Prognostic Value and Clinical Predictors of Lymph Node Metastases in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors : Pancreas

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Prognostic Value and Clinical Predictors of Lymph Node Metastases in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Zhang, Zheng MD; Liu, Mengqi MD; Ji, Shunrong PhD; Luo, Guopei PhD; Xu, Wenyan MD; Liu, Wensheng PhD; Hu, Qiangsheng MD; Sun, Qiqing MD; Ye, Zeng MD; Qin, Yi PhD; Fan, Guixiong MD; Yu, Xianjun PhD; Xu, Xiaowu PhD

Author Information
Pancreas 49(3):p 381-386, March 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001493

Abstract

Objectives 

To investigate the correlation between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and various clinicopathological features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and its impact on prognosis.

Methods 

We searched the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2004–2015) for patients with surgically treated pNETs. Factors correlated with LNMs were analyzed by logistic regression and by Cox analysis.

Results 

For tumors of 1 to 4 cm, age (P < 0.001, P = 0.014), grade (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), LNMs (P = 0.008, P < 0.001), and size (P = 0.038, P = 0.002) predicted overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). For tumor greater than 4 cm, age (P < 0.001, P = 0.001) and grade (P = 0.011, P = 0.048) were independent prognostic factors of OS and DSS. Lymph node metastasis modestly predicted DSS (P = 0.028) but not OS (P = 0.218).

Conclusions 

In pNETs greater than 4 cm, LNM is not a predictor of OS and modestly predicts DSS, and lymphadenectomy may be unhelpful in these patients. For pNETs 1 to 4 cm, LNM predicts poor OS and DSS, which supports lymphadenectomy in these patients. Pancreas-sparing resection with only limited peripancreatic node sampling needs to be questioned.

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid