The management of pediatric respiratory tract infections (RTIs) has become complicated by the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance, in particular in Streptococcus pneumoniae , the most frequently implicated bacterial pathogen.1 According to surveillance data covering the last 5 years, resistance rates for both β-lactams and macrolides in S. pneumoniae have surpassed 30% in the pediatric U.S. population.2–7
One approach to combat the dangers posed by antimicrobial resistance in S. pneumoniae is vaccination. The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7; Prevnar; Wyeth Lederle Vaccines, Pearl River, New York, NY) was introduced in the United States in February 2000. The vaccine is licensed for children up to 5 years of age and there is a general recommendation for its use in all children <2 years of age. PCV7 provides coverage against S. pneumoniae serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F. Crosscoverage may extend to other serotypes belonging to serogroups represented in PCV7, in particular, protection from disease caused by type 6A as a result of immunization with type 6B.8,9 Antimicrobial resistance in S. pneumoniae is closely associated with serotype, with resistance being higher in serotypes represented in the PCV7 vaccine than in those outside PCV7 coverage.10
The decline in invasive disease that has occurred after the introduction of PCV7 has been accompanied by reductions in penicillin and macrolide nonsusceptibility among invasive pneumococcal disease isolates.8,11,12 However, little information is available about how antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in nonblood (respiratory tract) isolates from children have been affected since PCV7 was introduced.
The PROTEKT US (P rospective R esistant O rganism T racking and E pidemiology for the K etolide T elithromycin in the U nited S tates) study is a longitudinal surveillance study initiated in 2000 to monitor the spread of antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract pathogens in the United States. The program includes serotyping analysis. In the current study, a comparison was made among the serotype distribution, PCV7 coverage and antimicrobial susceptibility of S. pneumoniae pediatric isolates collected in 2000 through 2001 (year 1 of the PROTEKT US study; around the time of the introduction of PCV7) and those collected in 2002 through 2003 and 2003 through 2004.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
S. pneumoniae isolates were collected from pediatric patients (≤14 years of age with community-acquired RTIs) during the 2000 to 2001 (PROTEKT US year 1), 2002 to 2003 (year 3) and 2003 to 2004 (year 4) respiratory seasons. One hundred twelve centers in 38 states participated. Patients presented to either primary care or a hospital with one of the following conditions acquired in the community: acute otitis media, community-acquired pneumonia, acute maxillary sinusitis or acute rhinosinusitis. Sources of clinical isolates included blood, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, middle ear fluid, nasopharyngeal swabs or aspirates, and sinus aspirates. Patients with nosocomial RTIs and those with cystic fibrosis were excluded from the study as were duplicate strains or strains originating from existing collections. The study design and methodology have been described previously.13
Serotyping was performed at G.R. Micro Ltd (London, U.K.) using the Neufeld Quellung reaction and Statens Serum Institute antisera (Copenhagen, Denmark). Statens Serum Institute was used as the reference laboratory for quality assurance and identification of rare serotypes.
Susceptibility to a range of antimicrobials was determined at the Clinical Microbiology Institute (Wilsonville, OR) using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methodology and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints when available.14,15
Genotyping of erythromycin-resistant isolates was conducted at G. R. Micro Ltd. using methods described previously.16,17 Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 and Fisher exact test tests and InStat software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).
RESULTS
Serotype Distribution.
During the 3 years studied, 7813 pediatric S. pneumoniae isolates were serotyped. To avoid bias, the analysis was conducted only on the isolates collected from the 112 centers that participated in all years of the study (year 1, 2033; year 3, 1740; year 4, 1591).
Across the United States as a whole, serotypes covered by the PCV7 vaccine decreased in prevalence from 65.5% in 2000 through 2001 to 34.7% in 2002 through 2003 and to 27.0% in 2003 through 2004 (P < 0.0001; Table 1 ). Decreases were also observed in this period in all states and regions surveyed (Table 2 ) with the largest reduction seen in Florida. There was considerable between-state variability in vaccine serotype (VS) prevalence in the year 4 isolates ranging from 18.3% in Ohio to 38.7% in California (Table 2 ).
TABLE 1: Proportion of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates With Serotypes Covered by PCV7 According to Source and Age Group Collected in Year 1 (2000–2001), Year 3 (2002–2003) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US Study
TABLE 2: Proportion of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Covered by the PCV7 Vaccine According to U.S. State and Region in Year 1 (2000–2001), Year 3 (2002–2003) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US Study
In year 1, the proportion of S. pneumoniae isolates with serotypes represented in PCV7 was higher in isolates cultured from blood than in those cultured from respiratory tract sources (Table 1 ). Similarly, a higher proportion of isolates collected from patients ≤2 years of age had serotypes covered by the vaccine than those from patients 3 to 14 years of age (Table 1 ). By year 4, these patterns were not evident and VS prevalence was <30% regardless of patient age or isolate source. The decrease in VS among isolates collected from blood is shown in Figure 1 .
FIGURE 1.:
Change in serotype prevalence between year 1 (2000–2001; n = 577) and year 4 (2003–2004; n = 277) for S. pneumoniae isolates collected in the PROTEKT US study and cultured from blood samples. (NT, nontypeable.)
Of the nonvaccine serotypes (NVS), the most common among year 4 isolates were 19A (19.0% of all isolates) followed by 6A (7.8%), 3 (7.6%), 15 (6.3%) and then 35B (5.8%) (Fig. 2 ).
FIGURE 2.:
Prevalence of the most common nonvaccine S. pneumoniae serotypes collected from pediatric isolates in year 1 (2000–2001), year 3 (2002–2003) and year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US study.
Antimicrobial Resistance in Nonvaccine Serotypes.
Rates of resistance to various antimicrobials among NVS isolates are shown in Table 3 . Among isolates collected from blood, there were no significant changes in the susceptibility of NVS to the drug classes tested. By contrast, intermediate susceptibility to penicillin, and resistance to amoxicillin–clavulanate and erythromycin, increased significantly among isolates from respiratory tract sources. One NVS isolate, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 μg/mL, exhibited resistance to telithromycin during the study period.
TABLE 3: Antimicrobial Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates With Nonvaccine Serotypes Collected in Year 1 (2000–2001), Year 3 (2002–2003) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US Study
Multidrug resistance (resistance to ≥2 antimicrobial classes) decreased, but not significantly, in blood isolates (P = 0.356) and increased among respiratory tract isolates (P = 0.0034) during the study period.
Antimicrobial Resistance in Vaccine Serotypes.
Table 4 shows the rates of antimicrobial resistance observed for VS isolates. Among VS blood isolates, there were no significant changes in resistance rates to all drug classes tested. By contrast, significant increases in the rates of resistance to erythromycin and amoxicillin–clavulanate occurred among VS respiratory tract isolates.
TABLE 4: Antimicrobial Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates With Vaccine Serotypes Collected in Year 1 (2000–2001), Year 3 (2002–2003) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US Study
Antimicrobial Resistance Among All Isolates.
Rates of resistance among all isolates are shown in Table 5 . With the exception of amoxicillin–clavulanate, resistance rates to all agents tested decreased significantly among the isolates collected from blood. Among the respiratory tract isolates, penicillin resistance decreased significantly, whereas intermediate penicillin susceptibility rose significantly; the rates of amoxicillin–clavulanate and erythromycin resistance did not change.
TABLE 5: Antimicrobial Resistance Among All Serotyped Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Collected in Year 1 (2000–2001) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of the PROTEKT US Study
Genotyping.
Genotyping analysis of erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates revealed a sharp increase in the proportion of strains positive for mef (A) and erm (B) between year 1 (10.9%) and year 4 (28.9%) with a corresponding decrease in the prevalence of isolates positive for either mef (A) alone (72.0% to 58.0%) or erm (B) alone (15.8% to 11.2%). Almost all mef (A) + erm (B) isolates analyzed were serotype 19F or 19A. The proportion of erm (B) + mef (A) isolates exhibiting NVS 19A increased relative to those exhibiting VS 19F between year 1 (7.8% [19A] versus 86.7% [19F]) and year 4 (45.5% [19A] versus 51.7% [19F]) (P < 0.0001).
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates that pneumococcal serotype distribution has changed significantly in the 4 years after the introduction of PCV7. As a consequence of the reduction in VS pneumococci, the predominant pneumococcal serotypes isolated from children in 2003 through 2004 were NVS. The observed decreased prevalence of PCV7 serotypes occurred in both patient subgroups analyzed, indicating that the vaccine has been equally effective in protecting infants (0–2 years of age) and older children (3–14 years of age). The degree to which serotype distribution changed over the study period varied from state to state and it will be important to determine if this variability reflects differential rates of immunization in different parts of the country.
A limitation of the surveillance program, which collects a specified number of isolates from each site in each year, is that burden of disease cannot be measured. However, data collected since the introduction of PCV7 indicate that routine vaccination has led to a reduction in the overall incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease in young children .8,11,12,18–20
Recent surveillance data suggested that pneumococcal penicillin and erythromycin resistance had declined in the pediatric population after the introduction of PCV7.8,11,12 However, concern has been expressed that resistance may emerge in NVS pneumococci.21 Increased macrolide resistance in NVS among blood isolates has been noted previously, but this was offset by a much larger decrease in macrolide resistance among VS.12 A major finding of the current analysis was the increase in antimicrobial resistance among NVS; resistance to penicillin, macrolides, cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin–clavulanate and multidrug resistance all increased between 2000 and 2004. Although these trends give cause for concern, the clinical significance of antimicrobial resistance in pneumococci cultured from the respiratory tract of children is difficult to interpret. An encouraging finding was the low rate of resistance to telithromycin, which is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
A factor contributing to the increased pneumococcal antimicrobial resistance among NVS is almost certainly the 3-fold increase between 2000 and 2004 in the prevalence of erm (B) + mef (A) isolates. Most of these strains are resistant to most antimicrobial classes.16,17 In addition, a high proportion of erm (B) + mef (A) isolates are international clonal strains expressing serogroup 19.16,17,22 In the current analysis, >90% of erm (B) + mef (A) isolates were either serotype 19A or 19F. However, the relative distribution of these 2 serotypes changed significantly over the study period; whereas VS 19F predominated in year 1, by year 4, the distribution between NVS 19A and 19F was roughly equal. Although serotype switching from 19F to 19A predates vaccine introduction,23 it is likely that immunologic selection by the vaccine explains the emergence of 19A. Lower vaccine efficacy against respiratory isolates of serotype 19F24 is the probable reason that a residual 12.7% of all isolates analyzed from year 4 were of VS 19F, making it the most common remaining VS, and the second most common serotype, overall (after 19A).
Along with selective pressure of the vaccine it is likely that a principle driver of increasing resistance among NVS is antibiotic consumption.25 A recent study showed that the variation in pneumococcal resistance across the United States was best explained by probable geographic variability in antibiotic selection pressure.26
In conclusion, serotype distribution among pediatric S. pneumoniae isolates has changed significantly since PCV7 was introduced. Unfortunately, this trend has been accompanied by significant increases in the rates of in vitro antimicrobial resistance among NVS. Our data, which are consistent with recent observations from Alaska,27 Boston,28 Kentucky29 and Pittsburgh,30 suggest that the impact of the vaccine on antimicrobial resistance among noninvasive pneumococci has been transient. Although expanded vaccine formulations with efficacy against a wider range of pneumococcal serotypes may be useful, reducing the level of indiscriminate or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is also essential if antimicrobial resistance is to be brought under control.
REFERENCES
1. Van Beneden CA, Whitney CG, Levine OS. Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young
children .
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2000;49:1–38.
2. Jacobs MR. Worldwide trends in antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory tract pathogens in
children .
Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2003;22(suppl):S109–119.
3. Felmingham D, Reinert RR, Hirakata Y, Rodloff A. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among isolates of
Streptococcus pneumoniae from the PROTEKT surveillance study, and comparative
in vitro activity of the ketolide, telithromycin.
J Antimicrob Chemother . 2002;50(suppl 1):25–37.
4. Jacobs MR, Felmingham D, Appelbaum PC, Grüneberg RN. The Alexander Project Group. The Alexander Project 1998–2000: Susceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infection to commonly used antimicrobial agents.
J Antimicrob Chemother . 2003;52:229–246.
5. Doern GV, Brown SD. Antimicrobial susceptibility among community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens in the USA: Data from PROTEKT US 2000–01.
J Infect . 2004;48:56–65.
6. Brown SD, Rybak MJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility of
Streptococcus pneumoniae ,
Streptococcus pyogenes and
Haemophilus influenzae collected from patients across the USA, in 2001–2002, as part of the PROTEKT US study.
J Antimicrob Chemother . 2004;54(suppl 1):7–15.
7. Brown SD, Farrell DJ. Antibacterial susceptibility among
Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from paediatric and adult patients as part of the PROTEKT US study in 2001–2002.
J Antimicrob Chemother . 2004;54(suppl 1):i23–i29.
8. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, et al. Decline in invasive pneumococcal disease after the introduction of protein–polysaccharide conjugate vaccine.
N Engl J Med . 2003;348:1737–1746.
9. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Huebner RE, Kohberger R, Mbelle N, Pierce N. A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in
children with and those without HIV infection.
N Engl J Med . 2003;349:1341–1348.
10. Klugman KP, Friedland IR. Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci in pediatric disease.
Microb Drug Resist . 1995;113:443–449.
11. Talbot TR, Poehling KA, Hartert TV, et al. Reduction in high rates of antibiotic-nonsusceptible invasive pneumococcal disease in Tennessee after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Clin Infect Dis . 2004;39:641–648.
12. Stephens DS, Zughaier SM, Whitney CG, et al. Incidence of macrolide resistance in
Streptococcus pneumoniae after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: Population-based assessment.
Lancet . 2005;365:855–863.
13. Felmingham D. The need for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
J Antimicrob Chemother . 2002;50(suppl S1):1–7.
14.
Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically . Document M07-A6. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003.
15.
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing , 16th Informational Supplement. Document M100-S16. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006.
16. Farrell DJ, Morrissey I, Bakker S, Morris L, Buckridge S, Felmingham D. Molecular epidemiology of multiresistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae with both
erm (B) and
mef (A)-mediated macrolide resistance.
J Clin Microbiol . 2004;42:764–768.
17. Farrell DJ, Jenkins SG, Brown SD, Patel M, Lavin BS, Klugman KP. Emergence and spread of
Streptococcus pneumoniae with erm(B) and mef(A) resistance.
Emerg Infect Dis . 2005;11:851–858.
18. Black S, Shinefield H, Baxter R, et al. Postlicensure surveillance for pneumococcal invasive disease after use of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Northern California Kaiser Permanente.
Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2004;23:485–489.
19. Kaplan SL, Mason EO Jr, Wald ER, et al. Decrease of invasive pneumococcal infections in
children among 8
children 's hospitals in the United States after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Pediatrics . 2004;113:443–449.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pneumococcal Disease. 2005. Available at:
www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/pink/pneumo.pdf . Accessed June 23, 2005.
21. Porat N, Arguedas A, Spratt BG, et al. Emergence of penicillin-nonsusceptible
Streptococcus pneumoniae clones expressing serotypes not present in the antipneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
J Infect Dis . 2004;190:2154–2161.
22. Ko KS, Song JH. Evolution of erythromycin-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae from Asian countries that contains
erm (B) and
mef (A) genes.
J Infect Dis . 2004;190:739–747.
23. Beall B, McEllistrem MC, Gertz RE Jr, et al. Pre- and postvaccination clonal compositions of invasive pneumococcal serotypes for isolates collected in the United States in 1999, 2001, and 2002.
J Clin Microbiol . 2006;44:999–1017.
24. Eskola J, Kilpi T, Palmu A, et al. Efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against acute otitis media.
N Engl J Med . 2001;344:403–409.
25. Albrich WC, Monnet DL, Harbarth S. Antibiotic selection pressure and resistance in
Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Streptococcus pyogenes .
Emerg Infect Dis . 2004;10:514–517.
26. McCormick AW, Whitney CG, Farley MM, et al. Geographic diversity and temporal trends of antimicrobial resistance in
Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States.
Nat Med . 2003;9:424–430.
27. Moore MR, Hyde TB, Hennessy TW, et al. Impact of a conjugate vaccine on community-wide carriage of nonsusceptible
Streptococcus pneumoniae in Alaska.
J Infect Dis . 2004;190:2031–2038.
28. Pelton SI, Loughlin AM, Marchant CD. Seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine immunization in two Boston communities: Changes in serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility among
Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates.
Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2004;23:1015–1022.
29. Block SL, Hedrick J, Harrison CJ, Tyler R, Smith A, Findlay R, Keegan E. Community-wide vaccination with the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate significantly alters the microbiology of acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2004;23:829–833.
30. McEllistrem MC, Adams JM, Patel K, et al. Acute otitis media due to penicillin-nonsusceptible
Streptococcus pneumoniae before and after the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Clin Infect Dis . 2005;40:1738–1744.