
61. Rudan I, Lawn J, Cousens S, et al. Gaps in policy-relevant information on burden of disease in children: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:2031–2040.
62. Sachdev HP. Commentary: utilizing information on causes of neonatal deaths in less-developed countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:718–719.
63. World Health Organization. Programme of acute respiratory infections. Report of the fourth meeting of technical advisory group 6–10 March 1989. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1989. WHO/ARI/89.4.
64. World Health Organization. Acute respiratory infections in children: case management in small hospitals in developing countries. A manual for doctors and other senior health workers. Document produced by the WHO programme for the control of acute respiratory infections. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1990. WHO/ARI/90.5.
65. World Health Organization. Management of the child with a serious infection or severe malnutrition. Guidelines for care at the first referral level in developing countries. Geneva, Switzerland; WHO; 2000. WHO/FCH/CAH/00.1.
66. World Health Organization. Management of the sick newborn. Report of a technical working group. Ankara, 5–8 June 1995. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2002. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.12.
67. Ahmed S, Sobhan F, Islam A, et al. Neonatal morbidity and care-seeking behaviour in rural Bangladesh. J Trop Pediatr. 2001;47:98–105.
68. Bhandari N, Bahl R, Bhatnagar V, et al. Treating sick young infants in urban slum setting. Lancet. 1996;347:1774–1775.
69. de Zoysa I, Bhandari N, Akhtari N, et al. Careseeking for illness in young infants in an urban slum in India. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:2101–2111.
70. Zaidi AK, Huskins WC, Thaver D, et al. Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet. 2005;365:1175–1188.
71. Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, et al. Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369:2121–2131.
72. Sazawal S, Black RE. Effect of pneumonia case management on mortality in neonates, infants, and preschool children: a meta-analysis of community-based trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:547–556.
73. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, et al. Neonates in Gadchiroli: field trial of home-based neonatal care in rural India (1993–2003). J. Perinatol. 2005;25(suppl 1s):S1–S122.
74. Martines J, Paul VK, Bhutta ZA, et al. Neonatal survival: a call for action. Lancet. 2005;365:1189–1197.
75. Baqui AH, El-Arifeen S, Darmstadt GL, et al. Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1936–1944.
76. Stoll BJ. Section 2-infections of the neonatal infant: pathogenesis and epidemiology. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 17th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2004:623–40.
77. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan BS, et al. Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2 suppl):519–617.
Keywords:

neonatal infections; incidence; mortality; community; developing country

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.