Journal Logo

Musculoskeletal

Prognostic factors for pain chronicity in low back pain: a systematic review

Nieminen, Linda Karoliinaa,*; Pyysalo, Liisa Mariaa; Kankaanpää, Markku Juhania,b

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000919

1. Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived in disability in high-income and middle-income countries.39 Moreover, a similar increase has also been seen in low-income countries.68 In 2015, LBP was responsible for approximately 60.1 million years lived in disabilities, an increase of 54% since 1990.39 For industrialized countries, LBP is a very costly illness21,138 and indirect costs (work absenteeism, productivity loss) account for more than half of the total costs.9 In many patients, the specific nociceptive source of LBP cannot be identified and those affected are often classified as having so-called “nonspecific low back pain.”84 Nonspecific LBP represents 90% to 95% of cases, with other causes being specific spinal pathology (<1% of cases) and radicular syndrome (approximately 5%–10% of cases).7 The global point prevalence of activity‐limiting LBP lasting more than 1 day is estimated to be 12%.69 Although most patients with acute LBP show rapid improvements in pain and disability within 1 month,106 between 4% and 25% of patients drift to chronicity.92 The prevalence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) increases linearly from the third decade of life until the age of 60 years, with CLBP being more prevalent in women.92

The prognosis of nonspecific LBP is greatly influenced by factors not related to the spine.115 In 1987, a biopsychosocial model for understanding LBP was first introduced by George Waddell.136 The idea behind the model is based on how psychologic and social influences modulate an individual's perception of symptoms. An overemphasis on pain alone and a dependence on only mechanical, nominal diagnosis can lead to more disability. Therefore, when treating patients with LBP, clinicians should consider all aspects (biomechanical, psychological, and psychosocial) of the illness.

To date, few comprehensive reviews have studied the risks of chronicity in patients with LBP. A review by Valat et al. in 1997133 concluded that CLBP is more closely related to demographic, psychosocial, and occupational factors than to the medical characteristics of the disorder itself. A 2010 systematic review of “yellow flag” risk factors for developing CLBP15 concluded that maladaptive pain coping behaviors, lower functional impairment at baseline, nonorganic signs referring to somatization, worse general health status before the onset of pain, and the presence of psychiatric comorbidities were significant in terms of chronicity. Since then, a large number of studies have focused on revealing the risk factors behind this global problem.

The aim of this systematic review is to identify the prognostic factors for pain chronicity in patients with LBP and to provide an update on the existing data.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Literature search

Systematic literature searches from computerized databases were conducted until March 30, 2020. The search strategy was developed in collaboration with an information specialist. The following databases were searched without any date restriction: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Database, and Medic specifically for articles in the Finnish language. The primary target of the search was articles concerning predictive risk factors for chronic, nonspecific LBP. The full search strategy is presented in Appendix 1 (available at http://links.lww.com/PR9/A99).

2.2. Study selection and inclusion criteria for selection of studies

The study types included in the literature search were cohort studies, follow-up studies, and reviews. The reviews were used only to search for additional articles to avoid duplication. Randomized controlled trials were not included because the effect of the intervention on the outcome (CLBP) could not be excluded and observing only the group without intervention could create bias. However, studies with interventions could be included if the intervention concerned the whole followed population or its impact could be taken into account in some other way. The references of the studies that met the inclusion criteria were searched for additional articles. There was no time limit for the search. Studies in the English or Finnish languages that focused on working population (aged 18–65 years) were included. If older individuals were recruited, the mean age with SD had to be no more than 65 years. The main outcome was nonspecific CLBP with or without pain radiation, but specific nerve root disorders were excluded. Articles that dealt only with operative treatment were also excluded. Chronic pain is most commonly described as lasting longer than 3 months.129 Therefore, studies must have assessed the predictive risk factors before that period to be included in the search. A chronic condition was defined as persistent pain in the lower back for a period of 3 months or longer.

2.3. Quality assessment

Study quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health study assessment tool.94 Two independent reviewers evaluated all the included articles according to assessment tool criteria. If the ratings differed, the reviewers discussed the article in an effort to reach consensus. If consensus was not achieved, a third reviewer was consulted. Each study was judged as good, fair, or poor by evaluating the potential risk of bias resulting from the existing flaws.

3. Results

3.1. Results of the search

A Prisma flow chart of the study selection is presented in Figure 1. A total of 2,028 articles were identified. The first exclusion round was based on inappropriate titles or abstracts. We then read the full text of 111 articles, and 25 articles met all the inclusion criteria. Characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1. Of these 25 articles, 17 68% were published in 2010 or thereafter.32,56–63,83,88,89,97,99,103,119,122 Two articles were found from the references of included articles.46,55 The excluded articles and the reasons for exclusion are listed in Table 2. Most of the excluded articles did not meet the criteria concerning the prospective information before the onset of chronic pain, the chronic pain was defined as lasting less than 3 months/12 weeks, or the pain was already chronic at baseline. In some articles concerning the working population, the chronic disease was only defined according to the time spent on sick leave without explaining whether the sick leave was due to LBP or to some other medical condition. In many of the excluded articles, the outcome was defined as timely pain during the follow-up contact compared with persistent symptoms for at least 3 months.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.:
Prisma flow diagram93 of the study selection process.
Table 1 - Characteristics of included studies.
Author, year of publication, country Study design Study objective Follow-up time Population at follow-up Inclusion and exclusion criteria Participant characteristics Chronic LBP after follow-up Prognostic risk factors with significant P
Bakker et al. 2007,6 the Netherlands Prospective inception cohort study To assess the prognostic value of spinal mechanical load and influence on the course of acute LBP 6 mo n = 88 Nonspecific LBP less than 6 wk, exclusion: pathologic and sciatica syndrome, not understanding Dutch language, previous episode of LBP in the past 12 mo, significant trauma, pregnancy, and spinal surgery Age 15–82 y (mean 41, SD 13.5), 56% male, and mean duration of symptoms 11.8 d n = 53 (60%) Smoking OR 4.41 95% CI 1.50–12.95, age OR 0.96 95% CI 0.93–0.99
Coste et al. 2003,18 France Inception cohort study To investigate various biologic and psychosocial factors in the natural history of acute LBP 3 mo n = 111 18 y or older, primary complaint of LBP, and pain duration <72 h without radiation below the gluteal fold. Exclusion: malignancy, infection, spondyloarthropathy, vertebral fracture, neurologic signs, or episode of LBP during the previous 3 mo, illiteracy, or unable to speak French Age ≥18 y (mean 44.3, SD 13.7), 49% male, and mean duration of symptoms 1.1 d n = 6 (5%) Poorer disability at baseline recovery HR 0.97 95% CI 0.93–1.00 (P = 0.05) and poorer general health at baseline recovery HR 0.89 95% CI 0.80–0.99 (P = 0.03)
Coste et al. 1994,19 France Inception cohort study To identify clinical, psychological, and sociodemographic prognostic factors for recovery from acute LBP 3 mo n = 92 18 y and over, primary complaint back pain, and duration <72 h without radiation below gluteal fold. Exclusion: malignancies, infections, spondyloarthropathies, vertebral fractures, neurological signs, or episode of LBP during the previous 3 mo, illiteracy, or unable to speak French Age ≥18 y (mean 46.5, SD 14.3), 60% male, and mean duration of symptoms 26 h n = 2 (1.9%) Previous chronic episode of LBP HR for recovery 0.21 95% CI 0.07–0.60 (P = 0.0004) and pain worse on standing 0.49 95% CI 0.30–0.77 (P = 0.003)
Esquirol et al. 2016,32 France Prospective cohort study (VISAT study) To determine the impact of a wide range of occupational factors on the incidence and persistence of chronic LBP 5 y n = 1560 Workers born in 1934, 1944, 1954, and 1964 Age 32–52 y, 52% male n = 255 (22.6%) Older age 42 y OR 1.44 95% CI 1.02–2.03 and 52 y 1.46 95% CI 0.99–2.15, history of rheumatological events ≥1 OR 2.34 95% CI 1.69–3.25, former productivity-related income 2.03 95% CI 1.18–3.50, number of different jobs held ≥2 OR 0.70 95% CI 0.51–0.95, carrying heavy loads at work OR 1.54 95% CI 1.09–2.18, and nonrecognition of work OR 1.76 95% CI 1.21–2.56
Hagen et al. 2005,46 Norway Public health study (HUNT studies) To evaluate the relationship between blood pressure and prevalence of chronic MSCs 11 y n = 46901 All residents of the county 20 y and older Age ≥20 y n = 8182 (17.5%) Higher blood pressure OR 0.7 95%CI 0.6–0.7
Heneewer et al. 2007,54 Belgium Prospective cohort study To evaluate the association between psychosocial factors and the transition from acute to subacute LBP to chronicity 3 mo n = 56 New episode of nonspecific LBP less than 12 wk, pain-free period at least 3 mo, age between 21–60 years, and able to understand the Dutch language. Exclusion: suspicion of specific cause, pregnancy, and coexisting major medical disease. Age (mean) 41.95 y, 61% male, and duration of symptoms <4 wk 52%, 4–6 wk 27%, 7–12 wk 21% n = 25 (45%) Higher pain intensity OR 1.787 95% CI 1.677–1.916 (P = 0.002)
Henschke et al. 2008,55 Australia Cohort study To estimate 1-y prognosis and identify prognostic factors in cases of recent-onset LBP managed in primary care 1 y n = 944 Low back pain 24 hours—2 wk, at least 14 years old, able to speak and read English. Exclusion: serious pathology, radiculopathy Age (mean) 43.3 y (SD 14.4), 54.8% male, and mean duration of symptoms 4.9 d n = 388 (41%) Age recovery HR 0.99 95% CI 0.99–1.00 (P = 0.004), pain intensity recovery HR 0.86 95% CI 0.77–0.96 (P = 0.009), depression recovery HR 0.94 95% CI 0.91–0.97 (P < 0.001), risk of persistence recovery HR 0.92 95% CI 0.89–0.95 (P < 0.001), compensable LBP recovery HR 0.59 95 %CI 0.47–0.74 (P < 0.001), days of reduced activity recovery HR 1.04 95% CI 1.00–1.008 (P = 0.033), and duration of episode recovery HR 0.97 95% CI 0.94–1.0 (P = 0.033)
Herin et al. 2014,56 France Longitudinal prospective epidemiological survey (ESTEV) To assess the impact of work-related factors according to sex on the development of regional and multisite MSP 5 y n = 12591 Workers born in 1938, 1943, 1948, and 1953, random selection from patients under the supervision of volunteer physicians Birth year 1938 16.9%, 1943 27%, 1948 28.4%, 1953 27.7%, male 64.8%, BMI ≥25 43.4%, blue collar workers 25.4%, clerks 26.5% n = 1206 (9.6%) Forceful effort at work HR 1.20 95% CI 1.01–1.44 men, awkward postures HR 1.19 95% CI 1.01–1.39 men, HR 1.33 95% CI 1.07–1.64 women, and exposure to vibration HR 1.73 95% CI 1.01–3.01 women
Heuch et al. 2019,57 Norway Follow-up study (HUNT studies) To explore the association between diabetes and subsequent risk of chronic LBP 11 y n = 18972 All residents of the county 20 y and older, study was restricted to respondents aged 30–69 y, and without chronic LBP at baseline and with known information about diabetes Age 30–69 y n = 3380 (17.8%) Diabetes men RR 1.43 CI 95% 1.04–1.96 (P = 0.043)
Heuch et al. 2017,58 Norway Prospective cohort study (HUNT studies) To study association between physical activity level at work and risk of chronic LBP 11 y n = 14915 All residents of the county 20 y and older, study was restricted to respondents aged 30–69 y. Study included participants without chronic LBP at baseline, with information about physical activity at work, education, physical activity in leisure time, smoking, and BMI. Exclusion: not employed or did not perform professional work Age 30–69 y, 49% male n = 2501 (16.8%) Particularly strenuous physical work men RR 1.22 95% CI 1.01–1.49 (P = 0.041) and work involving walking and heavy lifting women RR 1.21 95% CI 1.06–1.38 (P = 0.006))
Heuch et al. 2015a,59 Norway Cohort study (HUNT studies) To compare relationships with LBP for several measures of body size 11 y n = 25329 All residents of the county 20 y and older, study was restricted to respondents aged 30–69 y, with information whether they suffered from chronic LBP and had measurements of height, weight, waist, and hip Age 30–69 y, 50% male, and 74% without LBP at baseline NA Body weight (kg):RR 1.087 95% CI 1.039–1.138 women (P < 0.001), RR 1.091 95% CI 1.030–1.157 men (P = 0.003), BMI: RR 1.075 95% CI 1.023–1.128 women (P = 0.004), RR 1.091 95% CI 1.027–1.158 men (P = 0.004), higher hip and waist circumference; waist RR 1.078 95% CI 1.025–1.134 women (P = 0.004), 1.064 95% CI 1.001–1.131 men (P = 0.05), hip: RR 1.073 95% CI 1.024–1.123 women (P = 0.003), 1.060 95% CI 1.00–1.123 men (P = 0.05)
Heuch et al. 2015b,60 Norway Prospective cohort study (HUNT studies) To study associations between body height and chronic LBP 11 y n = 25329 Cohort of population aged 30–69 y with or without LBP Age 30–69 y, 45% male, and 74% without LBP at baseline n = 3230 (17%) of those without chronic LBP at baseline Women height per 10 cm RR 1.09 95% CI 1.01–1.17 (P = 0.03)
Heuch et al. 2014a,61 Norway Prospective cohort study (HUNT studies) To study relation between levels of cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides to chronic LBP 11 y n = 25450 Cohort of population aged 30–69 y with or without LBP Age 30–69 y, 45% male, and 74% without LBP at baseline n = 3254 (17%) of those without chronic LBP at baseline All results not significant statistically after complete adjustment for confounding variables
Heuch et al. 2014b,62 Norway Prospective study (HUNT studies) To investigate associations between blood pressure and chronic LBP 11 y n = 22949 Cohort of population aged 30–69 y with or without LBP Age 30–69 y,45% male, and 75% without LBP at baseline n = 2936 (17%) of those without chronic LBP at baseline Higher systolic pressure OR 0.95 95% CI 0.92–0.99 women (P = 0.005) and pulse pressure OR 0.93 95% CI 0.89–0.98 women (P = 0.007)
Heuch et al. 2013,63 Norway Prospective cohort study (HUNT studies) To determine whether elevated BMI increase chronic LBP 11 y n = 25450 Cohort of population aged 30–69 y with information available on height, weight, and with or without chronic LBP at baseline Age 30–69 y, 45% male, and 74% without LBP at baseline n = 3254 (17%) of those without chronic LBP at baseline BMI ≥30 vs BMI ≤25 OR 1.34 95% CI 1.08–1.67 men (P = 0.006), OR 1.22 95% CI 1.03–1.46 women (P = 0.008)
Machado et al. 2016,83 Australia Case crossover study To investigate the association of transient exposures to physical and psychosocial activities with the development of nonpersistent and persistent LBP 12 mo n = 832 Sudden-onset LBP with or without leg pain, preceded by a period of at least 1 mo without LBP. Must comprehend English, presented within 7 d from pain onset, and pain at least moderate intensity. Exclusion: serious spinal pathology Mean age 45.3 y, 54% male n = 352 (42.3%) Moderate or vigorous physical activity OR 2.4 95% CI 1.2–4.8, vigorous only OR 2.8 95% CI 1.0–7.8, manual tasks involving heavy loads OR 8.0 95% CI 2.8–22.6, awkward postures OR 16.0 95% CI 5.0–51.4
Mehling et al. 2015,88 USA Prospective cohort study To investigate the prognosis of acute LBP 2 y n = 436 Age 18–70, pain less than 1 mo, no other episodes preceded in the past year, speaking English, no red flags, fibromyalgia, chronic pain conditions, disabling psychiatric disease, or prescription for narcotics Average age 50.5(±12.6) years, 44% male, 61% with a college degree, 59% employed full time, and median duration of pain at baseline 14 d n = 66 (13%) at 6 months, n = 84 (19%) at 2 y At 6 mo: perceived risk that pain will persist OR 1.13 95% CI 1.01–1.27, catastrophizing OR 1.12 95% CI 1.01–1.24, coping with pain by ignoring OR 1.11 95% CI 1.01–1.21, coping with TV or music OR 0.90 95% CI 0.82–0.98, pain spreading to the upper back OR 6.06 95% CI 2.98–12.31; at 2 y: perceived stress OR 1.12 95% CI 1.02–1.24, low willingness to tolerate pain OR 1.17 95% CI 1.00–1.36
Melloh et al. 2013,89 Australia Inception cohort study To evaluate risk factors and protective factors of persistent LBP 6 mo n = 168 Cohort consecutively recruited by health practitioners. Ability to read and write English, 18–65 y. Exclusion: LBP free at baseline, chronic LBP at baseline, specific LBP, osteoarthritis of knee or hip, pregnancy, and age older than 65 y Mean age 36.0 y (±13.1), 48% male, mean BMI 28 (±6) n = 38 (23%) Social support at work OR 0.67 95% CI 0.45–0.99 (P = 0.045), somatization OR 1.08 95% CI 1.01–1.15 (P = 0.022)
Nilsen et al. 2011,97 Norway Prospective study of longitudinal data (HUNT studies) To investigate the association between physical exercise, BMI, and risk of chronic MSP 11 y n = 32417 All residents of the county 20 y or older, patients who participated at baseline and follow-up, had all relevant baseline information available. Exclusion: MSP for 10 y or more, physically impaired at baseline 48% male, mean BMI 24.9 (±27.7) n = 3314 (10.2%) Physical exercise ≥2 h/wk RR 0.92 95% CI 0.79–1.07 women (P = 0.02), RR 0.75 95% CI 0.64–0.88 men (P < 0.001), and obesity RR1.21 95% CI 1.04–1.41 women (P < 0.001)
Nolen et al. 2017,99 Canada Population-based cohort study To investigate the association between a lifetime history of LBP injury in a motor vehicle collision and future troublesome LBP 12 mo n = 509 Saskatchewan residents 20–69 years old with a valid health services card. Age-stratified random sample of 0%. 4% from eligible individuals Mean age 40,4 y (SD 12.5), 58% male, and history of low back injury 6.1% n = 45 (at 6 mo, 7.6%) and n = 39 (at 12 mo 7.7%) History of low back injury in a motor vehicle collision HRR = 2.20, 95%CI 1.04–4.68
van Oostrom et al. 2012,103 the Netherlands Prospective cohort study To explore long-term associations between physical load exposure and chronic LBP 10 y n = 4378 Inhabitants of Doetinchem, 20–60 y, were examined in population-based study every 5 y for 15 y, this study used population from the second examination onward Age 25–65 y, 46.6% male, at paid job 61.8%, smokers 31.1%, and BMI ≤25 49.3% n = 3196–3230 (20%) Awkward postures OR 2.51 95% CI 1.25–5.07
Poiraudeau et al. 2006,110 France Longitudinal descriptive survey To assess the outcome of subacute LBP, identify characteristics related to outcome of patients and physicians 3 mo n = 440 (patients). n = 266 (physicians) Random selection of rheumatologists from national database, each enrolled 1–4 consecutive patients. Exclusion: ≤18 y, had pain less than 4 or more than 12 wk, sciatica, subacute LBP during the past 12 mo, unemployed, pregnancy, infection, tumor, of inflammatory disease, and had consulted another physician for the same episode Patients: mean age 42.8 y (±9.5), 58.4% male, and duration of back pain 6.1 wk (±1.6) n = 178 (40%) Anxiety OR 2.41 95% CI 1.44–4.09 (<0.001), female sex OR 2.03 95% CI 1.30–3.18 (P = 0.0033), work-related back pain OR 3.37 95% CI 1.08–5.17 (P = 0.0028), patients' beliefs about work-related back pain OR 1.02 95% CI 1.00–1.05 (<0.001)
Shaw et al. 2010,119 USA Prospective cohort study To assess whether pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses increase the likelihood of transitioning from subacute to chronic LBP 12 mo n = 122 First episode of LBP lasting 6–10 wk, age 18–50 y. Exclusion: major medical illness, pain disorder, taking medications to affect mood, major surgery 12 mo earlier, back pain from neoplastic disease, and osteomyelitis or fracture Average age 30 y (±7.19),59% psychiatric disorder, 46% back pain without radiation, 16% had neurological signs (weakness, reflex, or sensory abnormality) n = 49 (40%) Depression OR 4.99 95% CI 1.49–16.76 (P < 0.01), general anxiety OR 2.45 95% CI 1.06–5.68 (P < 0.05), post-traumatic stress disorder OR 3.23 95% CI 1.11–9.44 (P < 0.05), nicotine dependence OR 2.49 95% CI 1.15–5.40 (P < 0.05), and psychiatric comorbidity 3.21 95% CI 1.29–7.99 (P < 0.05)
Sihawong et al. 2016,122 Thailand Prospective study To identify predictors for chronic neck and LBP 1 y n = 615 18–55 y working full time. Exclusion: Symptoms 3 mo before baseline, pregnancy, history of trauma in the spinal region, surgery 12 mo before baseline, and had diagnosis for specific disease of the spine Mean age 35.7 (±8.3), 25% male, history of LBP 78.5%, and BMI 23.4 (±4.9) n = 28 (26.7%) History of LBP OR 4.54 95% CI 1.02–20.21 (P = 0.04), high initial pain intensity OR 1.82 95% CI 1.46–2.28 (P < 0.01)
Wand et al. 2009,140 United Kingdom Prospective observational study To evaluate which patient profile offers the most useful guide to long-term outcome in acute LBP 6 mo n = 54 Nonspecific LBP less than 6 wk, 20–55 y, pain free at least 3 mo. Exclusion: specific low back pathology, nerve root pain, pregnancy or less than 3-mo postpartum, involvement in litigation, coexisting major medical disease, currently in physiotherapy, and previous spinal surgery Mean age 35 y, range 21%–55%, 48% male, duration 2.9(±1.4) wk, and 93% employed NA LBP-related disability, RMDQ correlation coefficient 0.48 (P < 0.01), higher pain intensity correlation coefficient 0.40 (P < 0.01), quality of life, EQ5D correlation coefficient −0.42 (P < 0.01), physical well-being, PCS correlation coefficient −0.36 (P < 0.01)
BMI, body mass index, EQ5D, Euro-Qol health transition score, ESTEV study, French epidemiological survey, Health, Work, and Ageing investigation, HUNT study, Nord-Trondelag Health Study, LBP, low back pain, MSC, musculoskeletal complaint, MSP, musculoskeletal pain, PCS, Short Form-36 physical component score, RMDQ, Roland– Morris Disability Questionnaire, VISAT study, Viellissement Santé Travail study

Table 2 - Excluded articles with reasons for exclusion.
Article Reason for exclusion
Amorim et al.3 Only chronic population at baseline
Andersen et al.5 Baseline information inadequate
Andersen et al.4 Different definition for chronic pain; >30 days during last year
Ashworth et al.2 Including chronic population at baseline
Beneciuk et al.8 Including chronic population at baseline
Bohman et al.10 Different definition for chronic pain; no persistent pain
Burton et al.11 Including chronic population at baseline
Campbell et al.12 Including chronic population at baseline
Carey et al.13 Different definition for chronic pain; RMDQ
Cats-Baril and Frymoyer14 Baseline information inadequate
Chou and Shekelle15 Review
Costa et al.17 Only chronic population at baseline
Currie and Wang20 Different definition for chronic pain; no time frame, including adolescents
Dario et al.22 Baseline information inadequate
Diamond and Borenstein23 Dissertation
Dunn et al.26 Including chronic population at baseline
Edmond et al.27 Different definition for chronic pain; maximal pain over the past week
El-Metwally et al.29 Only chronic population at baseline
Endo et al.30 Baseline information inadequate
Esteve et al.31 Multiple pain sites
Fishbain et al.33 Only chronic population at baseline, multiple pain sites
Fransen et al.35 Baseline information inadequate
Friedman et al.36 Different outcome; Roland Morris disability questionnaire
Gatchel et al.37 Different definition for chronic pain; return to work status at follow-up
Gatchel et al.38 Different definition for chronic pain; return to work status at follow-up
Green et al.40 Including chronic at baseline
Grotle et al.43 Different definition for chronic pain; pain during the past week at follow-up
Grotle et al.42 Different definition for chronic pain; RMDQ at 12 mo
Gurcay et al.44 Different definition for recovery; assessed after 2 wk of follow-up
Hagen et al.45 Baseline information inadequate
Haglund et al.47 Only chronic population at baseline
Hasue and Fujiwara48 Baseline information inadequate
Hayden et al.49 Including chronic population at baseline
Hayden et al.50 Review (the part discussing population)
Heitz et al.51 Review
Helmhout et al.52 Including chronic population at baseline
Heneewer et al.53 Only chronic population at baseline
Heymans et al.64 Including chronic population at baseline
Holtermann et al.66 Different definition for chronic pain; >30 d during last year
Hussain et al.70 Baseline information inadequate
Imagama et al.71 Study on elderly
Jegan et al.72 Only chronic population at baseline
Jones et al.73 Including chronic population at baseline
Kardouni et al.74 Baseline information inadequate
Klenerman et al.77 Different definition for outcome; information on the chronic group inadequate
Kopec et al.78 Different definition for chronic pain; diagnose for back problems
Kovacs et al.79 Including chronic population at baseline
Lagersted-Olsen et al.80 Baseline information inadequate
Matsuda et al.85 Only chronic population at baseline
Matsudaira et al.87 Baseline information inadequate
Matsudaira et al.86 Baseline information inadequate
Melloh et al.90 Different definition for chronic pain; >6 wk, measured by oswestry
Mercado et al.91 Baseline information inadequate, multiple pain sites
Neubauer et al.95 Including chronic population at baseline
Nisenzon et al.98 Baseline information inadequate
Noormohammadpour et al.100 Only chronic population at baseline
Nordstoga et al.101 Only chronic population at baseline
Oliveira et al.102 Only chronic population at baseline
Pagé et al.104 Only chronic population at baseline
Picavet et al.107 Baseline information inadequate
Pinheiro et al.108 Only chronic at baseline
Pinto et al.109 Only chronic population at baseline
Popescu and Lee111 Dissertation
Rabey et al.112 Only chronic population at baseline
Ramond et al.113 Review
Reis et al.114 Baseline information inadequate
Rodeghero et al.116 Baseline information inadequate
Schiøttz-Christensen et al.117 Different definition for chronic pain: sickleave and functional recovery
Shiri et al.121 Review and meta-analysis
Shultz et al.118 Baseline information inadequate
Smedley et al.123 Baseline information inadequate
Swinkels-Meewisse et al.126 Different definition for chronic pain; point prevalence at follow-up
Thomas et al.127 Baseline information inadequate
Traeger et al.128 Duplicate
Trinderup et al.130 Only chronic population at baseline
Urquhart et al.131 Prevalence study, does not have a follow-up
Wahlgren et al.137 Different definition for chronic pain; point prevalence at follow-up
Valat et al.132 Different definition for chronic pain; 7 wk
Walton et al.139 Multiple pain sites
van der Hoogen67 Including chronic population at baseline
van der Weide et al.141 Different definition for chronic pain; functional disability, return to work
Verkerk et al.134 Only chronic population at baseline
Werneke et al.142 Different definition for chronic pain; pain during the past week at follow-up
Wilkens et al.143 Only chronic population at baseline
Villafañe et al.135 Only chronic population at baseline
Williams et al.144 Different definition for chronic pain; point prevalence at follow-up
Yosef et al.146 Including chronic population at baseline

3.2. Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated. Only 1 study was rated as good quality,46 19 studies were rated as fair quality,6,18,32,54–63,89,97,99,119,122,140 and 5 articles were rated as poor quality.19,83,88,103,110 Those studies that met the criteria according to the National Institute of Health assessment tool94 are categorized as study population, measured exposures, measured outcomes, and study characteristics in Table 3.

Table 3 - Criteria for methodological quality.
Criteria for methodological quality All articles n = 25 [n (%)] Good n = 1 [n (%)] Fair n = 19 [n (%)] Poor n = 5 [n (%)]
Study population
 Description of population 20 (91) 1 (100) 17 (89) 4 (80)
 Participation of eligible participants ≥50% 18 (82) 1 (100) 16 (84) 3 (60)
 Inclusion criteria precise 21 (96) 1 (100) 19 (100) 4 (80)
 Loss to follow-up ≤20% 7 (32) 0 (0) 7 (37) 1 (20)
Measured exposures
 Exposures measured before outcome 22 (100) 1 (100) 19 (100) 5 (100)
 Levels of exposure examined 13 (59) 1 (100) 12 (63) 3 (60)
 Exposure measures valid 10 (45) 1 (100) 9 (47) 0 (0)
 Exposures assessed more than once 10 (45) 1 (100) 8 (42) 1 (20)
Measured outcome
 Sufficient timeframe to detect outcome 22 (100) 1 (100) 19 (100) 5 (100)
 Outcome measures valid 8 (36) 1 (100) 7 (37) 1 (20)
Study characteristics
 Research question clearly stated 19 (86) 1 (100) 18 (95) 3 (60)
 Sample size justification 3 (14) 1 (100) 2 (11) 0 (0)
 Outcome assessors blinded 1 (5) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0)
 Confounding variables adjusted 14 (64) 1 (100) 14 (74) 1 (20)

3.3. Prognostic risk factors

All prognostic factors are presented in Table 4. In total, 80 prognostic factors were found from the studies.

Table 4 - Prognostic factors.
Category Prognostic factor Categorical (1) or continuous variable (2) Evaluated in the study as [ref. number] Predictive value in overall Study quality (n)
Risk factor Protective factor Not significant statistically Good Fair Poor
Personal factors and medical history Age 1, 2 32,55 6 56,89,110,122,140 IE 7 1
Female sex 1 110 32,55,89,122,140 Risk 5 1
Body weight 1, 2 59,63,97 32,56,89,122 Risk 7
Body height 1 60 Risk 1
Body measures 1 59 Risk 1
Diabetes 1 57 Risk 1
Rheumatological event ≥1 1 32 Risk 1
Blood pressure 1 46,62 Protective 1 1
Pulse pressure 1 62 Protective 1
High cholesterol 1 61 NS 1
High HDL cholesterol 1 61 NS 1
High triglycerides 1 61 NS 1
Smoking and nicotine dependence 1 6,119 32,56 Risk 4
Alcohol dependence 1 119 NS 1
Psychoactive substance dependence 1 119 NS 1
Previous back surgery 1 18 NS 1
Previous episode of LBP 1 19,122 Risk 1 1
Low back injured in MVC 1 99 Risk 1
Baseline disability before LBP 2 18 122 Risk 2
Baseline general health poor 2 18 Risk 1
Physical well-being 1 140 89 Protective 2
Physical exercise 1 97 32,56,89,110,122 Protective 5 1
Level of education 1 88,110 NS 2
Former productivity-related income 1 32 Risk 1
Disability compensation 1 55 18,19 Risk 2 1
Occupational status 1 19,32,140 NS 2 1
Number of different jobs held 1 32 Protective 1
Back pain in parents 1 110 NS 1
Symptom characteristics
Pain intensity 1, 2 54,55,122,140 89,110 Risk 4 1
Pain duration 1 55 89,110,140 Risk 3 1
Pain radiation 1 89,140 NS 2
Leg pain 55,88 NS 1 1
To upper back 88 Risk 1
Multiple pain sites 55 NS 1
Pain requiring medication 1 55,110,140 NS 2 1
Days of reduced activity because of LBP 1 55 Protective 1
Affective pain 1 89 NS 1
Pain interfering sleeping 1 88 NS 1
Pain worse on standing 1 19 Risk 1
Pain worse on lying 1 19 NS 1
Disability and functional limitation 1, 2 140 19,54,55,88,89,110 Risk 4 3
Biomechanical factors
Spinal mechanical load 2 6 NS 1
Work-related back pain 1 110 Risk 1
Particularly physical work 1 56,58 110 Risk 2 1
Physical intensity of work 1
Moderate or vigorous 83 Risk 1
Vigorous only 83 Risk 1
Frequent rest breaks from work 1 122 NS 1
Difficult working positions 1 56,83,103 32 Risk 2 2
Repetitive short movements 1 103 NS 1
Carrying heavy loads/lifting at work 1 32,58,83 56,103 Risk 3 2
Working arms elevated 1 103 NS 1
Bending and twisting trunk 1 103 NS 1
Working kneeled/squatted 1 103 NS 1
Vibration and jolts at work 1 56 103 Risk 1 1
Working with animals 1 83 NS 1
Working tired 1 83 NS 1
Psychological and psychosocial factors
Good quality of life 1 140 Protective 1
Mental well-being 1 89 NS 1
Depression 1, 2 55,119 32,89,110,140 Risk 5 1
General anxiety 1 110,119 55 Risk 2 1
Post-traumatic stress disorder 1 119 Risk 1
Antisocial personality disorder 1 119 NS 1
Any psychiatric diagnosis 1 119 Risk 1
Somatization 1 88,89 Risk 1 1
Fear avoidance 1
In general 54 NS 1
Of work activity 89,110 NS 1 1
Of physical activity 89,110 NS 1 1
Perceived risk of persistence 1 55,88 Risk 1 1
Catastrophizing 1 88 89 Risk 1 1
Perceived stress 1 88 Risk 1
Low tolerance of pain 1 88 55 Risk 1 1
Coping by ignoring pain 1 88 Risk 1
Coping by music or TV watching 1 88 Protective 1
Nonrecognition of work 1 32 Risk 1
Job satisfaction/control 1 89 NS 1
Work absenteeism 1 89 NS 1
Support at work 1 88,89 32 Protective 2 1
Support at home 89 NS 1
High psychological job demands 1 32,56,89,122 NS 4
Difficulty communicating 1 32 NS 1
Categorical variable measured yes/no or in larger categories, continuous variable measured by continuous scale. Reference number of the studies evaluating each prognostic factor presented in brackets. The number of studies (sum) presented in quality categories.
HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IE, inconclusive evidence; LBP, low back pain; MCV, motor vehicle collision; NS, not significant statistically; protective, statistically significant protective factor; risk, statistically significant risk factor.

3.4. Personal factors and medical history

Three fair-quality studies found higher body weight to increase the risk of CLBP.59,63,97 Females seemed to be more at risk of developing chronicity according to 5 fair-quality studies32,55,89,122,140 and 1 poor-quality study,110 although statistical significance was achieved only in the latter. There was inconclusive evidence about age as a risk factor, although 2 fair-quality studies32,55 had a statistically significant result about age being a risk of chronicity. In 2 fair-quality studies, smoking and/or nicotine dependence was statistically significant risk factor.6,119 The only study rated as good quality found a statistically significant association between higher blood pressure and lower chronicity.46

3.5. Symptom characteristics

Higher pain intensity seemed to increase the risk of CLBP according to 6 studies,54,55,89,110,122,140 from which statistical significance was achieved in 4.54,55,122,140 Longer duration of symptoms before the onset of entering the studies (less than 3 months) was found to be predictive for chronicity in 1 fair-quality study.55 Seven studies investigated functional limitation and disability because of LBP as a risk factor,19,54,55,88,89,110,140 from which statistical significance was achieved in 1 study.140

3.6. Biomechanical factors

Carrying heavy loads at work was the most studied biomechanical risk factor for chronicity in 3 fair-quality studies32,56,58 and 2 poor-quality studies,103,110 and statistically significant in 3.35,58,83 Other significant factors predicting chronicity with statistical significance according to more than 1 study included particularly physical work56,58 and difficult working positions.56,83,103 Furthermore, vibrations and jolts at work significantly increased the risk of chronicity in 1 fair-quality study56 and nonsignificantly in 1 poor-quality study.103

3.7. Psychosocial factors

Numerous psychosocial factors were identified. Depression was the most studied factor predicting chronicity with statistically significant results in 2 studies55,119 and nonsignificantly in 4.32,89,110,140 Psychological risk factors that were investigated in more than 1 study included fear avoidance,54,89,110 general anxiety,55,110,119 somatization,88,89 pain catastrophizing,88,89 low tolerance of pain,55,88 patients' perceived risk of persistence of the symptoms,55,88 high psychological job demands,32,56,89,122 and finally support at work32,88,89 as a protective factor.

Compared with previous reviews,15,133 new factors were found to be predictive of CLBP. Of these, the most evident were obesity, smoking, higher pain intensity, and occupational factors, such as difficult working positions, vibrations, and jolts at work.

4. Discussion

The main findings in this review are that higher pain intensity, higher body weight, carrying heavy loads at work, difficult working positions, and depression are the most frequently observed prognostic risk factors for CLBP. Moreover, maladaptive behavior strategies, general anxiety, functional limitation during the episode, smoking, and particularly physical work are also explicitly predictive of chronicity. Most frequently observed protective factors were physical exercise and higher blood pressure.

According to the findings of this review, lifestyle-related factors, such as smoking and obesity, are major risk factors for pain chronicity. Odd ratios for smoking differed between 2.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–5.40)119 and 4.41(95% CI 1.50–12.95).6 In obesity, odd ratios varied between 1.075 (95% CI 1.023–1.128)59 and 1.21 (95% CI 1.04–1.41)97 in women and between 1.091 (95% CI 1.027–1.158)59 and 1.16 (95% CI 1.05–1.29)63 in men. In general, the findings about the risk factors of pain chronicity are similar.120,145 Baseline personal factors concerning poorer general health18 and functionality18 were found to be significant risk factors for chronic pain in this review. Conversely, physical well-being140 and physical exercise97 were found to protect against chronicity. Poor general health and functionality are coherently interrelated to multimorbidity, which is a major risk factor for general pain chronicity.24 The same nonmodifiable risk factors, such as age and female sex, found in this review are also found to be risk factors for other chronic pain conditions.28,41

LBP-induced disability and functional limitation were significant risk factors according to the findings of this review.140 A study by Wand et al.140 reported that the correlation coefficient between Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and CLBP was 0.48. A similar finding about functional impairment at baseline was reported in a previous review.15 The lower levels of functionality might be a continuum of a person's lifestyle and behavioral factors. Therefore, avoiding bed rest despite the pain seems even more important.

The physical intensity of work, particularly strenuous physical work, carrying heavy loads, and working in difficult working positions, was related to higher chronicity in this review.32,56,58,83,103 In a study by Machado and colleagues,83 the carrying of heavy loads was predictive for CLBP with an odds ratio of 8.0 (95% CI 2.8–22.6). It is possible therefore that the physical work itself is preventing workers from getting back to work in a timely fashion125 and thereby contributing to the prolongation of the symptoms.

There is previous strong evidence that cognitive factors, such as attitudes, cognitive style, and fear-avoidance beliefs, are related to the development of pain and disability in patients with back pain.82 Maladaptive behaviors, such as perceived risk of persistence,55,88 pain catastrophizing,88 somatization,88,89 and coping by ignoring pain,88 were found to be risk factors in a total of 3 studies. It is not always the case that maladaptive behavior is the first step on the road to chronicity. The prospective designs included in this review would, however, implicate such causality, but one might suggest that fear avoidance, eg, is the immediate result of the pain in the acute phase of LBP, as Linton82 discussed in his review. Low tolerance of pain was a significant risk factor in this review.88 The low pain threshold is a complex concept and combines both genetic124 and psychological aspects. In a study of pain thresholds in patients with chronic pain, there was a correlation between lower pain threshold and depressive tendency and hypochondriac concerns.75

A previous history of LBP substantially increases the risk of a subsequent new episode.105 In this review, it was found to be a risk factor in 2 studies.19,122 Interestingly, we found no evidence of sleep disturbances being a risk factor for chronicity. However, since there is a bidirectional relationship between the intensity of LBP and sleep disturbances,1 one might assume it would also be a risk factor for CLBP. This would be an interesting hypothesis to study in the future.

So-called “yellow flags” is an umbrella term used to describe psychological risk factors and social and environmental risk factors for prolonged disability and failure to return to work as a consequence of musculoskeletal symptoms.76 Many of the risk factors for chronicity identified in this review fall under this category. The interest in yellow flags originates from the concept that early interventions might avert the development of disability. When patient selection is performed accurately and when an intervention known to address these factors is competently applied, good outcomes are to be expected.96

4.1. Limitations of this review

A major limitation of this review was that only 1 high-quality study was detected in our literature search. Loss to follow-up was significant in many fair-quality studies, and this reduced the number of good-quality studies. Furthermore, chronic low back pain as an outcome is hard to validate since it is always more or less self-reported. Many studies have tried to minimize this bias by using validated questionnaires.

Nine of the studies (36%) used the same population data from HUNT studies.46,57–63,97 The results that were only observed from HUNT studies were body height60 and measures,59 diabetes,57 blood pressure,46,62 and pulse pressure.62 However, the risk of bias in this particular study population can be assessed as low because of the large sample size and long follow-up period. The Nord-Trondelag Health Studies (HUNT studies) were population-based health surveys conducted in 1984 to 1986, 1995 to 1997, and 2006 to 2008. All residents older than 20 years of the entire Norwegian county were invited to take part in these large surveys.63

Some risk factors that seemed similar and were detected in multiple studies differed nonetheless to some extent in definition or measurement choice. To avoid too much heterogeneity inside 1 risk factor, they were intentionally not combined. Thus, it was difficult to reach a strong conclusion about the significance of several risk factors because they were only evaluated by a small number of studies.

Defining CLBP as persistent pain for at least 3 months is an artificial means of controlling the heterogenic population with LBP symptoms. Evidence from long-term studies indicates that people with long-term problems can have pain episodes separated by periods that are pain free, periods of continuous mild pain with low impact, or periods of severe pain with a large impact on their lives.25

When finding a potential association between a prognostic factor and an outcome, one must not assume that the effect is direct and isolated. Nonspecific low back pain is a multifactorial and complex condition with the impact of different factors changing over time.32 This review simply identifies the factors related to chronicity; it does not, however, study whether the presence of 1 factor is sufficient or whether a certain mix of factors is required. Therefore, when developing more comprehensive models that include connections between these factors, it is essential to consider which factors are truly important.

4.2. Usefulness of results and recommendations

A “wait and see” approach is no longer advisable because early screening provides reliable and valuable information for identifying those at risk of delayed recovery and for formulating a treatment strategy from the start.81 The subgrouping of patients with nonspecific LBP and finding tailored treatments and management strategies are the main research priorities in the field of LBP.16 It is therefore important to detect those patients at risk of developing chronicity in the early phases of the symptoms and to offer tailored treatment according to the risks in question. Especially stratification according to psychosocial risk factors has achieved promising results,34,65 but the disadvantage is the lack of work-related items, socioeconomic variables, and symptom factors. Then, additional steps may be needed to identify the specific problems of patients to improve outcomes.81

The findings of this review may be helpful in the planning of future studies concerning the prevention of CLBP and to aid clinicians detect patients at risk of chronicity.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of interest and source of funding: The authors thank Jaana Isojärvi, information specialist from Tampere University for helping out in developing the literature search strategy. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This study was not financially supported.

Appendix A. Supplemental digital content

Supplemental digital content associated with this article can be found online at http://links.lww.com/PR9/A99.

References

[1]. Alsaadi SM, McAuley JH, Hush JM. The bidirectional relationship between pain intensity and sleep disturbance/quality in patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 2014;30:755–65.
[2]. Ashworth J, Green DJ, Dunn KM, Jordan KP. Opioid use among low back pain patients in primary care: is opioid prescription associated with disability at 6-month follow-up? PAIN 2013;154:1038–44.
[3]. Amorim AB, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Lier R, Simic M, Pappas E, Zadro JR, Mork PJ, Nilsen TI. Influence of family history on prognosis of spinal pain and the role of leisure time physical activity and body mass index: a prospective study using family-linkage data from the Norwegian HUNT study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e022785.
[4]. Andersen LL, Clausen T, Persson R, Holtermann A. Perceived physical exertion during healthcare work and risk of chronic pain in different body regions: prospective cohort study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013;86:681–7.
[5]. Andersen LL, Clausen T, Persson R, Holtermann A. Perceived physical exertion during healthcare work and prognosis for recovery from long-term pain in different body regions: prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:253.
[6]. Bakker EW, Verhagen AP, Lucas C, Koning HJ, Koes BW. Spinal mechanical load: a predictor of persistent low back pain? A prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 2007;16:933–41.
[7]. Bardin LD, King P, Maher CG. Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care. Med J Aust 2017;206:268–73.
[8]. Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, He Y, Wu SS, George SZ. Prediction of persistent musculoskeletal pain at 12 Months: a secondary analysis of the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome (ospro) validation cohort study. Phys Ther 2018;98:290–301.
[9]. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine 2010;35:1714–20.
[10]. Bohman T, Alfredsson L, Jensen I, Hallqvist J, Vingård E, Skillgate E. Does a healthy lifestyle behaviour influence the prognosis of low back pain among men and women in a general population? A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005713.
[11]. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995;20:722–8.
[12]. Campbell P, Foster NE, Thomas E, Dunn KM. Prognostic indicators of low back pain in primary care: five-year prospective study. J Pain 2013;14:873–83.
[13]. Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman AM. Beyond the good prognosis. Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2000;25:115–20.
[14]. Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center predictive model. Spine 1991;16:605–7.
[15]. Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA 2010;303:1295–302.
[16]. Costa Lda C, Koes BW, Pransky G, Borkan J, Maher CG, Smeets RJ. Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update. Spine 2013;38:148–56.
[17]. Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, Henschke N. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b3829.
    [18]. Coste J, Lefrançois G, Guillemin F, Pouchot J. French Study Group for Quality of Life in Rheumatology. Prognosis and quality of life in patients with acute low back pain: insights from a comprehensive inception cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:168–76.
    [19]. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ 1994;308:577–80.
    [20]. Currie SR, Wang J. More data on major depression as an antecedent risk factor for first onset of chronic back pain. Psychol Med 2005;35:1275–82.
      [21]. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008;8:8–20.
      [22]. Dario AB, Loureiro Ferreira M, Refshauge K, Luque-Suarez A, Ordoñana JR, Ferreira PH. Obesity does not increase the risk of chronic low back pain when genetics are considered. A prospective study of Spanish adult twins. Spine J 2017;17:282–90.
        [23]. Diamond S, Borenstein D. Chronic low back pain in a working-age adult. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:707–20.
          [24]. Dominick CH, Blyth FM, Nicholas MK. Unpacking the burden: understanding the relationships between chronic pain and comorbidity in the general population. PAIN 2012;153:293–304.
          [25]. Dunn KM, Hestbaek L, Cassidy JD. Low back pain across the life course. Best practice & research. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 27, 591–600.
          [26]. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Main CJ, Von Korff M. A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain: replication in a UK primary care low back pain population. PAIN 2008;135:48–54.
            [27]. Edmond SL, Werneke MW, Hart DL. Association between centralization, depression, somatization, and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:801–10.
              [28]. Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet 1999;354:1248–52.
              [29]. El-Metwally A, Shaikh Q, Aldiab A, Al-Zahrani J, Al-Ghamdi S, Alrasheed AA, Househ M, Da'ar OB, Nooruddin S, Razzak HA, Aldossari KK. The prevalence of chronic pain and its associated factors among Saudi Al-Kharj population; a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:177.
                [30]. Endo T, Abe T, Akai K, Kijima T, Takeda M, Yamasaki M, Isomura M, Nabika T, Yano S. Height loss but not body composition is related to low back pain in community-dwelling elderlies: shimane CoHRE study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:207.
                  [31]. Esteve R, Bendayan R, López-Martínez AE, Ramírez-Maestre C. Resilience and vulnerability factors when pain is acute as predictors of disability: findings from a two-year longitudinal study. Pain Med 2017;18:2116–25.
                    [32]. Esquirol Y, Niezborala M, Visentin M, Leguevel A, Gonzalez I, Marquié JC. Contribution of occupational factors to the incidence and persistence of chronic low back pain among workers: results from the longitudinal VISAT study. Occup Environ Med 2017;74:243–51.
                    [33]. Fishbain DA, Pulikal A, Lewis JE, Gao J. Chronic pain types differ in their reported prevalence of post -traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and there is consistent evidence that chronic pain is associated with PTSD: an evidence-based structured systematic review. Pain Med 2017;18:711–35.
                      [34]. Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:102–11.
                      [35]. Fransen M, Woodward M, Norton R, Coggan C, Dawe M, Sheridan N. Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain. Spine 2002;27:92–8.
                      [36]. Friedman BW, Gensler S, Yoon A, Nerenberg R, Holden L, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Predicting three-month functional outcomes after an ED visit for acute low back pain. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:299–305.
                        [37]. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Mayer TG. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine 1995;20:2702–9.
                          [38]. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Kinney RK. Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1995;14:415–20.
                            [39]. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 [published correction appears in Lancet. 2017 Oct 28; 390(10106):e38]. Lancet 2017;390:1211–59.
                            [40]. Green DJ, Lewis M, Mansell G, Artus M, Dziedzic KS, Hay EM, Foster NE, van der Windt DA. Clinical course and prognostic factors across different musculoskeletal pain sites: a secondary analysis of individual patient data from randomised clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2018;22:1057–70.
                              [41]. Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. PAIN 2007;132:S26–45.
                              [42]. Grotle M, Foster NE, Dunn KM, Croft P. Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care? PAIN 2010;151:790–7.
                                [43]. Grotle M, Brox JI, Glomsrød B, Lønn JH, Vøllestad NK. Prognostic factors in first-time care seekers due to acute low back pain. Eur J Pain 2007;11:290–8.
                                  [44]. Gurcay E, Bal A, Eksioglu E, Hasturk AE, Gurcay AG, Cakci A. Acute low back pain: clinical course and prognostic factors. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:840–5.
                                    [45]. Hagen EM, Svensen E, Eriksen HR. Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients. Spine 2005;30:2717–23.
                                      [46]. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Holmen J. Does hypertension protect against chronic musculoskeletal complaints? The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:916–22.
                                      [47]. Haglund E, Bremander A, Bergman S. The StarT back screening tool and a pain mannequin improve triage in individuals with low back pain at risk of a worse prognosis - a population based cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:460.
                                        [48]. Hasue M, Fujiwara M. Epidemiologic and clinical studies of long-term prognosis of low-back pain and sciatica. Spine 1979;4:150–5.
                                          [49]. Hayden JA, Wilson MN, Riley RD, Iles R, Pincus T, Ogilvie R. Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2019:CD011284.
                                            [50]. Hayden JA, Côté P, Steenstra IA, Bombardier C; QUIPS-LBP Working Group. Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:552–60.
                                              [51]. Heitz CA, Hilfiker R, Bachmann LM, Joronen H, Lorenz T, Uebelhart D, Klipstein A, Brunner F. Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1829–35.
                                                [52]. Helmhout PH, Staal JB, Heymans MW, Harts CC, Hendriks EJ, de Bie RA. Prognostic factors for perceived recovery or functional improvement in non-specific low back pain: secondary analyses of three randomized clinical trials. Eur Spine J 2010;19:650–9.
                                                  [53]. Heneweer H, Vanhees L, Picavet HS. Physical activity and low back pain: a U-shaped relation? Pain 2009;143:21–5.
                                                    [54]. Heneweer H, Aufdemkampe G, van Tulder MW, Kiers H, Stappaerts KH, Vanhees L. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. Spine 2007;32:586–92.
                                                    [55]. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a171.
                                                    [56]. Herin F, Vézina M, Thaon I, Soulat JM, Paris C; ESTEV group. Predictive risk factors for chronic regional and multisite musculoskeletal pain: a 5-year prospective study in a working population. PAIN 2014;155:937–43.
                                                    [57]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Sørgjerd EP, Åsvold BO, Zwart JA. Does diabetes influence the probability of experiencing chronic low back pain? A population-based cohort study: the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031692.
                                                    [58]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Physical activity level at work and risk of chronic low back pain: a follow-up in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175086.
                                                    [59]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. A comparison of anthropometric measures for assessing the association between body size and risk of chronic low back pain: the HUNT study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0141268.
                                                    [60]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Association between body height and chronic low back pain: a follow-up in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study [published correction appears in BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e006983]. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006983.
                                                    [61]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Do abnormal serum lipid levels increase the risk of chronic low back pain? The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. PLoS One 2014;9:e108227.
                                                    [62]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Does high blood pressure reduce the risk of chronic low back pain? The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Eur J Pain 2014;18:590–8.
                                                    [63]. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Body mass index as a risk factor for developing chronic low back pain: a follow-up in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Spine 2013;38:133–9.
                                                    [64]. Heymans MW, van Buuren S, Knol DL, Anema JR, van Mechelen W, de Vet HC. The prognosis of chronic low back pain is determined by changes in pain and disability in the initial period. Spine J 2010;10:847–56.
                                                      [65]. Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:1560–71.
                                                      [66]. Holtermann A, Clausen T, Aust B, Mortensen OS, Andersen LL. Risk for low back pain from different frequencies, load mass and trunk postures of lifting and carrying among female healthcare workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013;86:463–70.
                                                        [67]. van den Hoogen HJ, Koes BW, Devillé W, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM. The prognosis of low back pain in general practice. Spine 1997;22:1515–21.
                                                          [68]. Hoy DG, Smith E, Cross M. Reflecting on the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions: lessons learnt from the global burden of disease 2010 study and the next steps forward. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:4–7.
                                                          [69]. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2028–37.
                                                          [70]. Hussain SM, Urquhart DM, Wang Y, Dunstan D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ, Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM. Associations between television viewing and physical activity and low back pain in community-based adults: a cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3963.
                                                            [71]. Imagama S, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Seki T, Hamada T, Machino M, Ota K, Tanaka S, Morozumi M, Kanbara S, Ito S, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y. The relationship between neuropathic pain and spinal alignment: independent risk factors for low quality of life in middle-aged and elderly people. Spine 2019;44:E1130–5.
                                                              [72]. Jegan NR, Brugger M, Viniol A, Strauch K, Barth J, Baum E, Leonhardt C, Becker A. Psychological risk and protective factors for disability in chronic low back pain—a longitudinal analysis in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:114.
                                                                [73]. Jones GT, Johnson RE, Wiles NJ, Chaddock C, Potter RG, Roberts C, Symmons DP, Macfarlane GJ. Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:334–41.
                                                                  [74]. Kardouni JR, Shing TL, Rhon DI. Risk factors for low back pain and spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study in soldiers. Am J Prev Med 2016;51:e129–38.
                                                                    [75]. Kato F, Abe T, Kanbara K. Pain threshold reflects psychological traits in patients with chronic pain: a cross-sectional study. Biopsychosoc Med 2017;11:13.
                                                                    [76]. Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: Risk factors for long-term disability and work loss, 2004. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Compensation Corporation and the New Zealand Guidelines Group; 1997. Available at: https://www.healthnavigator.org.nz/media/1006/nz-acute-low-back-pain-guide-acc.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2020.
                                                                    [77]. Klenerman L, Slade PD, Stanley IM, Pennie B, Reilly JP, Atchison LE, Troup JD, Rose MJ. The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in a general practice setting. Spine 1995;20:478–84.
                                                                      [78]. Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Esdaile JM. Predictors of back pain in a general population cohort. Spine 2004;29:70–7.
                                                                        [79]. Kovacs FM, Seco J, Royuela A, Corcoll Reixach J, Abraira V; Spanish Back Pain Research Network. Predicting the evolution of low back pain patients in routine clinical practice: results from a registry within the Spanish National Health Service. Spine J 2012;12:1008–20.
                                                                          [80]. Lagersted-Olsen J, Bay H, Jørgensen MB, Holtermann A, Søgaard K. Low back pain patterns over one year among 842 workers in the DPhacto study and predictors for chronicity based on repetitive measurements. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:453.
                                                                            [81]. Linton SJ, Nicholas M, Shaw W. Why wait to address high-risk cases of acute low back pain? A comparison of stepped, stratified, and matched care. PAIN 2018;159:2437–41.
                                                                            [82]. Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 2000;25:1148–56.
                                                                            [83]. Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Maher CG. Transient physical and psychosocial activities increase the risk of nonpersistent and persistent low back pain: a case-crossover study with 12 months follow-up. Spine J 2016;16:1445–52.
                                                                            [84]. Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017;389:736–47.
                                                                            [85]. Matsuda N, Kitagaki K, Perrein E, Tsuboi Y, Ebina A, Kondo Y, Murata S, Isa T, Okumura M, Kawaharada R, Horibe K, Ono R. Association between excessive weight gain during pregnancy and persistent low back and pelvic pain after delivery. Spine 2020;45:319–24.
                                                                              [86]. Matsudaira K, Takahashi M, Kawaguchi M, Hamaguchi A, Haga Y, Koga T. Assessment of risk factors for non-specific chronic disabling low back pain in Japanese workers-findings from the CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study. IN Health 2019;57:503–10.
                                                                                [87]. Matsudaira K, Kawaguchi M, Isomura T, Inuzuka K, Koga T, Miyoshi K, Konishi H. Assessment of psychosocial risk factors for the development of non-specific chronic disabling low back pain in Japanese workers-findings from the Japan Epidemiological Research of Occupation-related Back Pain (JOB) study. IN Health 2015;53:368–77.
                                                                                  [88]. Mehling WE, Ebell MH, Avins AL, Hecht FM. Clinical decision rule for primary care patient with acute low back pain at risk of developing chronic pain. Spine J 2015;15:1577–86.
                                                                                  [89]. Melloh M, Elfering A, Stanton TR. Who is likely to develop persistent low back pain? A longitudinal analysis of prognostic occupational factors. Work 2013;46:297–311.
                                                                                  [90]. Melloh M, Elfering A, Egli Presland C, Röder C, Hendrick P, Darlow B, Theis JC. Predicting the transition from acute to persistent low back pain. Occup Med 2011;61:127–31.
                                                                                    [91]. Mercado AC, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Côté P. Passive coping is a risk factor for disabling neck or low back pain. PAIN 2005;117:51–7.
                                                                                      [92]. Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica 2015;49:1.
                                                                                      [93]. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
                                                                                        [94]. National Institutes of Health. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort. Accessed April 14, 2020.
                                                                                        [95]. Neubauer E, Junge A, Pirron P, Seemann H, Schiltenwolf M. HKF-R 10—screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Pain 2006;10:559–66.
                                                                                          [96]. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; “Decade of the Flags” Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther 2011;91:737–53.
                                                                                          [97]. Nilsen TI, Holtermann A, Mork PJ. Physical exercise, body mass index, and risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders: longitudinal data from the Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2011;174:267–73.
                                                                                          [98]. Nisenzon AN, George SZ, Beneciuk JM, Wandner LD, Torres C, Robinson ME. The role of anger in psychosocial subgrouping for patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 2014;30:501–9.
                                                                                            [99]. Nolet PS, Kristman VL, Côté P, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD. The association between a lifetime history of low back injury in a motor vehicle collision and future low back pain: a population-based cohort study. Eur Spine J 2018;27:136–44.
                                                                                            [100]. Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA, Koohpayehzadeh J, Asgari F, Rostami M, Rafei A, Kordi R. Prevalence of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and knee pain and their related factors in community-dwelling adults in Iran: a population-based national study. Clin J Pain 2017;33:181–7.
                                                                                              [101]. Nordstoga AL, Nilsen TIL, Vasseljen O, Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Mork PJ. The influence of multisite pain and psychological comorbidity on prognosis of chronic low back pain: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT Study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015312.
                                                                                                [102]. Oliveira DS, Vélia Ferreira Mendonça L, Sofia Monteiro Sampaio R, Manuel Pereira Dias de Castro-Lopes J, Ribeiro de Azevedo LF. The impact of anxiety and depression on the outcomes of chronic low back pain multidisciplinary pain management-A multicenter prospective cohort study in pain clinics with one-year follow-up. Pain Med 2019;20:736–46.
                                                                                                  [103]. van Oostrom SH, Verschuren M, de Vet HC, Boshuizen HC, Picavet HS. Longitudinal associations between physical load and chronic low back pain in the general population: the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Spine 2012;37:788–96.
                                                                                                  [104]. Pagé MG, Boyd K, Ware MA. Examination of the course of low back pain intensity based on baseline predictors and health care utilization among patients treated in multidisciplinary pain clinics: a quebec pain registry study. Pain Med 2019;20:564–73.
                                                                                                    [105]. Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Thomas E, Ferry S, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. Influence of previous pain experience on the episode incidence of low back pain: results from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. PAIN 1996;66:181–5.
                                                                                                    [106]. Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ 2003;327:323.
                                                                                                    [107]. Picavet HS, Vlaeyen JW, Schouten JS. Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia: predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1028–34.
                                                                                                      [108]. Pinheiro MB, Ferreira ML, Refshauge K, Colodro-Conde L, González-Javier F, Hopper JL, Ordoñana JR, Ferreira PH. Symptoms of depression and risk of low back pain: a prospective Co-twin study. Clin J Pain 2017;33:777–85.
                                                                                                        [109]. Pinto RZ, Ferreira PH, Kongsted A, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Kent P. Self-reported moderate-to-vigorous leisure time physical activity predicts less pain and disability over 12 months in chronic and persistent low back pain. Eur J Pain 2014;18:1190–8.
                                                                                                          [110]. Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Le Henanff A. Outcome of subacute low back pain: influence of patients' and rheumatologists' characteristics. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:718–23.
                                                                                                          [111]. Popescu A, Lee H. Neck pain and lower back pain. Med Clin North Am 2020;104:279–92.
                                                                                                            [112]. Rabey M, Smith A, Beales D, Slater H, O'Sullivan P. Multidimensional prognostic modelling in people with chronic axial low back pain. Clin J Pain 2017;33:877–91.
                                                                                                              [113]. Ramond A, Bouton C, Richard I, Roquelaure Y, Baufreton C, Legrand E, Huez JF. Psychosocial risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care--a systematic review. Fam Pract 2011;28:12–21.
                                                                                                                [114]. Reis S, Borkan J, Vanraalte R, Tamir A, Dahan R, Hermoni D; RAMBAM-Israeli Family Practice Research Network. The LBP patient perception scale: a new predictor of LBP episode outcomes among primary care patients. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67:191–5.
                                                                                                                  [115]. Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW. Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001380.
                                                                                                                  [116]. Rodeghero JR, Cook CE, Cleland JA, Mintken PE. Risk stratification of patients with low back pain seen in physical therapy practice. Man Ther 2015;20:855–60.
                                                                                                                    [117]. Schiøttz-Christensen B, Nielsen GL, Hansen VK, Schødt T, Sørensen HT, Olesen F. Long-term prognosis of acute low back pain in patients seen in general practice: a 1-year prospective follow-up study. Fam Pract 1999;16:223–32.
                                                                                                                      [118]. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. PAIN 2004;107:77–85.
                                                                                                                        [119]. Shaw WS, Means-Christensen AJ, Slater MA. Psychiatric disorders and risk of transition to chronicity in men with first onset low back pain. Pain Med 2010;11:1391–400.
                                                                                                                        [120]. Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, Hooten WM, Warner DO. Smoking and pain: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Anesthesiology 2010;113:977–92.
                                                                                                                        [121]. Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between smoking and low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2010;123:87.e7–35.
                                                                                                                          [122]. Sihawong R, Sitthipornvorakul E, Paksaichol A, Janwantanakul P. Predictors for chronic neck and low back pain in office workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study. J Occup Health 2016;58:16–24.
                                                                                                                          [123]. Smedley J, Inskip H, Cooper C, Coggon D. Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses. Spine 1998;23:2422–6.
                                                                                                                            [124]. Stamer UM, Stüber F. Genetic factors in pain and its treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:478–84.
                                                                                                                            [125]. Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2017;27:369–81.
                                                                                                                            [126]. Swinkels-Meewisse IE, Roelofs J, Schouten EG, Verbeek AL, Oostendorp RA, Vlaeyen JW. Fear of movement/(re)injury predicting chronic disabling low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study. Spine 2006;31:658–64.
                                                                                                                              [127]. Thomas E, Silman AJ, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ 1999;318:1662–7.
                                                                                                                                [128]. Traeger AC, Henschke N, Hübscher M, Williams CM, Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Moseley GL, McAuley JH. Estimating the risk of chronic pain: development and validation of a prognostic model (PICKUP) for patients with acute low back pain. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002019.
                                                                                                                                  [129]. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. PAIN 2015;156:1003–7.
                                                                                                                                  [130]. Trinderup JS, Fisker A, Juhl CB, Petersen T. Fear avoidance beliefs as a predictor for long-term sick leave, disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:431.
                                                                                                                                    [131]. Urquhart DM, Bell R, Cicuttini FM, Cui J, Forbes A, Davis SR. Low back pain and disability in community-based women: prevalence and associated factors. Menopause 2009;16:24–9.
                                                                                                                                      [132]. Valat JP, Goupille P, Rozenberg S, Urbinelli R, Allaert F. Spine group of the Societe Francaise.. Acute low back pain: predictive index of chronicity from a cohort of 2487 subjects. Spine Group of the Société Française de Rhumatologie. Joint Bone Spine 2000;67:456–61.
                                                                                                                                        [133]. Valat JP, Goupille P, Védere V. Low back pain: risk factors for chronicity. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997;64:189–94.
                                                                                                                                        [134]. Verkerk K, Luijsterburg PA, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Heymans MW, Ronchetti I, Miedema HS, Koes BW. Prognosis and course of work-participation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a 12-month follow-up cohort study. J Rehabil Med 2015;47:854–9.
                                                                                                                                          [135]. Villafañe JH, Bissolotti L, Zaina F, Arienti C, Donzelli S, Negrini S. Thoracic hyperkyphosis non invasively measured by general practitioners is associated with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study of 1364 subjects. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018;22:752–6.
                                                                                                                                            [136]. Waddell G. 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987;12:632–44.
                                                                                                                                            [137]. Wahlgren DR, Atkinson JH, Epping-Jordan JE, Williams RA, Pruitt SD, Klapow JC, Patterson TL, Grant I, Webster JS, Slater MA. One-year follow-up of first onset low back pain. PAIN 1997;73:213–21.
                                                                                                                                              [138]. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health 2003;15:79–87.
                                                                                                                                              [139]. Walton DM, Krebs D, Moulden D, Wade P, Levesque L, Elliott J, MacDermid JC. The traumatic injuries distress scale: a new tool that quantifies distress and has predictive validity with patient-reported outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46:920–8.
                                                                                                                                                [140]. Wand BM, McAuley JH, Marston L, De Souza LH. Predicting outcome in acute low back pain using different models of patient profiling. Spine 2009;34:1970–5.
                                                                                                                                                [141]. van der Weide WE, Verbeek JH, Sallé HJ, van Dijk FJ. Prognostic factors for chronic disability from acute low-back pain in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25:50–6.
                                                                                                                                                  [142]. Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001;26:758–64; discussion 765.
                                                                                                                                                    [143]. Wilkens P, Scheel IB, Grundnes O, Hellum C, Storheim K. Prognostic factors of prolonged disability in patients with chronic low back pain and lumbar degeneration in primary care: a cohort study. Spine 2013;38:65–74.
                                                                                                                                                      [144]. Williams RA, Pruitt SD, Doctor JN, Epping-Jordan JE, Wahlgren DR, Grant I, Patterson TL, Webster JS, Slater MA, Atkinson JH. The contribution of job satisfaction to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:366–74.
                                                                                                                                                        [145]. Wright LJ, Schur E, Noonan C, Ahumada S, Buchwald D, Afari N. Chronic pain, overweight, and obesity: findings from a community-based twin registry. J Pain 2010;11:628–35.
                                                                                                                                                        [146]. Yosef T, Belachew A, Tefera Y. Magnitude and contributing factors of low back pain among long distance truck drivers at modjo dry port, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Environ Public Health 2019;2019:6793090.
                                                                                                                                                          Keywords:

                                                                                                                                                          Nonspecific; Low back pain; Risk factors; Prognostic factors; Chronic pain

                                                                                                                                                          Supplemental Digital Content

                                                                                                                                                          Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.