Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. “Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: An evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis” [Pain 2009;141:215–221], and on Rollman “Perspectives on hypervigilance” [Pain 2009;141:183–184]

Damme, Stefaan Van1,*; Crombez, Geert1; Wiech, Katja3; Legrain, Valéry4; Peters, Madelon L.5; Eccleston, Christopher6

doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.035
Letter to the Editor

1Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium

3Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

4READ – Unité de Réadaptation et de Médecine physique, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve & Brussels, Belgium

5Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

6Centre for Pain Research, School for Health, University of Bath, UK

*Tel.: +32 92649149; fax: +32 92646489.


© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website