We aimed to evaluate the effect of pain education on opioid prescribing by early-career general practitioners. A brief training workshop was delivered to general practice registrars of a single regional training provider. The workshop significantly reduced “hypothetical” opioid prescribing (in response to paper-based vignettes) in an earlier evaluation. The effect of the training on “actual” prescribing was evaluated using a nonequivalent control group design nested within the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study: 4 other regional training providers were controls. In ReCEnT, registrars record detailed data (including prescribing) during 60 consecutive consultations, on 3 occasions. Analysis was at the level of individual problem managed, with the primary outcome factor being prescription of an opioid analgesic and the secondary outcome being opioid initiation. Between 2010 and 2015, 168,528 problems were recorded by 849 registrars. Of these, 71% were recorded by registrars in the nontraining group. Eighty-two percentages were before training. Opioid analgesics were prescribed in 4382 (2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-2.63) problems, with 1665 of these (0.97%, 95% CI: 0.91-1.04) representing a new prescription. There was no relationship between the training and total prescribing after training (interaction odds ratio: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.75-1.35; P value 0.96). There was some evidence of a reduction in initial opioid prescriptions in the training group (interaction odds ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.48-1.16; P value 0.19). This brief training package failed to increase overall opioid cessation. The inconsistency of these actual prescribing results with “hypothetical” prescribing behavior suggests that reducing opioid prescribing in chronic noncancer pain requires more than changing knowledge and attitudes.
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Brief training for general practitioners on universal precautions, which had improved hypothetical pain management, on objective analysis did not change total opioid analgesic prescribing.
aSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, Australia
bDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, NSW, Australia
cHunter Integrated Pain Service, Hunter New England Local Health District, NSW, Australia
dGP, Elermore Vale General Practice, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
eNSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy, Newcastle, NSW, Australia,
fDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
gPublic Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
hCReDITSS, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
iEastern Victoria General Practice Training, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
jDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
kRural Clinical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Corresponding author. Address: Albert St Medical Centre, 78 Albert St, Taree, NSW 2430, Australia. Tel.: +61 (0)2 6552 5533; fax: +61 (0)2 6552 4249. E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org (S. M. Holliday).
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.painjournalonline.com).
Received June 28, 2016
Received in revised form October 23, 2016
Accepted October 27, 2016