Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Emergency Provider Use of Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pediatric Constipation

Kearney, Ryan MD, MPH*; Edwards, Todd PhD; Bradford, Miranda MS; Klein, Eileen MD, MPH*

doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001549
Original Articles
Buy

Background More than half of children evaluated as outpatients for abdominal pain are diagnosed with constipation. X-ray use in this scenario is variable: less than 5% in clinic settings, greater than 70% in emergency departments. X-rays increase misdiagnosis rate, remain costly, and involve radiation exposure.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the use of plain radiographs by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers in the diagnostic evaluation and management of pediatric constipation.

Methods A cross-sectional survey of PEM providers was performed. Survey participants were subscribers to the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine Listserv. To assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, participants were presented a case of pediatric constipation meeting Rome III clinical criteria. Participants also categorized frequency of x-ray use, reasons for obtaining, estimated diagnostic utility, and elements of institutional standard approach. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

Results Three hundred five of 1272 Listserv members (24%) responded. Ninety-nine percent elected to treat for constipation in a case meeting Rome III clinical criteria; one third (31%) would obtain plain radiographs for this same scenario. Plain radiographs were viewed as somewhat (59%) or minimally (29%) value-added in the evaluation of suspected pediatric constipation. Obtaining family buy-in (44%) was the most common reason for utilizing plain radiographs. Frequency of use varied across geographic regions and with participant and hospital characteristics.

Conclusions This survey suggests that many PEM providers obtain radiographs to convince families of the diagnosis of constipation. This is not a viable management plan given the risks of radiation as well as costs. There remains room for improvement as we attempt to reduce use of radiation in the evaluation of common pediatric illnesses.

From the *Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics

School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA.

Reprints: Ryan Kearney, MD, MPH, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 (e-mail: ryan.kearney@seattlechildrens.org).

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding was provided by Seattle Children's Division of Emergency Medicine, Fellow Research Grant.

Online date: July 25, 2018

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.