Share this article on:

Commentary on “Power-Up: Exploration and Play in a Novel Modified Ride-On Car for Standing”

Tally, Melissa PT, MPT, ATP; Morress, Claire PhD, OTR/L, ATP

Pediatric Physical Therapy: January 2017 - Volume 29 - Issue 1 - p 38
doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000352
Clinical Bottom Line

Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Perlman Center Ohio

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

“How could I apply this information?”

Children with neuromotor disabilities may be deprived of normal play opportunities1 and thus may rely on assistive devices to allow them to explore and participate in activities critical to development. This study challenges us to think about how different types of mobility devices may affect play in different settings, and lends support to the notion that using more than one mobility device may be needed to optimize participation and function across settings. This study adds to the growing support for incorporating therapy interventions into everyday activities and routines to increase dosage.2 For a child, these daily routines include self-initiated, experiential play activities in multiple environments including home, school, the community, and playgrounds. Therapists should consider using the “right device, right time, right place” approach across settings to maximize developmental and functional outcomes for young children with mobility challenges, including wheeled mobility, adapted gait devices, and out-of-the-box thinking with modified ride-on options.

“What should I be mindful about when applying this information?”

Limitations include the inability to generalize behaviors beyond the case and the context described and to infer causation regarding any change in behaviors.

The equipment described in this study required aftermarket modifications to a commercial product and may be difficult for clinicians to replicate. Clinicians performing their own modifications to ride-on toys must be mindful of safety precautions, including the assurance that all modifications are technically sound and physically safe.

A number of clinically feasible experimental methodologies could be used to replicate findings and build evidence in this area, such as studies using matched pairs, well-designed N-of-1 studies, and cross-over designs.

Melissa Tally, PT, MPT, ATP

Claire Morress, PhD, OTR/L, ATP

Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Perlman Center


Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Missiuna C, Pollock N. Play deprivation in children with physical disabilities: the role of the occupational therapist in preventing secondary disability. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:882–888.
2. Morgan C, Novak I, Badawi N. Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e735–746.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. and Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved.