Secondary Logo

Sedation for peritonsillar abscess drainage in the pediatric emergency department

LUHMANN, JAN D., MD; KENNEDY, ROBERT M., MD; MCALLISTER, JOHN D., MD; JAFFE, DAVID M., MD

ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Free

Objective To evaluate the use of intravenous (IV) sedation in children during peritonsillar abscess (PTA) incision and drainage in the emergency department (ED).

Design Retrospective review of medical records of children with a diagnosis of PTA.

Setting The ED of a large, urban, academic children’s hospital.

Patients Consecutive patients 18 years or younger presenting from April 1995 to November 1998.

Methods Information was retrieved from a time-based sedation record that included age, sex, ASA classification, time since last liquid or solid, agent and dose, level of sedation (A=alert, V=response to voice, P=purposeful response to pain, U=unresponsive), vital signs, complications, recovery time, and disposition.

Results Forty-two patients had incision and drainage performed with IV sedation in the ED. Mean age was 11.3 ± 4.3 years (range 4–18 years); 57% were African-American, and 64% were female. Agents used included ketamine plus midazolam (K/M) (n = 36, 86%), morphine plus midazolam (n = 3, 7%), meperidine plus midazolam (n = 2, 5%), and nitrous oxide plus midazolam (n = 1, 2%). No cardiorespiratory complications, including laryngospasm, occurred. Vomiting occurred in 1 patient who received meperidine and midazolam. The deepest level of sedation reached included: 12% A, 64% V, and 24% P. No patient who had an abscess drained in the ED with IV sedation was admitted, and mean recovery time was 81.0 ± 30.1 minutes.

Conclusions IV sedation in children for incision and drainage of PTA by skilled personnel in the ED may eliminate the need for admission and surgical drainage in the operating room. K/M was used most frequently, without adverse effect, and all patients were discharged from the ED. Because K/M may result in deep sedation, appropriate personnel and equipment must be present.

From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri (J.D. Luhmann, R.M. Kennedy, D.M. Jaffe), and the Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri (J.D. McAllister).

Address for reprints: Jan D. Luhmann, MD, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, One Children’s Place, Room 4S50, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Abstract presented as a poster presentation at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ Annual Meeting in San Francisco, CA, on May 3, 1999.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is the most common deep neck space infection in children (1). Procedures used to drain PTAs include needle aspiration (2), incision and drainage (3), and abscess tonsillectomy (4). Although none of these interventions has been identified as the optimal drainage procedure (5), bedside needle aspiration followed by incision and drainage is preferred at our institution. This procedure is not effective or safe in an uncooperative patient, in which case operative management and admission are required. The few reports of outpatient PTA management in children do not address the use of sedation during incision and drainage (1,6–10). Safe and effective pharmacologic sedation can avert detrimental patient, parent, and practitioner sequelae and facilitate accomplishment of the procedure. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the use of intravenous (IV) sedation in children during PTA aspiration and drainage in the emergency department (ED).

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

A retrospective review of ED medical records for all children with a discharge diagnosis of PTA from April 1995 to November 1998 at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri was conducted. Information was retrieved from physician, nursing, and time-based sedation records that included age, race, sex, weight, time since last oral intake, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (11), medication, dose, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, level of sedation (ie, alert, responsive to voice, responsive to pain, unresponsive) throughout and after the procedure, complications, recovery time, and disposition. Recovery time was defined as completion of procedure to discharge. Data analysis was performed with JMP software (Version 3.1, SAS Institute, Carey, NC, 1995) using descriptive statistics, including frequencies of categoric data and means ± standard deviations for continuous data.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with a diagnosis of PTA were identified; 42 of these patients had incision and drainage performed with IV sedation in the ED, and were included in the study group. Of the other 20 patients, 18 had incision and drainage performed in the ED without IV sedation, and 2 patients were admitted to the operating room for incision and drainage. Mean age of the study group was 11.3 ± 4.3 years (range 4–18 years, Fig. 1); 64% were female; 58% were African-American, and 42% were white; 95% were ASA class I, and 5% were ASA class II. All sedation medications were administered by attending or fellow level pediatric emergency physicians with staffing and monitoring in accordance with the American Academy of Pediatric guidelines (12). No patient received supplemental oxygen. All incisions and drainages were performed by otolaryngology residents using topical and injected local anesthesia on patients who were in an upright position. Time-based sedation records were completed at the time of sedation and in all cases by the patient’s emergency nurse. Mean time since last oral intake was 5.2 ± 3.6 hours. Agents used included ketamine plus midazolam (n = 36, 86%), morphine plus midazolam (n = 3, 7%), meperidine plus midazolam (n = 2, 5%), and 50% nitrous oxide by nasal mask plus midazolam (n = 1, 2%). The mean total doses of ketamine were 0.75 ± 0.4 mg/kg, midazolam 0.09 ± 0.06 mg/kg, morphine 0.07 ± 0.003 mg/kg, and meperidine 0.81 ± 0.2 mg/kg.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

No cardiorespiratory complications, including laryngospasm or airway obstruction, hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 95%), respiratory distress, clinical pulmonary aspiration, need for positive pressure ventilation, or supplemental oxygen, were documented in any patient. Vomiting occurred after the procedure in 1 patient who received meperidine and midazolam. Emergence dysphoria did not occur in any patient. The deepest levels of sedation achieved during the procedure were: 12% alert, 64% responsive to voice, and 24% purposefully responsive to pain. Successful incision and drainage was accomplished in all children in the ED. Mean recovery time was 81.0 ± 30.1 minutes, and all patients who were sedated for abscess drainage were discharged from the ED.

Of the 20 patients who did not receive sedation for abscess drainage in the ED, 2 patients did not tolerate the procedure and were admitted to the operating room for drainage under general anesthesia. The mean length of hospital admission for these 2 patients was 30.5 hours. There was no difference in age, gender, or race between the study group and those who did not receive sedation. However, it was noted that patients who did not receive sedation for abscess drainage presented for treatment early in the study period.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

During the past decade, there has occurred an increased recognition of the importance of providing safe and effective outpatient management of pain and anxiety during painful procedures in children (13). Effective analgesia and sedation are essential to facilitate successful surgical management of children with PTA in the ED (14–17). Several reports comment on the failure to perform the procedure in children because of poor patient cooperation (7,10,16,18). In 1 report of 189 children with PTA, successful outpatient drainage was accomplished without general anesthesia in 92.5% of the children by having a parent hold the child tightly in his/her arms in a sitting position (10). In addition, this report suggests that although the procedure was considered difficult, violent, or even cruel for children, the majority of patients tolerated it well, and their parents consented in order to avoid the risk of surgical or anesthetic complications. Another report of 41 children describes selectively attempting the procedure if the children were able to sit quietly without moving (7).

Adequate treatment of procedure-related distress is essential for all children. An equally important goal for sedation during PTA drainage is to ensure technical safety and acceptable surgical conditions. Bedside incision and drainage has been considered too difficult or dangerous in children because of poor patient cooperation (18). The procedure generally involves advancing a needle into the superior, medial, or inferior pole of the tonsillar area. The risk of injury to the internal carotid artery, which can pass as close as 1.5 cm to the posterolateral aspect of the tonsillar fossa, necessitates both a cooperative patient and IV access (19). Because of this, ED incision and drainage in patients with syndromes, such as velocardiofacial syndrome, where the carotids may be especially close to the pharynx, is not recommended.

Several studies have documented safe management of PTA in an outpatient setting (5,14–16). However, the potential risks include aspiration of the abscess content and hemorrhage into the airway. This is a significant concern in the deeply sedated patient who may have diminished protective airway reflexes. Laryngospasm is a reported complication of ketamine (20), and the risk may be increased with purulent or bloody fluid in the oropharynx. Careful titration to the minimally effective depth of sedation is essential for minimizing this risk. We did not observe any adverse cardiorespiratory events in our series, but the sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions regarding safety. We believe these preliminary data warrant further prospective evaluation to determine safety and efficacy.

Because this study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric ED staffed by nurses and physicians experienced in the care of critically ill and injured children, caution in generalization of these results to other clinical settings is warranted. The minimum number of health providers present during the sedation and procedure included (1) an attending emergency physician or fellow who was responsible for administration of the medications, monitoring, and management of any complications, (2) an ED registered nurse who was responsible for monitoring patient recovery and documenting data on a standardized sedation record, and (3) the otolaryngology physician who performed the surgical procedures. Pediatric emergency medicine fellows are required to complete sedation training which includes reading an instructional packet of guidelines, protocols, recent literature, and bedside teaching with attending physicians. In addition, all fellows receive airway management instruction as part of a 1-month rotation in pediatric anesthesia. After this, fellows are directly observed by attending physicians for determination of competency to independently perform sedations. Resuscitation equipment was immediately available in the treatment room, and included: catheter and Yankauer suction; oxygen delivery system including mask, bag-valve-mask device, oral airways; “crash cart” complete with intubation equipment; resuscitation medications. Furthermore, the sedation plan was developed by the attending emergency physician after individual patient evaluation for the risk of sedation, coexisting illness, ASA physical status classification, age, and recent oral intake. Only ASA classification I and II patients should be considered candidates for this procedure. The sedation protocols were consistent with current Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations policies on hospital sedation (21). These assumptions should not be generalized to other institutions without careful review of operating procedures and training protocols.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that carefully titrated intravenous sedation of children by skilled pediatric emergency physicians facilitates incision and drainage of peritonsillar abscess in the emergency department.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Dodds B, Maniglia AJ. Peritonsillar and neck abscesses in the pediatric age group. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:956–959.
2. King JT. Aspiration treatment of peritonsillar abscess. J Med Assoc Ga 1961; 50:18–19.
3. Holt GR, Tinsley Jr. PP Peritonsillar abscesses in children. Laryngoscope 1981; 91:1226–1230.
4. Virtanen VS. Tonsillectomy of acute peritonsillitis, with clinical and statistical observations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1949; 80:1.
5. Herzon FS. Peritonsillar abscess: Incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope 1995; 105(S74):1–17.
6. Ungkanont K, Yellon RF, Weissman JL, et al. Head and neck space infections in infants and children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 112:375–382.
7. Weinberg E, Brodsky L, Stanievich J, et al. Needle aspiration of peritonsillar abscess in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119:169–172.
8. Apostolopoulos NJ, Nikolopoulos TP, Bairamis TN. Peritonsillar abscess in children. Is incision and drainage an effective management? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 31:129–135.
9. Wolf M, Kronenberg J, Kessler A, et al. Peritonsillar abscess in children and its indication for tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1988; 16:113–117.
10. Friedman NR, Mitchell RB, Pereira KD, et al. Peritonsillar abscess in early childhood. Presentation and management. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123:630–632.
11. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards, Guidelines and Statements. Park Ridge: ASA; 1999.
12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs, Section of Anesthesiology. G.uidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 1992;89:1110–1115.
13. Kennedy RM, Luhmann JD. The “ouchless emergency department.” Getting closer: Advances in decreasing distress during painful procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999; 46:1215–1247.
14. Herzon FS, Nicklaus P. Pediatric peritonsillar abscess: management guidelines. Curr Probl Pediatr 1996; 26:270–278.
15. Stringer SP, Schaefer SD, Close LG. A randomized trial of outpatient management of peritonsillar abscess. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:296–298.
16. Ophir D, Bawnik J, Poria Y, et al. Peritonsillar abscess. A prospective evaluation of outpatient management by needle aspiration. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:661–663.
17. Savolainen S, Jousimies-Somer HR, Makitie AA, et al. Peritonsillar abscess. Clinical and microbiologic aspects and treatment regimens. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119:521–524.
18. Brodsky L, Sobie SR, Korwin D, et al. A clinical prospectivestudy of peritonsillar abscess in children. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:780–783.
19. Tolczynski B. Tonsillectomy, its hazards and their prevention. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon 1969; 48:378–385.
20. Green SM, Rothrock SG, Lynch EL, et al. Intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation in the emergency department: Safety profile in 1,022 cases. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31:688–697.
21. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Revisions to anesthesia care standards for subacute comprehensive accreditation manual for long term care [JCAHO web site]. 2000. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org/standards_frm.html. Accessed February 2001.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

Pediatric Emergency Care
Suspected Peritonsillar Abscess in Children
Millar, KR; Johnson, DW; Drummond, D; Kellner, JD
Pediatric Emergency Care, 23(7): 431-438.
10.1097/01.pec.0000280525.44515.72
PDF (102) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

Sedation; peritonsillar abscess

© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.