Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Rotavirus Disease: Impact of Coinfections

Grimprel, Emmanuel MD*†; Rodrigo, Carlos MD, PhD‡§; Desselberger, Ulrich MD

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal: January 2008 - Volume 27 - Issue 1 - p S3-S10
doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815eedfa
Article

Background: Many rotavirus infections occur as mixed infections with other microorganisms, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoa. In vitro, animal and clinical studies provide evidence for potentiation between rotavirus infection and coinfecting pathogens. The mechanisms of such interactions are not well studied or understood.

Methods: A literature search was performed to identify publications on rotavirus coinfections.

Results: The evidence for potentiation between infections with rotavirus and bacterial enteropathogens—particularly E. coli—is strong. A number of large clinical investigations has shown that children infected with rotavirus and a bacterial enteropathogen suffer from more severe diarrhea and/or dehydration, with diarrhea often lasting longer than in children infected with rotavirus alone. In general, but not exclusively, coinfections result in a poorer prognosis.

Conclusions: In developing countries, rotavirus vaccination could possibly improve the poor prognosis associated with bacterial enteropathogen-rotavirus coinfections. However, further studies are needed to define the exact role of rotavirus vaccination in the context of coinfections.

From the *Department of Pediatrics, Armand-Trousseau Children's Hospital, Paris, France; †Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; ‡Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; §Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and ∥Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

This supplement was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium.

All authors are members of the Paediatric Rotavirus European Committee (PROTECT; consisting of European scientists and physicians to advise on the implementation of rotavirus vaccination). Expenses and consultancy fees are received from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals. U.D. has waived his fees in favor of a research trust fund; expenses of which are made without influence from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.

Address for correspondence: Emmanuel Grimprel, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Armand-Trousseau Children's Hospital, Paris, France. E-mail: emmanuel.grimprel@trs.aphp.fr.

Rotavirus infections cause severe disease, leading to approximately 611,000 deaths per year in children worldwide.1 However, global rotavirus mortality is not evenly spread, with most of the fatalities occurring in developing countries.2 The fact that outcomes are more often severe in developing countries is attributed to inadequacies in healthcare services resulting in poorer access to basic rehydration therapies and to a higher prevalence of malnutrition.2 In more general terms, the poorer health status of children may be a contributing factor, including the possibility of coinfections with other microbial agents, such as enteric pathogens. These major health problems in the developing world impact negatively on morbidity and mortality, as well as on cognitive and physical development.3

Coinfections with rotavirus can also be problematical in industrialized countries, particularly those with temperate climates. In these areas, rotavirus infections cause the highest number of disease cases during the winter and spring months.4,5 This coincides with the peak incidence of acute viral respiratory tract infections, such as with influenza viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).6,7 Such overlap in seasonality places a considerable strain on healthcare systems and increases the potential for nosocomial rotavirus infections. Rotavirus is the leading cause of pediatric nosocomial diarrhea in Europe7 and can be a major problem for neonates in intensive care units.8

Two new oral live-attenuated rotavirus vaccines (Rotarix, GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium; and RotaTeq, Sanofi Pasteur-MSD, Lyon, France) have recently become available and offer a new chance for better control of rotavirus disease. It is expected that introducing rotavirus vaccination into childhood immunization programs will substantially reduce the associated mortality in developing countries and virtually eliminate rotavirus hospitalizations in industrialized nations.9

This review will address the issue of rotavirus coinfections. Firstly, it will be established to what extent rotavirus coinfections with other pathogens actually occur, including the types of pathogens involved, focusing on clinical observations. Secondly, the impact of coinfections will be examined, ie, whether the outcome of rotavirus infection is influenced by coinfection with another pathogen (viral, bacterial, or parasitic) and which types of interactions may occur. Given the lack of data in humans, this necessitates expansion of the discussion to include published in vitro laboratory research and animal model data, as well as clinical observations. Finally, rotavirus coinfections with other organisms will be discussed in the context of rotavirus vaccination. It will be considered whether rotavirus vaccination may: (1) influence the severity or outcome of other gastrointestinal diseases in children in the developing world and (2) mitigate the problems associated with winter seasonality and nosocomial infections in industrialized nations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive PubMed search was performed in January 2007, involving papers/abstracts in English. From the initial search, for ‘rotavirus’ plus either ‘co-infection’ (or ‘coinfection'), ‘mixed’ or ‘interaction’, a list of 506 references was generated. The references were then reviewed individually to identify those of potential relevance (ie, relating to rotavirus infection and coinfection with other microorganisms; n = 127). Furthermore, separate searches were carried out for ‘rotavirus’ plus other specific microorganisms identified during the first stage. Of the 2073 references identified in this way, and after individual review of abstracts, 45 additional papers were identified as potentially relevant, and then reviewed in full. Any additional sources were identified from the bibliographies of these references or from the authors’ own libraries and expertise.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Rotavirus Infection and Coinfections

Occurrence

Table 1 shows the results of clinical observations investigating the types of organisms that have been observed in rotavirus coinfections and identifies viruses, bacteria, and protozoa as coinfecting microorganisms.10–25 Those were: astrovirus (2.0–19.2%),10,12,15,20,22,23 norovirus (2.4–23.5%),16,17,19,22,23 adenovirus (1.0–8.8%),16,17,20,23,25 picornavirus (1.2%),16 sapovirus (1.5%),19 any Campylobacter (1.0–3.2%),11,20 any Salmonella (0.5–4.8%),11,20 any Escherichia coli (11.1–45.5%),11,14,21,24 any Giardia (1.7–8.6%),13,24 and Shigella flexneri (3.2–8.0%).11,18 Occasionally, rotavirus was found to coinfect with more than 1 microorganism (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcomes

The following describes the clinical outcomes of coinfections with rotavirus and other pathogens, starting from a review of in vitro experiments and animal model studies.

Back to Top | Article Outline
In Vitro Data

Several in vitro studies have looked at pre- or coinfection of cultured cell lines with rotavirus and other pathogens. MA104 cells (derived from embryonic monkey kidney) were infected with rotavirus and enterobacteria (Salmonella typhimurium, S. flexneri or enteroinvasive E. coli), either concurrently or after preinfection with rotavirus.26 Preinfection with rotavirus enhanced the invasiveness of S. typhimurium, S. flexneri and enteroinvasive E. coli. However, 2 control strains of nonenteropathogenic E. coli did not become invasive in cells preinfected with rotavirus.

When Caco-2 cells, derived from a human colon tumor and remaining polarized in vitro, were preinfected with rotavirus they were more susceptible to infection with enteroinvasive Yersinia spp. than non-preinfected controls. The authors concluded that rotavirus infection enhances early Yersinia-host cell interactions required to initiate Yersinia infection.27

Caco-2 cells were preinfected with rotavirus or poliovirus and superinfected with Listeria monocytogenes.28 Increased L. monocytogenes internalization occurred in cells preinfected with rotavirus, whereas preinfection with poliovirus had a slight interfering effect on bacterial growth. Enhanced bacterial replication occurred in cells coinfected with rotavirus and L. monocytogenes compared with controls infected with L. monocytogenes alone. In contrast, poliovirus and L. monocytogenes-coinfected cultures had lower bacterial replication levels than controls infected with L. monocytogenes alone.

Thus, although a range of in vitro experiments have demonstrated that coinfection of cells with rotavirus and a variety of bacterial pathogens can increase bacterial replication and/or invasiveness, not all in vitro systems have shown that preinfection of mammalian cell lines with rotavirus increases the susceptibility of host cells to bacterial pathogens. For example, preinfection of Caco-2 cells with rotavirus did not affect adhesion or internalization of 3 strains of Campylobacter jejuni.29

Back to Top | Article Outline
Studies in Animal Models

Experimental animal model studies with calves, piglets, lambs, mice, and rabbits have shown the impact, or potential impact, on outcome after infection with rotavirus and other gut pathogens. Infection of calves with rotavirus followed by infection with enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) within 2–4 days induced diarrhea independently of age, but mono-infections with rotavirus or ETEC only resulted in diarrhea when calves were less than 7 days or 24 hours old, respectively.30 This study showed that ETEC-induced diarrhea was age-related, and that the lack of diarrhea in older calves infected with ETEC could be reversed by mixed infections with rotavirus.

These data were complemented by another study conducted with 6-day-old calves infected with either rotavirus, ETEC, or both.31 Infection with rotavirus alone consistently resulted in diarrhea, whereas ETEC inoculation did not lead to diarrhea, and ETEC intestinal colonization did not occur. In dual infections, both rotavirus and ETEC multiplied, but diarrhea severity was not greater than after rotavirus mono-infection. The results suggested that prior or simultaneous rotavirus infection is required to allow ETEC intestine colonization in calves of this age.

Rotavirus and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) may also have an impact on each other in calves, leading to worse clinical outcomes such as dehydration and death.32 This was shown by a study in which a single, small dose of EPEC resulted in mild diarrhea, and mono-infection with rotavirus also caused diarrhea but not dehydration or death. However, in combination, nonlethal doses of the 2 pathogens caused severe dehydration and death. A scanning electron microscopy study of gut tissues of calves infected with rotavirus and/or EPEC revealed that infection with rotavirus alone resulted in the abomasum (ie, the fourth stomach compartment) being covered with an abundant mucous film.33 However, coinoculation with rotavirus and EPEC not only resulted in severe diarrhea, but also severe erosion of the whole digestive tract, even the abomasum and colon.

In 107 samples from neonatal calves with diarrhea (n = 134), rotavirus and/or coronavirus were identified.34 In 58 cases (54%), both rotavirus and coronavirus were present, whereas rotavirus and coronavirus were found singly in 15 (14%) and 34 (32%) of cases, respectively. As 107 of 134 (80%) diarrheal samples contained rotavirus and/or coronavirus, both of these viruses were considered to be associated with diarrhea in young calves. Moreover, other viruses (togavirus, enterovirus, herpesvirus) found in 7% of cases always occurred in association with rotavirus and/or coronavirus. In a separate study, when fecal samples from 218 calves (aged 1–30 days) were screened for the presence of rotavirus, 93 samples were positive of which 39 (41.9%) contained rotavirus as the only enteropathogen.35 However, other enteropathogens, even multiple organisms, were found in conjunction with rotavirus [ie, Cryptosporidium (85.2%), coronavirus (20.4%), and E. coli (16.7%)]. Another study of calves, under 30 days of age with diarrhea (n = 218), showed that rotavirus and coronavirus are commonly detected in the same fecal sample (in 87% of cases).36 Furthermore, when calves aged 22 days or younger were infected with astrovirus alone, or mixed with rotavirus, those infected with astrovirus alone did not have diarrhea, whereas a mixed infection resulted in severe diarrhea (however, calves infected with rotavirus alone were not included in this study).37

Three-day-old piglets (n = 59) were orally inoculated with either rotavirus, ETEC, or both pathogens (rotavirus was given at 3 days of age, followed by ETEC 24 hours later).38 Piglets infected with both (rotavirus and ETEC) developed more severe diarrhea compared with those given either agent alone at the same dose, and all dually inoculated piglets died between 3 and 6 days after inoculation (no piglet given either pathogen in isolation died). Similar results were found for 4-week-old piglets given either rotavirus, EPEC, or both agents sequentially.39 Although EPEC alone produced more serious diarrheal disease than rotavirus alone, when both pathogens were given sequentially the resulting diarrhea was more severe than after either agent given alone. In contrast to these results, experiments in which 1-day-old piglets (n = 54) were infected orally with either rotavirus, enterovirus, or both concurrently, showed that a mixed inoculum partially mitigated the clinical effects observed with rotavirus infection alone.40 Enterovirus alone did not induce diarrhea or intestinal lesions, even though infection was established in all inoculated piglets. Rotavirus alone produced severe diarrhea through widespread villous destruction. Inoculation with rotavirus plus enterovirus resulted in some reduction in villous damage compared with rotaviral mono-infection, and was accompanied by a moderation in clinical signs and premature mortality. By 48 hours after inoculation, 12 out of 19 piglets given rotavirus alone were moribund and 3 had died, whereas none of the dual-infected piglets had become moribund or had died. These results suggested a partial inhibition of rotavirus replication by enterovirus infection.

In experiments with lambs infected with EPEC or rotavirus, either pathogen given alone induced diarrhea.41 However, when lambs were inoculated with a mixture of EPEC and rotavirus the mortality rate was higher than for either agent given alone, though the duration of diarrhea was not longer. Experiments with 4-day-old mice have also shown potentiation between rotavirus and E. coli infections leading to increased premature mortality.42 When rabbits aged 10–16 weeks were inoculated with rotavirus and/or E. coli 015:H-(RDEC-1), mono-infection with E. coli produced mild diarrhea, but in combination with rotavirus premature mortality and morbidity increased because of diarrheal disease.43

In conclusion, combined infections of different animals with rotavirus and several bacterial enteropathogens led to an increased severity of disease. The molecular mechanisms underlying these observations remain to be elucidated.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Clinical Data
Viral Infections.

The impact of rotavirus infection on infections with other viral enteropathogens has been noted in several clinical observations. A 14-month-old infant suffered from 2 attacks of rotavirus gastroenteritis, with the second episode occurring within 1 month of the first, and preceded by a mild case of adenovirus-associated gastroenteritis.44 The second episode of rotavirus gastroenteritis resulted in more severe gastrointestinal symptoms than the first, with both rotaviral infections associated with more severe symptoms than the adenovirus infection. An initial natural rotavirus infection would normally be expected to provide a degree of protection against subsequent infections, and thus reduce the severity of diarrheal symptoms.45 As the second episode of rotavirus gastroenteritis was more severe than the first, and preceded by an adenovirus infection, it is suggested that an interaction could possibly have occurred between adenovirus and rotavirus to increase the severity of the child's symptoms. However, it should be noted that at the time (1979), rotavirus serotyping was not yet available, and the second rotavirus infection could have been by a different serotype/genotype.

It seems possible that rotavirus and astrovirus infections in young children may impact on each other, leading to more severe diarrhea, particularly as most children have been infected by astrovirus (and rotavirus) by 6 years of age.46 Isolated human astrovirus infections tend to be associated with milder symptoms (less severe diarrhea for a shorter duration, lower likelihood of fever and/or shorter duration of vomiting episodes) than mono-infections with rotavirus.46 A study conducted in U.S. children (n = 214) showed that coinfection of astrovirus with another enteropathogen resulted in more frequent diarrhea than astrovirus infection alone.47 However, in this study only 11 out of 26 diarrheal episodes were because of a mixed infection, and only 1 mixed infection was caused by rotavirus plus astrovirus. In another study in Spanish children (n = 820), coinfection of rotavirus and astrovirus (n = 13) resulted in a higher mean Ruuska/Vesikari score than in children infected with astrovirus alone [n = 23, 11 (6–16) versus 8 (4–12), respectively], suggesting that coinfection of these 2 agents results in more severe gastroenteritis.20 More clinical evidence is required to demonstrate an interaction between members of these 2 viral families.

Like rotavirus disease, infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its clinical sequelae are a particular problem in the developing world. The coexistence of HIV and rotavirus infections together with malnutrition in developing countries could potentially lead to increased disease severity. A study conducted in Zambia showed that rotavirus and HIV concurrently infected 132 (24.6%) of 537 infants under 5 years of age hospitalized with diarrhea.48 Dehydration was most common in infants coinfected with rotavirus and HIV, but mortality rates were similar for HIV-positive patients, regardless of coinfection with rotavirus.48 Malawian children under 5 years of age and attending hospital for acute gastroenteritis as inpatients (n = 786) or outpatients (n = 400) were enrolled in a study to examine the effect of HIV infection on rotavirus gastroenteritis.49 Children with rotavirus diarrhea, with or without HIV, were followed up for up to 4 weeks after hospital discharge. Rotavirus was detected less frequently among HIV-infected children [102 of 336 (30%)] than HIV-uninfected children [348 of 850 (41%)] (relative risk 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53–0.87; P = 0.0007). This may be related to the gastrointestinal effects of other enteropathogens in children with HIV infection (ie, patients were diagnosed with these infections, in the presence of rotavirus). There were no differences in the severity of rotavirus disease in hospitalized children with and without HIV infection, but HIV-infected children were more likely to die during follow up [11 of 50 (22%)] than HIV-uninfected children [0 of 61 (0%); P < 0.0001]. However, this increased mortality was more due to the sequelae of HIV infection and disease. When stool specimens from 198 consecutive adult hospital admissions to a general ward were tested, the prevalence of enteric viruses did not differ significantly between patients with or without HIV infection.50 A Venezuelan study in which 125 stools were collected from patients with HIV, with or without diarrhea, showed that enteric viruses were detected in only 8 (6.4%) samples.51 Another study conducted in Venezuelan children, positive (n = 27) or negative (n = 38) for HIV infection, found similar rates of virus-associated diarrhea for these 2 groups.52 In summary, the studies cited above do not support a major role for enteric viruses, including rotavirus, in diarrheic episodes experienced by patients with HIV.50–52

Back to Top | Article Outline
Bacterial Infections.

In a study in Brazil, children aged 5 years or younger and suffering from acute diarrhea (n = 154) were evaluated for fecal pathogens.24 Bacteria were the most frequently found group of pathogens [53 of 154 cases (34.4%)], followed by rotavirus [32 of 154 (20.8%)] and 2 (1.4%) cases of G. lamblia; 25 of 154 (16.2%) cases were mixed rotavirus/bacterial infections. Of the 105 bacteria isolated, 90 were E. coli (EPEC, 27; diffusely adherent E. coli, 24; ETEC, 21; enteroaggregative E. coli, 18). Children with a mixed (rotavirus and bacterial) infection had the highest incidence of severe vomiting and dehydration among this cohort of 154 children (Table 2).

TABLE 2

TABLE 2

In another study, involving 225 Ghanaian children of preschool age with acute gastroenteritis, 157 (69.8%) had mild dehydration and 68 (30.2%) had severe dehydration.53 Children who had mixed rotavirus/bacterial infections were more likely to have severe than mild dehydration. In a study carried out in Iran on 197 children under the age of 3 years with diarrhea and ETEC infection, the mean number of stool productions per day was much higher and duration of diarrhea was longer in patients with ETEC and rotavirus than those with only an ETEC infection (P < 0.001 for both parameters).14 A study of children aged 3 weeks to 13 years admitted to hospital with acute gastroenteritis compared the clinical and laboratory features of rotavirus diarrhea (n = 168) with those of diarrhea caused by enteric adenoviruses (n = 32), bacterial infections (n = 42), mixed bacterial and viral infections [n = 16; most commonly rotavirus and E. coli (n=13)], and nonspecific infections (n = 135).54 Mixed infections caused longer-lasting diarrhea (mean 8.0 days) than rotavirus infections alone (mean 5.9 days), but with a similar level of illness severity. By contrast, another study has shown that the severity of mixed infections of rotavirus and E. coli was similar to that with rotavirus mono-infections.55

Back to Top | Article Outline
Protozoan Parasitic Infections.

There are a lack of data concerning potential interactions between rotavirus and protozoan parasitic infections, but several studies have investigated G. lamblia in this respect. Bedouin infants (n = 238) were followed-up from birth to 18–23 months.56 This study showed that diarrheal episodes were more severe in children infected with rotavirus alone (n = 12) than in cases where there was a mixed infection with rotavirus plus G. lamblia (n = 3), according to age-adjusted mean scores of illness severity (80.9 versus 58.8, respectively; P = 0.03). However, the number of relevant cases was small.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Respiratory Infections.

Rotavirus syndrome’ has been described in the literature where it is proposed that rotavirus infection, possibly in conjunction with other pathogens, leads to respiratory symptoms.57–59 A hospital study identified rotavirus in 51% of 152 children with diarrhea, and a respiratory illness was described in 66% of rotavirus patients, usually preceding gastrointestinal symptoms.57 Rotavirus was detected in the stools of 5 children with sudden infant death syndrome over a 3-week period.58 Although none of the children had acute gastroenteritis, 4 of 5 had acute upper respiratory tract infections. Rotavirus was also identified in tracheal aspirates from 2 of the infants. Extensive investigations failed to reveal the presence of any other viruses or toxins in specimens obtained from the 5 children with sudden infant death syndrome. The possible association between respiratory tract manifestations and rotavirus infection was investigated by testing for human rotavirus antigen and RSV antigen in tracheal aspirates of children (n = 58) with pneumonia.59 Rotavirus antigen was detected in 16 of 58 (27.6%) cases, and RSV antigen in 27 of 58 (46.5%) cases, with both detected in 4 of 58 (6.9%) children. In the authors’ opinion, these results suggest that rotavirus may occasionally be a causative agent of acute lower respiratory infections in children, and that it may be transmitted via a respiratory route. However, rotaviruses are generally not accepted as the cause of respiratory tract infections. A study of 283 children with diarrhea showed that while 34% of children infected with rotavirus exhibited diarrheal and respiratory symptoms, respiratory symptoms were also present in 25% of those uninfected with rotavirus or adenovirus.60 Thus, an association between rotavirus infection and respiratory symptoms (or the existence of a rotavirus syndrome) could not be confirmed. Furthermore, in a prospective study of children referred to hospital, rotavirus was identified in 37% of 128 patients with acute gastroenteritis.61 One or more signs of upper respiratory tract illness were observed in 36% of the patients with rotavirus gastroenteritis and in 35% of those with nonrotavirus gastroenteritis. A similar study of 197 episodes of acute gastroenteritis in 109 children during a 12-month period also failed to show that rotavirus was associated with upper respiratory tract manifestations.62 One or more upper respiratory tract manifestations were observed in 39% of children with rotavirus gastroenteritis, but also in 36% of rotavirus-negative cases of gastroenteritis. Likewise, a study conducted in South African children (n = 1672) aged 0–12 years, failed to find a rotavirus syndrome associated with respiratory symptoms and/or pyrexia in patients with a rotaviral infection as these occurred with equal frequency in patients not infected with rotavirus.63 Furthermore, in a study of 202 infants with bronchiolitis, there was no evidence that simultaneous rotavirus and respiratory infections (ie, RSV) were associated with increased severity of bronchiolitis.64 Thus, the existence of a rotavirus syndrome cannot be substantiated, and upper respiratory tract illnesses in patients with rotavirus gastroenteritis are more likely to be caused by a separate infection with another pathogen occurring coincidentally.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Potential Impact of Rotavirus Vaccination

Whether rotavirus vaccination can have a positive effect on disease outcomes in the context of coinfections has been inadequately studied. However, it is of interest to note that rotavirus vaccination may have a benefit in children infected with pathogens other than rotavirus that cause diarrhea.65,66 In a placebo-controlled trial of rotavirus vaccination in children between 50 and 110 days of age, 86 of 1528 episodes of diarrhea were positive for enteric adenovirus infection alone (12 cases of mixed rotavirus-adenovirus infections were excluded).65 Compared with a vaccine placebo, the rotavirus vaccine group had a shorter duration of watery diarrhea in these pure enteric adenovirus-associated cases (P = 0.008). Stool samples (n = 1432) were also obtained from another placebo-controlled rotavirus vaccine trial.66 In this instance, sapovirus was detected in 132 (9.2%) of the samples, and in 80 (5.6%) of stools as the sole gastroenteritis virus. Although the proportion of sapovirus-associated cases was similar in the rotavirus vaccine and placebo groups, those in the vaccine group had a shorter duration of diarrhea and a reduced frequency of diarrhea. The mechanism by which rotavirus vaccine may impact on either adenovirus or sapovirus infections is unknown.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

From the literature it is clear that many rotavirus infections occur as mixed infections with other microorganisms, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoa. In the studies cited in this review, the incidence of mixed infections was 0.3–45.5%. It is likely that the wide range reflects differences in local epidemiology, economic development, and hygiene conditions.

In vitro, animal and clinical studies provide evidence for potentiation between rotavirus infection and coinfecting pathogens. In general, but not exclusively, this results in a poorer prognosis. It should be stressed that the precise mechanisms by which rotavirus influences the invasiveness, growth, or pathogenicity of another pathogen are poorly studied and not understood. Suggested mechanisms for rotavirus-associated changes to bacterial invasiveness include effects on phagocytosis or membrane receptors,28 and general effects on the cell membrane or the cytoskeleton.26 Coinfection with a viral and bacterial agent often produces more severe disease than mono-infection, possibly explained by nonspecific virus-associated effects on the host rendering it more susceptible to bacterial disease.28 Such general effects may contribute to potentiation effects between rotavirus and specific pathogens. Other mechanisms may be related to the timing of the 2 infections31 or to the more severe intestinal lesions observed after certain dual infections.41

It should be noted that most studies cited investigate the presence of organisms in stool samples and that it is often difficult to directly attribute observed symptoms to the detection of an agent. To confirm the association, it is necessary to demonstrate true replication in the course of the illness and an immunologic response towards the pathogen.

The evidence for potentiation between infections with rotavirus and bacterial enteropathogens—particularly E. coli—is strong. A number of large clinical investigations have shown that children infected with rotavirus plus a bacterial enteropathogen suffer from more severe diarrhea and/or dehydration, with diarrhea often lasting longer than in those infected with rotavirus alone.

Rotavirus gastroenteritis is now considered to be a vaccine-preventable disease.67 To achieve reduction of the morbidity and mortality associated with rotavirus, it is essential that universal mass vaccination programs are instigated. In developing countries, rotavirus vaccination could improve the poor prognosis associated with bacterial enteropathogen-rotavirus coinfections. In industrialized countries, universal childhood rotavirus vaccination could reduce the number of cases of nosocomial rotavirus infections in children already suffering severe symptoms related to other infectious agents or noninfectious diseases.

In summary, rotavirus vaccination may have a positive impact on the course of disease involving other gastrointestinal pathogens, preventing potential exacerbations and providing benefits to the individual and society as a whole. However, further studies are needed to define the exact role of rotavirus vaccination in the context of coinfections.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Elisabetta Franco, Hans-Iko Huppertz, Zsófia Meszner, Jacek Mrukowicz, Nuran Salman, Vladimir Tatochenko, and Timo Vesikari for their input in developing this manuscript. The input of Carlo Giaquinto is particularly appreciated. Thanks are also due to Susan Brackenridge, Alison Lovibond, and Diane Sutherland for their support in preparing the manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Parashar UD, Gibson CJ, Bresee JS, Glass RI. Rotavirus and severe childhood diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:304–306.
2. Parashar UD, Hummelman EG, Bresee JS, Miller MA, Glass RI. Global illness and deaths caused by rotavirus disease in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:565–572.
3. Walker RI. Considerations for development of whole cell bacterial vaccines to prevent diarrheal diseases in children in developing countries. Vaccine. 2005;23:3369–3385.
4. Berner R, Schumacher RF, Hameister S, Forster J. Occurrence and impact of community-acquired and nosocomial rotavirus infections—a hospital-based study over 10 years. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999;88:48–52.
5. Desenclos JC, Rebiere I, Letrillard L, Flahault A, Hubert B. Diarrhea-related morbidity and rotavirus infection in France. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999;88:42–47.
6. Shek LP, Lee BW. Epidemiology and seasonality of respiratory tract virus infections in the tropics. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2003;4:105–111.
7. Gleizes O, Desselberger U, Tatochenko V, et al. Nosocomial rotavirus infection in European countries: a review of the epidemiology, severity and economic burden of hospital-acquired rotavirus disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:S12–S21.
8. Sharma R, Hudak ML, Premachandra BR, et al. Clinical manifestations of rotavirus infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:1099–1105.
9. Cunliffe NA, Nakagomi O. A critical time for rotavirus vaccines: a review. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005;4:521–532.
10. Bhattacharya R, Sahoo GC, Nayak MK, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human astrovirus infections in Kolkata, India. Infect Genet Evol. 2006;6:425–435.
11. Candeias JA, Racz ML, Travulsi LR, Murahowsky J. Relative prevalence of rotavirus diarrhea in children attending outpatient departments of hospitals and general practitioners in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1989;7:24–27.
12. Giordano MO, Ferreyra LJ, Isa MB, et al. The epidemiology of acute viral gastroenteritis in hospitalized children in Cordoba City, Argentina: an insight of disease burden. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2001;43:193–197.
13. Gusmao RH, Mascarenhas JD, Gabbay YB, et al. Rotaviruses as a cause of nosocomial, infantile diarrhea in northern Brazil: pilot study. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995;90:743–749.
14. Katouli M, Shokouhi F, Farhoudi-Moghaddam AA, Amini S. Occurrence of colonization factor antigens I & II in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli associated diarrhea in Iran & correlation with severity of disease. Indian J Med Res. 1992;95:115–120.
15. Liu CY, Shen KL, Wang SX, Liu YY, Zhaori GT. Astrovirus infection in young children with diarrhea hospitalized at Beijing Children's Hospital. Chin Med J (Engl). 2004;117:353–356.
16. Medici MC, Martinelli M, Arcangeletti MC, et al. Epidemiological aspects of human rotavirus infection in children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in an area of northern Italy. Acta Biomed. 2004;75:100–106.
17. Oh DY, Gaedicke G, Schreier E. Viral agents of acute gastroenteritis in German children: prevalence and molecular diversity. J Med Virol. 2003;71:82–93.
18. Orlandi PP, Silva T, Magalhaes GF, et al. Enteropathogens associated with diarrheal disease in infants of poor urban areas of Porto Velho, Rondonia: a preliminary study. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:621–625.
19. Phan TG, Nguyen TA, Kuroiwa T, et al. Viral diarrhea in Japanese children: results from a one-year epidemiologic study. Clin Lab. 2005;51:183–191.
20. Roman E, Wilhelmi I, Colomina J, et al. Acute viral gastroenteritis: proportion and clinical relevance of multiple infections in Spanish children. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:435–440.
21. Samuel S, Vadivelu J, Parasakthi N. Characteristics of childhood diarrhea associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997;28:114–119.
22. Sanchez-Fauquier A, Montero V, Moreno S, et al. Human rotavirus G9 and G3 as major cause of diarrhea in hospitalized children, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1536–1541.
23. Simpson R, Aliyu S, Iturriza-Gomara M, Desselberger U, Gray J. Infantile viral gastroenteritis: on the way to closing the diagnostic gap. J Med Virol. 2003;70:258–262.
24. Souza EC, Martinez MB, Taddei CR, et al. [Etiologic profile of acute diarrhea in children in Sao Paulo]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78:31–38.
25. Yan H, Nguyen TA, Phan TG, et al. Development of RT-multiplex PCR assay for detection of adenovirus and group A and C rotaviruses in diarrheal fecal specimens from children in China [English abstract]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2004;78:699–709.
26. Bukholm G. Human rotavirus infection enhances invasiveness of enterobacteria in MA-104 cells. APMIS. 1988;96:1118–1124.
27. Di Biase AM, Petrone G, Conte MP, et al. Infection of human enterocyte-like cells with rotavirus enhances invasiveness of Yersinia enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:897–904.
28. Superti F, Petrone G, Pisani S, et al. Superinfection by Listeria monocytogenes of cultured human enterocyte-like cells infected with poliovirus or rotavirus. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 1996;185:131–137.
29. Hanel I, Elschner M, Berndt A, Otto P. [Mixed infections of rotaviruses and Campylobacter jejuni in Caco-2 cells]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002;109:167–172.
30. Tzipori SR, Makin TJ, Smith ML, Krautil FL. Clinical manifestations of diarrhea in calves infected with rotavirus and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:1011–1016.
31. Snodgrass DR, Smith ML, Krautil FL. Interaction of rotavirus and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in conventionally-reared dairy calves. Vet Microbiol. 1982;7:51–60.
32. Gouet P, Contrepois M, Dubourguier HC, et al. The experimental production of diarrhea in colostrum deprived axenic and gnotoxenic calves with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, rotavirus, coronavirus and in a combined infection of rotavirus and E. coli. Ann Rech Vet. 1978;9:433–440.
33. Dubourguier HC, Gouet P, Mandard O, Contrepois M, Bachelerie C. Scanning electron microscopy of abomasium and intestine of gnotoxenic calves infected either with rotavirus, coronarivus or enteropathogenic Escherichia coli or with rotavirus and E. coli. Ann Rech Vet. 1978;9:441–451.
34. Marsolais G, Assaf R, Montpetit C, Marois P. Diagnosis of viral agents associated with neonatal calf diarrhea. Can J Comp Med. 1978;42:168–171.
35. Garcia A, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria JA, Orden JA, et al. Rotavirus and concurrent infections with other enteropathogens in neonatal diarrheic dairy calves in Spain. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;23:175–183.
36. de la Fuente R, Luzon M, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria JA, et al. Cryptosporidium and concurrent infections with other major enterophatogens in 1 to 30-day-old diarrheic dairy calves in central Spain. Vet Parasitol. 1999;80:179–185.
37. Woode GN, Pohlenz JF, Gourley NE, Fagerland JA. Astrovirus and Breda virus infections of dome cell epithelium of bovine ileum. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19:623–630.
38. Benfield DA, Francis DH, McAdaragh JP, et al. Combined rotavirus and K99 Escherichia coli infection in gnotobiotic pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49:330–337.
39. Tzipori S, Chandler D, Makin T, Smith M. Escherichia coli and rotavirus infections in four-week-old gnotobiotic piglets fed milk or dry food. Aust Vet J. 1980;56:279–284.
40. Janke BH, Morehouse LG, Solorzano RF. Single and mixed infections of neonatal pigs with rotaviruses and enteroviruses: clinical signs and microscopic lesions. Can J Vet Res. 1988;52:364–369.
41. Wray C, Dawson M, Afshar A, Lucas M. Experimental Escherichia coli and rotavirus infection in lambs. Res Vet Sci. 1981;30:379–381.
42. Newsome PM, Coney KA. Synergistic rotavirus and Escherichia coli diarrheal infection of mice. Infect Immun. 1985;47:573–574.
43. Thouless ME, DiGiacomo RF, Deeb BJ. The effect of combined rotavirus and Escherichia coli infections in rabbits. Lab Anim Sci. 1996;46:381–385.
44. Chiba S, Kogasaka R, Akihara M, Horino K, Nakao T. Recurrent attack of rotavirus gastroenteritis after adenovirus-induced diarrhea. Arch Dis Child. 1979;54:398–400.
45. Velazquez FR, Matson DO, Calva JJ, et al. Rotavirus infections in infants as protection against subsequent infections. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1022–1028.
46. Walter JE, Mitchell DK. Role of astroviruses in childhood diarrhea. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2000;12:275–279.
47. Guerrero ML, Noel JS, Mitchell DK, et al. A prospective study of astrovirus diarrhea of infancy in Mexico City. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:723–727.
48. Oshitani H, Kasolo FC, Mpabalwani M, et al. Association of rotavirus and human immunodeficiency virus infection in children hospitalized with acute diarrhea, Lusaka, Zambia. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:897–900.
49. Cunliffe NA, Gondwe JS, Kirkwood CD, et al. Effect of concomitant HIV infection on presentation and outcome of rotavirus gastroenteritis in Malawian children. Lancet. 2001;358:550–555.
50. Thea DM, Glass R, Grohmann GS, et al. Prevalence of enteric viruses among hospital patients with AIDS in Kinshasa, Zaire. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993;87:263–266.
51. Gonzalez GG, Pujol FH, Liprandi F, Deibis L, Ludert JE. Prevalence of enteric viruses in human immunodeficiency virus seropositive patients in Venezuela. J Med Virol. 1998;55:288–292.
52. Liste MB, Natera I, Suarez JA, et al. Enteric virus infections and diarrhea in healthy and human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2873–2877.
53. Hori H, Akpedonu P, Armah G, et al. Enteric pathogens in severe forms of acute gastroenteritis in Ghanaian children. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1996;38:672–676.
54. Uhnoo I, Olding-Stenkvist E, Kreuger A. Clinical features of acute gastroenteritis associated with rotavirus, enteric adenoviruses, and bacteria. Arch Dis Child. 1986;61:732–738.
55. Unicomb LE, Faruque SM, Malek MA, Faruque AS, Albert MJ. Demonstration of a lack of synergistic effect of rotavirus with other diarrheal pathogens on severity of diarrhea in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1340–1342.
56. Bilenko N, Levy A, Dagan R, et al. Does co-infection with Giardia lamblia modulate the clinical characteristics of enteric infections in young children? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19:877–883.
57. Lewis HM, Parry JV, Davies HA, et al. A year's experience of the rotavirus syndrome and its association with respiratory illness. Arch Dis Child. 1979;54:339–346.
58. Yolken R, Murphy M. Sudden infant death syndrome associated with rotavirus infection. J Med Virol. 1982;10:291–296.
59. Zhaori GT, Fu LT, Xu YH, et al. Detection of rotavirus antigen in tracheal aspirates of infants and children with pneumonia. Chin Med J (Engl). 1991;104:830–833.
60. Vesikari T, Maki M, Sarkkinen HK, Arstila PP, Halonen PE. Rotavirus, adenovirus, and non-viral enteropathogens in diarrhea. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56:264–270.
61. Hjelt K, Krasilnikoff PA, Grauballe PC, Rasmussen SW. Clinical features in hospitalised children with acute gastroenteritis. Does the rotavirus syndrome exist? Acta Paediatr Scand. 1985;74:96–101.
62. Hjelt K, Nielson OH, Paerregaard A, Grauballe PC, Krasilnikoff PA. Acute gastroenteritis in children attending day-care centres with special reference to rotavirus infections. II. Clinical manifestations. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76:763–768.
63. Haffejee IE, Moosa A. Rotavirus studies in Indian (Asian) South African infants with acute gastro-enteritis: II. Clinical aspects and outcome. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1990;10:245–254.
64. Brouard J, Freymuth F, Vabret A, et al. [Viral co-infections in immunocompetent infants with bronchiolitis: prospective epidemiologic study]. Arch Pediatr. 2000;7:S531–S535.
65. Pang XL, Koskenniemi E, Joensuu J, Vesikari T. Effect of rhesus rotavirus vaccine on enteric adenovirus-associated diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;29:366–369.
66. Pang XL, Zeng SQ, Honma S, Nakata S, Vesikari T. Effect of rotavirus vaccine on Sapporo virus gastroenteritis in Finnish infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:295–300.
67. Lepage P. Rotavirus infection in Europe: time for effective prevention? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:S5–S6.
Keywords:

rotavirus; epidemiology; coinfections with other pathogens

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.