Analgesic efficacy of sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis : PAIN Reports

Journal Logo

General Section: Review

Analgesic efficacy of sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Andersson, Emeliea; Kander, Thomasa,b; Werner, Mads U.c; Cho, Joshua H.d; Kosek, Evae,f; Bjurström, Martin F.a,b,d,f,*

Author Information
PAIN Reports 8(1):p e1061, January 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001061

1. Introduction

Experimental studies in animals4,56,71 and humans,44,61,66 large-scale longitudinal observational studies,11,13,55 clinical trials,50,64 and meta-analytic data2,21,58,60 show that sleep and pain interact in a bidirectional manner, with a stronger causal influence of sleep on pain, than pain on sleep.2,30 More than half of patients with chronic pain report insomnia symptoms, such as trouble falling asleep, maintaining sleep, and dissatisfaction with sleep quality.30,65 Fragmentation and shortening of sleep may heighten pain sensitivity and trigger spontaneous pain through alterations in central nervous system (CNS) pain processes, including proinflammatory mechanisms,38,42,57 dysregulation of monoaminergic systems,56 and glutamatergic signaling,36 which together amplify central sensitization and diminish descending pain inhibitory capacity. Moreover, sleep fragmentation has been shown to decrease the analgesic effects of opioids.67 The effects of sleep disturbance may thus negatively affect pain control and contribute to pain chronicity. Given that treatments of long-term pain are extremely limited, often ineffective and associated with adverse effects,15,32,73 targeting of sleep may improve both sleep and pain outcomes, in addition to multiple other health benefits.41,45,63

We and others have previously found that perioperative pharmacologic sleep-promotion through zolpidem or melatonin may improve postoperative pain control.10,51 Moreover, eszopiclone has been shown to provide meaningful analgesia during acute pain due to mucositis.25 In addition, in a pilot study of fibromyalgia patients with comorbid insomnia, use of suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, was recently found to improve sleep continuity and reduce heat pain sensitivity simultaneously.53 Despite the high frequency of sleep problems in patients with chronic pain, no systematic review has addressed whether pharmacologic treatments that target sleep may have beneficial effects not only on sleep itself but also on pain perception.

Hence, the main objective of the current systematic review was to examine the effects of sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy on pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. Moreover, we wanted to evaluate whether potential improvement of pain control was mediated through improved subjective or objective sleep measures, including sleep continuity and sleep architecture.

2. Methods

This study was conducted as a systematic review and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.49 The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID = CRD42022304189) in January 2022.

2.1. Eligibility criteria

Published English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 20 participants were considered for inclusion in the systematic review. Inclusion criteria were defined according to the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) framework.

2.2. Population

Patients with nonmalignant or malignant chronic pain (as diagnosed according to the International Association for the Study of Pain [IASP] criteria), ie, “pain that persists or recurs for longer than 3 months.”72 There were no predefined exclusion criteria related to pain intensity or pain interference.

2.3. Intervention

Pharmacologic sleep-promotion included the following medications: zolpidem, zaleplon, zopiclone, eszopiclone, melatonin, ramelteon, suvorexant, and triazolam.

Medications used for off-label treatment of sleep problems were excluded (eg, long-acting benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants).

2.4. Comparison

Any nonexposed control group included (1) placebo, (2) analgesics, (3) nonpharmacological treatment, and (4) no specific treatment.

2.5. Outcomes

The primary outcome was change in pain intensity from baseline to the end of intervention (ie, change in pain Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score or Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] score). Studies were considered for inclusion even if the primary outcome of the review (change in pain intensity) was not the primary outcome of the identified trial, ie, irrespective of whether the study was primarily designed to assess pain.

Secondary outcomes included changes in analgesic consumption (eg, morphine equivalents), objective sleep continuity, and sleep architecture variables (actigraphy and polysomnography measures, eg, sleep onset latency [SOL], wakefulness after sleep onset [WASO], total sleep time [TST], and sleep efficiency [SE]); subjective sleep quality; subjective estimates of SOL, WASO, TST, and SE; health-related function; anxiety; depression; quality-of-life; physical activity; cognition; and adverse events, from baseline to the end of intervention.

2.6. Search strategy

A comprehensive, systematic search strategy including citation tracking was planned and conducted with assistance from an information specialist (Appendix 1, available at Multiple electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central register of controlled trials [CENTRAL]) were searched from inception to January 2022. In addition, reference lists of eligible studies and review articles were scanned for pertinent articles, and other sources of published and unpublished literature were manually searched (eg, clinical trials registries). Searches were executed in January 2022 and rerun before the final analysis. Only English-language RCTs were considered for inclusion. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 1.:
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow chart depicting study selection.

2.7. Study selection and data collection

Two reviewers (E.A. and M.F.B.) independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles for inclusion. The Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia) was used to record decisions during the study selection process. Two review authors (E.A. and M.F.B.) extracted data from the eligible full-text articles using data collection forms. In brief, the following data were extracted from study documents: information about study design, methodology (eg, diagnosis of chronic pain condition, intervention (type, dosage, and duration), sleep assessment, and sleep-related and pain-related inclusion or exclusion criteria), participant demographics (eg, age, sex, and body-mass index [BMI]), baseline characteristics (eg, pain intensity, sleep quality, and health-related function), and measures of effect. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus, including a third reviewer (T.K.). In case of missing data, attempts were made to obtain or clarify data from study authors.

2.8. Risk of bias assessment

Study quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers (E.A. and M.F.B.) for each of the included studies according to the domain-based Cochrane risk of bias tool. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus, including a third reviewer (T.K.).

2.9. Strategy for data synthesis

Since the primary outcome (pain intensity) is typically reported as a continuous variable (eg, NRS/VAS pain scores), mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) (with 95% confidence interval), at end of intervention, was selected as the principal summary measure to determine the effect size. Minimum clinically important difference in pain intensity was defined as a relative reduction of 30% from baseline to end of intervention.

Based on methodology and study design, indicating clinically homogenous studies, meta-analysis of the primary outcome (pain intensity) was planned to synthesize data quantitatively. To assess effect sizes and model parameters, taking into account both within-study and between-study variation in treatment effect, a random-effects model was used. Magnitude of statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Analyses of the following subgroups were preplanned: different pharmacologic interventions, specific chronic pain conditions, and only in studies at low risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed in RevMan (version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence for each outcome, taking into account 5 factors (risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias).

3. Results

3.1. Included studies

The search identified 10 studies involving 3 pharmacologic interventions (melatonin, zopiclone, and eszopiclone) and 574 randomized participants (Fig. 1, Table 1).5,24,26,27,34,35,54,59,68,74 Attempts were made to contact 4 authors to request additional data not reported in the original article24,26,35,68; 2 authors replied but were not able to provide data,26,68 2 failed to reply.24,35

Table 1 - Overview of randomized controlled studies examining analgesic effects of sleep-promoting medications in chronic pain populations.
First author, y [ref#] Chronic pain population N M:F Intervention: sleep-promoting medication Comparison BL pain intensity* Sleep outcome results (intervention vs control) Pain outcome results (intervention vs control) ≥30% pain reduction?
Altiparmak 2019 5 NeuP 80 41:39 Melatonin 3 mg (30 d) Melatonin + gabapentin 300 mg TID vs placebo + gabapentin 300 mg TID NRS 0-10: 7.4±1.1 (MEL), 7.5±1.0 (C) ESS↓
PSQI n.s.
NRS pain↓ Pain NRS: 14.2% reduction
Drewes 1991 26 FM 41 0:41 Zopiclone 7.5 mg (12 wk) Zopiclone vs placebo NR LSEQ: sleep quality↑, SOL↓
PSG: Sleep architecture n.s.
Pain VRS n.s. pressure algometry n.s.
Analgesic consumption n.s.
Pain VRS n.s. over time
Drewes 1998 27 RA 40 11:29 Zopiclone 7.5 mg (2 wk) Zopiclone vs placebo MPQ PPI (0-5): 1.7 ± 0.9 (ZOP), 2.0 ± 1.1 (C) LSEQ: sleep quality↑, SOL↓
PSG: N2%↑, power in delta↓, theta↓, alpha↑, sigma↑ bands
MPQ present pain intensity and total pain rating index n.s. MPQ present pain intensity: +11.8%
Goforth 2014 34 CLBP 52 19:33 Eszopiclone 3 mg (4 wk) Eszopiclone + naproxen 500 mg BID vs placebo + Naproxen 500 mg BID VAS 0-100: 48.5 ± 16.2 (ESZ), 53.8 ± 21.0 (C) Sleep diary: TST↑, SOL↓, WASO↓, SE↑, sleep quality↑. ISI↓. Pain VAS↓, patient and clinical global impression of pain ratings n.s. Pain VAS: 34.6% reduction
Gronblad 1993 35 FM 33 2:31 Zopiclone 7.5 mg (8 wk) Zopiclone vs placebo NR Global sleep quality score n.s. Pain NRS scores n.s. pain drawings n.s., pressure algometry n.s. NR
Roth 2009 54 RA 153 20:133 Eszopiclone 3 mg (4 wk) Eszopiclone vs placebo NRS 0-10: 5.2 ± 2.3 (ESZ), 5.3 ± 1.9 (C) SOL↓, WASO↓, TST↑, sleep quality↑, sleep depth↑, ISI↓ Subjective pain severity assessment scale↓; pain severity score n.s., SF-36 BP score↑ (i.e., less pain), ASES score pain↓, analgesic consumption n.s. Subjective pain severity assessment scale score: 9.3% reduction
Schwertner 2013 59 Endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain 40 0:40 Melatonin 10 mg (8 wk) Melatonin vs placebo VAS 0-10: 6.5 ± 2.6 (MEL), 6.9 ± 2.1 (C) Sleep quality↑ Maximum pain last 24 h↓, pain during menstrual period/intercourse/evacuation/urination↓; analgesic consumption↓ Maximum pain last 24 h: 39.3% reduction
Song 2005 68 IBS 40 16:24 Melatonin 3 mg (2 wk) Melatonin vs placebo NRS 0-10: 4.1 ± 0.3 (MEL), 3.9 ± 0.3 (C) PSQI, ESS n.s.
PSG parameters n.s.
Abdominal pain↓
Rectal distension pain threshold↑
Abdominal pain: 42.0% reduction
Vidor 2013 74 Painful TMD 32 0:32 Melatonin 5 mg (4 wk) Melatonin vs placebo VAS 0-10: 4.7 ± 2.3 (MEL), 4.7 ± 2.1 (C) Sleep quality↑ Maximum pain last 24 h↓, analgesic consumption↓, PPDT↑ Maximum pain last night: 44.0% reduction
de Zanette 2014 24 FM 63 0:63 Melatonin 10 mg (6 wk) Melatonin + placebo vs amitriptyline + placebo vs melatonin + amitriptyline VAS 0-100: 64.9 ± 15.4 (MEL), 62.9 ± 14.3 (C1), 69.6 ± 10.9 (C2) PSQI n.s. Pain intensity↓ (melatonin vs amitriptyline; melatonin + amitriptyline vs amitriptyline), analgesic consumption n.s., CPM-effect↑, PPDT↑ Melatonin group pain intensity: 26.8% reduction
*Mean ± SD.
Change baseline—end of intervention or final follow-up.
No results provided, only comment in text.
ASES, arthritis self-efficacy scale; BL, baseline; BP, bodily pain; C, control; CLBP, chronic low back pain; CPM, conditioned pain modulation; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; ESZ, eszopiclone; FM, fibromyalgia; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index; LSEQ, Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire; meds, medications; MEL, melatonin; M:F, male:female; MPQ, McGill Pain Questionnaire; N, number of randomized participants; NeuP, neuropathic pain; NR, not reported; NRS, Numeric Rating Scale; n.s., nonsignificant; PPDT, pressure pain detection threshold; PPI, present pain intensity; PSG, polysomnography; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SE, sleep efficiency; SOL, sleep onset latency; TMD, temporomandibular disorder; TST, total sleep time; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; VRS, Visual Rating Scale; WASO, wakefulness after sleep onset; ZOP, zopiclone.

3.2. Characteristics of included studies

An overview of RCTs examining analgesic effects of sleep-promoting medications in chronic pain populations is provided in Table 1. All studies were placebo-controlled. Eight studies were designed as single-site, parallel group RCTs,5,26,27,34,35,59,68,74 one study was a multicenter, parallel group RCT,54 and one study was a single-center, 3-group parallel RCT.24 Sample sizes of the 10 studies ranged from 32 to 153 (Table 1). Chronic pain populations included endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain,59 fibromyalgia,24,26,35 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS),68 chronic low back pain,34 mixed neuropathic pain conditions,5 rheumatoid arthritis,27,54 and painful temporomandibular disorders.74

An overview of outcome measures is provided in Appendix 2 (Supplementary Table 2, available at Three studies investigated the effects of melatonin vs placebo,59,68,74 2 studies investigated the effects of melatonin alone or adjuvant to other analgesic medications vs placebo with or without the same analgesic medications,5,24 3 studies evaluated the effects of zopiclone vs placebo,26,27,35 1 study investigated the effects of eszopiclone vs placebo,54 and 1 study examined the effects of eszopiclone adjuvant to analgesic medication vs placebo and the same analgesic medication.34

Pain intensity was reported in all 10 studies. Analgesic consumption was assessed in 5 studies. A descriptive and qualitative summary of outcome results are provided in Table 1.

3.3. Risk of bias assessment

A summary of risk of bias assessment according to the domain-based Cochrane tool is provided in Figure 2 and Appendix 3, available at Only 3 of 10 studies were deemed to be at low risk of bias5,24,74; 2 studies were labeled high risk of bias (due to attrition bias).34,35 Given that only 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis, we chose not to assess publication bias with funnel plots.

Figure 2.:
Summary of risk of bias assessment according to the domain-based Cochrane risk of bias tool.

3.4. Primary outcome: pain intensity

Minimum clinically significant pain reduction ≥30% was reported in 4 studies (Table 1).34,59,68,74 Data from 6 studies were pooled in meta-analyses; results from 4 studies were limited to qualitative synthesis due to inadequate reporting of outcome data (Table 1).24,26,35,68 Detailed information regarding the GRADE assessment of quality of evidence for each outcome is presented in Appendix 4, available at

3.4.1. Sleep-promoting medication in combination with analgesic vs analgesic alone or sleep-promoting medication vs placebo

There is low-quality evidence (downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision) that 2 to 8 weeks treatment with a sleep-promoting medication (melatonin, zopiclone, or eszopiclone) alone or in combination with an adjuvant analgesic (gabapentin and naproxen) (6 trials, n = 397)5,27,34,54,59,74 decreases pain intensity compared with placebo or the same analgesic treatment alone (SMD −0.58 [−1.00, −0.17], P = 0.006) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.:
Meta-analysis: Pain intensity after 2 to 8 weeks of treatment with sleep-promoting medication in combination with analgesic vs analgesic alone or sleep-promoting medication vs placebo. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

3.4.2. Sleep-promoting medication vs placebo

There is low-quality evidence (downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision) that 2 to 8 weeks treatment with a sleep-promoting medication (melatonin, zopiclone, or eszopiclone; 4 trials, n = 265)27,54,59,74 does not reduce pain intensity compared with placebo (SMD −0.47 [−1.06, 0.12], P = 0.12) (Appendix 5, available at

3.4.3. Sleep-promoting medication in combination with analgesic vs analgesic alone

There is low-quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) that a sleep-promoting medication (melatonin or eszopiclone) in combination with an adjuvant analgesic (gabapentin) or an NSAID (naproxen) for 4 weeks (2 trials, n = 132)5,34 decreases pain intensity compared with the same analgesic treatment alone (SMD −0.78 [−1.14, −0.42], P < 0.0001) (Appendix 5, available at

3.5. Preplanned subgroup analyses related to the primary outcome measure

3.5.1. Pain intensity according to the pharmacologic intervention

Only one zopiclone trial provided sufficient data for meta-analysis.27 Owing to baseline differences in pain intensity, it was not possible to pool data from one melatonin study to perform meta-analysis of melatonin in combination with an adjuvant analgesic (amitriptyline) vs analgesic alone.24 Melatonin vs placebo

There is low-quality evidence (downgraded due to imprecision) that 4 to 8 weeks of melatonin treatment (2 trials, n = 72)59,74 reduces pain intensity compared with placebo (MD −1.76 [−2.49, −1.03], P < 0.0001) (Appendix 5, available at Eszopiclone with or without analgesic vs placebo or analgesic alone

There is very low-quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision) that eszopiclone treatment for 4 weeks, with or without naproxen (2 trials, n = 205),34,54 does not decrease pain intensity compared with placebo or the same analgesic alone (SMD −0.54 [−1.34, 0.26], P = 0.18) (Appendix 5, available at

3.5.2. Pain intensity according to the chronic pain condition

Seven different chronic pain populations were examined in the 10 trials. Three trials included patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia; it was not possible to conduct meta-analyses of these trials due to inadequate reporting of outcome data in 2 trials.26,35 Meta-analyses of zopiclone or eszopiclone treatment for 2 to 4 weeks vs placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2 trials, n = 193)27,54 showed no significant effects on pain intensity (SMD −0.06 [−0.42, 0.29], P = 0.72; low-quality evidence, downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) (Appendix 5, available at

3.5.3. Pain intensity—only studies at low risk of bias

Three studies (all investigating melatonin) were deemed to be at low risk of bias.5,24,74 Owing to the reasons stated above, we were only able to pool data from 2 of these trials (n = 112).5,74 Meta-analysis of these studies (melatonin + gabapentin vs placebo + gabapentin and melatonin vs placebo) showed that melatonin alone or in combination with an analgesic (4–6 weeks treatment) decreases pain intensity compared with placebo or the same analgesic alone (SMD −0.71 [−1.09, −0.33], P = 0.0003) (Appendix 5, available at

3.6. Secondary outcome measures

3.6.1. Effects of sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy on analgesic consumption

Owing to heterogeneous methodologies and reporting of analgesic consumption outcomes, meta-analysis was not possible. Analgesic consumption was assessed in 5 trials. Three trials found no significant group differences regarding analgesic consumption,24,26,54 whereas 2 trials found significantly lower analgesic consumption in the intervention group compared with placebo.59,74 In 2 of the trials which found no significant differences in analgesic consumption, brief information was outlined in the text, with no numbers provided.26,54 Schwertner et al.59 found that 22.9% of patients in the melatonin group used supplementary analgesics (acetaminophen, ibuprofen, codeine, or tramadol) compared with 42.2% in the placebo group during the 8 week trial; the relative risk for using an analgesic ≥3 times per week was 80% higher for those receiving placebo compared with melatonin. In a similar study design, Vidor et al.74 found significantly lower adjusted daily mean analgesic consumption (acetaminophen, ibuprofen, codeine, or orphenadrine/dypirone/caffeine) in the melatonin group compared with placebo (0.10 [SD 0.36] vs 0.32 [0.58], P < 0.01; medications not specified).74

3.6.2. Analysis of association between pharmacologically induced changes in sleep variables and pain control

Analyses of associations between changes in sleep and pain outcomes were only provided in 2 articles.34,74 Goforth et al.34 found that improvement of sleep variables (self-reported WASO, SE, TST, and sleep quality) were associated with decreased pain intensity ratings (Spearman correlation analysis). By contrast, Vidor et al.74 found no significant associations between improvement of sleep quality and pain VAS scores (multivariate linear regression). In addition, Drewes et al.26 reported that there were no correlations between polysomnography outcomes and pain variables (in text only). Notably, pain intensity decreased in the sleep intervention group despite no clear beneficial effects on sleep measures in 2 melatonin trials,24,68 whereas 2 trials (melatonin and eszopiclone) showed beneficial effects on pain and sleep measures in parallell.54,59

3.6.3. Sleep and sleep-related measures

All 10 trials reported at least one sleep-related outcome measure (Appendix 2, Supplementary Table 2, available at Objective sleep assessment was only implemented in 3 trials.26,27,68 Two of the trials using polysomnography found no significant differences between groups,26,68 whereas 1 trial detected higher relative amounts of N2 sleep and lower delta power in patients receiving zopiclone compared with placebo (Table 1).27 Six trials showed that pharmacologic sleep intervention improved subjective sleep quality according to sleep diary or NRS or Insomnia Severity Index,26,27,34,54,59,74 whereas 4 trials (3/4 including more comprehensive sleep quality assessment through the Pittsburgh sleep quality index [PSQI]) found no significant differences between groups.5,24,35,68 Both eszopiclone trials which assessed self-reported sleep continuity parameters found significant decreases in SOL and WASO and increases in TST and SE for the intervention group as compared with the control group.34,54

3.6.4. Adverse events

Methods for assessment of adverse events were often poorly described and varied significantly between studies, from no specific details, spontaneous reporting, to structured assessment. Nine of 10 trials reported no serious adverse events (Appendix 2, Supplementary Table 3, available at; only 1 trial reported “major” adverse events, but with no significant between-group differences.24 Two trials found that minor adverse events were more common in the sleep intervention group compared with the control group.27,35

3.6.5. Other relevant reported outcomes

Two trials found beneficial effects related to fatigue,5,26 whereas 1 trial found no significant effect on fatigue.27 One trial showed that eszopiclone in combination with analgesic decreased depression scores compared with analgesic alone,34 whereas 1 melatonin trial found no significant group differences in anxiety or depression scores.68 Five trials included QST for the assessment of pain neurophysiology.24,26,35,68,74 Three of 5 trials indicated salutary changes in pain thresholds related to sleep intervention (decreased rectal pain sensitivity68 and decreased pressure pain sensitivity24,74). One of these trials also evaluated conditioned pain modulation effects and found that melatonin alone or in combination with amitriptyline increased pain inhibitory capacity compared with amitriptyline alone.24 By contrast, 2 trials evaluating sleep intervention in patients with fibromyalgia found no significant effects on pressure pain thresholds.26,35

4. Discussion

4.1. Main findings

In the current systematic review, we found low-quality evidence that sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy may decrease pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. Pain relief exceeded the á priori defined minimum clinically significant level of at least 30% pain reduction in 4 of 10 studies.34,59,68,74 Overall, effect sizes were medium, except for melatonin vs placebo trials, where subgroup analyses demonstrated large effects (mean difference approximately −1.8 pain VAS units on a scale 0–10).59,74 Notably, findings from all 5 melatonin trials were positive, whereas all 3 zopiclone trials showed no pain-relieving effects. Conclusions are limited by the low number of included trials, with small sample sizes, and only 3 trials can clearly be labeled low risk of bias.

4.2. Does improvement of sleep mediate decreased pain intensity in chronic pain populations?

Although our results indicate potential benefits associated with short-term to medium-term (2–8 weeks) melatonin and eszopiclone treatment in patients with chronic pain, it is unclear whether analgesic effects are mediated by improved sleep quality, increased sleep quantity, altered sleep architecture, psychological factors, or other mechanisms. Pain-relieving effects were most consistent in melatonin trials, and only 2 of these 5 trials detected improvements in sleep quality. However, characterization of sleep was surprisingly poor in most trials; only 3 trials implemented objective sleep assessment, which severely limits interpretation of associations between changes in sleep measures and pain outcomes. Over the past decades, data from preclinical studies, longitudinal observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses have shown that sleep and pain interrelate closely.2,4,9,11,30,44,64,66 Nevertheless, further research is needed to fully understand the impact of sleep disturbance on pain perception in various contexts.47,69 About 50% of people with persistent insomnia disorder suffer from chronic pain, and conversely, about half of patients with chronic pain meet criteria for persistent insomnia disorder.70 Although the mechanisms whereby dysregulation of sleep may heighten pain sensitivity, trigger spontaneous pain, increase risk for development of chronic pain, and exacerbate existing pain are not fully understood, several possible explanations have been proposed. Sleep disturbance can induce systemic inflammation,37,42 and systemic inflammation has been linked to elevated pain sensitivity in healthy subjects as well as in patients with chronic pain.38,57 Furthermore, poor sleep quality and short sleep duration are associated with increased mu opioid receptor (MOR)-binding potential during evoked pain,19 as well as decreased analgesic effect of morphine in healthy human subjects,67 indicating reduced analgesic efficacy of the opioid system. In addition, sleep loss can induce increased cortical availability of metabotropic glutamate receptors of subtype 5 (mGluR5), which are involved in both sleep–wake homeostasis and pain regulation, in humans.22,36 The mGluR5 is widely distributed within the human CNS, in particular in cortical regions and basal ganglia,52 and is coexpressed and forms heterodimers with MOR.3,62 In rodents, coadministration of a MOR agonist and an mGluR5 antagonist enhances antinociceptive effects and reduces MOR-induced tolerance and dependence.3,62 Hence, it could be hypothesized that alterations in the balance between MOR and mGluR5 receptors might account for some of the proalgesic effects induced by sleep loss. Moreover, sleep disturbance leads to detrimental psychological and behavioral effects, such as increased depressive and anxiety symptoms,39 decreased positive affect,31 increased attention to pain and pain helplessness,20 and decreased activity,43,48 which aggravate pain. Reciprocally, increased pain intensity negatively influences sleep homeostasis through increased sympathetic nervous system outflow, increased inflammation, and adverse effects of analgesics, eg, opioids.12,40 Hence, multitargeting of the sleep–pain interface, ie, treating sleep disturbance or pain, is likely to impact both sleep and pain beneficially.

4.3. Clinical implications: pharmacologic sleep intervention to target pain

Based on our results, adjuvant treatment with melatonin or eszopiclone may have a role as part of multimodal pain management in patients with chronic pain who suffer from sleep problems. Nevertheless, pharmacologic sleep intervention is considered second-line treatment of persistent insomnia symptoms, to be combined with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I).18 Congruent with our findings, recent meta-analytic data, based on 12 CBT-I trials in patients with chronic pain and comorbid insomnia, showed significant, albeit small, beneficial effects on pain intensity.60 Pharmacologic treatment is typically recommended for patients with acute insomnia (<3 months), and level of evidence for improvement of sleep in the management of insomnia is overall relatively weak, with small absolute effect sizes.77 A stepwise, tailored approach to improve sleep, possibly including both behavioral and pharmacologic sleep interventions, may be the most efficient strategy to enhance both sleep and pain outcomes, in addition to other physical and mental health benefits. As for all pharmacologic interventions, it is important to consider potential serious harms, especially during extended treatment periods. Given the small sample sizes, typically limited follow-up periods, and methodology for assessment of adverse events, it is not unlikely that side effects may have been underestimated in these trials. Future large studies are needed to assess the benefit/harm balance. Moreover, optimal dosage and duration of treatment remain to be determined. Previously, results from observational studies and RCTs have raised concerns regarding falls, fractures, impaired driving, cognitive impairment, withdrawal insomnia, and even excess mortality.33,46 Although there were no group differences regarding adverse events in the 10 included trials, more rigorous monitoring of adverse events should be implemented in future attempts to evaluate sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic pain.

Interestingly, 3 melatonin trials found significant pain-relieving effects despite no clear evidence of improved sleep.5,24,68 However, it is possible that improvements in sleep may not have been detected due to the relatively limited sleep assessment methodologies; numerous existing meta-analyses have demonstrated modest sleep-promoting effects associated with melatonin treatment.1,14,16,17,28,29,75,76,78,79 Direct antinociceptive effects of melatonin have been documented in a wide range of experimental animal models.8 Moreover, a recent meta-analysis found that melatonin reduces levels of systemic inflammatory markers (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF) in humans.23 However, conflicting reports regarding the analgesic effects of melatonin in acute pain in humans seem to exist.6,80 Since most studies have used oral, single-dose administration, it is notable that the bioavailability of oral melatonin in healthy humans may be as low as 3%, albeit with interindividual variability (2%–5%).7 In an experimental human 3-arm crossover RCT (n = 29) using the contact burn injury model, administration of intravenous melatonin 10 mg and 100 mg, no analgesic, antihyperalgesic, or peripheral anti-inflammatory effects, compared with placebo, could be demonstrated.8 These findings indicate that in a range from low to very high doses, melatonin does not seem to possess analgesic properties in the context of acute pain, at least after single-dose administration. Obviously, utmost care should be exercised when extrapolating these data to a complex chronic pain scenario including multimodal pain management, but the results could be a putative explanation for an inconsistent relation between pain and sleep outcomes.

4.4. Methodological considerations and future directions

Our findings are limited by a number of factors. We were only able to pool data from 6 of 10 included trials for the quantitative analysis; results might have been different if data from the other 4 trials were also included. Results from 2 of these trials (both zopiclone vs placebo in patients with fibromyalgia) were negative, whereas the 2 other trials (both melatonin) showed benefits associated with sleep intervention. All trials were relatively small and included different, often heterogeneous, chronic pain populations. Dosage and duration of treatment, as well as sleep-related and pain-related exclusion criteria, varied significantly between trials, which limits generalizability. Given that the pain intensity was the primary outcome and the basis for power calculation in only 3 trials, baseline pain intensity varied from relatively mild–moderate to severe levels; these differences and the fact that most trials were not primarily designed to assess pain may have affected results. Indeed, exploratory meta-analysis of the studies which assessed pain as a secondary outcome failed to identify a significant pain-relieving effect of sleep-promoting pharmacotherapy (SMD −0.40 [−0.85, 0.06], P = 0.09),5,27,34,54 whereas those designed to examine pain intensity as primary outcome measure showed meaningful analgesic effects (see subgroup analysis melatonin vs placebo).59,74 Conclusions are further limited given that the 4 oldest trials (published 1991–2005) provided no specification of primary outcome or motivation of sample size. Moreover, instruments used to assess pain intensity were heterogeneous, whereas 5 of the 6 trials included in the main meta-analysis used different continuous VAS or NRS scores (0–10 or 0–100), 1 study used the McGill pain questionnaire present pain intensity score (0–5), which may not be validated in this setting. Nevertheless, given the relatively low number of identified trials, we chose to include these results to provide a more balanced image of the evidence base. Notably, only 3 trials implemented inclusion criteria related to degree of insomnia symptoms. Analgesic consumption was only assessed in half of trials, and sleep was typically not comprehensively characterized. To fully understand the relationship between sleep and pain, it is essential to include objective measures of sleep, such as actigraphy or polysomnography.

5. Conclusion

In this systematic review, we found low-quality evidence that pharmacologic sleep promotion, in particular through melatonin or eszopiclone, may achieve significant reductions in pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. Given the low number of included trials, with small patient samples, and potential harms associated with pharmacotherapies for insomnia symptoms, the clinical impact of large-scale pharmacologic sleep promotion must be further investigated before wide implementation as part of multimodal pain treatment.


The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Appendix A. Supplemental digital content

Supplemental digital content associated with this article can be found online at


The authors thank Alexandra Forsberg, Information Specialist, Library of the Medical Faculty at Lund University, for assistance with design of the systematic search strategy.

No specific funding sources were provided.

Data transparency: The authors agree to make data supporting the results and analyses presented in the article available on request.

Systematic review registration: The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO ID = CRD42022304189.


[1]. Abdelgadir IS, Gordon MA, Akobeng AK. Melatonin for the management of sleep problems in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 2018;103:1155–62.
[2]. Afolalu EF, Ramlee F, Tang NKY. Effects of sleep changes on pain-related health outcomes in the general population: a systematic review of longitudinal studies with exploratory meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 2018;39:82–97.
[3]. Akgun E, Javed MI, Lunzer MM, Smeester BA, Beitz AJ, Portoghese PS. Ligands that interact with putative MOR-mGluR5 heteromer in mice with inflammatory pain produce potent antinociception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:11595–9.
[4]. Alexandre C, Latremoliere A, Ferreira A, Miracca G, Yamamoto M, Scammell TE, Woolf CJ. Decreased alertness due to sleep loss increases pain sensitivity in mice. Nat Med 2017;23:768–74.
[5]. Altiparmak B, Cil H, Celebi N. Effect of melatonin on the daytime sleepiness side-effect of gabapentin in adults patients with neuropathic pain. Braz J Anesthesiol 2019;69:137–43.
[6]. Andersen LPH. The analgesic effects of exogenous melatonin in humans. Dan Med J 2016;63:B5289.
[7]. Andersen LPH, Werner MU, Rosenkilde MM, Harpsoe NG, Fuglsang H, Rosenberg J, Gogenur I. Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous melatonin in healthy volunteers. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2016;17:8.
[8]. Andersen LPH, Gogenur I, Fenger AQ, Petersen MC, Rosenberg J, Werner MU. Analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of melatonin in a human inflammatory pain model: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm crossover study. PAIN 2015;156:2286–94.
[9]. Bjurstrom MF, Irwin MR. Polysomnographic characteristics in nonmalignant chronic pain populations: a review of controlled studies. Sleep Med Rev 2016;26:74–86.
[10]. Bjurstrom MF, Irwin MR. Perioperative pharmacological sleep-promotion and pain control: a systematic review. Pain Pract 2019;19:552–69.
[11]. Bjurstrom MF, Irwin MR, Chen DC, Smith MT, Montgomery A. Sex differences, sleep disturbance and risk of persistent pain associated with groin hernia surgery: a nationwide register-based cohort study. J Pain 2021;22:1360–70.
[12]. Bohra MH, Kaushik C, Temple D, Chung SA, Shapiro CM. Weighing the balance: how analgesics used in chronic pain influence sleep? Br J Pain 2014;8:107–18.
[13]. Bonvanie IJ, Oldehinkel AJ, Rosmalen JGM, Janssens KAM. Sleep problems and pain: a longitudinal cohort study in emerging adults. PAIN 2016;157:957–63.
[14]. Braam W, Smits MG, Didden R, Korzilius H, Geijlswijk IMV, Curfs LMG. Exogenous melatonin for sleep problems in individuals with intellectual disability: a meta-analysis. Develop Med Child Neurol 2009;51:340–9.
[15]. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333.
[16]. Brzezinski A, Vangel MG, Wurtman RJ, Norrie G, Zhdanova I, Ben-Shushan A, Ford I. Effects of exogenous melatonin on sleep: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 2005;9:41–50.
[17]. Buscemi N, Vandermeer B, Hooton N, Pandya R, Tjosvold L, Hartling L, Baker G, Klassen TP, Vohra S. The efficacy and safety of exogenous melatonin for primary sleep disorders. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1151–8.
[18]. Buysse DJ, Rush AJ, Reynolds CF III. Clinical management of insomnia disorder. JAMA 2017;318:1973–4.
[19]. Campbell CM, Bounds SC, Kuwabara H, Edwards RR, Campbell JN, Haythornthwaite JA, Smith MT. Individual variation in sleep quality and duration is related to cerebral mu opioid receptor binding potential during tonic laboratory pain in healthy subjects. Pain Med 2013;14:1882–92.
[20]. Campbell CM, Buenaver LF, Finan P, Bounds SC, Redding M, McCauley L, Robinson M, Edwards RR, Smith MT. Sleep, pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis patients with and without insomnia. Arthritis Care Res 2015;67:1387–96.
[21]. Chang JR, Wang X, Lin G, Samartzis D, Pinto SM, Wong AYL. Are changes in sleep quality/quantity or baseline sleep parameters related to changes in clinical outcomes in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain?: a systematic review. Clin J Pain 2022;38:292–307.
[22]. Chiechio S. Modulation of chronic pain by metabotropic glutamate receptors. Adv Pharmacol 2016;75:63–89.
[23]. Cho JH, Bhutani S, Kim CH, Irwin MR. Anti-inflammatory effects of melatonin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Brain Behav Immun 2021;93:245–53.
[24]. de Zanette SA, Vercelino R, Laste G, Rozisky JR, Schwertner A, Machado CB, Xavier F, de Souza ICC, Deitos A, Torres ILS, Caumo W. Melatonin analgesia is associated with improvement of the descending endogenous pain-modulating system in fibromyalgia: a phase II, randomized, double-dummy, controlled trial. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2014;15:40.
[25]. Dimsdale JE, Ball ED, Carrier E, Wallace M, Holman P, Mulroney C, Shaikh F, Natarajan L. Effect of eszopiclone on sleep, fatigue, and pain in patients with mucositis associated with hematologic malignancies. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:2015–20.
[26]. Drewes AM, Andreasen A, Jennum P, Nielsen KD. Zopiclone in the treatment of sleep abnormalities in fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol 1991;20:288–93.
[27]. Drewes AM, Bjerregard K, Taagholt SJ, Svendsen L, Nielsen KD. Zopiclone as night medication in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1998;27:180–7.
[28]. Fatemeh G, Sajjad M, Niloufar R, Neda S, Leila S, Khadijeh M. Effect of melatonin supplementation on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol 2022;269:205–16.
[29]. Ferracioli-Oda E, Qawasmi A, Bloch MH. Meta-analysis: melatonin for the treatment of primary sleep disorders. PLoS One 2013;8:e63773.
[30]. Finan PH, Goodin BR, Smith MT. The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward. J Pain 2013;14:1539–52.
[31]. Finan PH, Quartana PJ, Smith MT. The effects of sleep continuity disruption on positive mood and sleep architecture in healthy adults. Sleep 2015;38:1735–42.
[32]. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:162–73.
[33]. Glass J, Lanctot KL, Herrmann N, Sproule BA, Busto UE. Sedative hypnotics in older people with insomnia: meta-analysis of risks and benefits. BMJ 2005;331:1169.
[34]. Goforth HW, Preud'homme XA, Krystal AD. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of eszopiclone for the treatment of insomnia in patients with chronic low back pain. Sleep 2014;37:1053–60.
[35]. Gronblad M, Nykanen J, Konttinen Y, Jarvinen E, Helve T. Effect of zopiclone on sleep quality, morning stiffness, widespread tenderness and pain and general discomfort in primary fibromyalgia patients. A double-blind randomized trial. Clin Rheumatol 1993;12:186–91.
[36]. Holst SC, Sousek A, Hefti K, Saberi-Moghadam S, Buck A, Ametamey SM, Scheidegger M, Franken P, Henning A, Seifritz E, Tafti M, Landolt HP. Cerebral mGluR5 availability contributes to elevated sleep need and behavioral adjustment after sleep deprivation. Elife 2017;6:e28751.
[37]. Hurtado-Alvarado G, Dominguez-Salazar E, Pavon L, Velazquez-Moctezuma J, Gomez-Gonzalez B. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by chronic sleep loss: low-grade inflammation may be the link. J Immunol Res 2016;2016:1–15.
[38]. Hutchinson MR, Buijs M, Tuke J, Kwok YH, Gentgall M, Williams D, Rolan P. Low-dose endotoxin potentiates capsaicin-induced pain in man: evidence for a pain neuroimmune connection. Brain Behav Immun 2013;30:3–11.
[39]. Irwin MR. Why sleep is important for health: a psychoneuroimmunology perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2015;66:143–72.
[40]. Irwin MR. Sleep and inflammation: partners in sickness and in health. Nat Rev Immunol 2019;19:702–15.
[41]. Irwin MR, Carrillo C, Sadeghi N, Bjurstrom MF, Breen EC, Olmstead R. Prevention of incident and recurrent major depression in older adults with insomnia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022;79:33–41.
[42]. Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carroll JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biol Psychiatry 2016;80:40–52.
[43]. Kline CE. The bidirectional relationship between exercise and sleep: implications for exercise adherence and sleep improvement. Am J Lifestyle Med 2014;8:375–9.
[44]. Krause AJ, Prather AA, Wager TD, Lindquist MA, Walker MP. The pain of sleep loss: a brain characterization in humans. J Neurosci 2019;39:2291–300.
[45]. Krause AJ, Simon EB, Mander BA, Greer SM, Saletin JM, Goldstein-Piekarski AN, Walker MP. The sleep-deprived human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017;18:404–18.
[46]. Kripke DF. Hypnotic drug risks of mortality, infection, depression, and cancer: but lack of benefit. F1000Res 2017;5:918.
[47]. Lautenbacher S. Sleep and pain are definitely coupled—but how tight is this coupling? PAIN 2018;159:3–4.
[48]. Law LF, Sluka KA. How does physical activity modulate pain? PAIN 2017;158:369–70.
[49]. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
[50]. McCurry SM, Zhu W, Von Korff M, Wellman R, Morin CM, Thakral M, Yeung K, Vitiello MV. Effect of telephone cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in older adults with osteoarthritis pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:530–8.
[51]. O'Hagan ET, Hubscher M, Miller CB, Gordon CJ, Gustin S, Briggs N, McAuley JH. Zolpidem reduces pain intensity postoperatively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of hypnotic medicines on post-operative pain intensity. Syst Rev 2020;9:206.
[52]. Patel S, Hamill TG, Connolly B, Jagoda E, Li W, Gibson RE. Species differences in mGluR5 binding sites in mammalian central nervous system determined using in vitro binding with [18F]F-PEB. Nucl Med Biol 2007;34:1009–17.
[53]. Roehrs T, Withrow D, Koshorek G, Verkler J, Bazan L, Roth T. Sleep and pain in humans with fibromyalgia and comorbid insomnia: double-blind, crossover study of suvorexant 20 mg versus placebo. J Clin Sleep Med 2020;16:415–21.
[54]. Roth T, Price JM, Amato DA, Rubens RP, Roach JM, Schnitzer TJ. The effect of eszopiclone in patients with insomnia and coexisting rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2009;11:292–301.
[55]. Sanders AE, Akinkugbe AA, Bair E, Fillingim RB, Greenspan JD, Ohrbach R, Dubner R, Maixner W, Slade GD. Subjective sleep quality deteriorates before development of painful temporomandibular disorder. J Pain 2016;17:669–77.
[56]. Sardi NF, Tobaldini G, Morais RN, Fischer L. Nucleus accumbens mediates the pronociceptive effect of sleep deprivation: the role of adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. PAIN 2018;159:75–84.
[57]. Schistad EI, Stubhaug A, Furberg AS, Engdahl BL, Nielsen CS. C-reactive protein and cold-pressor tolerance in the general population: the Tromso Study. PAIN 2017;158:1280–8.
[58]. Schrimpf M, Liegl G, Boeckle M, Leitner A, Geisler P, Pieh C. The effect of sleep deprivation on pain perception in healthy subjects: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med 2015;16:1313–20.
[59]. Schwertner A, Conceicao Dos Santos CC, Costa GD, Deitos A, de Souza A, de Souza ICC, Torres IL, da Cunha Filho JSL, Caumo W. Efficacy of melatonin in the treatment of endometriosis: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PAIN 2013;154:874–81.
[60]. Selvanathan J, Pham C, Nagappa M, Peng PWH, Englesakis M, Espie CA, Morin CM, Chung F. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with chronic pain—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev 2021;60:101460.
[61]. Simpson NS, Scott-Sutherland J, Gautam S, Sethna N, Haack M. Chronic exposure to insufficient sleep alters processes of pain habituation and sensitization. PAIN 2018;159:33–40.
[62]. Smeester BA, Lunzer MM, Akgun E, Beitz AJ, Portoghese PS. Targeting putative mu opioid/metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 heteromers produces potent antinociception in a chronic murine bone cancer model. Eur J Pharmacol 2014;743:48–52.
[63]. Smith MT. Highlighting the possibilities of precision sleep medicine by focusing on sleep-pain interactions: basic clinical research and pragmatic trials needed. Sleep Med Rev 2021;59:101542.
[64]. Smith MT, Finan PH, Buenaver LF, Robinson M, Haque U, Quain A, McInrue E, Han D, Leoutsakis J, Haythornthwaite JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:1221–33.
[65]. Smith MT, Haythornthwaite JA. How do sleep disturbance and chronic pain inter-relate? Insights from the longitudinal and cognitive-behavioral clinical trials literature. Sleep Med Rev 2004;8:119–32.
[66]. Smith MT Jr, Remeniuk B, Finan PH, Speed TJ, Tompkins DA, Robinson M, Gonzalez K, Bjurstrom MF, Irwin MR. Sex differences in measures of central sensitization and pain sensitivity to experimental sleep disruption: implications for sex differences in chronic pain. Sleep 2019;42:zsy209.
[67]. Smith MT, Mun CJ, Remeniuk B, Finan PH, Campbell CM, Buenaver LF, Robinson M, Fulton B, Tompkins DA, Tremblay JM, Strain EC, Irwin MR. Experimental sleep disruption attenuates morphine analgesia: findings from a randomized trial and implications for the opioid abuse epidemic. Sci Rep 2020;10:20121.
[68]. Song GH, Leng PH, Gwee KA, Moochhala SM, Ho KY. Melatonin improves abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome patients who have sleep disturbances: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. Gut 2005;54:1402–7.
[69]. Stroemel-Scheder C, Karmann AJ, Ziegler E, Heesen M, Knippenberg-Bigge K, Lang PM, Lautenbacher S. Sleep, experimental pain and clinical pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and healthy controls. J Pain Res 2019;12:3381–93.
[70]. Taylor DJ, Mallory LJ, Lichstein KL, Durrence HH, Riedel BW, Bush AJ. Comorbidity of chronic insomnia with medical problems. Sleep 2007;30:213–8.
[71]. Tomim DH, Pontarolla FM, Bertolini JF, Arase M, Tobaldini G, Lima MMS, Fischer L. The pronociceptive effect of paradoxical sleep deprivation in rats: evidence for a role of descending pain modulation mechanisms. Mol Neurobiol 2016;53:1706–17.
[72]. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Korwisi B, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic pain for the international classification of diseases (ICD-11). PAIN 2019;160:19–27.
[73]. Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet 2011;377:2226–35.
[74]. Vidor LP, Torres IL, Custodio de Souza IC, Fregni F, Caumo W. Analgesic and sedative effects of melatonin in temporomandibular disorders: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;46:422–32.
[75]. Wang YY, Zheng W, Ng CH, Ungvari GS, Wei W, Xiang YT. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of melatonin in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017;32:50–7.
[76]. Wei S, Smits MG, Tang X, Kuang L, Meng H, Ni S, Xiao M, Zhou X. Efficacy and safety of melatonin for sleep onset insomnia in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med 2020;68:1–8.
[77]. Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Brasure M, Olson CM, Carlyle M, Fuchs E, Khawaja IS, Diem S, Koffel E, Ouellette J, Butler M, Kane RL. Pharmacologic treatment of insomnia disorder: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline by the American college of physicians. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:103–12.
[78]. Xu J, Wang LL, Dammer EB, Li CB, Xu G, Chen SD, Wang G. Melatonin for sleep disorders and cognition in dementia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2015;30:439–47.
[79]. Zhang W, Chen XY, Su SW, Jia QZ, Ding T, Zhu ZN, Zhang T. Exogenous melatonin for sleep disorders in neurodegenerative diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neurol Sci 2016;37:57–65.
[80]. Zhu C, Xu Y, Duan Y, Li W, Zhang L, Huang Y, Zhao W, Wang Y, Li J, Feng T, Li X, Hu X, Yin W. Exogenous melatonin in the treatment of pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017;8:100582–92.

Analgesia; Sleep; Insomnia; Chronic pain; Pharmacotherapy; Melatonin; Zopiclone; Eszopiclone

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.