Tracheal suctioning is a routine procedure in mechanically ventilated children, however, in severe head-injured patients it can result in potential deleterious increase in intracranial pressure. We aimed to assess the effect of tracheal lidocaine administration on intracranial pressure during tracheal suctioning.
Prospective randomized controlled crossover study.
PICU of a tertiary hospital.
Eleven patients with severe head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale score 4–8)
Lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) or saline solution was endotracheally instilled before a standardized tracheal suctioning maneuver. Each patient received both treatments in a crossover design. Cerebral hemodynamic and systemic and ventilatory effects were assessed at four time points: in baseline (T0), within 2 minutes (T1), 5 minutes (T2), and 15 minutes after tracheal instillation (T3). The 2-minute time interval around tracheal suctioning was used to assess each treatment efficacy
The time course of intracranial pressure was different throughout the study in both treatment groups, with a significant increase of intracranial pressure from 14.82 ± 3.48 to 23.27 ± 9.06 with lidocaine (p = 0.003) and from 14.73 ± 2.41 to 30.45 ± 13.14 with saline (p = 0.02). The mean variation in intracranial pressure immediately after tracheal suctioning was smaller with lidocaine instillation than saline (8.45 vs 15.72 mm Hg; p = 0.006). Patients treated with lidocaine returned to baseline intracranial pressure value at 5 minutes after tracheal suctioning whereas those receiving saline solution returned to baseline intracranial pressure value at 15 minutes. Although patients treated with lidocaine had no significant hemodynamic changes, patients receiving saline solution experienced a higher mean value of mean arterial pressure (99.36 vs 81.73 mm Hg; p = 0.004) at T1.
This preliminary study showed that tracheal lidocaine instillation can attenuate increase in intracranial pressure induced by tracheal suctioning and favor a faster return to the intracranial pressure baseline levels without significant hemodynamic and ventilatory changes.
1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, São Paulo, Brazil.
2Health Technology Assessment Unit, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
*See also p. 387.
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
This work was performed in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, Rua Castro Alves, São Paulo, Brazil.
For information regarding this article, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org