Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Studies

Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools


Author Information
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal: April 2001 - Volume 20 - Issue 4 - p 380-391
  • Free



In the control of communicable diseases, it is important to have accurate information about incubation periods and periods of infectiousness. The incubation period of an infectious disease can be used to estimate the time during which further cases may occur and to indicate the most effective time for the introduction of control measures such as passive immunization and prophylactic antibiotics. The period of infectiousness can be used to define an exclusion period for conditions in which cases represent a risk to the health of other individuals. Knowledge of both the incubation period and the period of infectiousness of communicable diseases is also needed to inform epidemiologic studies and investigations.

In practice, information about incubation periods and periods of infectiousness is usually obtained from textbooks and manuals. 1–4 This information and recommendations for exclusion periods are also available in various national and local guidelines for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. 5–9 The values in these sources are rarely referenced, and the origin of the data is unclear. In the case of exclusion periods some existing recommendations may be excessive or ineffective, and the removal of children from school could place an unnecessary financial and organizational burden on families in an era when both parents work and increasing proportions of children are cared for by a single parent. It is therefore imperative that any disruption to schooling is supported by the best available evidence.

We were commissioned by the UK Government Department for Education and Employment and the Department of Health to prepare national guidelines on the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. We took this opportunity to undertake a thorough systematic review of the incubation period and period of infectiousness of childhood infections and to determine whether exclusion would influence secondary transmission. The resulting evidence-based information is presented below.



Information was collected on 41 infections and infestations. The conditions were selected on the basis that they are common, or are a particular concern, in immunocompetent children of school or preschool age. For each disease information was collected on the incubation period, period of infectiousness and a number of other properties (Table 1). Information on the effectiveness of exclusion was also sought. Data on duration of shedding and serial interval were collected because these can be used to estimate periods of infectiousness in the absence of direct information. The serial interval depends on both the incubation period and the period of infectiousness. Thus if the incubation period is known, the serial interval can be used to estimate the period of infectiousness. If, for example, the serial interval is shorter than the incubation period, the period of infectiousness occurs before the onset of clinical illness.

Table 1
Table 1:
Data collected in this study and definitions used

Literature search

Information was collected by performing a thorough MEDLINE computerized literature search of articles published between 1966 and 1998. 10, 11 Original epidemiologic or experimental studies on the chosen aspects of each infection were sought. Review articles were also sought as a source of references and to assess the risk of transmission. Further original papers were identified from the bibliographies of articles obtained from the computerized search. Papers were also identified by consulting United Kingdom authorities on individual infections or organisms (see Acknowledgments for details). If more than one paper yielded the required information, the most useful papers were identified on the basis of the number of cases reported, the age of cases (school age children preferred), the location (school preferred to community or family setting) and geography (industrialized world preferred). In addition the type of study was taken into consideration. Epidemiologic or observational studies were preferred, especially when these involved a brief exposure to a point source of infection.

Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation

Data were collated and the quality of the information available on each variable was indicated by ascribing it to a level of evidence on a scale of I to IV as shown in Table 2. Proposals on the need for exclusion were originally produced by the authors according to the perceived seriousness of the disease and the likely effectiveness of exclusion. Exclusion periods were suggested in the light of the evidence obtained. The evidence base and proposals on exclusion were then circulated among members of the professional groups represented by the authors. These included groups with interests in pediatric infectious diseases, community child health, public health and epidemiology (see Acknowledgments). Opinions were sought from these groups, and the authors then produced the final recommendations on exclusion. Grades of recommendation were used to support the exclusion periods (Table 2). Grades A, B and C can be considered to represent strongly, reasonably and poorly evidence-based recommendations respectively. The levels of evidence and grades of recommendation used in this project were derived from those commonly applied in evidence-based medicine. 12, 13

Table 2
Table 2:
Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation used in this study


In the course of this study >3000 articles were obtained and read. Of these ∼20% yielded useful information. Information on the risk of transmission, incubation period, duration of shedding, period of infectiousness and serial interval of the 41 selected infections is summarized in Table 3. Recommended exclusion periods for schools and preschools are shown in the final column. For ease of presentation only the highest quality references are provided.

Table 3
Table 3:
Risk of transmission, duration of shedding, period of infectiousness, serial interval and recommendations on exclusion for the 41 infections studied
Table 3
Table 3:
Table 3
Table 3:
Table 3
Table 3:

Exclusion periods have been recommended for 25 infections. In school age children examples include: 5 days from the onset of clinical illness for chickenpox, measles, mumps and rubella; 5 days from the commencement of appropriate antimicrobial therapy for pertussis and scarlet fever; and 24 h from the last episode of diarrhea for most gastrointestinal infections. Exclusion is not recommended for 16 infections and infestations, usually because the condition is mild or exclusion would be ineffective. Examples include common childhood conditions such as head lice, threadworms and warts and verrucas. For three herpesvirus infections (herpes simplex, infectious mononucleosis and roseola infantum), it was judged that although prevention of secondary cases might be desirable, exclusion would be impractical because of prolonged excretion of the virus. Similarly exclusion was not recommended for fifth disease (erythema infectiosum) and hepatitis A because the evidence suggests that children are probably infectious only before the onset of clinical illness.

The quantity and quality of information obtained varied widely between diseases. For some infections such as chickenpox and tuberculosis, evidence of Level I or II was widely available. For others such as head lice and gastroenteritis, very little useful information was obtained. The quality of evidence also varied between the properties studied. For incubation periods Level I or II evidence was available for 25 infections. Data on periods of infectiousness could be found for only 11 infections (Level I or II evidence for 3 infections), and data on the effectiveness of exclusion were found for only 4 infections. We were able to make Grade A recommendations on exclusion for 3 infections. There were 17 Grade B and 21 Grade C recommendations.


As far as we are aware this study represents the first attempt to develop evidence-based guidelines for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. This approach was necessary because the origin of most existing information is unclear and the strength of the data and the reliability of any recommendations is uncertain.

In general we found that the values obtained for incubation periods are similar to those given in commonly used, unreferenced texts. 1–4 Where there are discrepancies, these are largely in infections where the only available evidence was weak. It is difficult to compare periods of infectiousness with those quoted in existing texts because this variable could be identified for only about one-fourth of the infections. In practice, periods of infectiousness usually had to be estimated from other data such as duration of shedding and serial interval.

There is good accord between this study and existing texts as to which infections require exclusion. However, the decision to exclude largely depends on the perceived seriousness of the condition and cannot therefore be truly evidence-based. When exclusion periods have been recommended in this project, the duration of these is in broad agreement with those given in existing texts. Nevertheless there are a few decisions on exclusion that require particular comment. We concluded that exclusion for 5 days was sufficient for the control of chickenpox, measles, mumps and rubella. Some texts suggest that longer periods of exclusion are required for mumps and rubella (from 7 to 9 days and 7 days, respectively). 1, 2, 4 Although we were unable to find evidence about the precise periods of infectiousness of these conditions, data on the duration of shedding and serial interval suggest that 5 days is sufficient. 102, 117, 118, 129, 131 Some authorities suggest that children with chickenpox should be excluded from school until all lesions have crusted over. 3, 4 We could find no evidence to support this practice, but there was good evidence to support the 5-day rule. 19–22 Our guidelines also differ on the bacterial gastrointestinal infections, such as salmonellosis, shigellosis, typhoid and paratyphoid. Some authorities suggest that children with these conditions should be kept away from school until negative stool samples have been obtained. 3, 4 We could find no evidence to support or refute this practice, and we have suggested that schoolchildren should be excluded only while they have diarrhea. This approach is in accord with recent guidelines on the control of gastrointestinal infections. 1, 178

We also identified a number of infections in which exclusion would not be fully effective because cases are infectious before they develop a clinical illness. This situation applies to many of the childhood exanthems, including chickenpox, measles and rubella. 19, 103, 130, 179, 180 In some infections, notably hepatitis A and fifth disease, the period of infectiousness has probably passed before the illness becomes apparent. For this reason we have not recommended exclusion for schoolchildren with these conditions. In the case of hepatitis A this advice is contrary to existing guidelines which state that children should be excluded for at least 7 days. 1–4 We found that children with hepatitis A are infectious 2 weeks before the onset of symptoms, but the precise duration of infectiousness is not known. 81–84 However, we also found that most virus is excreted before the onset of illness 78–80 and that the serial interval is shorter than the incubation period. 76, 85, 78–80 In addition to this evidence of early transmission, it could also be argued that exclusion is not necessary because hepatitis A is usually a mild disease in children. 181 Despite these findings exclusion has been recommended for younger children and those who are unable to maintain personal hygiene. This is because children attending day-care centers are a recognized source of hepatitis A in adults, 86, 181 and adults typically have a more severe form of the disease.

One of the major findings of this study is the lack of knowledge about the incubation period and period of infectiousness of certain communicable diseases. These include common childhood ailments such as head lice, threadworms and warts, as well as a number of gastrointestinal infections. This lack of scientific information is a hindrance to the development of guidelines for communicable disease control. Hopefully the finding of deficiencies in our database can be used to identify areas for future epidemiologic research. We would suggest that research into gastrointestinal infections would be particularly useful because diarrheal diseases account for the majority of disease outbreaks in schools and preschools. 182 Research into the effectiveness of exclusion policies would also be valuable. In this study we identified only four conditions in which the implementation of an exclusion period had been shown to terminate an outbreak. 69, 124, 133, 183 We also found some evidence that widely recommended exclusion periods are not effective in schools. 179, 180 Ideally studies of interventions to limit the spread of communicable diseases should include a control group. Such studies have only rarely been undertaken in childhood populations, 184, 185 and none has assessed the effectiveness of exclusion.

In summary we have attempted to develop evidence-based guidelines for the control of communicable diseases in children by collecting data on the incubation period and period of infectiousness of 41 infections and infestations. We were able to make strongly or reasonably evidence-based recommendations for approximately one-half of the diseases. We believe that this research has been valuable in demonstrating the strengths and weaknesses of our knowledge of the epidemiology of infectious diseases. The guidelines given in the extensive summary table represent the best evidence available for the control of communicable diseases in children.

We acknowledge the following individuals and organizations who provided information and commented on our findings and recommendations: Hilarie Williams, Laura Cunningham and officials from the Department for Education and Employment; Hugh Nicholas, Ros Skinner and officials from the Department of Health; Norman Begg, Liz Miller, Gordon Nichols, Mary Ramsay, John Watson and other members of the Public Health Laboratory Service (which was represented on the writing group by Angus Nicoll); Graham Davies, Paul Heath, Mike Sharland and other members of the British Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases Group (represented by Martin Richardson); British Association for Community Child Health (represented by David Elliman); Consultants in Communicable Disease Control (represented by John Simpson); Public Health Medicine Environmental Group (represented by John Simpson); Communicable Diseases Surveillance Centre Regional Epidemiologists (represented by Helen Maguire).


1. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2000 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 25th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2000.
2. Benenson AS, ed. Control of communicable diseases manual. 16th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1995.
3. Davies EG, Elliman DAC, Hart CA, Nicoll A, Rudd PT, eds. Manual of childhood infections. London: Saunders, 1996.
4. Donowitz LG, ed. Infection control in the child care center and preschool. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
5. Control of communicable disease in schools. London: Department of Health and Social Security and the Welsh Office, 1977.
6. Hale CM, Polder JA. The ABCs of safe and healthy child care: a handbook for child care providers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
7. >Guidelines for control of communicable disease in centres for the under-fives. London: South Thames West Regional Health Authority, 1993.
8. Control of infectious disease in schools. Liverpool: Office of the Consultant, Communicable Disease Control, 1994.
9. Van Den Bosch C. Control of communicable disease in schools. London: East London and City Health Authority, 1996.
10. Greenhalgh T. The Medline database. Br Med J 1997; 315: 180–3.
11. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
12. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 1979; 121: 1193–1254.
13. Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development. Br Med J 1996; 312: 760–2.
14. Cowden J. Campylobacter: epidemiologic paradoxes. Br Med J 1992; 305: 132–3.
15. Wood RC, MacDonald KL, Osterholm MT. Campylobacter enteritis outbreaks associated with drinking raw milk during youth activities: a 10-year review of outbreaks in the United States. JAMA 1992; 268: 3228–30.
16. Blaser MJ, LaForce FM, Wilson NA, Wang WL. Reservoirs of human campylobacteriosis. J Infect Dis 1980; 141: 665–9.
17. Evans MR, Roberts RJ, Ribeiro CD, Gardner D, Kembrey D. A milk-borne Campylobacter outbreak following an educational farm visit. Epidemiol Infect 1996; 117: 457–62.
18. Ross AH. Modification of chicken pox in family contacts by administration of gamma globulin. N Engl J Med 1962; 267: 369–76.
19. Gordon JE, Meader FM. The period of infectivity and serum prevention of chickenpox. JAMA 1929; 93: 2013–5.
20. Evans P. An epidemic of chickenpox. Lancet 1940; 2: 339–40.
21. Thomson FH. The aerial conveyance of infection with a note on the contact infection of chicken-pox. Lancet 1916; 1: 341–4.
22. Thomson FH. Contact infection of chicken-pox. Lancet 1919; 1: 397.
23. Barnard DL, Dean Hart JC, Marmion VJ, Clarke SK. Outbreak in Bristol of conjunctivitis caused by adenovirus type 8, its epidemiology and control. Br Med J 1973; 2: 165–9.
24. Taylor JW, Chandler JW, Cooney MK. Conjunctivitis due to adenovirus type 19. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8: 209–13.
25. Keenlyside RA, Hierholzer JC, D’Angelo LJ. Keratoconjunctivitis associated with adenovirus type 37: an extended outbreak in an ophthalmologist’s office. J Infect Dis 1983; 147: 191–8.
26. Public Health Laboratory Service Study Group. Cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales: prevalence and clinical and epidemiologic features. Br Med J 1990; 300: 774–7.
    27. Alpert G, Bell LM, Kirkpatrick CE, et al. Outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in a day-care center. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 152–7.
    28. Mac Kenzie WR, Schell WL, Blair KA, et al. Massive outbreak of waterborne cryptosporidium infection in Milwaukee, Wisconsin: recurrence of illness and risk of secondary transmission. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21: 57–62.
    29. Jokipii L, Jokipii AM. Timing of symptoms and oocyst excretion in human cryptosporidiosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1643–7.
    30. Karzon DT, Eckert GL, Barron AL, Hayner NS, Winkelstein W. Aseptic meningitis due to echo 4 virus. Am J Dis Child 1961; 101: 610–22.
    31. Reeves WC, Quiroz E, Brenes MM, Centeno R, Campos G. Aseptic meningitis due to echovirus 4 in Panama City, Republic of Panama. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 562–75.
    32. Couch RB, Douglas RG, Lindgren KM, Gerone PJ, Knight V. Airborne transmission of respiratory infection with coxsackievirus A type 21. Am J Epidemiol 1970; 91: 78–86.
    33. Lenaway DD, Brockmann R, Dolan GJ, Cruz-Uribe F. An outbreak of an enterovirus-like illness at a community wading pool: implications for public health inspection programs. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 889–90.
    34. Viljanen MK, Peltola T, Junnila SY, et al. Outbreak of diarrhoea due to Escherichia coli 0111: B4 in schoolchildren and adults: association of Vi antigen-like reactivity. Lancet 1990; 336: 831–4.
    35. Belongia EA, Osterholm MT, Soler JT, Ammend DA, Braun JE, MacDonald KL. Transmission of Escherichia coli 0157: H7 infection in Minnesota child day-care facilities. JAMA 1993; 269: 883–8.
    36. Keene WE, McAnulty JM, Hoesly KC, et al. A swimming-associated outbreak of hemorrhagic colitis caused by Escherichia coli 0157: H7 and Shigella sonnei. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 579–84.
    37. Marier R, Wells JG, Swanson RC, Callahan W, Mehlman IJ. An outbreak of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli foodborne disease traced to imported French cheese. Lancet 1973; 2: 1376–8.
    38. Yamamura K, Sumi N, Egashira Y, Fukuoka I, Motomura S, Tsuchida R. Food poisoning caused by enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (O164: H): a case in which the causative agent was identified [Japanese] J Jpn Assoc Infect Dis 1992; 66: 761–8.
    39. Taylor WR, Schell WL, Wells JG, et al. A foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 1093–5.
    40. Schroeder SA, Caldwell JR, Vernon TM, White PC, Granger SI, Bennett JV. A waterborne outbreak of gastroenteritis in adults associated with Escherichia coli. Lancet 1968; 1: 737–40.
    41. Gorbach SL, Kean BH, Evans DG, Evans DJ, Bessudo D. Travellers’ diarrhea and toxigenic Escherichia coli. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 933–6.
    42. Risks associated with human parvovirus B19 infection. MMWR 1989; 38: 81–97.
    43. Joseph PR. Incubation period of fifth disease [Letter]. Lancet 1986; 2: 1390–1.
    44. Anderson MJ, Higgins PG, Davis LR, et al. Experimental parvoviral infection in humans. J Infect Dis 1985; 152: 257–65.
    45. Ager EA, Chin TD, Poland JD. Epidemic erythema infectiosum. N Engl J Med 1966; 275: 1326–31.
    46. Richmond SJ, Caul EO, Dunn SM, Ashley CR, Clarke SK. An outbreak of gastroenteritis in young children caused by adenoviruses. Lancet 1979; 1: 1178–80.
    47. Mitchell DK, Van R, Morrow AL, Monroe SS, Glass RI, Pickering LK. Outbreaks of astrovirus gastroenteritis in day care centers. J Pediatr 1993; 123: 725–32.
    48. Kurtz JB, Lee TW, Craig JW, Reed SE. Astrovirus infection in volunteers. J Med Virol 1979; 3: 221–30.
    49. Blacklow NR, Greenberg HB. Viral gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 252–64.
    50. Cubitt WD, McSwiggan DA. Calicivirus gastroenteritis in North West London. Lancet 1981; 2: 975–7.
    51. Kaplan JE, Gary GW, Baron RC, et al. Epidemiology of Norwalk gastroenteritis and the role of Norwalk virus in outbreaks of acute nonbacterial gastroenteritis. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 756–61.
    52. Baron RC, Murphy FD, Greenberg HB, et al. Norwalk gastrointestinal illness: an outbreak associated with swimming in a recreational lake and secondary person-to-person transmission. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 163–72.
    53. Thornhill TS, Kalica AR, Wyatt RG, Kapikian AZ, Chanock RM. Pattern of shedding of the Norwalk particle in stools during experimentally induced gastroenteritis in volunteers as determined by immune electron microscopy. J Infect Dis 1975; 132: 28–34.
    54. White KE, Osterholm MT, Mariotti JA, et al. A foodborne outbreak of Norwalk virus gastroenteritis: evidence for post-recovery transmission. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 120–6.
    55. Grimwood K, Abbott GD, Fergusson DM, Jennings LC, Allan JM. Spread of rotavirus within families: a community based study. Br Med J 1983; 287: 575–7.
    56. Kapikian AZ, Wyatt RG, Levine MM, et al. Oral administration of human rotavirus to volunteers: induction of illness and correlates of resistance. J Infect Dis 1983; 147: 95–106.
    57. Davidson GP, Bishop RF, Townley RR, Holmes IH, Ruck BJ. Importance of a new virus in acute sporadic enteritis in children. Lancet 1975; 1: 242–6.
    58. Flanagan PA. Giardia: diagnosis, clinical course and epidemiology. Epidemiol Infect 1992; 109: 1–22.
    59. Black RE, Dykes AC, Sinclair SP, Wells JG. Giardiasis in day-care centers: evidence of person-to-person transmission. Pediatrics 1977; 60: 486–91.
    60. Hopkins RS, Juranek DD. Acute giardiasis: an improved case definition for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 402–7.
    61. Rauch AM, Van R, Bartlett AV, Pickering LK. Longitudinal study of Giardia lamblia infection in a day care center population. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9: 186–9.
    62. Makintubee S, Istre GR, Ward JI. Transmission of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in day care settings. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 180–6.
    63. Ward JI, Fraser DW, Baraff LJ, Plikaytis BD. Haemophilus influenzae meningitis: a national study of secondary spread in household contacts. N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 122–6.
    64. Homer C, Poncher J, Yogev R, Hansen EJ. Simultaneous presentation of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type B disease after brief exposure in a day care setting. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9: 296–8.
    65. Ogle JW, Rabalais GP, Glode MP. Duration of pharyngeal carriage of Haemophilus influenzae type b in children hospitalized with systemic infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1986; 5: 509–11.
    66. Shapiro ED, Ward JI. The epidemiology and prevention of disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Epidemiol Rev 1991; 13: 113–42.
    67. Robinson CR, Doane FW, Rhodes AJ. Report of an outbreak of febrile illness with pharyngeal lesions and exanthem: Toronto, summer 1957—isolation of group A coxsackie virus. Can Med Assoc J 1958; 79: 615–21.
    68. Higgins PG, Ellis EM, Boston DG. Hand, foot and mouth disease, 1963–64: a study of cases and family contacts. Monthly Bull Minist Health 1965; 24: 38–45.
      69. Ferson MJ, Bell SM. Outbreak of coxsackievirus A16 hand, foot, and mouth disease in a child day-care center. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1675–6.
      70. Goh KT, Doraisingham S, Tan JL, Lim GN, Chew SE. An outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Singapore. Bull World Health Organ 1982; 60: 965–9.
      71. Chunge RN, Scott FE, Underwood JE, Zavarella KJ. A review of the epidemiology, public health importance, treatment and control of head lice. Can J Public Health 1991; 82: 196–200.
      72. Hopper JM. An epidemic of nits. Can J Public Health 1971; 62: 159–60.
      73. Ibarra J. Lice (Anoplura). In: Lane RP, Crosskey RW, eds. Medical insects and arachnids. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
        74. Ström J. A comparison between family infections during epidemics of poliomyelitis and hepatitis in Stockholm. Acta Med Scand 1959; 165: 49–54.
        75. Knight V, Drake ME, Belden EA, Franklin BJ, Romer M, Copple LO. Characteristics of spread of infectious hepatitis in schools and households in an epidemic in a rural area. Am J Hyg 1954; 59: 1–16.
        76. Hooper RR, Juels CW, Routenberg JA, et al. An outbreak of type A viral hepatitis at the Naval Training Center, San Diego: epidemiologic evaluation. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 105: 148–55.
        77. Krugman S, Ward R, Giles JP. The natural history of infectious hepatitis. Am J Med 1962; 32: 717–28.
        78. Coulepsis AG, Locarnini SA, Lehmann NI, Gust ID. Detection of hepatitis A virus in the feces of patients with naturally acquired infections. J Infect Dis 1980; 141: 151–6.
        79. Rakela J, Mosley JW. Fecal excretion of hepatitis A virus in humans. J Infect Dis 1977; 135: 933–8.
        80. Dienstag JL, Feinstone SM, Kapikian AZ, Purcell RH, Boggs JD, Conrad ME. Faecal shedding of hepatitis-A antigen. Lancet 1975; 1: 765–7.
        81. Batten PJ, Runte VE, Skinner HG. Infectious hepatitis: infectiousness during the presymptomatic phase of the disease. Am J Hyg 1963; 77: 129–36.
        82. Ward R, Krugman S, Giles JP, Jacobs AM, Bodansky O. Infectious hepatitis: studies of its natural history and prevention. N Engl J Med 1958; 258: 407–16.
        83. Havens WP. Period of infectivity of patients with experimentally induced infectious hepatitis. J Exp Med 1946; 83: 251–8.
        84. Neefe JR, Stokes J, Reinhold JG. Oral administration to volunteers of feces from patients with homologous serum hepatitis and infectious (epidemic) hepatitis. Am J Med Sci 1945; 210: 29–32.
        85. Brodribb HS. Infective hepatitis in a boarding-school. Lancet 1952; 1: 339–42.
        86. Hadler SC, McFarland L. Hepatitis in day care centers: epidemiology and prevention. Rev Infect Dis 1986; 8: 548–57.
        87. Buddingh GJ, Schrum DI, Lanier JC, Guidry DJ. Studies of the natural history of herpes simplex infections. Pediatrics 1953; 11: 595–609.
        88. Manzella JP, McConville JH, Valenti W, Menegus MA, Swierkosz EM, Arens M. An outbreak of herpes simplex type I gingivostomatitis in a dental hygiene practice. JAMA 1984; 252: 2019–22.
        89. Daniels CA, LeGoff SG, Notkins AL. Shedding of infectious virus/antibody complexes from vesicular lesions of patients with recurrent herpes labialis. Lancet 1975; 2: 524–8.
        90. Juretic M. Incubation period of primary herpetic infections. Helv Paediatr Acta 1960; 15: 102.
        91. Dillon HC. Impetigo contagiosa: suppurative and non-suppurative complications. Am J Dis Child 1968; 115: 530–41.
        92. Ferrieri P, Dajani AS, Wannamaker LW, Chapman SS. Natural history of impetigo: 1. Site sequence of acquisition and familial patterns of spread of cutaneous streptococci. J Clin Invest 1972; 51: 2851–62.
        93. Brodsky AL, Heath CW. Infectious mononucleosis: epidemiologic patterns at United States colleges and universities. Am J Epidemiol 1972; 96: 87–93.
        94. Hoagland RJ. The incubation period of infectious mononucleosis. Am J Public Health 1964; 54: 1699–705.
          95. Miller G, Niederman JC, Andrews LL. Prolonged oropharyngeal excretion of Epstein-Barr virus after infectious mononucleosis. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 229–32.
          96. Alford RH, Kasel JA, Gerone PJ, Knight V. Human influenza resulting from aerosol inhalation. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1966; 122: 800–4.
          97. Moser MR, Bender TR, Margolis HS, Noble GR, Kendal AP, Ritter DG. An outbreak of influenza aboard a commercial airliner. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 110: 1–6.
          98. Hall CB, Douglas RG. Nosocomial influenza infection as a cause of intercurrent fevers in infants. Pediatrics 1975; 55: 673–7.
          99. Jordan WS, Denny FW, Badger GF, et al. A study of illness in a group of Cleveland families XVII: the occurrence of Asian influenza. Am J Hyg 1958; 68: 190–212.
          100. Steere AC. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 586–96.
          101. Steere AC, Broderick TF, Malawista SE. Erythema chronicum migrans and Lyme arthritis: epidemiologic evidence for a tick vector. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108: 312–21.
          102. Hope Simpson RE. Infectiousness of communicable diseases in the household (measles, chickenpox, and mumps). Lancet 1952; 2: 549–54.
          103. Christensen PE, Schmidt H, Bang HO, Andersen V, Jordal B, Jensen O. An epidemic of measles in southern Greenland Measles in virgin soil II: the epidemic proper. Acta Med Scand 1951; 1953; 144: 430–49.
          104. Ruckle G, Rogers KD. Studies with measles virus II: isolation of virus and immunologic studies in persons who have had the natural disease. J Immunol 1957; 78: 341–55.
          105. De Wals P, Hertoghe L, Borlée-Grimée I, et al. Meningococcal disease in Belgium: secondary attack rate among household, day-care nursery and pre-elementary school contacts. J Infect 1981; 3 (Suppl 1): 53–61.
          106. Broome CV. The carrier state:Neisseria meningitidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 18 (Suppl A): 25–34.
          107. Greenfield S, Sheehe PR, Feldman HA. Meningococcal carriage in a population of “normal” families. J Infect Dis 1971; 123: 67–73.
          108. Deal WB, Sanders E. Efficacy of rifampicin in treatment of meningococcal carriers. N Engl J Med 1969; 281: 641–5.
          109. Zangwill KM, Schuchat A, Riedo FX, et al. School-based clusters of meningococcal disease in the United States: descriptive epidemiology and a case-control analysis. JAMA 1997; 277: 389–95.
          110. Cooke RPD, Riordan T, Jones DM, Painter MJ. Secondary cases of meningococcal infection among close family and household contacts in England and Wales, 1984–7. Br Med J 1989; 298: 555–7.
          111. Overfield TM, Brody JA. An epidemiologic study of molluscum contagiosum in Anchorage, Alaska. J Pediatr 1966; 69: 640–2.
          112. Wile UJ, Kingery LB. The etiology of molluscum contagiosum: preliminary report of experimental study. J Cutan Dis 1919; 37: 431–46.
            113. Foulds IS. Molluscum contagiosum: an unusual complication of tattooing. Br Med J 1982; 285: 607.
            114. Commens CA. Cutaneous transmission of molluscum contagiosum during orienteering competition. Med J Aust 1987; 146: 117.
            115. Cranston Low R. Molluscum contagiosum. Edinburgh Med J 1946; 53: 657–71.
            116. Meyer MB. An epidemiologic study of mumps: its spread in schools and families. Am J Hyg 1962; 75: 259–81.
            117. Henle G, Henle W, Wendell KK, Rosenberg P. Isolation of mumps virus from human beings with induced apparent or inapparent infections. J Exp Med 1948; 88: 223–32.
            118. Ennis FA, Jackson D. Isolation of virus during the incubation period of mumps infection. J Pediatr 1968; 72: 536–7.
            119. Lambert HJ. Epidemiology of a small pertussis outbreak in Kent County, Michigan. Public Health Rep 1965; 80: 365–9.
            120. Gordon JE, Hood RI. Whooping cough and its epidemiologic anomalies. Am J Med Sci 1951; 222: 333–61.
            121. Kwantes W, Joynson DH, Williams WO. Bordetella pertussis isolation in general practice: 1977–79 whooping cough epidemic in West Glamorgan. J Hyg (Camb) 1983; 90: 149–58.
            122. Aoyama T, Sunakawa K, Iwata S, Takeuchi Y, Fujii R. Efficacy of short-term treatment of pertussis with clarithromycin and azithromycin. J Pediatr 1996; 129: 761–4.
            123. Stocks P. Some epidemiologic features of whooping-cough. Lancet 1933; 1: 265–9.
            124. Christie CD, Marx ML, Daniels JA, Adcock MP. Pertussis containment in schools and day care centres during the Cincinnati epidemic of 1993. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 460–2.
            125. Barenberg LH, Greenspan L. Exanthema subitum (roseola infantum). Am J Dis Child 1939; 58: 983–93.
              126. Berenberg W, Wright S, Janeway CA. Roseola infantum (exanthem subitum). N Engl J Med 1949; 241: 253–9.
              127. Harnett GB, Farr TJ, Pietroboni GR, Bucens MR. Frequent shedding of human herpesvirus 6 in saliva. J Med Virol 1990; 30: 128–30.
              128. Green RH, Balsamo MR, Giles JP, Krugman S, Mirick GS. Studies of the natural history and prevention of rubella. Am J Dis Child 1965; 110: 348–65.
              129. Sever JL, Brody JA, Schiff GM, McAlister R, Cutting R. Rubella epidemic on St. Paul Island in the Pribilofs, 1963. JAMA 1965; 191: 88–90.
              130. Hattis RP, Halstead SB, Herrmann KL, Witte JJ. Rubella in an immunized island population. JAMA 1973; 223: 1019–21.
              131. Aycock WL, Ingalls TH. Maternal disease as a principle in the epidemiology of congenital anomalies with a review of rubella. Am J Med Sci 1946; 212: 366–79.
              132. Palmer SR, Jephcott AE, Rowland AJ, Sylvester DG. Person-to-person spread of Salmonella typhimurium phage type 10 after a common-source outbreak. Lancet 1981; 1: 881–4.
              133. Chorba TL, Meriwether RA, Jenkins BR, Gunn RA, MacCormack JN. Control of a non-foodborne outbreak of salmonellosis: day care isolation. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 979–81.
              134. Glynn JR, Palmer SR. Incubation period, severity of disease, and infecting dose: evidence from a Salmonella outbreak. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 1369–77.
              135. O’Mahony M, Barnes H, Stanwell-Smith R, Dickens T, Jephcott A. An outbreak of Salmonella heidelberg infection associated with a long incubation period. J Public Health Med 1990; 12: 19–21.
              136. Buchwald DS, Blaser MJ. A review of human salmonellosis II: duration of excretion following infection with nontyphi Salmonella. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 345–56.
              137. Church RE, Knowelden J. Scabies in Sheffield: a family infestation. Br Med J 1978; 1: 761–3.
              138. Gooch JJ, Strasius SR, Beamer B, Reiter MD, Correll GW. Nosocomial outbreak of scabies. Arch Dermatol 1978; 114: 897–8.
              139. Haustein UF, Hlawa B. Treatment of scabies with permethrin vs. lindane and benzyl benzoate. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh) 1989; 69: 348–51.
              140. Schwentker FF, Janney JH, Gordon JE. The epidemiology of scarlet fever. Am J Hyg 1943; 38: 27–98.
                141. Dick GF, Dick GH. Experimental scarlet fever. JAMA 1923; 81: 1166–7.
                142. Richman DD, Breton SJ, Goldmann DA. Scarlet fever and group A streptococcal surgical wound infection traced to an anal carrier. J Pediatr 1977; 90: 387–90.
                143. Anthony BF, Yamauchi T, Penso JS, Kamei I, Chapman SS. Classroom outbreak of scarlet fever and acute glomerulonephritis related to type 2 (M-2, T-2) group A Streptococcus. J Infect Dis 1974; 129: 336–40.
                144. Stillerman M, Isenberg HD, Facklam RR. Treatment of pharyngitis associated with group A Streptococcus: comparison of amoxicillin and potassium phenoxymethyl penicillin. J Infect Dis 1974; 129 (Suppl): S169–77.
                145. Hutchinson RI. Some observations on the method of spread of Sonne dysentery. Monthly Bull Minist Health 1956; 15: 110–18.
                  146. Weissman JB, Schmerier A, Weiler P, Filice G, Godbey N, Hansen I. The role of preschool children and day-care centres in the spread of shigellosis in urban communities. J Pediatr 1974; 84: 797–802.
                  147. Makintubee S, Mallonee J, Istre GR. Shigellosis outbreak associated with swimming. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 166–8.
                  148. Dunn RA, Hall WN, Altamirano JV, Dietrich SE, Robinson-Dunn B, Johnson DR. Outbreak of Shigella flexneri linked to salad prepared at a central commissary in Michigan. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 580–6.
                  149. DuPont HL, Hornick RB, Dawkins AT, Snyder MJ, Formal SB. The response of man to virulent Shigella flexneri 2a. J Infect Dis 1969; 119: 296–9.
                  150. Beer B, O’Donnell GM, Henderson RJ. A school outbreak of Sonne dysentery controlled by hygienic measures. Monthly Bull Minist Health 1966; 25: 36–41.
                    151. Claesson BE, Svensson NG, Gotthardsson L, Gotthardsson L, Garden B. A foodborne outbreak of group A streptococcal disease at a birthday party. Scand J Infect Dis 1992; 24: 577–86.
                    152. Boissard JM, Fry RM. Streptococcal school outbreaks: a method of investigation and control. J Hyg 1966; 64: 221–30.
                    153. De Wals P, Bouckaert A. Methods for estimating the duration of bacterial carriage. Int J Epidemiol 1985; 14: 628–34.
                    154. Cram EB. Studies on oxyuriasis XXVIII: summary and conclusions. Am J Dis Child 1943; 65: 46–59.
                    155. Lane C. Threadworm infections: prevalence pathogenicity, periodicity and prevention. Lancet 1944; 2: 511–13.
                    156. English MP. Trichopyton rubrum infection in families. Br Med J 1957; 1: 744–6.
                    157. Mackenzie DW, Burrows D, Walby AL. Trichophyton sulphureum in a residential school. Br Med J 1960; 2: 1055–8.
                    158. Lunder M, Lunder M. Tinea corporis durch ein Eichhörnchen übergaten. Mykosen 1981; 25: 391–2.
                      159. Weller R, Leifert C. Transmission of Trichophyton interdigitale via an intermediate plant host. Br J Dermatol 1996; 135: 656–7.
                      160. Baer RL, Rosenthal SA. The biology of fungous infections of the feet. JAMA 1966; 197: 1017–20.
                      161. Medical Research Council Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases Unit. Tuberculosis in children: a national survey of notifications in England and Wales in 1983. Arch Dis Child 1988; 63: 266–76.
                      162. Rouillon A, Perdrizet S, Parrot R. Transmission of tubercle bacilli: the effects of chemotherapy. Tubercle 1976; 57: 275–99.
                      163. Smith WHR, Davies D, Mason KD, Onions JP. Intraoral and pulmonary tuberculosis following dental treatment. Lancet 1982; 1: 842–4.
                      164. Riley RL, Moodie AS. Infectivity of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in inner city homes. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 110: 810–2.
                      165. Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Control and prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: code of practice Thorax 1994; 49: 1193–200.
                      166. Aspin J, Sheldon M. An epidemic of tuberculosis in a Staffordshire school. Tubercle 1965; 46: 321–44.
                      167. Wales JM, Buchan AR, Cookson JB, Jones DA, Marshall BS. Tuberculosis in a primary school: the Uppingham outbreak. Br Med J 1985; 291: 1039–40.
                      168. Galloway H, Clark NS, Blackhall M. Paediatric aspects of the Aberdeen typhoid outbreak. Arch Dis Child 1966; 41: 63–8.
                      169. Birkhead GS, Morse DL, Levine WC, et al. Typhoid fever at a resort hotel in New York: a large outbreak with an unusual vehicle. J Infect Dis 1993; 167: 1228–32.
                      170. Hornick RB, Greisman SE, Woodward TE, DuPont HL, Dawkins AT, Snyder MJ. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. N Engl J Med 1970; 283: 686–91.
                      171. Goh KT. An outbreak of paratyphoid A in Singapore: clinical and epidemiologic studies. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1981; 12: 55–62.
                      172. Public Health Laboratory Service. Paratyphoid B infection: reception W Midlands. Commun Dis Rep 1988;88/09:1.
                        173. Francis S, Rowland J, Rattenbury K, et al. An outbreak of paratyphoid fever in the UK associated with a fish-and-chip shop. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 445–8.
                        174. Bunney MH, Benton C, Cubie HA. Viral warts: biology and treatment 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992.
                          175. Long GE, Rickman LS. Infectious complications of tattoos. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 18: 610–19.
                          176. Rowson KE, Mahy BW. Human papova (wart) virus. Bacteriol Rev 1967; 31: 110–31.
                          177. Grussendorf-Conen EI, Gissmann L, Holters J. Correlation between content of viral DNA and evidence of mature virus particles in HPV-1, HPV-4, and HPV-6 induced virus acanthomata. J Invest Dermatol 1983; 81: 511–13.
                          178. Working Party of the PHLS Salmonella Committee. The prevention of human transmission of gastrointestinal infections, infestations, and bacterial intoxications. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev 1995; 5: R157–72.
                          179. Brunell PA. Transmission of chickenpox in a school setting before the observed exanthem. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 1451–2.
                          180. Moore DA, Hopkins RS. Assessment of a school exclusion policy during a chickenpox outbreak. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 1161–7.
                          181. Lemon SM. Type A viral hepatitis: new developments in an old disease. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 1059–67.
                          182. Joseph C, Noah N, White J, Hoskins T. A review of outbreaks of infectious disease in schools in England and Wales 1979–88. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105: 419–34.
                          183. Tauxe RV, Johnson KE, Boase JC, Helgerson SD, Blake PA. Control of day care shigellosis: a trial of convalescent day care in isolation. Am J Public Health 1986; 76: 627–30.
                          184. Kotch JB, Weigle KA, Weber DJ, et al. Evaluation of an hygienic intervention in child day-care centers. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 991–4.
                          185. Uhari M, Mottonen M. An open randomized controlled trial of infection prevention in child day-care centers. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18: 672–7.


                          The information on exclusion periods from this article is incorporated in a poster that has been distributed to schools and preschools in England and Wales. The poster also includes guidance on other topics such as hygiene, universal precautions, immunization and vulnerable children and members of staff. Copies of the poster, Guidance on Infection Control in Schools and Nurseries, and an accompanying wallet-sized leaflet are available from Department of Health, P.O. Box 777, London SE1 6XH, UK. Details are available at The website also contains a fully referenced database of the evidence identified in this study.


                          Communicable disease control; schools; incubation period; period of infectiousness; exclusion period; evidence-based medicine

                          Copyright © 2001 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.