The association between daily physical exercise and pain among women with fibromyalgia: the moderating role of pain catastrophizing : PAIN Reports

Journal Logo


The association between daily physical exercise and pain among women with fibromyalgia: the moderating role of pain catastrophizing

Lazaridou, Asiminaa,*; Paschali, Myrellaa; Schreiber, Kristina; Galenkamp, Lauraa; Berry, Michaelb; Paschalis, Theodorosc; Napadow, Vitalyb; Edwards, Robert R.a

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000832
  • Open

1. Background

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a multifaceted, multifactorial chronic pain disorder characterized by various symptoms such as widespread pain, difficulty with sleep, cognitive difficulties, depression, anxiety, and fatigue.18 Fibromyalgia affects predominantly women, and the broad array of FM symptoms and contributory factors suggests a strong biopsychosocial basis for the condition. Many of the most effective treatments for FM pain symptomatology involve mind–body treatments that emphasize physical activity along with a cognitive and emotional focus (eg, yoga and movement therapies). Previous research on the role of exercise in FM has shown that short-term aerobic training can lead to improvements in physical function, and strength training can improve pain, wellbeing, and physical function, as well as decrease tender points and depression.5 Hence, current guidelines for patients with FM recommend individually tailored exercise programs including aerobic exercise and strength training.8 Generally, activity studies have demonstrated that patients with FM are physically deconditioned, with low levels of cardiorespiratory endurance and decreased muscle strength.21 Although activity has been identified as an important intervention for FM symptom management, patient adherence with recommended activity regimens are often suboptimal.

One model that can explain unhealthy behavior engagement in FM patients is the fear-avoidance model. The fear-avoidance model of chronic pain, introduced39 and further refined by Vlaeyen and colleagues,53–55 presents putative pathways by which patients who experience pain might become ensnared in a downward spiral of increasing avoidance, physical disability, and pain. It postulates that when bodily sensations, including movement, are misinterpreted in a catastrophic way (eg, pain reliably signals the presence of danger), pain-related fear increases, which is followed by the initiation of a number of safety behaviors including avoidance and guarded movements.53 In addition, avoidance behavior may hinder recovery because it diminishes the number of opportunities to correct patient's beliefs and expectations about pain, thereby allowing for wrongful anticipation of pain to persist.13,36,38 These interrelationships between fear-avoidance-related factors (such as catastrophizing) and outcome variables (such as physical disability) have been examined predominantly in cross-sectional studies using moderation and meditation analyses, and reviews have frequently called for further prospective research on these associations.56,57 Numerous past studies have explored pain catastrophizing as a moderator between pain-related clinical outcomes.7,28,41,52 Therefore, pain catastrophizing has since become increasingly recognized as an important moderator and one of the main determinants of the pain experience.

De Gier et al.16 demonstrated that in FM patients, pain-related fear is associated with decreased tolerance for physical performance, which in turn might explain avoidance behaviors of rigorous physical activities in these patients. Furthermore, FM patients seemed to be especially predisposed to psychological distress and present a unique tendency to pain catastrophize due to difficulty adjusting to the illness.22

There have not been many reports in the past that have examined the relationship between negative cognitions (eg, catastrophizing), engagement in physical activity, and self-reported pain especially in a sample of women with FM. The aim of the present daily diary study was to examine the associations among daily pain symptoms, catastrophizing, and physical activity in patients with FM. We hypothesized that catastrophizing would have important moderating effects on associations between physical activity and pain intensity in patients with FM.

2. Methods

In total, we invited 140 FM patients for telephone-based or in-person screening. Patients were diagnosed as having FM (as confirmed by physician and medical records) and met the 2011 American College of Rheumatology criteria, which require the presence of widespread pain as well as a number of other somatic (eg, sleep disturbance, fatigue), psychological (eg, depression, anxiety), and cognitive symptoms.58

After screening the 140 FM patients, 107 participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria described below. This study was approved by the Partners Human Research Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) 18 to 75 years old, (2) female, (3) meet Wolfe et al.'s58 FM criteria for at least 1 year, (4) pain severity of at 3 out of 10 on average, (5) English language proficiency, and (6) able to provide written informed consent. The exclusion criteria included (1) comorbid acute pain or comorbid chronic pain condition more prominent than FM, (2) current use of stimulant medications, (3) pregnant or planning to become pregnant, (4) severe psychiatric disorder or prior psychiatric hospitalization in the past 6 months, (5) current or recent substance use disorder, (6) active suicidal ideation, and (7) recent lower-limb vascular surgery (this criterion was included as such surgery is a contraindication for some of the lower-body sensory testing procedures that were included—these findings are reported elsewhere).

2.1. Procedures

The baseline visit included engagement in the process of informed consent, completion of self-report questionnaires, and confirmation of study eligibility (described below). Sociodemographic information included date of birth, marital status, educational status, current occupational status, duration of pain symptoms, and medical comorbidities (Table 1). In addition, participants were asked to complete daily diaries for 7 days; responses to a variety of questions were recorded using a Likert scale. The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was used to assess daily pain and negative cognitions (eg, catastrophizing). Four surveys were used to assess key study variables: (1) Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), (2) The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), (3) Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and (4) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-anxiety, PROMIS-depression.

Table 1:
Clinical profile and demographics characteristics (N = 107).

2.1.1. Fibromyalgia pain and symptoms

To measure FM symptomatology, including pain, we used the FIQR3 and the BPI.12 The FIQR is a 21-question assessment with an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being “worst.” The FIQR has 3 subscales for scoring: (1) “function”, (2) “overall impact,” and (3) “symptoms,” as well as a total overall score to assess the total impact of FM disease on the patient. The BPI is a 15-item measure, which includes 2 subscales that assess: (1) pain intensity and (2) pain interference12; the BPI is well validated in chronic pain.48

2.1.2. Emotional distress—anxiety and depression

Participants completed the PROMIS anxiety and depression short forms, which have been repeatedly validated in chronic pain populations.10,40 The anxiety subscale consists of 7 items and assesses the frequency with which patients experience emotions such as fear, stress, and anxiety (“never” to “always”). The depression subscale consists of 8 items that assess the frequency with which the respondent has experienced emotions such as worthlessness, hopelessness, and sadness. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of emotional distress.

2.1.3. Daily state pain catastrophizing

Participants were asked to report catastrophizing scores (0 “not at all” to 4 “all the time”; same response scale as used in the PCS) once a day for one week using a Likert scale through the secure REDCap. The Situational Catastrophizing Questionnaire (SCQ) is a six-question adaptation of the PCS (described above). It has been used by our group in a number of previous studies.6,19 The average of state pain catastrophizing across days was calculated.

2.1.4. Daily physical activity

Patients were asked to report their levels of physical activity (0 “not at all” to 100 “all the time”) once a day for a period of 7 days using a Likert scale27 through the REDCap.

2.1.5. Daily Fitbit Flex step counts (physical activity)

The Fitbit Flex is a popular, relatively inexpensive, and widely available small wristband that tracks physical activity, including measures of the estimated number of steps per day. The Fitbit Flex provides a valid measure of physical activity.14,46,51 The Fitbit Flex wirelessly synchronizes data to a computer, tablet, or phone and provides participants with feedback through a user-friendly website. Patients in the study wore the Fitbit Flex for the week during which they completed daily diaries; Fitbit Flex data were downloaded and stored at the end of the week. Participants optionally kept their Fitbit Flex after completion of the study. These data were used as part of an exploratory analysis to explore whether objective and subjective measures of physical activity are correlated.

2.1.6. Body mass index

The body mass index (BMI) was calculated according to the following formula: BMI = body mass [kg]/(height [m])2.

2.2. Data analysis

All analyses were conducted using IBM-SPSS v.24. Descriptive data for continuous variables are presented as mean values and SDs, and data for categorical variables are presented as percentages (Table 1). Statistical assumptions and Pearson correlation coefficients were analyzed using SPSS (v. 23; IBM Corporation, Armonk NY) for MacVR. We conducted both bivariate correlations, controlling for age and education level, and the significance of associations did not differ. Thus, we only report bivariate correlations. To test our moderation model, we used the SPSS PROCESS macro because it allows to test moderation effects.24 Based on prior reports,11,17,30,42,45,59 we followed the approach of averaging the diary assessments across the 7 time-points. We tested Model 1, in which average daily physical activity was the predictor as used on past reports,20,37 pain intensity (BPI) was the dependent variable, and average daily state pain catastrophizing was the moderator of the relationship between average physical activity and average pain intensity controlling (covariates) for FM symptoms (FIQR) and BMI following prior literature.25,50

3. Results

Descriptive statistics for our study outcomes are presented in Table 1. The average age of patients was 39.5 years (SD = 12.4). Missing data percentages were low, with baseline questionnaires missing 1.7% and diary outcomes only 17.6% of the data. Table 2 demonstrated Pearson correlations for study outcomes and Table 1 demonstrates the mean values and SDs of the variables used in the moderation analysis described below. Fitbit data were collected from only 44 of 107 participants due to lack of compliance.

Table 2:
Pearson correlations between physical activity, BMI, fibromyalgia symptoms, pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and Fitbit Flex.

3.1. Moderation analysis

We examined whether state pain catastrophizing moderates the relationship between physical activity and pain intensity. Results showed that the overall model was significant (F (5, 87) = 17.81, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.50). Although the main effects of physical activity and pain catastrophizing were not significant (P > 0.05), the association between physical activity and pain intensity was moderated by state pain catastrophizing. To further examine the significance of simple slopes of the interaction, a simple moderation model was first conducted, and results showed the interaction was significant (B = 0.003, SE = 0.001, P < 0.05). These results suggest that the association between physical activity and pain intensity is moderated by state pain catastrophizing (Table 3). A visual representation of the moderation is presented in Figure 1, depicting the association between physical activity and pain as a function of state pain catastrophizing (ie, 1 SD above and below the mean; Fig. 1). In addition, significant associations were observed between average state pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and Fitbit Flex step count (P < 0.05). Self-report physical activity was positively correlated with average Fitbit Flex step count (P < 0.005).

Table 3:
Moderation model examining the influence of physical activity and pain catastrophizing on pain intensity (BPI) controlling for BMI and fibromyalgia impact (FIQR) among women with fibromyalgia.
Figure 1.:
The significant effects of the interaction between daily pain physical activity and daily catastrophizing on pain intensity.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to explore the moderating effects of catastrophizing on the relationship between daily physical activity and pain intensity in patients with FM. The primary finding of our diary-based study was that catastrophizing moderated the relationship between daily self-reported physical activity and pain intensity. State pain catastrophizing and physical activity both seem to influence pain levels in FM, with catastrophizing magnifying the acute, pain-increasing effects of physical activity. Patients high in state pain catastrophizing report greater pain in the context of relatively higher activity levels, whereas among patients low in state pain catastrophizing, higher activity levels are associated with lower ratings of pain intensity. Our results support previous findings about the importance of psychosocial factors including anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing that should be targeted in chronic pain patients to pain-related disability and sedentary behaviors.27,34

A primary challenge to effective self-management of chronic pain is limited adherence to physical activity and lifestyles that are most likely to reduce the physical and emotional “triggers” that worsen symptoms in chronic pain.2,9,44 We now have abundant evidence that negative affective and cognitive states contribute to reduced activity levels in patients with chronic pain.15 Although we do not have data on the mechanisms by which these associations unfold, it is possible that high catastrophizing may magnify the perception of pain when physical activity levels are higher, promoting a feeling of reduced motivation and increased physical symptoms. Past evidence has indicated that high pain catastrophizing predicts deficits in activity-associated hypoalgesia,4 which may contribute to our observations of larger activity-provoked increases in pain among patients with high catastrophizing.

Furthermore, because fear of movement due to potential injury represents a response to pain related to state catastrophizing,54 this could be a further mechanism through which state catastrophizing can increase perceived pain intensity when there is increased physical activity. Pain perception in individuals with higher pain-related fear and higher self-reported state catastrophizing seems to be biased towards predictions (eg, cognitive bias) and less towards nociceptive inputs.32 Therefore, on higher activity days, higher state catastrophizing is likely to produce increases in perceived pain. Catastrophizing has also been shown to be significantly associated with fatigue and to serve as a good predictor of fatigue severity,33 which may be one of the pathways by which state catastrophizing reduces engagement in daily activity. Finally, pain catastrophizing seems to have a maladaptive influence on brain circuitry that is involved with pain facilitation and central sensitization.26,29 Therefore, it seems that it is important to assess catastrophizing and target it when focusing on improving physical function in patients with FM.35,47,49

In addition, it is important to note that measuring physical activity is inherently challenging, regardless of the method of measurement. Evaluating patient-reported activity estimates and accelerometer-monitored steps seems to yield overlapping yet substantially distinct domains of information. It is interesting to note that patient-reported daily activity is correlated with pain intensity and with other FM symptoms as well as Fitbit-assessed step count. Although the subjective and objective measures of physical activity were modestly and significantly correlated in this study, they seem to have different patterns of association with other subjective reports of FM symptomatology. Although some have argued that accelerometry may offer a better assessment of physical activity than subjective self-report because it avoids issues of recall bias, there are notable limitations for objective physical activity assessments, including the inability to assess dynamic physical activity, dependence on accelerometer wear location (eg, wrist vs hip), and sensitivity to the assessment variables analyzed (eg, step count, activity counts).31 In addition, repeated assessment of repeated physical activity and situational catastrophizing from a multilevel modelling analysis approach would have been able to capture day-to-day variability among participants suffering from FM.

Collectively, the limitations of this study should be recognized when interpreting these results. First, physical activity over a 7-day period may not be fully representative of habitual physical activity levels. Second, participants used in our study included only women with moderate to severe FM pain; this sample may not fully represent all FM populations, such as those with milder FM symptoms or men. Finally, this study is based on baseline data assessing patients' daily symptoms. This relatively brief assessment of FM symptomatology is likely unable to capture the extensive range of FM outcomes (and the mechanisms that contribute to those outcomes) that emerge over longer timeframes. In addition, the numeric scale of physical activity assessment used in our study has not been validated before as an objective measure.

5. Conclusions

Overall, given the physical limitations imposed by pain, catastrophizing seems to be an important outcome to target with chronic pain interventions because there are strong associations with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions.43 Aerobic activity, stretching, strengthening, and aqua therapy have been shown to reduce pain and improve functional capacity and quality of life.1,23 Future interventions combining skills targeting physical activity and reducing negative maladaptive pain cognitions (eg, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) might be able to reduce kinesiophobia and promote a healthier lifestyle in women with chronically painful musculoskeletal conditions such as FM.


The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


This research was supported by NIH grant R01-AR064367-05, R33-AR064367-05, and P01-AT009965-02 by grants to RRE and VN from The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease. This funding source had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Study procedures received approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Brigham & Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA, USA).

Upon request, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, we will provide access to individual deidentified participant data.


[1]. Barker AL, Talevski J, Morello RT, Brand CA, Rahmann AE, Urquhart DM. Effectiveness of aquatic exercise for musculoskeletal conditions: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:1776–86.
[2]. Becker S, Navratilova E, Nees F, Van Damme S. Emotional and motivational pain processing: current state of knowledge and perspectives in translational research. Pain Res Manag 2018;2018:5457870.
[3]. Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL. The revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R120.
[4]. Brellenthin AG, Crombie KM, Cook DB, Sehgal N, Koltyn KF. Psychosocial influences on exercise-induced hypoalgesia. Pain Med 2017;18:538–50.
[5]. Busch AJ, Barber KA, Overend TJ, Peloso PM, Schachter CL. Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD003786.
[6]. Campbell CM, Kronfli T, Buenaver LF, Smith MT, Berna C, Haythornthwaite JA, Edwards RR. Situational versus dispositional measurement of catastrophizing: associations with pain responses in multiple samples. J Pain 2010;11:443–53 e442.
[7]. Carriere JS, Lazaridou A, Martel MO, Cornelius M, Campbell C, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA, Edwards RR. The moderating role of pain catastrophizing on the relationship between partner support and pain intensity: a daily diary study in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Behav Med 2019. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00121-5 [Epub ahead of print].
[8]. Carville SF, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bliddal H, Blotman F, Branco JC, Buskila D, Da Silva JA, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Dincer F, Henriksson C, Henriksson KG, Kosek E, Longley K, McCarthy GM, Perrot S, Puszczewicz M, Sarzi-Puttini P, Silman A, Spath M, Choy EH, Eular. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:536–41.
[9]. Celiker R, Borman P, Oktem F, Gokce-Kutsal Y, Basgoze O. Psychological disturbance in fibromyalgia: relation to pain severity. Clin Rheumatol 1997;16:179–84.
[10]. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R, Group PC. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179–94.
[11]. Charoenpol FN, Tontisirin N, Leerapan B, Seangrung R, Finlayson RJ. Pain experiences and intrapersonal change among patients with chronic non-cancer pain after using a pain diary: a mixed-methods study. J Pain Res 2019;12:477–87.
[12]. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.
[13]. Crombez G, Vervaet L, Lysens R, Baeyens F, Eelen P. Avoidance and confrontation of painful, back-straining movements in chronic back pain patients. Behav Modif 1998;22:62–77.
[14]. Daligadu J, Pollock CL, Carlaw K, Chin M, Haynes A, Thevaraajah Kopal T, Tahsinul A, Walters K, Colella TJF. Validation of the Fitbit Flex in an acute post-cardiac surgery patient population. Physiother Can 2018;70:314–20.
[15]. de Bruijn ST, van Wijck AJ, Geenen R, Snijders TJ, van der Meulen WJ, Jacobs JW, Veldhuijzen DS. Relevance of physical fitness levels and exercise-related beliefs for self-reported and experimental pain in fibromyalgia: an explorative study. J Clin Rheumatol 2011;17:295–301.
[16]. de Gier M, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW. Fear of pain, physical performance, and attentional processes in patients with fibromyalgia. PAIN 2003;104:121–30.
[17]. de Wit R, van Dam F, Hanneman M, Zandbelt L, van Buuren A, van der Heijden K, Leenhouts G, Loonstra S, Abu-Saad HH. Evaluation of the use of a pain diary in chronic cancer pain patients at home. PAIN 1999;79:89–99.
[18]. Dean LE, Arnold L, Crofford L, Bennett R, Goldenberg D, Fitzcharles MA, Paiva ES, Staud R, Clauw D, Sarzi-Puttini P, Jones GT, Ayorinde A, Fluss E, Beasley M, Macfarlane GJ. Impact of moving from a widespread to multisite pain definition on other fibromyalgia symptoms. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1878–86.
[19]. Edwards RR, Smith MT, Stonerock G, Haythornthwaite JA. Pain-related catastrophizing in healthy women is associated with greater temporal summation of and reduced habituation to thermal pain. Clin J Pain 2006;22:730–7.
[20]. Fukuoka Y, Kamitani E, Dracup K, Jong SS. New insights into compliance with a mobile phone diary and pedometer use in sedentary women. J Phys Act Health 2011;8:398–403.
[21]. Gaudreault N, Boulay P. Cardiorespiratory fitness among adults with fibromyalgia. Breathe (Sheff) 2018;14:e25–33.
[22]. Hassett AL, Cone JD, Patella SJ, Sigal LH. The role of catastrophizing in the pain and depression of women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2493–500.
[23]. Hauser W, Klose P, Langhorst J, Moradi B, Steinbach M, Schiltenwolf M, Busch A. Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R79.
[24]. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press, 2013.
[25]. Kocyigit BF, Okyay RA. The relationship between body mass index and pain, disease activity, depression and anxiety in women with fibromyalgia. PeerJ 2018;6:e4917.
[26]. Lazaridou A, Kim J, Cahalan CM, Loggia ML, Franceschelli O, Berna C, Schur P, Napadow V, Edwards RR. Effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on brain connectivity supporting catastrophizing in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain 2017;33:215–21.
[27]. Lazaridou A, Martel MO, Cornelius M, Franceschelli O, Campbell C, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA, Wright JR, Edwards RR. The association between daily physical activity and pain among patients with knee osteoarthritis: the moderating role of pain catastrophizing. Pain Med 2018;20:916–24.
[28]. Lazaridou A, Martel MO, Cornelius M, Franceschelli O, Campbell C, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA, Wright JR, Edwards RR. The association between daily physical activity and pain among patients with knee osteoarthritis: the moderating role of pain catastrophizing. Pain Med 2019;20:916–24.
[29]. Lee J, Protsenko E, Lazaridou A, Franceschelli O, Ellingsen DM, Mawla I, Isenburg K, Berry MP, Galenkamp L, Loggia ML, Wasan AD, Edwards RR, Napadow V. Encoding of self-referential pain catastrophizing in the posterior cingulate cortex in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1308–18.
[30]. Lewandowski AS, Palermo TM, Kirchner HL, Drotar D. Comparing diary and retrospective reports of pain and activity restriction in children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions. Clin J Pain 2009;25:299–306.
[31]. Liebano RE, Rakel B, Vance CG, Walsh DM, Sluka KA. An investigation of the development of analgesic tolerance to TENS in humans. PAIN 2011;152:335–42.
[32]. Lim M, O'Grady C, Cane D, Goyal A, Lynch M, Beyea S, Hashmi JA. Threat prediction from schemas as a source of bias in pain perception. J Neurosci 2020:2104–19.
[33]. Lukkahatai N, Saligan LN. Association of catastrophizing and fatigue: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2013;74:100–9.
[34]. Marshall PWM, Schabrun S, Knox MF. Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain. PLoS One 2017;12:e0180788.
[35]. Martinez-Calderon J, Jensen MP, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Pain catastrophizing and function in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 2019;35:279–93.
[36]. McCracken LM, Gross RT. Does anxiety affect coping with chronic pain? Clin J Pain 1993;9:253–9.
[37]. O'Donnell J, Smith-Byrne K, Velardo C, Conrad N, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Doherty A, Dwyer T, Tarassenko L, Rahimi K. Self-reported and objectively measured physical activity in people with and without chronic heart failure: UK Biobank analysis. Open Heart 2020;7:e001099.
[38]. Pfingsten M, Schops P. Low back pain: from symptom to chronic disease. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004;142:146–52.
[39]. Philips HC. Avoidance behaviour and its role in sustain- ing chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1987;25:273–9.
[40]. Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Salsman JM, Butt Z, Moore TL, Lawrence SM, Zill N, Cyranowski JM, Kelly MA, Knox SS, Cella D. Assessment of self-reported negative affect in the NIH Toolbox. Psychiatry Res 2013;206:88–97.
[41]. Quartana PJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Pain catastrophizing: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother 2009;9:745–58.
[42]. Ravyts SG, Dzierzewski JM, Grah SC, Buman MP, Aiken-Morgan AT, Giacobb PR Jr, Roberts BL, Marsiske M, McCrae CS. Sleep and pain in mid- to late-life: an exploration of day-to-day pain inconsistency. Clin Gerontol 2018;41:123–9.
[43]. Simoes D, Araujo FA, Severo M, Monjardino T, Cruz I, Carmona L, Lucas R. Patterns and consequences of multimorbidity in the general population: there is No chronic disease management without rheumatic disease management. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:12–20.
[44]. Steffens D, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Hancock MJ, Glass T, Latimer J. Clinicians' views on factors that trigger a sudden onset of low back pain. Eur Spine J 2014;23:512–19.
[45]. Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Lalloo C, Feldman BM, McGrath PJ, Petroz GC, Streiner D, Dupuis A, Gill N, Stevens BJ. Comparison of average weekly pain using recalled paper and momentary assessment electronic diary reports in children with arthritis. Clin J Pain 2014;30:1044–50.
[46]. Sushames A, Edwards A, Thompson F, McDermott R, Gebel K. Validity and reliability of Fitbit Flex for step count, moderate to vigorous physical activity and activity energy expenditure. PLoS One 2016;11:e0161224.
[47]. Talaei-Khoei M, Fischerauer SF, Lee SG, Ring D, Vranceanu AM. Pain catastrophizing mediates the effect of psychological inflexibility on pain intensity and upper extremity physical function in patients with upper extremity illness. Pain Pract 2017;17:129–40.
[48]. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004;5:133–7.
[49]. Tichonova A, Rimdeikiene I, Petruseviciene D, Lendraitiene E. The relationship between pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and subjective knee function during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscectomy: a pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2016;52:229–37.
[50]. Timmerman GM, Calfa NA, Stuifbergen AK. Correlates of body mass index in women with fibromyalgia. Orthop Nurs 2013;32:113–19.
[51]. Twiggs J, Salmon L, Kolos E, Bogue E, Miles B, Roe J. Measurement of physical activity in the pre- and early post-operative period after total knee arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis using a Fitbit Flex device. Med Eng Phys 2018;51:31–40.
[52]. Vervoort T, Goubert L, Eccleston C, Verhoeven K, De Clercq A, Buysse A, Crombez G. The effects of parental presence upon the facial expression of pain: the moderating role of child pain catastrophizing. PAIN 2008;138:277–85.
[53]. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. PAIN 2000;85:317–32.
[54]. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. PAIN 1995;62:363–72.
[55]. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PH. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil 1995;5:235–52.
[56]. Vlaeyen JWS. The intricate relationship amongst pain intensity, fear and avoidance. Scand J Pain 2016;13:128–9.
[57]. Wideman TH, Asmundson GG, Smeets RJ, Zautra AJ, Simmonds MJ, Sullivan MJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Edwards RR. Rethinking the fear avoidance model: toward a multidimensional framework of pain-related disability. PAIN 2013;154:2262–5.
[58]. Wolfe F, Hauser W. Fibromyalgia diagnosis and diagnostic criteria. Ann Med 2011;43:495–502.
[59]. Zhao L, Chen J, Li Y, Sun X, Chang X, Zheng H, Gong B, Huang Y, Yang M, Wu X, Li X, Liang F. The long-term effect of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:508–15.

Fibromyalgia; Psychological factors; Pain intensity; Physical exercise; Pain catastrophizing

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.